Skip to content

A Clinical Study to Determine the Safety and Effectiveness of Dentinal Hypersensitivity Treatment With Two Different Toothbrushes

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02513212
Enrollment
24
Registered
2015-07-31
Start date
2015-07-31
Completion date
2015-09-30
Last updated
2020-08-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dentin Sensitivity

Keywords

Sensitivity

Brief summary

This study will determine the effects toothbrush type (power or manual) has on the safety and effectiveness of professional dentinal hypersensitivity treatment with a marketed oxalate-containing solution.

Interventions

Professionally applied liquid

DEVICEManual toothbrush

Marketed manual toothbrush

Marketed power toothbrush

Sponsors

Procter and Gamble
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* be at least 18 years of age; * provide written informed consent prior to participation and be given a signed copy of the informed consent form; * complete a photography consent agreement pertaining to the collection and use of non-identifying intraoral photographs; * be in good general health as determined by the Investigator/designee; and * have at least one tooth with a Schiff sensitivity score of at least 1 in response to the cool air challenge.

Exclusion criteria

* self-reported pregnancy or nursing; * severe periodontal disease, as characterized by purulent exudate, generalized mobility, and/or severe recession; * active treatment of periodontitis; * any diseases or conditions that might interfere with the safe completion of the study; or * an inability to undergo any study procedures.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline Air Challenge30 daysThe Schiff Sensitivity Scale was assessed for each test tooth via an evaporative air challenge. The examiner recorded the Schiff Index score corresponding to the response to the air challenge. The Schiff Index Sensitivity scale is scored as follows- 0: tooth/subject did not respond to stimulus, 1: tooth/subject responds to stimulus, but does not request discontinuation of stimulus, 2: tooth/subject responds to stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves form stimulus, 3: tooth/subject responds to stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful, and requests discontinuation of the stimulus. The higher the Schiff score, the more sensitive the tooth. The mean change from Baseline was calculated for this measure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline Visual Analog Scale30 daysVisual Analog Scale (VAS) - subjects are asked to look at a VAS and designate the level of hypersensitivity they experienced as a result of the thermal and water challenges using a continuum scale of 0 = No tooth pain up to 100 = Worst tooth pain ever experienced.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Oxalate Liquid, SnF2 Paste, Manual Toothbrush
Potassium oxalate liquid, professionally applied Stannous fluoride paste, self applied Manual toothbrush Potassium Oxalate: Professionally applied liquid Stannous fluoride paste: SnF2 Paste Manual toothbrush: Marketed manual toothbrush
12
Oxalate Liquid, SnF2 Paste, Power Toothbrush
Potassium oxalate liquid, professionally applied Stannous fluoride paste, self applied Power toothbrush Potassium Oxalate: Professionally applied liquid Stannous fluoride paste: SnF2 Paste Power toothbrush: Marketed power toothbrush
12
Total24

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOxalate Liquid, SnF2 Paste, Manual ToothbrushOxalate Liquid, SnF2 Paste, Power ToothbrushTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
12 Participants12 Participants24 Participants
Age, Continuous42.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.74
46.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.63
44.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.36
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Asian Oriental
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Black
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Caucasian
7 Participants8 Participants15 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Hispanic
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Multi-Racial
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
12 participants12 participants24 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants12 Participants22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 120 / 12
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 120 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 120 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline Air Challenge

The Schiff Sensitivity Scale was assessed for each test tooth via an evaporative air challenge. The examiner recorded the Schiff Index score corresponding to the response to the air challenge. The Schiff Index Sensitivity scale is scored as follows- 0: tooth/subject did not respond to stimulus, 1: tooth/subject responds to stimulus, but does not request discontinuation of stimulus, 2: tooth/subject responds to stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves form stimulus, 3: tooth/subject responds to stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful, and requests discontinuation of the stimulus. The higher the Schiff score, the more sensitive the tooth. The mean change from Baseline was calculated for this measure.

Time frame: 30 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oxalate Liquid, SnF2 Paste, Manual ToothbrushChange From Baseline Air Challenge-0.409 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.701
Oxalate Liquid, SnF2 Paste, Power ToothbrushChange From Baseline Air Challenge-0.917 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.733
Secondary

Change From Baseline Visual Analog Scale

Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - subjects are asked to look at a VAS and designate the level of hypersensitivity they experienced as a result of the thermal and water challenges using a continuum scale of 0 = No tooth pain up to 100 = Worst tooth pain ever experienced.

Time frame: 30 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oxalate Liquid, SnF2 Paste, Manual ToothbrushChange From Baseline Visual Analog Scale-11.000 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.929
Oxalate Liquid, SnF2 Paste, Power ToothbrushChange From Baseline Visual Analog Scale-28.500 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.075

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026