Skip to content

Comparison of Levobupivacaine, Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine in Epidural Anaesthesia

Comparative Evaluation of Newer Congeners i.e. Levobupivacaine and Ropivacaine With Bupivacaine, in Lumbar Epidural Anaesthesia for Hip Surgeries

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02513433
Enrollment
90
Registered
2015-07-31
Start date
2012-12-31
Completion date
2014-09-30
Last updated
2015-08-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain Insensitivity, Congenital

Keywords

Lumbar epidural anaesthesia

Brief summary

This study compares the clinical efficacy of newer local anaesthetic drugs Levobupivacaine and Ropivacaine with Bupivacaine in lumbar epidural anaesthesia for hip surgeries.

Detailed description

Some of the most common day care surgeries are hip surgeries, in which local anaesthetic agents can be used via epidural route for both intra-op and post-op analgesia. Among the drugs used nowadays are Lignocaine, Bupivacaine, Levobupivacaine and Ropivacaine.However Bupivacaine usage is not free from side effects. The claimed benefits of both Levobupivacaine and Ropivacaine are reduced cardiac toxicity on overdose and more specific effects on sensory rather than motor nerve fibres. Ropivacaine, an analog of Mepivacaine, is one of the long acting amide anaesthetic agent similar to Bupivacaine in chemical structure and anaesthetic function. It is a first enantiomer-specific compound, which has a reduced risk of cardio toxicity, neuro toxicity and rapid recovery of motor function. Levobupivacaine is the pure S (-)-enantiomer of Bupivacaine, and in recent year has emerged as a safer alternative for regional anaesthesia than its racemic parent.

Interventions

DRUGBupivacaine

Local anesthetic

DRUGLevobupivacaine

Local anesthetic

DRUGRopivacaine

Local anesthetic

Sponsors

Government Medical College, Haldwani
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* ASA Grade I and II patients of either sex * Age 18-60 years * Undergoing various hip surgeries under lumbar epidural anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

* Refusal for epidural * ASA-III&IV * Head injury * Psychiatric disease * Known allergic to test drugs * Major systemic disease * Any analgesia with in past 24 hours

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Onset of sensory block30 minutesTime to achieve sensory block up to tenth thoracic dermatome

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time for 2 segment regression of sensory block90 minutesTime for regression of sensory block 2 segments lower than maximum blocked dermatome
Time to achieve maximum motor block45 minutesTime to achieve motor block of modified Bromage score

Countries

India

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026