Skip to content

ENABLE CHF-PC (Comprehensive Heartcare For Patients and Caregivers)

Randomized Trial of ENABLE CHF-PC for Heart Failure Patients and Caregivers. (Comprehensive Heartcare For Patients and Caregivers)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02505425
Acronym
ENABLE CHF PC
Enrollment
573
Registered
2015-07-22
Start date
2015-11-30
Completion date
2019-05-10
Last updated
2022-01-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure

Brief summary

Advanced heart failure affects nearly 6 million Americans, and less is known about how this illness affects the 80% of heart failure patients who are 65 years and older because research tends to focus on younger patients. Older patients with heart failure and their family caregivers, rarely have access to palliative supportive care services because the disease is unpredictable and palliative treatment may not be provided until after other medical treatments have been tried. Investigators are studying whether palliative care provided when advanced heart failure patients are still well will result in better quality of life, mood and less symptom distress compared to usual or standard heart failure care. Specific Aims and Hypotheses: Specific Aim 1: Determine whether ENABLE CHF-PC leads to higher advanced heart failure patient-reported quality of life (QOL) and mood (depression/anxiety); and lower symptom burden and resource use (e.g. hospital admissions and days, emergency visits) through 16 weeks post baseline. • Hypothesis 1: Intervention participants will experience higher QOL and mood, and lower symptom burden and resource use through 16 weeks post baseline compared with those receiving usual HF care. Specific Aim 2: Determine whether ENABLE CHF-PC leads to higher caregiver-reported QOL, mood (anxiety/depression), and self-reported health and lower caregiver burden through 16 weeks post baseline. • Hypothesis 2: Intervention caregivers will report higher QOL, mood, and self-reported health, and lower caregiver burden through 16 weeks post baseline.

Detailed description

As described.

Interventions

ENABLE CHF-PC includes: 1. In-person comprehensive Palliative Care Team (PCT) Consultation- as soon as feasible after enrollment. 2. Palliative Care Nurse Coach (PNC) embedded within HF teams, instituting a phone-based 6-session patient and a 4-session caregiver curriculum followed by monthly phone-based supportive care for 48 weeks or patient death. The PNC uses the manualized curriculum: Charting Your Course (CYC): An Intervention for Patients with Heart Failure and their Families. Usual Care: Usual heart failure care includes any available supportive care resources and heart failure patient medical management based on national HF guidelines.

BEHAVIORALUsual HF Care

Usual heart failure care includes any available supportive care resources and heart failure patient medical management based on national HF guidelines.

Sponsors

US Department of Veterans Affairs
CollaboratorFED
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Able to read and understand English 2. NYHF III/IV heart failure (physician-determined)

Exclusion criteria

1. Dementia or significant confusion (Callahan 6-Item Cognitive Screening score ≤ 3) 2. DSM-IV Axis I diagnosis (e.g. schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or active substance use disorder) 3. Patients will not be excluded if they do not identify a caregiver 4. Uncorrectable hearing loss.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Caregiver Burden - Stress- as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB)16 weeksCaregiver-reported Stress burden was measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) at 16 weeks. This subscale indicates the stress burden or emotional stress from the demands of caregiving. Score range: 6-30, Greater than 23 indicates high burden.
Patient Quality of Life as Measured on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Clinical Summary ScoreBaselineBaseline patient-reported Quality of Life (QOL) was measured on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Clinical Summary Score, a heart failure-specific 23-item instrument. The KCCQ consists of 4 clinical domains: symptoms - frequency & severity; Physical Limitation; Quality of Life and Social Limitation and captures the patient's perspective of heart failure. Clinical summary scores range from 0 to 100. Higher KCCQ scores indicate better perceived health status. KCCQ clinical summary scores greater than or equal to 50 indicate good QOL.
Patient Quality of Life as Measured on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative Care Scale (FACIT-PAL-14)BaselineBaseline patient-reported Quality of Life (QOL) was measured on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative Care Scale (FACIT-PAL-14). Scores range from 0 to 56; higher scores indicate better quality of life.
Patient & Caregiver Mood - Anxiety - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)BaselineBaseline patient & caregiver-reported mood - Anxiety - was measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). 7 items measure anxiety symptoms.Scores range from 0 to 21; higher scores indicate more severe symptoms.
Patient & Caregiver Mood - Depression - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)BaselineBaseline patient and caregiver-reported depression was measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). 7 items measure depression symptoms. Scores range from 0 to 21; higher scores indicate more severe symptoms.
Caregiver Quality of Life as Measured on the Bakas Caregiving Outcomes Scale (BCOS)BaselineBaseline caregiver-reported quality of life (QOL) was measured on the Bakas Caregiving Outcomes Scale (BCOS). Score range: 15-105; higher scores indicate higher quality of life.
Caregiver Burden - Objective - as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB)BaselineBaseline caregiver-reported Objective burden was measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB). This subscale measures the object burden, interference with the caregiver's day-to-day activities given caregiving demands. Score range: 6-30, Greater than 23 indicates high burden.
Caregiver Burden - Demand - as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB)BaselineBaseline caregiver-reported Demand burden was measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB). This subscale measures the demand burden or the strain among caregivers from meeting the needs of the care recipient. Score range: 6-30, Greater than 23 indicates high burden.
Caregiver Burden - Stress - as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB)BaselineBaseline caregiver-reported Stress burden was measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB). his subscale indicates the stress burden or emotional stress from the demands of caregiving. Score range: 6-30, Greater than 23 indicates high burden.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient and Caregiver MENTAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-10BaselineBaseline patient- and caregiver-reported MENTAL health status was measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health. The PROMIS SF Global Health-10 measures general domains of health including physical, mental, and social health, symptoms, overall quality of life. Summed scores for PROMIS measures are converted to T scores with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the general US population; higher scores indicate better functioning.
Patient Symptom Burden as Measured on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Symptom ItemsBaselineBaseline patient-reported symptom burden was measured on symptom-based items from the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). Higher KCCQ scores indicate better perceived health status. The KCCQ Symptom burden domain consists of 8 items and quantifies the frequency, severity and change over time with clinical symptoms in heart failure, including fatigue, shortness of breath, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea and patients' edema/swelling. KCCQ symptom domain scores range from 0 to 100; A score of 50 is the threshold between unstable heart failure symptoms (\<50) or stable heart failure symptoms (\>=50).
Patient Symptom Burden Items as Measured on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Symptom Items.16 weeksPatient-reported symptom burden was measured on symptom-based items from the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) at 16 weeks. Higher KCCQ scores indicate better perceived health status. The KCCQ Symptom burden domain consists of 8 items and quantifies the frequency, severity and change over time for clinical symptoms in heart failure, including fatigue, shortness of breath, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea and patients' edema/swelling. KCCQ symptom domain scores range from 0 to 100; A score of 50 is the threshold between unstable heart failure symptoms (\<50) or stable heart failure symptoms (\>=50).
Patient Pain Intensity as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 3-item Pain Intensity ScaleBaselineBaseline patient-reported PAIN INTENSITY was measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity Scale. Higher pain scores indicate more pain. Score range: 0-100; Scores greater than 50 indicate high pain.
Patient Pain Interference as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 2-item Pain Interference ScaleBaselineBaseline patient-reported PAIN INTERFERENCE was measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity Scale. Higher pain interference scores indicate more interference in daily life. Score range: 0-100; Scores greater than 50 indicate high pain.
Patient Resource Use - Days in Hospital - as Measured on the Investigator-developed InstrumentBaselineBaseline patient-reported health care utilization - Number of Days in Hospital, last two months - was measured on the Resource Use Questionnaire. This measure is an investigator-developed instrument to capture number of Inpatient days, ICU days, ED visits, hospice use, palliative care provider visits, AD completion, and DNR orders. The possible range of Days in Hospital is 0 Days to 60 Days (last/previous two months prior to this measure).
Patient Resource Use - Emergency Department Visits - as Measured on the Investigator-developed InstrumentBaselineBaseline patient-reported health care utilization - Number of Emergency Department Visits, last two months - was measured on the Resource Use Questionnaire. This measure is an investigator-developed instrument to capture number of Inpatient days, ICU days, ED visits, hospice use, palliative care provider visits, AD completion, and DNR orders. The possible range of Visits to ED is 0 Visits to 60 Visits (in the last/previous two months prior to this measure).
Patient and Caregiver PHYSICAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-10BaselineBaseline patient- and caregiver-reported PHYSICAL health status was measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-10. The PROMIS SF Global Health-10 measures general domains of health including physical, mental, and social health, symptoms, overall quality of life. Summed scores for PROMIS measures are converted to T scores with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the general US population; higher scores indicate better functioning.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study recruitment period was from October 2015 thru October 2018. Recruitment occurred at two sites: the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) and the Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center (BVAMC).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Active Intervention for Patients
Behavioral: behavioral support Usual HF Care + ENABLE CHF-PC Behavioral Support: ENABLE CHF-PC includes: 1. In-person comprehensive Palliative Care Team (PCT) Consultation- as soon as feasible after enrollment. 2. Palliative Care Nurse Coach (PNC) embedded within HF teams, instituting a phone-based 6-session patient and a 4-session caregiver curriculum followed by monthly phone-based supportive care for 48 weeks or patient death. The PNC uses the manualized curriculum: Charting Your Course (CYC): An Intervention for Patients with Heart Failure and their Families. Usual Care: Usual heart failure care includes any available supportive care resources and heart failure patient medical management based on national HF guidelines.
208
Usual HF Care for Patients
Usual heart failure care includes any available supportive care resources and heart failure patient medical management based on national HF guidelines. Usual HF Care: Usual heart failure care includes any available supportive care resources and heart failure patient medical management based on national HF guidelines.
207
Active Intervention for Caregivers
Behavioral: behavioral support Usual HF Care + ENABLE CHF-PC Behavioral Support: ENABLE CHF-PC includes: 1. In-person comprehensive Palliative Care Team (PCT) Consultation- as soon as feasible after enrollment. 2. Palliative Care Nurse Coach (PNC) embedded within HF teams, instituting a phone-based 6-session patient and a 4-session caregiver curriculum followed by monthly phone-based supportive care for 48 weeks or patient death. The PNC uses the manualized curriculum: Charting Your Course (CYC): An Intervention for Patients with Heart Failure and their Families. Usual Care: Usual heart failure care includes any available supportive care resources and heart failure patient medical management based on national HF guidelines.
82
Usual HF Care for Caregivers
Usual heart failure care includes any available supportive care resources and heart failure patient medical management based on national HF guidelines. Usual HF Care: Usual heart failure care includes any available supportive care resources and heart failure patient medical management based on national HF guidelines.
76
Total573

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyDeath81200
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up41613119
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject399197

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalActive Intervention for PatientsUsual HF Care for PatientsActive Intervention for CaregiversUsual HF Care for Caregivers
Age, Continuous60.85 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
63.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
64.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1
58.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4
57.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
308 Participants113 Participants113 Participants46 Participants36 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
10 Participants3 Participants2 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
254 Participants92 Participants92 Participants32 Participants38 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
573 Participants208 Participants207 Participants82 Participants76 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
329 Participants97 Participants97 Participants73 Participants62 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
244 Participants111 Participants110 Participants9 Participants14 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
8 / 20812 / 2070 / 820 / 76
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 2080 / 2070 / 820 / 76
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 2080 / 2070 / 820 / 76

Outcome results

Primary

Caregiver Burden - Demand - as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB)

Caregiver-reported Demand burden was measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) at 16 weeks. This subscale measures the demand burden or the strain among caregivers from meeting the needs of the care recipient. Score range: 6-30, Greater than 23 indicates high burden.

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) was measured among Caregivers only.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Intervention for CaregiversCaregiver Burden - Demand - as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB)11.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
Usual HF Care for CaregiversCaregiver Burden - Demand - as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB)11.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Primary

Caregiver Burden - Demand - as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB)

Baseline caregiver-reported Demand burden was measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB). This subscale measures the demand burden or the strain among caregivers from meeting the needs of the care recipient. Score range: 6-30, Greater than 23 indicates high burden.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) was measured among Caregivers only.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Intervention for CaregiversCaregiver Burden - Demand - as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB)11.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Usual HF Care for CaregiversCaregiver Burden - Demand - as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB)11.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Primary

Caregiver Burden - Objective - as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB)

Baseline caregiver-reported Objective burden was measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB). This subscale measures the object burden, interference with the caregiver's day-to-day activities given caregiving demands. Score range: 6-30, Greater than 23 indicates high burden.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) was measured among Caregivers only.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Intervention for CaregiversCaregiver Burden - Objective - as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB)20.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.8
Usual HF Care for CaregiversCaregiver Burden - Objective - as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB)20.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.9
Primary

Caregiver Burden - Objective - as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB)

Caregiver-reported Objective burden was measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) at 16 weeks. This subscale measures the object burden, interference with the caregiver's day-to-day activities given caregiving demands.Score range: 6-30, Greater than 23 indicates high burden.

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) was measured among Caregivers only.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Intervention for CaregiversCaregiver Burden - Objective - as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB)20.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
Usual HF Care for CaregiversCaregiver Burden - Objective - as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB)19.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
Primary

Caregiver Burden - Stress - as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB)

Baseline caregiver-reported Stress burden was measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB). his subscale indicates the stress burden or emotional stress from the demands of caregiving. Score range: 6-30, Greater than 23 indicates high burden.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) was conducted among Caregivers only.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Intervention for CaregiversCaregiver Burden - Stress - as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB)12.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Usual HF Care for CaregiversCaregiver Burden - Stress - as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB)12.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Primary

Caregiver Burden - Stress- as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB)

Caregiver-reported Stress burden was measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) at 16 weeks. This subscale indicates the stress burden or emotional stress from the demands of caregiving. Score range: 6-30, Greater than 23 indicates high burden.

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) was measured among Caregivers only.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Intervention for CaregiversCaregiver Burden - Stress- as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB)11.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
Usual HF Care for CaregiversCaregiver Burden - Stress- as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB)12.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Primary

Caregiver Quality of Life as Measured on the Bakas Caregiving Outcomes Scale (BCOS)

Caregiver-reported quality of life (QOL) was measured on the Bakas Caregiving Outcomes Scale (BCOS) at 16 weeks. Score range: 15-105; higher scores indicate higher quality of life.

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: This measure conducted among Caregiver participants only.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Intervention for CaregiversCaregiver Quality of Life as Measured on the Bakas Caregiving Outcomes Scale (BCOS)66.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.1
Usual HF Care for CaregiversCaregiver Quality of Life as Measured on the Bakas Caregiving Outcomes Scale (BCOS)63.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.7
Primary

Caregiver Quality of Life as Measured on the Bakas Caregiving Outcomes Scale (BCOS)

Baseline caregiver-reported quality of life (QOL) was measured on the Bakas Caregiving Outcomes Scale (BCOS). Score range: 15-105; higher scores indicate higher quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: This measure was conducted among Caregiver participants only.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Intervention for CaregiversCaregiver Quality of Life as Measured on the Bakas Caregiving Outcomes Scale (BCOS)65.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.9
Usual HF Care for CaregiversCaregiver Quality of Life as Measured on the Bakas Caregiving Outcomes Scale (BCOS)60.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.4
Primary

Patient & Caregiver Mood - Anxiety - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

Change from baseline in patient & caregiver-reported mood - Anxiety was measured on the HADS. 7 items measure anxiety symptoms. Scores range from 0 to 21; higher scores indicate more severe symptoms.

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: This measure pertains to Patient \& Caregiver Mood - Anxiety HADS. One intervention patient and three usual care patients did not provide sufficient responses to contribute to this outcomes measure score at 16 weeks.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Intervention for PatientsPatient & Caregiver Mood - Anxiety - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)6.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Usual HF Care for PatientsPatient & Caregiver Mood - Anxiety - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)7.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Active Intervention for CaregiversPatient & Caregiver Mood - Anxiety - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)3.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
Usual HF Care for CaregiversPatient & Caregiver Mood - Anxiety - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)4.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
Primary

Patient & Caregiver Mood - Anxiety - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

Baseline patient & caregiver-reported mood - Anxiety - was measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). 7 items measure anxiety symptoms.Scores range from 0 to 21; higher scores indicate more severe symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: This measure pertains to Patient \& Caregiver Mood - Anxiety HADS

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Intervention for PatientsPatient & Caregiver Mood - Anxiety - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)6.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
Usual HF Care for PatientsPatient & Caregiver Mood - Anxiety - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)6.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
Active Intervention for CaregiversPatient & Caregiver Mood - Anxiety - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)3.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Usual HF Care for CaregiversPatient & Caregiver Mood - Anxiety - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)3.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
Primary

Patient & Caregiver Mood - Depression - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

Baseline patient and caregiver-reported depression was measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). 7 items measure depression symptoms. Scores range from 0 to 21; higher scores indicate more severe symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: This measure pertains to Patient and Caregiver Mood - Depression Scale.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Intervention for PatientsPatient & Caregiver Mood - Depression - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)5.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.3
Usual HF Care for PatientsPatient & Caregiver Mood - Depression - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)5.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
Active Intervention for CaregiversPatient & Caregiver Mood - Depression - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)4.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Usual HF Care for CaregiversPatient & Caregiver Mood - Depression - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)4.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
Primary

Patient & Caregiver Mood - Depression - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

Patient and caregiver-reported depression was measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at 16 weeks. 7 items measure depression symptoms. Scores range from 0 to 21; higher scores indicate more severe symptoms.

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: This measure pertains to Patient and Caregiver Mood - Depression Scale. One intervention patient and three usual care patients did not provide sufficient responses to contribute to this outcomes measure score at 16 weeks.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Intervention for PatientsPatient & Caregiver Mood - Depression - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)4.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Usual HF Care for PatientsPatient & Caregiver Mood - Depression - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)5.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Active Intervention for CaregiversPatient & Caregiver Mood - Depression - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)4.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
Usual HF Care for CaregiversPatient & Caregiver Mood - Depression - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)4.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
Primary

Patient Quality of Life as Measured on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative Care Scale (FACIT-PAL-14)

Patient-reported Quality of Life (QOL) was measured on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative Care Scale (FACIT-PAL-14) at 16 weeks. Scores range from 0 to 56; higher scores indicate better quality of life.

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: This measure pertains to Patient Quality of Life (QOL). Caregiver QOL was analyzed using a different measure. One intervention participant and two usual care participants did not provide sufficient responses to contribute to this outcomes measure score at 16 weeks.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Intervention for PatientsPatient Quality of Life as Measured on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative Care Scale (FACIT-PAL-14)38.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.8
Usual HF Care for PatientsPatient Quality of Life as Measured on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative Care Scale (FACIT-PAL-14)36.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.8
Primary

Patient Quality of Life as Measured on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative Care Scale (FACIT-PAL-14)

Baseline patient-reported Quality of Life (QOL) was measured on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative Care Scale (FACIT-PAL-14). Scores range from 0 to 56; higher scores indicate better quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: This measure pertains to Patient Quality of Life (QOL). Caregiver QOL was analyzed using a different measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Intervention for PatientsPatient Quality of Life as Measured on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative Care Scale (FACIT-PAL-14)36.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.3
Usual HF Care for PatientsPatient Quality of Life as Measured on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative Care Scale (FACIT-PAL-14)36.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.7
Primary

Patient Quality of Life as Measured on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Clinical Summary Score

Baseline patient-reported Quality of Life (QOL) was measured on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Clinical Summary Score, a heart failure-specific 23-item instrument. The KCCQ consists of 4 clinical domains: symptoms - frequency & severity; Physical Limitation; Quality of Life and Social Limitation and captures the patient's perspective of heart failure. Clinical summary scores range from 0 to 100. Higher KCCQ scores indicate better perceived health status. KCCQ clinical summary scores greater than or equal to 50 indicate good QOL.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: This measure pertains to Patient Quality of Life (QOL). Caregiver QOL was analyzed using a different measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Intervention for PatientsPatient Quality of Life as Measured on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Clinical Summary Score54.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.5
Usual HF Care for PatientsPatient Quality of Life as Measured on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Clinical Summary Score51.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.5
Primary

Patient Quality of Life as Measured on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Clinical Summary Score

Patient-reported Quality of Life (QOL) was measured on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) at 16 weeks. The KCCQ consists of 4 clinical domains: symptoms - frequency & severity; Physical Limitation; Quality of Life and Social Limitation and captures the patient's perspective of heart failure. Clinical summary scores range from 0 to 100. Higher KCCQ scores indicate better perceived health status. KCCQ clinical summary scores greater than or equal to 50 indicate good QOL.

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: This measure pertains to Patient Quality of Life (QOL) using the KCCQ. Caregiver QOL was analyzed using a different measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Intervention for PatientsPatient Quality of Life as Measured on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Clinical Summary Score59.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.8
Usual HF Care for PatientsPatient Quality of Life as Measured on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Clinical Summary Score54.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.8
Secondary

Patient and Caregiver MENTAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-10

Patient- and caregiver-reported MENTAL health status was measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health at 16 weeks. The PROMIS SF Global Health-10 measures general domains of health including physical, mental, and social health, symptoms, overall quality of life. Summed scores for PROMIS measures are converted to T scores with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the general US population; higher scores indicate better functioning.

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: One intervention patient and three usual care patients did not provide sufficient responses to contribute to this outcomes measure score at 16 weeks.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Intervention for PatientsPatient and Caregiver MENTAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-1045.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
Usual HF Care for PatientsPatient and Caregiver MENTAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-1044.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
Active Intervention for CaregiversPatient and Caregiver MENTAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-1047.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 1
Usual HF Care for CaregiversPatient and Caregiver MENTAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-1048.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.9
Secondary

Patient and Caregiver MENTAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-10

Baseline patient- and caregiver-reported MENTAL health status was measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health. The PROMIS SF Global Health-10 measures general domains of health including physical, mental, and social health, symptoms, overall quality of life. Summed scores for PROMIS measures are converted to T scores with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the general US population; higher scores indicate better functioning.

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Intervention for PatientsPatient and Caregiver MENTAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-1045.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.6
Usual HF Care for PatientsPatient and Caregiver MENTAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-1044.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.7
Active Intervention for CaregiversPatient and Caregiver MENTAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-1048.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.1
Usual HF Care for CaregiversPatient and Caregiver MENTAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-1048.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.9
Secondary

Patient and Caregiver PHYSICAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-10

Patient- and caregiver-reported PHYSICAL health status was measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health at 16 weeks. The PROMIS SF Global Health-10 measures general domains of health including physical, mental, and social health, symptoms, overall quality of life. Summed scores for PROMIS measures are converted to T scores with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the general US population; higher scores indicate better functioning.

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: One intervention and three usual care patients did not provide sufficient responses to contribute to this outcomes measure score at 16 weeks. One intervention patient and three usual care patients did not provide sufficient responses to contribute to this outcomes measure score at 16 weeks.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Intervention for PatientsPatient and Caregiver PHYSICAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-1039.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
Usual HF Care for PatientsPatient and Caregiver PHYSICAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-1038.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
Active Intervention for CaregiversPatient and Caregiver PHYSICAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-1046.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 8.9
Usual HF Care for CaregiversPatient and Caregiver PHYSICAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-1048.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 8.6
Secondary

Patient and Caregiver PHYSICAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-10

Baseline patient- and caregiver-reported PHYSICAL health status was measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-10. The PROMIS SF Global Health-10 measures general domains of health including physical, mental, and social health, symptoms, overall quality of life. Summed scores for PROMIS measures are converted to T scores with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the general US population; higher scores indicate better functioning.

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Intervention for PatientsPatient and Caregiver PHYSICAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-1038.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8
Usual HF Care for PatientsPatient and Caregiver PHYSICAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-1038.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8
Active Intervention for CaregiversPatient and Caregiver PHYSICAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-1046.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.9
Usual HF Care for CaregiversPatient and Caregiver PHYSICAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-1048.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.6
Secondary

Patient Pain Intensity as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 3-item Pain Intensity Scale

Patient-reported PAIN INTENSITY was measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity Scale at 16 weeks. Higher pain scores indicate more pain. Score range: 0-100; Scores greater than 50 indicate high pain.

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: Measure conducted among patients only. One intervention participant and three usual care participants did not provide sufficient responses to contribute to this outcomes measure score at 16 weeks.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Intervention for PatientsPatient Pain Intensity as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 3-item Pain Intensity Scale45.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.9
Usual HF Care for PatientsPatient Pain Intensity as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 3-item Pain Intensity Scale47.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.9
Secondary

Patient Pain Intensity as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 3-item Pain Intensity Scale

Baseline patient-reported PAIN INTENSITY was measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity Scale. Higher pain scores indicate more pain. Score range: 0-100; Scores greater than 50 indicate high pain.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Measure conducted among patients only.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Intervention for PatientsPatient Pain Intensity as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 3-item Pain Intensity Scale46.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.8
Usual HF Care for PatientsPatient Pain Intensity as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 3-item Pain Intensity Scale45.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.5
Secondary

Patient Pain Interference as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 2-item Pain Interference Scale

Baseline patient-reported PAIN INTERFERENCE was measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity Scale. Higher pain interference scores indicate more interference in daily life. Score range: 0-100; Scores greater than 50 indicate high pain.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: This measure was conducted among patients only.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Intervention for PatientsPatient Pain Interference as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 2-item Pain Interference Scale55.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.9
Usual HF Care for PatientsPatient Pain Interference as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 2-item Pain Interference Scale54.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.7
Secondary

Patient Pain Interference as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 2-item Pain Interference Scale

Patient-reported PAIN INTERFERENCE was measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity Scale at 16 weeks. Higher pain interference scores indicate more interference in daily life. Score range: 0-100; Scores greater than 50 indicate high pain.

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: Conducted among patients only. One intervention participant and three usual care participants did not provide sufficient responses to contribute to this outcomes measure score at 16 weeks.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Intervention for PatientsPatient Pain Interference as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 2-item Pain Interference Scale54.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.9
Usual HF Care for PatientsPatient Pain Interference as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 2-item Pain Interference Scale57.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.9
Secondary

Patient Resource Use - Days in Hospital - as Measured on the Investigator-developed Instrument

Baseline patient-reported health care utilization - Number of Days in Hospital, last two months - was measured on the Resource Use Questionnaire. This measure is an investigator-developed instrument to capture number of Inpatient days, ICU days, ED visits, hospice use, palliative care provider visits, AD completion, and DNR orders. The possible range of Days in Hospital is 0 Days to 60 Days (last/previous two months prior to this measure).

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Patient resource use (e.g. hospital admissions and days, emergency visits) was only captured among patients.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Active Intervention for PatientsPatient Resource Use - Days in Hospital - as Measured on the Investigator-developed Instrument2.59 days
Usual HF Care for PatientsPatient Resource Use - Days in Hospital - as Measured on the Investigator-developed Instrument2.75 days
Secondary

Patient Resource Use - Days in Hospital - as Measured on the Investigator-developed Instrument

Patient-reported health care utilization - Number of Days in Hospital, last two months - was measured on the Resource Use Questionnaire at 16 weeks. This measure is an investigator-developed instrument to capture number of Inpatient days, ICU days, ED visits, hospice use, palliative care provider visits, AD completion, and DNR orders. The possible range of Days in Hospital is 0 Days to 60 Days (last/previous two months prior to this measure).

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: Patient resource use (e.g. hospital admissions and days, emergency visits) was only captured among patients. One intervention participant and one usual care participant did not provide sufficient responses to contribute to this outcomes measure at 16 weeks.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Active Intervention for PatientsPatient Resource Use - Days in Hospital - as Measured on the Investigator-developed Instrument1.51 days
Usual HF Care for PatientsPatient Resource Use - Days in Hospital - as Measured on the Investigator-developed Instrument1.29 days
Secondary

Patient Resource Use - Emergency Department Visits - as Measured on the Investigator-developed Instrument

Patient-reported health care utilization - Number of Emergency Department Visits, last two months - was measured on the Resource Use Questionnaire at 16 weeks. This measure is an investigator-developed instrument to capture number of Inpatient days, ICU days, ED visits, hospice use, palliative care provider visits, AD completion, and DNR orders. The possible range of Visits to ED is 0 Visits to 60 Visits (in the last/previous two months prior to this measure).

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: Patient resource use (e.g. hospital admissions and days, emergency visits) was only captured among patients. One intervention participant did not provide sufficient responses to contribute to this outcomes measure score at 16 weeks.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Active Intervention for PatientsPatient Resource Use - Emergency Department Visits - as Measured on the Investigator-developed Instrument0.17 visits
Usual HF Care for PatientsPatient Resource Use - Emergency Department Visits - as Measured on the Investigator-developed Instrument0.19 visits
Secondary

Patient Resource Use - Emergency Department Visits - as Measured on the Investigator-developed Instrument

Baseline patient-reported health care utilization - Number of Emergency Department Visits, last two months - was measured on the Resource Use Questionnaire. This measure is an investigator-developed instrument to capture number of Inpatient days, ICU days, ED visits, hospice use, palliative care provider visits, AD completion, and DNR orders. The possible range of Visits to ED is 0 Visits to 60 Visits (in the last/previous two months prior to this measure).

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Patient resource use (e.g. hospital admissions and days, emergency visits) was only captured among patients. One participant in the Usual Care group did not respond to this survey item.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Active Intervention for PatientsPatient Resource Use - Emergency Department Visits - as Measured on the Investigator-developed Instrument0.3 visits
Usual HF Care for PatientsPatient Resource Use - Emergency Department Visits - as Measured on the Investigator-developed Instrument0.28 visits
Secondary

Patient Symptom Burden as Measured on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Symptom Items

Baseline patient-reported symptom burden was measured on symptom-based items from the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). Higher KCCQ scores indicate better perceived health status. The KCCQ Symptom burden domain consists of 8 items and quantifies the frequency, severity and change over time with clinical symptoms in heart failure, including fatigue, shortness of breath, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea and patients' edema/swelling. KCCQ symptom domain scores range from 0 to 100; A score of 50 is the threshold between unstable heart failure symptoms (\<50) or stable heart failure symptoms (\>=50).

Time frame: Baseline

Population: This outcomes measure pertains to patient-reported symptom burden.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Intervention for PatientsPatient Symptom Burden as Measured on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Symptom Items52.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.1
Usual HF Care for PatientsPatient Symptom Burden as Measured on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Symptom Items50.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.2
Secondary

Patient Symptom Burden Items as Measured on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Symptom Items.

Patient-reported symptom burden was measured on symptom-based items from the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) at 16 weeks. Higher KCCQ scores indicate better perceived health status. The KCCQ Symptom burden domain consists of 8 items and quantifies the frequency, severity and change over time for clinical symptoms in heart failure, including fatigue, shortness of breath, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea and patients' edema/swelling. KCCQ symptom domain scores range from 0 to 100; A score of 50 is the threshold between unstable heart failure symptoms (\<50) or stable heart failure symptoms (\>=50).

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: This outcomes measure pertains to patient-reported symptom burden.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Intervention for PatientsPatient Symptom Burden Items as Measured on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Symptom Items.59.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 2
Usual HF Care for PatientsPatient Symptom Burden Items as Measured on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Symptom Items.55.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.9

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 5, 2026