Skip to content

Latarjet Procedure: Comparative Outcomes Study of Arthroscopic Versus Mini-open Approach With Minimum 2-year Follow-up

Latarjet Procedure: Comparative Outcomes Study of Arthroscopic Versus Mini-open Approach With Minimum 2-year Follow-up

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02505932
Acronym
Latarjet
Enrollment
58
Registered
2015-07-22
Start date
2012-01-31
Completion date
2014-12-31
Last updated
2015-07-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Joint Instability

Keywords

Shoulder instability

Brief summary

To date, use of arthroscopic procedure to perform Latarjet procedure is still technically demanding. The benefits of arthroscopic procedure need to be evaluated compared to the mini-invasive approach. The aim of this study was to assess postoperative pain during the first week, and the positioning of coracoid bone block at the anterior aspect of the glenoid. At minimum 2 years follow-up, the recurrence of shoulder instability and functional evaluation of patients according to the Western Ontario Score Index (WOSI) were assessed.

Detailed description

This prospective comparative study was performed at two centers in 2012. Each center performed one procedure so this study was observational. All patients with a chronic anterior instability requiring bone grafting (Instability Severity Index Score\>3) were included. The Latarjet procedure was performed by mini-open approach (set Arthrex, Naples, FL) in the first group, and by arthroscopic approach (set Depuy-Mitek, Raynham, MA) in the second group. The analgesic postoperative protocol was standardized (paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory, tramadol).

Interventions

arthroscopic approach (set Depuy-Mitek, Raynham, MA)

PROCEDUREMini-open Latarjet procedure

mini-open approach (set Arthrex, Naples, FL)

Sponsors

Hospital Ambroise Paré Paris
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* chronic anterior instability requiring bone grafting (Instability Severity Index Score\>3)

Exclusion criteria

* Patient refusal

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Average postoperative shoulder's pain on visual analogic scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain)Average during the first week

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
analgesic consumption (Number of pills)Daily from day1 to day7
presence of postoperative discomfort symptoms (yes/no)Daily from day1 to day7The presence (yes/no) of incision site pain, nausea, vomiting, vertigo, anxiety
Mean daily pain on visual analogic scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain)Daily from day1 to day7
Recurrence rate of shoulder instability (number of recurrence/total number of patients)2-year minimal follow-up
Functional evaluation of patients2-year minimal follow-upWestern Ontario Score Index (WOSI)
coracoid bone block position to the anterior aspect of the glenoid on the anterior-posterior and the lateral X-ray and on CT-scanBetween 3 to 6 months follow-up

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026