Skip to content

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Obsessive Compulsive Disorders

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders: Double Blind Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02511392
Acronym
rTMS-OCD
Enrollment
45
Registered
2015-07-30
Start date
2014-01-31
Completion date
2015-07-31
Last updated
2015-07-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obsessive Compulsive Disorders

Brief summary

Objectives.-Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive stimulation methods that became widely used as therapeutic tools in neuropsychiatric research. The aim of this study is to Evaluate the therapeutic impact of different frequencies of repetitive transcranial stimulation (1HZ, 10HZ) in OCD patients. Material and Methods; Forty five patients of OCD were participated in the study. All patients fulfilled the diagnostic criteria of DSM-IV-TR. The mean age of the patients was 27.1+4.5 years. Each patient was subjected to the following: Yale-Brown obsessive compulsive scale (Y-BOCS), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), and Clinical Global Impression - Severity scale (CGI-S). The patients were randomly classified into three equal groups using closed envelop: 1st group received 1 Hz rTMS at 100% of the RMT, 2nd group received 10 Hz rTMS with intensity of 100% of the RMT and 3rd group was sham group received the sham stimulation with a total 2000 pulses every day for each group for 10 sessions. Follow up of the patients using the same previous scales after the end of sessions and 3 months later.

Interventions

PROCEDURErTMS-1Hz
PROCEDURErTMS-10 Hz
PROCEDURESham rTMS

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients fulfilled the diagnostic criteria of DSM-IV-TR

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with comorbid psychiatric disorder .

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
changes of Y-BOCSBase line and after 3 monthsYale-Brown obsessive compulsive scale (Y-BOCS). It is an observer-rated scale that measures the severity of OCD symptoms. It is not a diagnostic tool. It is formed of 2 subscales, one for obsessions and another for compulsions. Each subscale consists of 5 items; і) time spent in the symptoms, іі) interference from the symptoms, ііі) subjective distress from symptoms, іv) resistance over symptoms, v) control over symptom. Each of these is rated from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (extreme symptoms). The total Y-BOCS score ranges between: 0-7 subclinical 8-15 mild 16-23 moderate 24-31 severe 32-40 extreme (Goodman et al., 1989).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in HAM-A scoreBase line and after 3 monthsHamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A). The HAM-A was one of the first rating scales developed to measure the severity of anxiety symptoms by Max Hamilton (1959), and is still widely used today in both clinical and research settings. The scale consists of 14 items, each defined by a series of symptoms, and measures both psychic anxiety (mental agitation and psychological distress) and somatic anxiety (physical complaints related to anxiety). Each item is scored on a scale of 0 (not present) to 4 (severe), with a total score range of 0-56, where 0-14,normal range; 15-28, mild to moderate anxiety; 29-42, severe anxiety; 43-56, very severe anxiety. The scale has been translated into Arabic by Lotfy Fatem (1994).
Changes in CGI-S scoreBase line and after 3 monthsClinical Global Impression - Severity scale (CGI-S): It is a 7- point scale that requires the clinician to rate the severity of the patient's illness at the time of assessment, relative to the clinician's past experience with patients who have the same diagnosis. (Guy 1976). Considering total clinical experience, a patient is assessed on severity of mental illness at the time of rating 1,normal,not at all ill; 2,borderline mentally ill; 3,mildly ill; 4,moderately ill; 5,markedly ill; 6,severely ill; or 7, extremely ill. (Rush 2000).

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026