Skip to content

Medical Monitoring for Agitated Patients Pilot RCT - Medical Monitoring

A Pilot Randomized Control Trial: The Ability to Medically Monitor With Use of Physical and Chemical Restraints or Seclusion of Acutely Agitated or Violent Patients Who Present to the Psychiatric Emergency Services

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02512705
Enrollment
90
Registered
2015-07-31
Start date
2015-09-30
Completion date
2016-04-30
Last updated
2015-07-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Agitation

Brief summary

The Psychiatric Emergency Services (PES) is an under researched area of clinical practice, largely in the management of acutely agitated and violent patients. The goal of this pilot randomized clinical trial (RCT) is to assess the benefit of medically monitoring patients that present with extreme agitation and/or violent behaviour to PES. Placing them in physical restraints and immediately administering chemical restraint, will enable medical monitoring of these potentially medically unstable patients. Investigators believe that this practice will provide safer management of patients, reduce risk to staff and other patients, reduce risk of undiagnosed medical conditions that underly the agitation, and increase clinical management and quality of care. Patients that come into the Emergency Department that are agitated and violent, where verbal-deescalation will not suffice, will be randomly treated with either immediate placement in seclusion (current practice) or be placed in physical restraints and given chemical restraint (as outlined in the BETA project guidelines). The same time interval assessments will be performed on both groups of patients including; medical monitoring and agitation scale assessment. Data will also be collected on number of violent episodes, code whites, required increase in the use of physical restraints, length of intervention, and more. This assessment will enable a comparison between the current practice and the proposed practice to establish evidence based clinical guidelines for the management of acute agitation in PES, where de-escalation techniques are ineffective and the lack of medical monitoring is harmful to the patient and can negatively effect their outcome. In order to best assess the importance of medical monitoring for such patients, a pilot study must be performed to assess the feasibility of such a phase III RCT study.

Interventions

DEVICEPinel Restraints
BEHAVIORALSeclusion Room

Sponsors

St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Was agitated or violent upon entry into PES. * Is 18+ years of age. * Verbal de-escalation techniques are not useful for management of this patient. * BETA Project techniques alone are not useful for management of this patient. * The patient is assigned a CTAS1 or CTAS2 score.

Exclusion criteria

* The patient scores a Low or Moderate level of risk on the Violence/Aggression Screening Tool (VAST) that is used at ER triage. * The point of agitation or violence began after the patient was already admitted to PES.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Analysis of feasibility, as measured by the recruitment rates3 monthsProcess
Analysis of feasibility, as measured by staff and resource availability3 monthsResources
Analysis of feasibility, as measured by baseline data of demographic and clinical characteristics3 monthsScientific

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Occurrence of medical event3 monthsWere there any medical events? What was the time to the first medical event?
Time to medical event response3 monthsWhat was the time taken to respond to a medical event from the start of the intervention?
Time of agitation event response3 monthsWhat was the time it took to respond to an agitation event?

Contacts

Primary ContactHava Starkman, BScH
hava.starkman@gmail.com905-522-4941

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026