Skip to content

Conventional Surgery vs. Verion/VerifEye

Refractive Outcomes Evaluation of the Verion Image Guided System + ORA System With VerifEye

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02513745
Enrollment
84
Registered
2015-08-03
Start date
2015-06-30
Completion date
2017-05-05
Last updated
2019-09-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Astigmatism, Cataract

Keywords

cataract, toric, phacoemulsification

Brief summary

Nowadays cataract patient's expectations are closer to those of refractive surgery patients. Patients want to be spectacle independent. However, fifteen to twenty percent of cataract surgery patients have from 1.00 to 3.00 diopters (D) of corneal astigmatism which makes achieving spectacle independence unlikely in this patients unless the astigmatism is treated at the time of cataract surgery. Option to treat this astigmatism include corneal or limbal incisions (LRIs), the use of toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) or LASIK. Regardless of the treatment of choice to correct the astigmatism at time of cataract extraction, a treatment plan has to be calculated preoperatively. This planning include: keratometry measurements and the use of a calculator to estimate the treatment and orientation of IOL and/or placement of the LRIs. New technology has been developed and is widely used. Among this technology, we have the VERION Image Guided System. This system encompasses a reference unit that takes a picture of the eye with the patient in the sitting position creating image of the patient's eye, capturing scleral vessels, limbus and iris features. It measures keratometry as well as the corneal diameter (limbus) and pupil size. The information captured is transferred automatically to its planner where IOL power calculation and astigmatism correction calculation are completed. Additionally, intraoperative wavefront aberrometry has been used in the last couple of years with increase success.

Detailed description

Nowadays cataract patient's expectations are closer to those of refractive surgery patients. Patients want to be spectacle independent. However, fifteen to twenty percent of cataract surgery patients have from 1.00 to 3.00 diopters (D) of corneal astigmatism which makes achieving spectacle independence unlikely in this patients unless the astigmatism is treated at the time of cataract surgery. Currently available treatments include corneal or limbal incisions, the use of toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) or LASIK. Limbal relaxing incisions (LRIs) are the most commonly used manual method Traditionally, LRIs have been made manually (with a surgical knife). With the introduction of femtosecond laser to assist during cataract surgery, a new alternative is available for creating corneal incisions. The stability of the LRIs and visual outcomes using toric IOLs have been shown. Regardless of the treatment of choice to correct the astigmatism at time of cataract extraction, a treatment plan has to be calculated preoperatively. This planning include: keratometry measurements and the use of a calculator to estimate the treatment and orientation of IOL and placement of the LRIs. Keratometry can be measured using a variety of devices including manual keratometers (i.e. Javal-Shiotz), automated keratometers, corneal topography, and optical biometry ( IOL master and Lenstar). Once keratometry to be used has been selected, if the treatment of choice are LRIs, a calculator is used to determine the location and size of the LRI. Many nomograms have been developed; the choice of nomogram is the surgeon's prefer one, usually based on prior experience, and their preferred knife. LRIs calculators are available on line. Nomograms specify the location, length, size, and number of incisions based on the patient's age, the type of astigmatism, and the amount of astigmatism correction needed. If a toric IOL has been chosen then planning the appropriate orientation of the toric IOL is accomplished by using online calculators. The calculator selects the optimal toric power and location based on the keratometry and the surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) values entered by the surgeon. Intraoperatively, marking the eye and placing the incisions or aligning the toric IOL in the right axis are key steps for the success of astigmatism correction. Marking of the eye can be done using a variety of instruments using ink and it is routinely done with the patient in the upright position to avoid cyclorotation. Once patient is on the table in supine position, axis should be checked once again. Additional suggested methods to mark the eye include taking pictures preoperatively to identify anatomical landmarks similar to iris registration in refractive surgery. The use of iris registration during LASIK was introduced in 2008. Several publications have shown that patients undergoing wavefront-guided LASIK with iris recognition achieved better visual and refractive outcomes compared to conventional LASIK. Recently, Alcon introduced VERION Image Guided System: Digital Surgical Planning and Positioning Tools. This system encompasses a reference unit that takes a picture of the eye with the patient in the sitting position creating a high-resolution digital image of the patient's eye, capturing scleral vessels, limbus and iris features. It measures keratometry as well as the corneal diameter (limbus) and pupil size. The information captured is then transferred automatically to the planner where additional information including target refraction, manifest refraction, axial length, anterior chamber depth, and lens thickness is entered for IOL power calculation and astigmatism correction planning. Astigmatism correction options include corneal incisions, toric IOL and a combination of both. Intraoperatively, The VERION Digital Marker displays patient information and images from the VERION Reference Unit. Additionally it positions all incision locations and assists with lens alignment in real time while accounting for the variable impact of cyclorotation and patient eye movement. In the OR, it displays a reticle that helps to align the IOL to the axis according the surgical plan. It also helps to position manual LRIs. Intraoperative wavefront aberrometry has been used in the last couple of years to confirm spherical and toric power as well as lens position. The Optiwave Refractive Analysis (ORA) system can refract the eye in phakic, aphakic, and pseudophakic states at any time during cataract surgery and assists in IOL power selection and recommendations for toric IOL positioning before and after implantation as well as LRIs confirming the surgery plan calculated preoperatively. Furthermore, VerifEye, an ORA hardware upgrade, provides continuous assessment of the patient's eye allowing for more precise measurements; therefore, more accurate results and improved refractive outcomes and VerifEye +, the latest upgrade that provides streaming information on the refractive status and correct IOL positioning through the right ocular of the surgical microscope. This enables the surgeon to visualize all the information without having to look up at the monitor screen during the surgical procedure. This new technology is an alternative to plan and treat astigmatism at the time of cataract surgery. It could make this treatment easier for less experience surgeons by facilitating the calculations and making the identification of the correct axis easier by reducing the need for manual marks. The main objective of this study is to evaluate spherical and astigmatism outcomes post routine cataract surgery when the complete VERION Image Guided System packet + ORA System with VerifEye or VerifEye + are used in the treatment of pre-existing astigmatism using toric intraocular lens (IOL) or corneal incisions compared to the surgeon's standard of care.

Interventions

DEVICEConventional

Routine cataract surgery by phacoemulsification before laser-assisted cataract surgery.

DEVICERefractive Cataract Suite (Verion + ORA)

Laser-assisted cataract surgery with the digital surgical planning and positioning tools, and intraoperative aberrometry.

Sponsors

Science in Vision
CollaboratorOTHER
Carolina Eyecare Physicians, LLC
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject is undergoing bilateral cataract extraction or refractive lens exchange with intraocular lens implantation and astigmatism correction. * Willing and able to provide written informed consent for participation in the study * Willing and able to comply with scheduled visits and other study procedures.

Exclusion criteria

* Severe preoperative ocular pathology: amblyopia, rubella cataract, proliferative diabetic retinopathy, shallow anterior chamber, macular edema, retinal detachment, aniridia or iris atrophy, uveitis, history of iritis, iris neovascularization, medically uncontrolled glaucoma, microphthalmos or macrophthalmos, optic nerve atrophy, macular degeneration (with anticipated best postoperative visual acuity less than 20/30), advanced glaucomatous damage, etc. * Uncontrolled diabetes. * Use of any systemic or topical drug known to interfere with visual performance. * Contact lens use during the active treatment portion of the trial. * Any concurrent infectious/non infectious conjunctivitis, keratitis or uveitis. * Pseudoexfoliation syndrome or any other condition that has the potential to weaken the zonules * Previous refractive surgery. * Any clinically significant, serious or severe medical or psychiatric condition that may increase the risk associated with study participation or study device implantation or may interfere with the interpretation of study results. * Participation in (or current participation) any investigational drug or device trial within the previous 30 days prior to the start date of this trial. * Intraocular conventional surgery within the past three months or intraocular laser surgery within one month in the operated eye.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Residual Refractive CylinderThree monthsThis is the manifest refractive cylinder measured 3 months after surgery. Note that because cataract surgery has been performed, there is no associated baseline value.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Residual Mean Spherical Equivalent RefractionThree monthsThis is the mean of the spherical equivalent refraction (sphere + 0.5\*cylinder) from each eye. Note that because cataract surgery has been performed, there is no associated baseline value.
Residual Corneal AstigmatismThree monthsThis is the anterior corneal astigmatism measured through keratometry. Note that because cataract surgery has been performed, there is no associated baseline value.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 84 eyes of 42 patients were enrolled and started the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Conventional
Surgeon's standard of care prior to getting VERION. Spherical power will be selected using the surgeon's preferred formula (Haigis, Holladay 2, Holladay, or other) and biometry method (IOL Master, Lenstar). Astigmatism correction will be planned using the surgeon's preferred keratometry method and calculator/nomogram to determine toric power and corneal incisions (i.e. Alcon toric calculator, Holladay toric calculator, Abbott Medical Optics (AMO) LRI calculator, etc). At time of surgery, axis of placement will be marked using blue ink marks. Corneal incisions will be made manually. Conventional: Routine cataract surgery by phacoemulsification before laser-assisted cataract surgery.
39
Conventional
Surgeon's standard of care prior to getting VERION. Spherical power will be selected using the surgeon's preferred formula (Haigis, Holladay 2, Holladay, or other) and biometry method (IOL Master, Lenstar). Astigmatism correction will be planned using the surgeon's preferred keratometry method and calculator/nomogram to determine toric power and corneal incisions (i.e. Alcon toric calculator, Holladay toric calculator, Abbott Medical Optics (AMO) LRI calculator, etc). At time of surgery, axis of placement will be marked using blue ink marks. Corneal incisions will be made manually. Conventional: Routine cataract surgery by phacoemulsification before laser-assisted cataract surgery.
39
Refractive Cataract Suite (Verion + ORA)
Digital Surgical Planning and Positioning Tools + ORA System with VerifEye or VerifEye +. Spherical power of the IOL will be selected using the Verion Planner with the surgeon's preferred formula with an optimized A-constant (Haigis, Holladay 2, Holladay, or other). Both toric lenses and corneal incisions will be calculated with the Verion Planner using the Verion Reference Unit keratometry and white to white measurements, and Lenstar biometry. The VERION Digital Markers L and M will be used for axis of placement and confirmed using ORA System with VerifEye or VerifEye +. Verion: Laser-assisted cataract surgery with the digital surgical planning and positioning tools, and intraoperative aberrometry.
39
Refractive Cataract Suite (Verion + ORA)
Digital Surgical Planning and Positioning Tools + ORA System with VerifEye or VerifEye +. Spherical power of the IOL will be selected using the Verion Planner with the surgeon's preferred formula with an optimized A-constant (Haigis, Holladay 2, Holladay, or other). Both toric lenses and corneal incisions will be calculated with the Verion Planner using the Verion Reference Unit keratometry and white to white measurements, and Lenstar biometry. The VERION Digital Markers L and M will be used for axis of placement and confirmed using ORA System with VerifEye or VerifEye +. Verion: Laser-assisted cataract surgery with the digital surgical planning and positioning tools, and intraoperative aberrometry.
39
Total156

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyCriteria at time of surgery not met.33

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicConventionalTotalRefractive Cataract Suite (Verion + ORA)
Age, Continuous67.11 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.79
67.11 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.79
67.11 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.79
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Eyes0 Eyes0 Eyes
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Eyes0 Eyes0 Eyes
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Eyes4 Eyes2 Eyes
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Eyes0 Eyes0 Eyes
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Eyes0 Eyes0 Eyes
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Eyes0 Eyes0 Eyes
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
37 Eyes74 Eyes37 Eyes
Region of Enrollment
United States
39 Eyes78 Eyes39 Eyes
Sex: Female, Male
Female
26 Eyes52 Eyes26 Eyes
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Eyes26 Eyes13 Eyes

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 390 / 39
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 392 / 39
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 390 / 39

Outcome results

Primary

Residual Refractive Cylinder

This is the manifest refractive cylinder measured 3 months after surgery. Note that because cataract surgery has been performed, there is no associated baseline value.

Time frame: Three months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ConventionalResidual Refractive Cylinder0.28 DioptersStandard Deviation 0.25
Refractive Cataract Suite (Verion + ORA)Residual Refractive Cylinder0.33 DioptersStandard Deviation 0.37
Secondary

Residual Corneal Astigmatism

This is the anterior corneal astigmatism measured through keratometry. Note that because cataract surgery has been performed, there is no associated baseline value.

Time frame: Three months

Population: This is a contra-lateral eye study where the first eye undergoing surgery was randomized to conventional or the refractive cataract suite, the fellow eye received the alternate treatment; therefore, we analyzed 78 eyes of 39 participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ConventionalResidual Corneal Astigmatism1.12 DioptersStandard Deviation 0.71
Refractive Cataract Suite (Verion + ORA)Residual Corneal Astigmatism1.16 DioptersStandard Deviation 0.65
Secondary

Residual Mean Spherical Equivalent Refraction

This is the mean of the spherical equivalent refraction (sphere + 0.5\*cylinder) from each eye. Note that because cataract surgery has been performed, there is no associated baseline value.

Time frame: Three months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ConventionalResidual Mean Spherical Equivalent Refraction0.06 DioptersStandard Deviation 0.22
Refractive Cataract Suite (Verion + ORA)Residual Mean Spherical Equivalent Refraction0.02 DioptersStandard Deviation 0.31

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026