Skip to content

Inflammation-related Alterations in Neurocircuitry: Reversal With Levodopa

Inflammation-related Alterations in Neurocircuitry: Reversal With Levodopa; Inflammation Effects on Corticostriatal Connectivity and Reward: Role of Dopamine

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02513485
Enrollment
57
Registered
2015-07-31
Start date
2015-10-09
Completion date
2020-08-01
Last updated
2022-09-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Depression

Keywords

Inflammation, Anhedonia, Psychomotor retardation

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to learn more about the changes that happen in the brain and the body when a person is depressed. This study will determine if the level of inflammation in the body is related to symptoms of depression, how well the person thinks, and how certain brain regions communicate.

Detailed description

Cytokines released by an activated immune system have been associated with decreased brain dopamine and the development of depression. Biomarkers of inflammation, such as inflammatory cytokines and acute-phase proteins like C-reactive protein (CRP), are elevated in a significant proportion of patients with mood and psychiatric disorders. The investigators will study if administration of Levodopa (L- 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine \[DOPA\]-carbidopa, 250/25mg) to depressed patients with high inflammation will 1) increase corticostriatal functional connectivity, and 2) improve objective measures of motivation compared to placebo.

Interventions

DRUGLevodopa+carbidopa

Sinemet is a combination of 250 mg levodopa and 50 mg carbidopa. Sinemet will be administered orally at Visit 1 or Visit 2.

DRUGPlacebo

A placebo is a sugar pill that has no therapeutic effect and will be administered orally at Visit 1 or Visit 2.

Sponsors

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH
Emory University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects have signed a current version of the Informed Consent and HIPAA documents prior to initiation of study procedures * Able to comprehend English * Diagnosis of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-V major depression and currently off antidepressant medication, unless otherwise approved by the PI or PI's designee * Depression as the primary axis I disorder * Negative pregnancy test for women of childbearing potential * Not breast feeding * At least two CRP tests conducted to establish reliability

Exclusion criteria

* Evidence of untreated or poorly controlled endocrine, cardiovascular, pulmonary, hematological, renal, or neurological disease * History of central nervous system (CNS) trauma or active seizure disorder requiring medication unless otherwise approved by principal investigator, or PI's designee * Current or history of migraines, glaucoma, melanoma, or bleeding disorder of any kind * Autoimmune or inflammatory disorder of any kind * Embedded metallic objects, prosthetics made of paramagnetic metals, aneurysmal clips and/or a history of claustrophobia * Chronic infection (e.g. hepatitis B or C or Human Immunodeficiency Virus infection) * Chronic use of agents known to affect the immune system including glucocorticoid therapy within the past 6 months, methotrexate within the past 1 year, chemotherapy of any kind (past or present), immunotherapy of any kind (past or present), aspirin or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs; within the past 2 weeks), statins (within the past 1 month), vaccinations (within the past 2 weeks), topical steroids (within the past 2 weeks), and antibiotics (within the past two weeks) unless otherwise approved by principal investigator or PI's designee. * Suicide attempt within six months of screening, or active suicidal intent or plan, or score \>2 on Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), or Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (QIDS) or Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Suicide Item, unless otherwise approved by the PI or PI's designee * A positive pregnancy test * Organ transplants * Current or history of cancer within the past five years besides basal cell carcinoma, unless otherwise approved by the PI or PI's designee * A score of \<28 on the Mini Mental Status Exam (MMSE), unless otherwise approved by the PI or PI's designee * Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT-3) score indicating less than 8th grade reading level, unless otherwise approved by the PI or PI's designee * Either QIDS \<14 or PHQ-9 \<15, or HDRS \<18, unless otherwise approved by the principal investigator or PI's designee * History of the following: schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, other (non mood disorder) psychosis, depression secondary to a medical condition, mental retardation, dementia, or delirium * Substance dependence \[or abuse within the past year (except nicotine)\], unless otherwise approved by the PI or PI's designee * Body Mass Index \>40 to limit the impact of morbid obesity on the results, unless otherwise approved by the principal investigator or PI's designee * Antisocial personality disorder diagnosis as assessed during clinical interview, as well as a history of hospitalization and/or recurrent suicidal behavior judged to be directly due to the personality disorder * Current eating disorder (except binge eating related to depression) unless approved by PI or PI's designee * Current obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), exclusionary only if impacting daily functioning, as assessed by clinical interview * Any other condition which in the opinion of the investigator would make the patient unsuitable for enrollment, or could interfere with participating in or completing the protocol * Smoking more than 1/2 pack a day or e-cigarette equivalent, unless approved by the PI or PI's designee * Initiation of any of the following medications, unless otherwise approved by the PI or PI's designee: Aspirin or Aspirin-like compounds, Ibuprofen or Naproxen Sodium, Cholesterol medications, Antibiotics, Herbal Medications, Psychiatric or Psychotropic Medications, Omega-3 supplements, Topical Steroids, Vaccinations * Currently on antidepressant medication, unless otherwise approved by the PI or PI's designee

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Correlation Coefficient Between Change in Corticostriatal Connectivity and Levels of Plasma C-reactive Protein and Other Immune MarkersScans approximately 45 minutes post drug/placebo administration at Visit 1, Visit 2 (spaced by approximately 1 week)Peripheral blood samples were analyzed for levels of immune markers like plasma C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), soluble interleukin-6 receptor (sIL-6R), tumor necrosis factor (TNF) -alpha, soluble cytokine receptor2 (TNFR 2), interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta), interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra), interleukin 10 (IL-10) and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1).
Change in Functional Corticostriatal ConnectivityScans approximately 45 min post drug/placebo administration at Visit 1, Visit 2 (spaced by approximately 1 week)Corticostriatal connectivity was assessed by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Resting-state and task-based (monetary incentive delay \[MID\]) fMRI scans were conducted on a 3 Tesla Siemens Trio MRI scanner. Subject-level correlations for degree of cortical and striatal functional connectivity were Fisher's Z transformed {Z(R)=0.5ln\[(1+R)/(1-R)\]}, a standard method for calculating fMRI functional connectivity. Greater Fisher's Z-scores reflected stronger correlated fMRI activity (i.e., higher corticostriatal connectivity).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Trail Making Test (TMT) Neurocognitive AssessmentAt baseline and approximately 2-3 hours post drug/placebo administration at Visit 1, Visit 2 (spaced by approximately 1 week)The Trail Making Test (TMT) is used to measure basic attention and psychomotor processing speed. Time taken to complete each task is recorded in seconds, whereby the greater the number of seconds, the slower the psychomotor speed.
Digit Symbol Task Neurocognitive TestAt baseline and approximately 2-3 hours post drug/placebo administration at Visit 1, Visit 2 (spaced by approximately 1 week)The Digit Symbol Task was used to assess graphomotor speed, visual scanning and memory processing speed involving numbers and a corresponding blank box where subjects are asked to fill in matching symbol as fast as they can. Results show the average number of correct symbols completed in up to 100 boxes in 90 seconds.
Finger Tapping Task (FTT) Neurocognitive TestAt baseline and approximately 2-3 hours post drug/placebo administration at Visit 1, Visit 2 (spaced by approximately 1 week)The Finger Tapping Task (FTT) assesses motor speed and can detect subtle motor impairment. The test measures the average number of taps per 10 second trial. A greater number of taps reflects faster motor speed.
Reaction Time Task (CANTAB) Neurocognitive TestAt baseline and approximately 2-3 hours post drug/placebo administration at Visit 1, Visit 2 (spaced by approximately 1 week)The reaction time test includes simple and choice reaction time tasks and is divided into 5 stages requiring increasingly complex chains of responses. The task provided distinction between reaction (or decision) time and movement latencies (milliseconds) based on touch responses made to a single (simple) or chosen from multiple (choice) stimuli flashed on a computer screen. Results show mean response latency in milliseconds.
Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) Self-report QuestionnaireAt baseline and Visit 1, Visit 2 (spaced by approximately 1 week)The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) is a 20-item self-report instrument designed to measure severity of fatigue based on five dimensions of fatigue, general fatigue, physical fatigue, mental fatigue, reduced motivation, and reduced activity. The total MFI scores range from 20 to 100 where high scores indicate greater fatigue.
Inventory of Depressive Symptoms-Self Report (IDS-SR) QuestionnaireAt baseline and Visit 1: Pre drug/placebo, Visit 2: Pre drug/placebo (spaced by approximately 1 week)The Inventory of Depressive Symptoms-Self Report (IDS-SR) is a 30-item self-report instrument with excellent psychometric properties for measuring symptom constructs consistent with current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) nosology and that is widely used to measure depression severity in clinical trials. Response scores are summed and range from 0 to 84, with higher scores reflecting greater depression severity.
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), Anhedonia Subscale ScoreVisit 1: Pre drug/placebo, Visit 2: Pre drug/placebo (spaced by approximately 1 week)The Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) is a widely used self-report for measuring depression severity over the past two weeks and the anhedonia subscale is one of several validated subscales in the BDI-II. Responses are given on a 4-point scale where 0 = the symptom of depression has not been experienced and 3 = the symptom of depression is severe. The anhedonia subscale score is created by summing responses to four items of the BDI-II that assess loss of pleasure, loss of interest, loss of energy, loss of sex drive. The total score of the anhedonia subscale ranges from 0 to 12 where higher scores reflect greater severity of anhedonia symptoms.
Profile of Mood States (POMS) ScaleVisit 1: Pre drug/placebo, Visit 1: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo, Visit 2: Pre drug/placebo, Visit 2: 1-2 hrs post drug/placeboThe Profile of Mood States (POMS) scale is a 30-item psychological rating scale used to assess transient, distinct mood states. Participants rate the extent to which they feel unhappy, blue, lonely, gloomy, and worthless on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). Scores range from 0 to 120 with higher scores reflecting a more negative mood state.
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) State ScaleVisit 1: Pre drug/placebo, Visit 1: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo, Visit 2: Pre drug/placebo, Visit 2: 1-2 hrs post drug/placeboThe 20-item self-report State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) State scale was used to measure severity of anxiety symptoms. Total scores range from 20 to 80 with higher scores reflecting greater anxiety. Scores in the high 40s are considered clinically significant.
Change in Motivation and Pleasure (MAP) Scale ScoreVisit 1: Pre drug/placebo, Visit 1: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo, Visit 2: Pre drug/placebo, Visit 2: 1-2 hrs post drug/placeboThe motivation and pleasure (MAP) questionnaire is an 18-item self-report inventory that was created to disentangle state-wise motivational and consummatory components of everyday activities over a 24-hour period. This scale was used to assess self-reported changes in symptoms of anhedonia before and after inflammation blockade. Respondents respond to statements about daily activities on a scale from 0 (no pleasure/not at all) to 4 (extreme pleasure/very often). Total scores range from 0 to 72 where higher scores indicate greater motivation and effort given to everyday situations.
Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) Self-report QuestionnaireVisit 1: Pre drug/placebo, Visit 1: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo, Visit 2: Pre drug/placebo, Visit 2: 1-2 hrs post drug/placeboThe Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS), a 14-item self-report scale with high psychometric validity for assessing the presence of anhedonia, was used to assess hedonic capacity. Participants rated how much they agreed or disagreed with the 14 items phrased as I would enjoy \_\_ based on their ability to experience pleasure. Of the four possible response categories (Definitely Agree, Agree, Disagree, and Strongly Disagree), either of the Disagree responses received a score of 1 and either of the Agree responses received a score of 0. The SHAPS score calculated as the sum of these 14 items ranged from 0 to 14, and higher SHAPS scores indicated greater anhedonia.
Effort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT) Neurocognitive TestAt baseline and approximately 2-3 hours post drug/placebo administration at Visit 1, Visit 2 (spaced by approximately 1 week)The Effort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT) is a computer-based multi-trial task used to objectively assess motivation. Possible results range between 0 to1 with 1 being a better outcome. Results show mean probability of hard (high effort) choice.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Correlation Coefficient Between Change in Cerebral Blood Flow (CBF) and Change in Functional ConnectivityScans approximately 45 minutes post drug/placebo administration at Visit 1, Visit 2 (spaced by approximately 1 week)The cerebral blood flow (CBF) before and after Sinemet (250 mg levodopa/ 50mg carbidopa) or placebo administration was assessed by arterial spin labeling (ASL) fMRI.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled between October 2015 and February 2020.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Sinemet/Placebo
Subjects with major depression were given Sinemet (a combination of 250 mg of levodopa and 50 mg of carbidopa) at one study visit and placebo at the other study visit. Sinemet was given first followed by placebo at the subsequent visit. Levodopa+carbidopa: Sinemet is a combination of 250 mg levodopa and 50 mg carbidopa. Sinemet was administered orally at Visit 1 or Visit 2. Placebo: A placebo is a sugar pill that has no therapeutic effect and was administered orally at Visit 1 or Visit 2.
27
Placebo/Sinemet
Subjects with major depression were given placebo at one study visit and Sinemet (a combination of 250 mg of levodopa and 50 mg of carbidopa) at the other study visit. Placebo was given first followed by Sinemet at the subsequent visit. Levodopa+carbidopa: Sinemet is a combination of 250 mg levodopa and 50 mg carbidopa. Sinemet was administered orally at Visit 1 or Visit 2. Placebo: A placebo is a sugar pill that has no therapeutic effect and was administered orally at Visit 1 or Visit 2.
29
Total56

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSinemet/PlaceboTotalPlacebo/Sinemet
Age, Continuous36.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5
37.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9
38.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants6 Participants5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
26 Participants50 Participants24 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
15 Participants23 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
11 Participants31 Participants20 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
27 participants56 participants29 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
20 Participants41 Participants21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants15 Participants8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 570 / 56
other
Total, other adverse events
50 / 5711 / 56
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 570 / 56

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Functional Corticostriatal Connectivity

Corticostriatal connectivity was assessed by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Resting-state and task-based (monetary incentive delay \[MID\]) fMRI scans were conducted on a 3 Tesla Siemens Trio MRI scanner. Subject-level correlations for degree of cortical and striatal functional connectivity were Fisher's Z transformed {Z(R)=0.5ln\[(1+R)/(1-R)\]}, a standard method for calculating fMRI functional connectivity. Greater Fisher's Z-scores reflected stronger correlated fMRI activity (i.e., higher corticostriatal connectivity).

Time frame: Scans approximately 45 min post drug/placebo administration at Visit 1, Visit 2 (spaced by approximately 1 week)

Population: The number analyzed in one or more rows correspond to the number with available and analyzable resting fMRI scans both pre and post drug and placebo.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sinemet/PlaceboChange in Functional Corticostriatal ConnectivityVisit 1 resting corticostriatal connectivity response to drug/placebo (post minus pre)0.10 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.22
Sinemet/PlaceboChange in Functional Corticostriatal ConnectivityVisit 2 resting corticostriatal connectivity post drug/placebo0.24 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.18
Sinemet/PlaceboChange in Functional Corticostriatal ConnectivityVisit 1 task (reward anticipation) corticostriatal connectivity post drug/placebo0.02 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.16
Sinemet/PlaceboChange in Functional Corticostriatal ConnectivityVisit 2 resting corticostriatal connectivity response to drug/placebo (post minus pre)0.07 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.18
Sinemet/PlaceboChange in Functional Corticostriatal ConnectivityVisit 2 task (reward anticipation) corticostriatal connectivity post drug/placebo-0.04 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.19
Sinemet/PlaceboChange in Functional Corticostriatal ConnectivityVisit 1 resting corticostriatal connectivity post drug/placebo0.22 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.15
Placebo/SinemetChange in Functional Corticostriatal ConnectivityVisit 2 task (reward anticipation) corticostriatal connectivity post drug/placebo-0.03 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.16
Placebo/SinemetChange in Functional Corticostriatal ConnectivityVisit 1 resting corticostriatal connectivity response to drug/placebo (post minus pre)0.04 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.17
Placebo/SinemetChange in Functional Corticostriatal ConnectivityVisit 1 resting corticostriatal connectivity post drug/placebo0.24 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.12
Placebo/SinemetChange in Functional Corticostriatal ConnectivityVisit 2 resting corticostriatal connectivity post drug/placebo0.17 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.18
Placebo/SinemetChange in Functional Corticostriatal ConnectivityVisit 1 task (reward anticipation) corticostriatal connectivity post drug/placebo0.00 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.15
Placebo/SinemetChange in Functional Corticostriatal ConnectivityVisit 2 resting corticostriatal connectivity response to drug/placebo (post minus pre)0.00 Z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.23
Primary

Correlation Coefficient Between Change in Corticostriatal Connectivity and Levels of Plasma C-reactive Protein and Other Immune Markers

Peripheral blood samples were analyzed for levels of immune markers like plasma C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), soluble interleukin-6 receptor (sIL-6R), tumor necrosis factor (TNF) -alpha, soluble cytokine receptor2 (TNFR 2), interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta), interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra), interleukin 10 (IL-10) and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1).

Time frame: Scans approximately 45 minutes post drug/placebo administration at Visit 1, Visit 2 (spaced by approximately 1 week)

Population: The number analyzed in each row correspond to the number available and analyzable with resting fMRI scans both pre and post drug and placebo.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Sinemet/PlaceboCorrelation Coefficient Between Change in Corticostriatal Connectivity and Levels of Plasma C-reactive Protein and Other Immune MarkersSum of cytokine Z scores and Visit 2 task (reward anticipation) connectivity post drug/placebo0.04 Pearson's r Correlation Coefficient
Sinemet/PlaceboCorrelation Coefficient Between Change in Corticostriatal Connectivity and Levels of Plasma C-reactive Protein and Other Immune MarkersCRP mg/L and Visit 2 task (reward anticipation) connectivity post drug/placebo0.10 Pearson's r Correlation Coefficient
Sinemet/PlaceboCorrelation Coefficient Between Change in Corticostriatal Connectivity and Levels of Plasma C-reactive Protein and Other Immune MarkersCRP > vs. < 2 mg/L and Visit 1 resting connectivity post drug/placebo0.12 Pearson's r Correlation Coefficient
Sinemet/PlaceboCorrelation Coefficient Between Change in Corticostriatal Connectivity and Levels of Plasma C-reactive Protein and Other Immune MarkersSum of cytokine Z scores and Visit 2 resting connectivity post drug/placebo-0.22 Pearson's r Correlation Coefficient
Sinemet/PlaceboCorrelation Coefficient Between Change in Corticostriatal Connectivity and Levels of Plasma C-reactive Protein and Other Immune MarkersSum of cytokine Z scores and Visit 1 task (reward anticipation) connectivity post drug/placebo0.26 Pearson's r Correlation Coefficient
Sinemet/PlaceboCorrelation Coefficient Between Change in Corticostriatal Connectivity and Levels of Plasma C-reactive Protein and Other Immune MarkersCRP mg/L and Visit 1 resting connectivity response to drug/placebo (post minus pre)0.36 Pearson's r Correlation Coefficient
Sinemet/PlaceboCorrelation Coefficient Between Change in Corticostriatal Connectivity and Levels of Plasma C-reactive Protein and Other Immune MarkersCRP mg/L and Visit 2 resting connectivity response to drug/placebo (post minus pre)-0.12 Pearson's r Correlation Coefficient
Sinemet/PlaceboCorrelation Coefficient Between Change in Corticostriatal Connectivity and Levels of Plasma C-reactive Protein and Other Immune MarkersCRP mg/L and Visit 2 resting connectivity post drug/placebo-0.10 Pearson's r Correlation Coefficient
Sinemet/PlaceboCorrelation Coefficient Between Change in Corticostriatal Connectivity and Levels of Plasma C-reactive Protein and Other Immune MarkersCRP mg/L and Visit 1 task (reward anticipation) connectivity post drug/placebo0.49 Pearson's r Correlation Coefficient
Sinemet/PlaceboCorrelation Coefficient Between Change in Corticostriatal Connectivity and Levels of Plasma C-reactive Protein and Other Immune MarkersCRP > vs. < 2 mg/ and Visit 1 resting connectivity response to drug/placebo (post minus pre)0.20 Pearson's r Correlation Coefficient
Sinemet/PlaceboCorrelation Coefficient Between Change in Corticostriatal Connectivity and Levels of Plasma C-reactive Protein and Other Immune MarkersCRP > vs. < 2 mg/L and Visit 2 resting connectivity response to drug/placebo (post minus pre)-0.33 Pearson's r Correlation Coefficient
Sinemet/PlaceboCorrelation Coefficient Between Change in Corticostriatal Connectivity and Levels of Plasma C-reactive Protein and Other Immune MarkersCRP > vs. < 2 mg/L and Visit 2 resting connectivity post drug/placebo-0.31 Pearson's r Correlation Coefficient
Sinemet/PlaceboCorrelation Coefficient Between Change in Corticostriatal Connectivity and Levels of Plasma C-reactive Protein and Other Immune MarkersCRP > vs. < 2 mg/L and Visit 1 task (reward anticipation) connectivity post drug/placebo0.22 Pearson's r Correlation Coefficient
Sinemet/PlaceboCorrelation Coefficient Between Change in Corticostriatal Connectivity and Levels of Plasma C-reactive Protein and Other Immune MarkersCRP > vs. < 2 mg/L and Visit 2 task (reward anticipation) connectivity post drug/placebo-0.18 Pearson's r Correlation Coefficient
Sinemet/PlaceboCorrelation Coefficient Between Change in Corticostriatal Connectivity and Levels of Plasma C-reactive Protein and Other Immune MarkersSum of cytokine Z scores and Visit 1 resting connectivity response to drug/placebo (post minus pre)0.40 Pearson's r Correlation Coefficient
Sinemet/PlaceboCorrelation Coefficient Between Change in Corticostriatal Connectivity and Levels of Plasma C-reactive Protein and Other Immune MarkersSum of cytokine Z scores and Visit 2 resting connectivity response to drug/placebo (post minus pre)-0.14 Pearson's r Correlation Coefficient
Sinemet/PlaceboCorrelation Coefficient Between Change in Corticostriatal Connectivity and Levels of Plasma C-reactive Protein and Other Immune MarkersSum of cytokine Z scores and Visit 1 resting connectivity post drug/placebo0.15 Pearson's r Correlation Coefficient
Sinemet/PlaceboCorrelation Coefficient Between Change in Corticostriatal Connectivity and Levels of Plasma C-reactive Protein and Other Immune MarkersCRP mg/L and Visit 1 resting connectivity post drug/placebo0.10 Pearson's r Correlation Coefficient
Placebo/SinemetCorrelation Coefficient Between Change in Corticostriatal Connectivity and Levels of Plasma C-reactive Protein and Other Immune MarkersSum of cytokine Z scores and Visit 2 resting connectivity response to drug/placebo (post minus pre)0.29 Pearson's r Correlation Coefficient
Placebo/SinemetCorrelation Coefficient Between Change in Corticostriatal Connectivity and Levels of Plasma C-reactive Protein and Other Immune MarkersCRP mg/L and Visit 2 resting connectivity post drug/placebo0.41 Pearson's r Correlation Coefficient
Placebo/SinemetCorrelation Coefficient Between Change in Corticostriatal Connectivity and Levels of Plasma C-reactive Protein and Other Immune MarkersCRP > vs. < 2 mg/ and Visit 1 resting connectivity response to drug/placebo (post minus pre)0.04 Pearson's r Correlation Coefficient
Placebo/SinemetCorrelation Coefficient Between Change in Corticostriatal Connectivity and Levels of Plasma C-reactive Protein and Other Immune MarkersSum of cytokine Z scores and Visit 2 resting connectivity post drug/placebo0.08 Pearson's r Correlation Coefficient
Placebo/SinemetCorrelation Coefficient Between Change in Corticostriatal Connectivity and Levels of Plasma C-reactive Protein and Other Immune MarkersCRP > vs. < 2 mg/L and Visit 2 task (reward anticipation) connectivity post drug/placebo0.48 Pearson's r Correlation Coefficient
Placebo/SinemetCorrelation Coefficient Between Change in Corticostriatal Connectivity and Levels of Plasma C-reactive Protein and Other Immune MarkersCRP > vs. < 2 mg/L and Visit 2 resting connectivity response to drug/placebo (post minus pre)0.52 Pearson's r Correlation Coefficient
Placebo/SinemetCorrelation Coefficient Between Change in Corticostriatal Connectivity and Levels of Plasma C-reactive Protein and Other Immune MarkersCRP > vs. < 2 mg/L and Visit 1 resting connectivity post drug/placebo0.17 Pearson's r Correlation Coefficient
Placebo/SinemetCorrelation Coefficient Between Change in Corticostriatal Connectivity and Levels of Plasma C-reactive Protein and Other Immune MarkersSum of cytokine Z scores and Visit 1 task (reward anticipation) connectivity post drug/placebo-0.34 Pearson's r Correlation Coefficient
Placebo/SinemetCorrelation Coefficient Between Change in Corticostriatal Connectivity and Levels of Plasma C-reactive Protein and Other Immune MarkersSum of cytokine Z scores and Visit 2 task (reward anticipation) connectivity post drug/placebo-0.18 Pearson's r Correlation Coefficient
Placebo/SinemetCorrelation Coefficient Between Change in Corticostriatal Connectivity and Levels of Plasma C-reactive Protein and Other Immune MarkersSum of cytokine Z scores and Visit 1 resting connectivity response to drug/placebo (post minus pre)-0.05 Pearson's r Correlation Coefficient
Placebo/SinemetCorrelation Coefficient Between Change in Corticostriatal Connectivity and Levels of Plasma C-reactive Protein and Other Immune MarkersCRP mg/L and Visit 1 resting connectivity response to drug/placebo (post minus pre)-0.15 Pearson's r Correlation Coefficient
Placebo/SinemetCorrelation Coefficient Between Change in Corticostriatal Connectivity and Levels of Plasma C-reactive Protein and Other Immune MarkersCRP > vs. < 2 mg/L and Visit 2 resting connectivity post drug/placebo0.38 Pearson's r Correlation Coefficient
Placebo/SinemetCorrelation Coefficient Between Change in Corticostriatal Connectivity and Levels of Plasma C-reactive Protein and Other Immune MarkersCRP mg/L and Visit 2 resting connectivity response to drug/placebo (post minus pre)0.44 Pearson's r Correlation Coefficient
Placebo/SinemetCorrelation Coefficient Between Change in Corticostriatal Connectivity and Levels of Plasma C-reactive Protein and Other Immune MarkersCRP mg/L and Visit 1 resting connectivity post drug/placebo0.15 Pearson's r Correlation Coefficient
Placebo/SinemetCorrelation Coefficient Between Change in Corticostriatal Connectivity and Levels of Plasma C-reactive Protein and Other Immune MarkersSum of cytokine Z scores and Visit 1 resting connectivity post drug/placebo-0.05 Pearson's r Correlation Coefficient
Placebo/SinemetCorrelation Coefficient Between Change in Corticostriatal Connectivity and Levels of Plasma C-reactive Protein and Other Immune MarkersCRP > vs. < 2 mg/L and Visit 1 task (reward anticipation) connectivity post drug/placebo-0.35 Pearson's r Correlation Coefficient
Placebo/SinemetCorrelation Coefficient Between Change in Corticostriatal Connectivity and Levels of Plasma C-reactive Protein and Other Immune MarkersCRP mg/L and Visit 1 task (reward anticipation) connectivity post drug/placebo-0.31 Pearson's r Correlation Coefficient
Placebo/SinemetCorrelation Coefficient Between Change in Corticostriatal Connectivity and Levels of Plasma C-reactive Protein and Other Immune MarkersCRP mg/L and Visit 2 task (reward anticipation) connectivity post drug/placebo0.25 Pearson's r Correlation Coefficient
Secondary

Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), Anhedonia Subscale Score

The Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) is a widely used self-report for measuring depression severity over the past two weeks and the anhedonia subscale is one of several validated subscales in the BDI-II. Responses are given on a 4-point scale where 0 = the symptom of depression has not been experienced and 3 = the symptom of depression is severe. The anhedonia subscale score is created by summing responses to four items of the BDI-II that assess loss of pleasure, loss of interest, loss of energy, loss of sex drive. The total score of the anhedonia subscale ranges from 0 to 12 where higher scores reflect greater severity of anhedonia symptoms.

Time frame: Visit 1: Pre drug/placebo, Visit 2: Pre drug/placebo (spaced by approximately 1 week)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sinemet/PlaceboBeck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), Anhedonia Subscale ScoreVisit 1: Pre drug/placebo6.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Sinemet/PlaceboBeck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), Anhedonia Subscale ScoreVisit 2: Pre drug/placebo5.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
Placebo/SinemetBeck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), Anhedonia Subscale ScoreVisit 1: Pre drug/placebo5.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Placebo/SinemetBeck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), Anhedonia Subscale ScoreVisit 2: Pre drug/placebo5.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Secondary

Change in Motivation and Pleasure (MAP) Scale Score

The motivation and pleasure (MAP) questionnaire is an 18-item self-report inventory that was created to disentangle state-wise motivational and consummatory components of everyday activities over a 24-hour period. This scale was used to assess self-reported changes in symptoms of anhedonia before and after inflammation blockade. Respondents respond to statements about daily activities on a scale from 0 (no pleasure/not at all) to 4 (extreme pleasure/very often). Total scores range from 0 to 72 where higher scores indicate greater motivation and effort given to everyday situations.

Time frame: Visit 1: Pre drug/placebo, Visit 1: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo, Visit 2: Pre drug/placebo, Visit 2: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo

Population: This analysis includes participants who completed this assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sinemet/PlaceboChange in Motivation and Pleasure (MAP) Scale ScoreVisit 2: Pre drug/placebo28.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.6
Sinemet/PlaceboChange in Motivation and Pleasure (MAP) Scale ScoreVisit 1: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo26.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.1
Sinemet/PlaceboChange in Motivation and Pleasure (MAP) Scale ScoreVisit 2: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo29.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.7
Sinemet/PlaceboChange in Motivation and Pleasure (MAP) Scale ScoreVisit 1: Pre drug/placebo25.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.5
Placebo/SinemetChange in Motivation and Pleasure (MAP) Scale ScoreVisit 2: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo25.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.3
Placebo/SinemetChange in Motivation and Pleasure (MAP) Scale ScoreVisit 1: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo25.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.1
Placebo/SinemetChange in Motivation and Pleasure (MAP) Scale ScoreVisit 2: Pre drug/placebo25.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22
Placebo/SinemetChange in Motivation and Pleasure (MAP) Scale ScoreVisit 1: Pre drug/placebo26.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.8
Secondary

Digit Symbol Task Neurocognitive Test

The Digit Symbol Task was used to assess graphomotor speed, visual scanning and memory processing speed involving numbers and a corresponding blank box where subjects are asked to fill in matching symbol as fast as they can. Results show the average number of correct symbols completed in up to 100 boxes in 90 seconds.

Time frame: At baseline and approximately 2-3 hours post drug/placebo administration at Visit 1, Visit 2 (spaced by approximately 1 week)

Population: This analysis includes participants who completed this assessment and had usable data. One participant in the Placebo/Sinemet arm did not complete this assessment at any time point and one had unusable data for the baseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sinemet/PlaceboDigit Symbol Task Neurocognitive TestBaseline Visit (Task Practice)52.0 number of correct symbolsStandard Deviation 8.8
Sinemet/PlaceboDigit Symbol Task Neurocognitive TestVisit 1: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo61.3 number of correct symbolsStandard Deviation 11.3
Sinemet/PlaceboDigit Symbol Task Neurocognitive TestVisit 2: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo66.6 number of correct symbolsStandard Deviation 11.7
Placebo/SinemetDigit Symbol Task Neurocognitive TestBaseline Visit (Task Practice)54.9 number of correct symbolsStandard Deviation 11.3
Placebo/SinemetDigit Symbol Task Neurocognitive TestVisit 1: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo64.5 number of correct symbolsStandard Deviation 10.2
Placebo/SinemetDigit Symbol Task Neurocognitive TestVisit 2: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo66.4 number of correct symbolsStandard Deviation 11.6
Secondary

Effort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT) Neurocognitive Test

The Effort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT) is a computer-based multi-trial task used to objectively assess motivation. Possible results range between 0 to1 with 1 being a better outcome. Results show mean probability of hard (high effort) choice.

Time frame: At baseline and approximately 2-3 hours post drug/placebo administration at Visit 1, Visit 2 (spaced by approximately 1 week)

Population: This analysis includes participants who completed this assessment and had usable data. Two participants in each study arm did not complete this assessment at any time point. Two participants in the Placebo/Sinemet group had unusable data for the baseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sinemet/PlaceboEffort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT) Neurocognitive TestBaseline Visit (Task Practice)0.29 Probability of hard/high effort choicesStandard Deviation 0.13
Sinemet/PlaceboEffort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT) Neurocognitive TestVisit 1: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo0.28 Probability of hard/high effort choicesStandard Deviation 0.13
Sinemet/PlaceboEffort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT) Neurocognitive TestVisit 2: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo0.30 Probability of hard/high effort choicesStandard Deviation 0.15
Placebo/SinemetEffort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT) Neurocognitive TestBaseline Visit (Task Practice)0.39 Probability of hard/high effort choicesStandard Deviation 0.17
Placebo/SinemetEffort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT) Neurocognitive TestVisit 1: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo0.34 Probability of hard/high effort choicesStandard Deviation 0.17
Placebo/SinemetEffort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT) Neurocognitive TestVisit 2: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo0.34 Probability of hard/high effort choicesStandard Deviation 0.21
Secondary

Finger Tapping Task (FTT) Neurocognitive Test

The Finger Tapping Task (FTT) assesses motor speed and can detect subtle motor impairment. The test measures the average number of taps per 10 second trial. A greater number of taps reflects faster motor speed.

Time frame: At baseline and approximately 2-3 hours post drug/placebo administration at Visit 1, Visit 2 (spaced by approximately 1 week)

Population: This analysis includes participants who completed this assessment and had usable data. One participant in the Placebo/Sinemet arm did not complete this assessment at any time point and one had unusable data for the baseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sinemet/PlaceboFinger Tapping Task (FTT) Neurocognitive TestBaseline Visit (Task Practice)52.0 number of tapsStandard Deviation 8.8
Sinemet/PlaceboFinger Tapping Task (FTT) Neurocognitive TestVisit 1: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo61.3 number of tapsStandard Deviation 11.3
Sinemet/PlaceboFinger Tapping Task (FTT) Neurocognitive TestVisit 2: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo66.6 number of tapsStandard Deviation 11.7
Placebo/SinemetFinger Tapping Task (FTT) Neurocognitive TestVisit 2: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo66.4 number of tapsStandard Deviation 11.6
Placebo/SinemetFinger Tapping Task (FTT) Neurocognitive TestBaseline Visit (Task Practice)54.9 number of tapsStandard Deviation 11.3
Placebo/SinemetFinger Tapping Task (FTT) Neurocognitive TestVisit 1: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo64.5 number of tapsStandard Deviation 10.2
Secondary

Inventory of Depressive Symptoms-Self Report (IDS-SR) Questionnaire

The Inventory of Depressive Symptoms-Self Report (IDS-SR) is a 30-item self-report instrument with excellent psychometric properties for measuring symptom constructs consistent with current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) nosology and that is widely used to measure depression severity in clinical trials. Response scores are summed and range from 0 to 84, with higher scores reflecting greater depression severity.

Time frame: At baseline and Visit 1: Pre drug/placebo, Visit 2: Pre drug/placebo (spaced by approximately 1 week)

Population: Three participants in the Sinemet/Placebo arm and four participants in the Placebo/Sinemet arm had unusable data for the baseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sinemet/PlaceboInventory of Depressive Symptoms-Self Report (IDS-SR) QuestionnaireBaseline37.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 65
Sinemet/PlaceboInventory of Depressive Symptoms-Self Report (IDS-SR) QuestionnaireVisit 1: Pre drug/placebo37.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.3
Sinemet/PlaceboInventory of Depressive Symptoms-Self Report (IDS-SR) QuestionnaireVisit 2: Pre drug/placebo34.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.6
Placebo/SinemetInventory of Depressive Symptoms-Self Report (IDS-SR) QuestionnaireVisit 1: Pre drug/placebo31.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.7
Placebo/SinemetInventory of Depressive Symptoms-Self Report (IDS-SR) QuestionnaireBaseline35.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.8
Placebo/SinemetInventory of Depressive Symptoms-Self Report (IDS-SR) QuestionnaireVisit 2: Pre drug/placebo32.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.1
Secondary

Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) Self-report Questionnaire

The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) is a 20-item self-report instrument designed to measure severity of fatigue based on five dimensions of fatigue, general fatigue, physical fatigue, mental fatigue, reduced motivation, and reduced activity. The total MFI scores range from 20 to 100 where high scores indicate greater fatigue.

Time frame: At baseline and Visit 1, Visit 2 (spaced by approximately 1 week)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sinemet/PlaceboMultidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) Self-report QuestionnaireBaseline74.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.9
Sinemet/PlaceboMultidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) Self-report QuestionnaireVisit 1: Pre drug/placebo76.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.7
Sinemet/PlaceboMultidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) Self-report QuestionnaireVisit 2: Pre drug/placebo75.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.5
Placebo/SinemetMultidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) Self-report QuestionnaireBaseline72.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.5
Placebo/SinemetMultidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) Self-report QuestionnaireVisit 1: Pre drug/placebo74.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.05
Placebo/SinemetMultidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) Self-report QuestionnaireVisit 2: Pre drug/placebo74.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.9
Secondary

Profile of Mood States (POMS) Scale

The Profile of Mood States (POMS) scale is a 30-item psychological rating scale used to assess transient, distinct mood states. Participants rate the extent to which they feel unhappy, blue, lonely, gloomy, and worthless on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). Scores range from 0 to 120 with higher scores reflecting a more negative mood state.

Time frame: Visit 1: Pre drug/placebo, Visit 1: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo, Visit 2: Pre drug/placebo, Visit 2: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo

Population: This analysis includes participants who completed this assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sinemet/PlaceboProfile of Mood States (POMS) ScaleVisit 1: Pre drug/placebo60.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.6
Sinemet/PlaceboProfile of Mood States (POMS) ScaleVisit 1: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo54.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.1
Sinemet/PlaceboProfile of Mood States (POMS) ScaleVisit 2: Pre drug/placebo53.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.7
Sinemet/PlaceboProfile of Mood States (POMS) ScaleVisit 2: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo48.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.3
Placebo/SinemetProfile of Mood States (POMS) ScaleVisit 2: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo51.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.5
Placebo/SinemetProfile of Mood States (POMS) ScaleVisit 1: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo51.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.8
Placebo/SinemetProfile of Mood States (POMS) ScaleVisit 1: Pre drug/placebo57.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.6
Placebo/SinemetProfile of Mood States (POMS) ScaleVisit 2: Pre drug/placebo56.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.3
Secondary

Reaction Time Task (CANTAB) Neurocognitive Test

The reaction time test includes simple and choice reaction time tasks and is divided into 5 stages requiring increasingly complex chains of responses. The task provided distinction between reaction (or decision) time and movement latencies (milliseconds) based on touch responses made to a single (simple) or chosen from multiple (choice) stimuli flashed on a computer screen. Results show mean response latency in milliseconds.

Time frame: At baseline and approximately 2-3 hours post drug/placebo administration at Visit 1, Visit 2 (spaced by approximately 1 week)

Population: This analysis includes participants who completed this assessment and had usable data. Seven participants in the Sinemet/Placebo arm and 8 participants in the Placebo/Sinemet arm did not complete this assessment at any time point. One participant in each study arm had unusable data for the baseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sinemet/PlaceboReaction Time Task (CANTAB) Neurocognitive TestBaseline Simple Reaction Time360.84 millisecondsStandard Deviation 38.38
Sinemet/PlaceboReaction Time Task (CANTAB) Neurocognitive TestVisit 1: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo Simple Reaction Time256.99 millisecondsStandard Deviation 35.69
Sinemet/PlaceboReaction Time Task (CANTAB) Neurocognitive TestVisit 2: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo Choice Reaction Time395.22 millisecondsStandard Deviation 33.75
Sinemet/PlaceboReaction Time Task (CANTAB) Neurocognitive TestVisit 1: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo Choice Reaction Time397.07 millisecondsStandard Deviation 39.5
Sinemet/PlaceboReaction Time Task (CANTAB) Neurocognitive TestBaseline Choice Reaction Time397.60 millisecondsStandard Deviation 46.74
Sinemet/PlaceboReaction Time Task (CANTAB) Neurocognitive TestVisit 2: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo Simple Motor Time241.28 millisecondsStandard Deviation 46.34
Sinemet/PlaceboReaction Time Task (CANTAB) Neurocognitive TestBaseline Choice Motor Time286.82 millisecondsStandard Deviation 50.47
Sinemet/PlaceboReaction Time Task (CANTAB) Neurocognitive TestVisit 2: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo Choice Motor Time260.47 millisecondsStandard Deviation 42.43
Sinemet/PlaceboReaction Time Task (CANTAB) Neurocognitive TestVisit 1: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo Simple Motor Time240.62 millisecondsStandard Deviation 55.5
Sinemet/PlaceboReaction Time Task (CANTAB) Neurocognitive TestVisit 2: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo Simple Reaction Time358.59 millisecondsStandard Deviation 35.87
Sinemet/PlaceboReaction Time Task (CANTAB) Neurocognitive TestVisit 1: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo Choice Motor Time268.69 millisecondsStandard Deviation 52.17
Sinemet/PlaceboReaction Time Task (CANTAB) Neurocognitive TestBaseline Simple Motor Time266.92 millisecondsStandard Deviation 59.55
Placebo/SinemetReaction Time Task (CANTAB) Neurocognitive TestVisit 2: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo Choice Reaction Time396.68 millisecondsStandard Deviation 38.93
Placebo/SinemetReaction Time Task (CANTAB) Neurocognitive TestBaseline Choice Motor Time299.57 millisecondsStandard Deviation 89.33
Placebo/SinemetReaction Time Task (CANTAB) Neurocognitive TestVisit 1: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo Simple Motor Time258.53 millisecondsStandard Deviation 89.29
Placebo/SinemetReaction Time Task (CANTAB) Neurocognitive TestBaseline Simple Motor Time276.12 millisecondsStandard Deviation 94.35
Placebo/SinemetReaction Time Task (CANTAB) Neurocognitive TestBaseline Simple Reaction Time356.53 millisecondsStandard Deviation 42.11
Placebo/SinemetReaction Time Task (CANTAB) Neurocognitive TestBaseline Choice Reaction Time394.82 millisecondsStandard Deviation 31.31
Placebo/SinemetReaction Time Task (CANTAB) Neurocognitive TestVisit 1: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo Choice Motor Time284.94 millisecondsStandard Deviation 75.16
Placebo/SinemetReaction Time Task (CANTAB) Neurocognitive TestVisit 1: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo Simple Reaction Time348.93 millisecondsStandard Deviation 26.14
Placebo/SinemetReaction Time Task (CANTAB) Neurocognitive TestVisit 1: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo Choice Reaction Time385.03 millisecondsStandard Deviation 22.59
Placebo/SinemetReaction Time Task (CANTAB) Neurocognitive TestVisit 2: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo Simple Motor Time268.37 millisecondsStandard Deviation 93.51
Placebo/SinemetReaction Time Task (CANTAB) Neurocognitive TestVisit 2: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo Choice Motor Time296.94 millisecondsStandard Deviation 83.62
Placebo/SinemetReaction Time Task (CANTAB) Neurocognitive TestVisit 2: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo Simple Reaction Time361.76 millisecondsStandard Deviation 47.55
Secondary

Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) Self-report Questionnaire

The Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS), a 14-item self-report scale with high psychometric validity for assessing the presence of anhedonia, was used to assess hedonic capacity. Participants rated how much they agreed or disagreed with the 14 items phrased as I would enjoy \_\_ based on their ability to experience pleasure. Of the four possible response categories (Definitely Agree, Agree, Disagree, and Strongly Disagree), either of the Disagree responses received a score of 1 and either of the Agree responses received a score of 0. The SHAPS score calculated as the sum of these 14 items ranged from 0 to 14, and higher SHAPS scores indicated greater anhedonia.

Time frame: Visit 1: Pre drug/placebo, Visit 1: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo, Visit 2: Pre drug/placebo, Visit 2: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo

Population: This analysis includes participants who completed this assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sinemet/PlaceboSnaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) Self-report QuestionnaireVisit 1: Pre drug/placebo4.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
Sinemet/PlaceboSnaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) Self-report QuestionnaireVisit 2: Pre drug/placebo4.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.9
Sinemet/PlaceboSnaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) Self-report QuestionnaireVisit 1: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo4.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4
Sinemet/PlaceboSnaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) Self-report QuestionnaireVisit 2: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo4.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.4
Placebo/SinemetSnaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) Self-report QuestionnaireVisit 2: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo3.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
Placebo/SinemetSnaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) Self-report QuestionnaireVisit 1: Pre drug/placebo5.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
Placebo/SinemetSnaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) Self-report QuestionnaireVisit 1: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo4.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
Placebo/SinemetSnaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) Self-report QuestionnaireVisit 2: Pre drug/placebo4.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
Secondary

State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) State Scale

The 20-item self-report State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) State scale was used to measure severity of anxiety symptoms. Total scores range from 20 to 80 with higher scores reflecting greater anxiety. Scores in the high 40s are considered clinically significant.

Time frame: Visit 1: Pre drug/placebo, Visit 1: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo, Visit 2: Pre drug/placebo, Visit 2: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo

Population: This analysis includes participants who completed this assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sinemet/PlaceboState-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) State ScaleVisit 1: Pre drug/placebo52.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.3
Sinemet/PlaceboState-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) State ScaleVisit 1: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo49.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.3
Sinemet/PlaceboState-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) State ScaleVisit 2: Pre drug/placebo51.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.9
Sinemet/PlaceboState-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) State ScaleVisit 2: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo43.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12
Placebo/SinemetState-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) State ScaleVisit 2: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo43.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.9
Placebo/SinemetState-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) State ScaleVisit 1: Pre drug/placebo46.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.6
Placebo/SinemetState-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) State ScaleVisit 2: Pre drug/placebo45.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14
Placebo/SinemetState-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) State ScaleVisit 1: 1-2 hrs post drug/placebo42.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.3
Secondary

The Trail Making Test (TMT) Neurocognitive Assessment

The Trail Making Test (TMT) is used to measure basic attention and psychomotor processing speed. Time taken to complete each task is recorded in seconds, whereby the greater the number of seconds, the slower the psychomotor speed.

Time frame: At baseline and approximately 2-3 hours post drug/placebo administration at Visit 1, Visit 2 (spaced by approximately 1 week)

Population: This analysis includes participants who completed this assessment and had usable data. One participant in the Sinemet/Placebo arm and two participants in the Placebo/Sinemet arm did not complete this assessment at any time point. Three participants in the Placebo/Sinemet group had unusable data for the baseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sinemet/PlaceboThe Trail Making Test (TMT) Neurocognitive AssessmentVisit 2: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo23.0 secondsStandard Deviation 13.8
Sinemet/PlaceboThe Trail Making Test (TMT) Neurocognitive AssessmentBaseline Visit (Task Practice)24.0 secondsStandard Deviation 10
Sinemet/PlaceboThe Trail Making Test (TMT) Neurocognitive AssessmentVisit 1: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo21.7 secondsStandard Deviation 8.8
Placebo/SinemetThe Trail Making Test (TMT) Neurocognitive AssessmentBaseline Visit (Task Practice)23.7 secondsStandard Deviation 4.7
Placebo/SinemetThe Trail Making Test (TMT) Neurocognitive AssessmentVisit 1: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo21.0 secondsStandard Deviation 5.2
Placebo/SinemetThe Trail Making Test (TMT) Neurocognitive AssessmentVisit 2: 2-3 hrs post drug/placebo19.7 secondsStandard Deviation 4.6
Other Pre-specified

Correlation Coefficient Between Change in Cerebral Blood Flow (CBF) and Change in Functional Connectivity

The cerebral blood flow (CBF) before and after Sinemet (250 mg levodopa/ 50mg carbidopa) or placebo administration was assessed by arterial spin labeling (ASL) fMRI.

Time frame: Scans approximately 45 minutes post drug/placebo administration at Visit 1, Visit 2 (spaced by approximately 1 week)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026