Skip to content

Bifrontal and Bitemporal Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) in Treatment of Patients With Schizophrenia

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of the Bifrontal Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) and the Standard Bitemporal ECT in the Treatment of Patients With Schizophrenia

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02511509
Acronym
ESBECT
Enrollment
100
Registered
2015-07-30
Start date
2015-09-30
Completion date
2019-07-31
Last updated
2016-10-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Schizophrenia

Keywords

Schizophrenia, Electroconvulsive Therapy, Bifrontal ECT, Bitemporal ECT, Cognitive functions, Postictal delirium

Brief summary

Electroconvulsive therapy has been used in clinical practice since 1938, a number of randomized trials found significant differences favoring ECT in response rates between individuals with depression receiving real and sham ECT. Results of early studies performed on patients with schizophrenia weren't so clear, only few of these trials found appreciable differences between real and sham ECT in clinical outcome. The recent, more reliable studies have found that ECT is efficacious on different symptoms which might be present in the course of schizophrenia, for example, psychotic and affective ones, as well as suicidality. The serious complications of electroconvulsive therapy are rare, however, more frequent side effects may include cognitive impairment and postictal delirium. Thus, the researchers try to develop new, more effective and less harmful procedures of ECT, like bifrontal electrodes. The available studies revealed that bifrontal ECT has equal efficacy to bitemporal ECT with less cognitive impairment, but the literature examining this placement is limited to major depressive disorder and the results are inconsistent. In the worldwide literature there is lack of studies regarding the use of bifrontal ECT among patients with schizophrenia. It is interesting how bifrontal ECT would affect axial symptoms of schizophrenia, since the electrodes in this procedure are placed over the brain areas responsible for negative symptoms. This randomized, double blind study is going to assess whether the bifrontal ECT is more effective in the treatment of positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia, has less harmful impact on the cognitive functions and decrease the frequency and severity of postictal delirium comparing to the bitemporal ECT. Moreover, as the first worldwide will assess the brain dopaminergic activity with the use of PET in the patients with schizophrenia after ECT and the impact of the ECT on the concentration of such neurotrophins as brain-derived neurotrophic factor-BDNF, neuron specific enolase-NSE and protein S100B.

Interventions

DEVICEBifrontal electroconvulsive therapy

The centre of each electrode will be placed 4-5 cm above the outer canthus of the eye along a vertical line perpendicular to a line connecting the pupils.

DEVICEBitemporal electroconvulsive therapy

The centre of the stimulus electrodes will be applied 2-3 cm above the midpoint of the line connecting the outer canthus of the eye and the external auditory meatus on each side of the individual's head.

Sponsors

Medical University of Lodz
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 64 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The patients who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-DSM-V criteria for schizophrenia (apart from residual type) * The patients qualified for ECT according the standard protocol * Antipsychotic treatment with dibenzepins according to the following scheme: the dose of clozapine not higher than 450mg, the dose of olanzapine not higher than 20mg and the dose of quetiapine not higher than 600mg per day * If needed concomitant treatment allowed with hydroxyzine (max. 100mg per day) and lorazepam (max. 4mg per day) * Anaesthesia conducted with the use of suxamethonium chloride, propofol and atropine

Exclusion criteria

* The lack of patient's consent * Mental retardation confirmed with the psychological and psychiatric examination (IQ\<70; fulfilled DSM-V criteria for mental retardation) * Dementia diagnosed on the basis of DSM-V criteria * Substance abuse during the year prior study enrolment or substance addiction * The presence of symptoms which met DSM-V criteria for affective episode (an episode of mania, hypomania or depression) * The ECT conducted during 6 months prior the study enrolment * The history of previous ineffective ECT * The need for antipsychotic treatment other than derivatives of dibenzothiazepines or in doses higher than 450mg of clozapine, 20mg of olanzapine and 600mg of quetiapine per day * The women in the generative period who do not use effective contraception (sexual abstinence, contraceptives, intrauterine device, mechanical contraceptive devices) * The need for use of other than suxamethonium chloride, propofol and atropine anaesthetics and concomitant medications

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Continuous Performance Testup to 5 weeksAssessment conducted on baseline, after the 6th ECT and one week after the last ECT (24 hours after each ECT course).
Finger Tapping Testup to 5 weeksAssessment conducted on baseline, after the 6th ECT and one week after the last ECT (24 hours after each ECT course)
Symbol Digit Coding Testup to 5 weeksAssessment conducted on baseline, after the 6th ECT and one week after the last ECT (24 hours after each ECT course)
Stroop Testup to 5 weeksAssessment conducted on baseline, after the 6th ECT and one week after the last ECT (24 hours after each ECT course)
Shifting Attention Testup to 5 weeksAssessment conducted on baseline, after the 6th ECT and one week after the last ECT (24 hours after each ECT course)
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scaleup to 5 weeksAssessment conducted on baseline, after 6th, 12th and the last ECT.
Clinical Global Impressionup to 5 weeksAssessment conducted on baseline, after 6th, 12th and the last ECT.
Memorial Delirium Assessment Scaleup to 5 weeksAssessment conducted after the each ECT course.
Confusion Assessment Methodup to 5 weeksAssessment conducted after the each ECT course.
Verbal Memory Testup to 5 weeksAssessment conducted on baseline, after the 6th ECT and one week after the last ECT (24 hours after each ECT course).
Visual Memory Testup to 5 weeksAssessment conducted on baseline, after the 6th ECT and one week after the last ECT (24 hours after each ECT course).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The concentration of brain-derived neurotrophic factor.up to 5 weeksThe blood samples will be collected on baseline, 2 and 6 hours after the first ECT course, 2 hours after the 3rd, 6th, 9th and the last ECT course
The concentration of neuron specific enolase.up to 5 weeksThe blood samples will be collected on baseline, 2 and 6 hours after the first ECT course, 2 hours after the 3rd, 6th, 9th and the last ECT course
The concentration of protein S100Bup to 5 weeksThe blood samples will be collected on baseline, 2 and 6 hours after the first ECT course, 2 hours after the 3rd, 6th, 9th and the last ECT course
Positron Emission Tomography to assess the impact of ECT on the dopaminergic system activityup to 5 weeksAssessment conducted before the first and after the last ECT course.

Countries

Poland

Contacts

Primary ContactJakub Kazmierski, PhD
jakub.kazmierski@umed.lodz.pl0048426757232

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026