Heart Failure
Conditions
Brief summary
Advanced heart failure affects nearly 6 million Americans, and less is known about how this illness affects the 80% of heart failure patients who are 65 years and older because research tends to focus on younger patients. Older patients with heart failure and their family caregivers, rarely have access to palliative supportive care services because the disease is unpredictable and palliative treatment may not be provided until after other medical treatments have been tried. Investigators are studying whether palliative care provided when advanced heart failure patients are still well will result in better quality of life, mood and less symptom distress compared to usual or standard heart failure care. Specific Aims and Hypotheses: Specific Aim 1: Determine whether ENABLE CHF-PC leads to higher advanced heart failure patient-reported quality of life (QOL) and mood (depression/anxiety); and lower symptom burden and resource use (e.g. hospital admissions and days, emergency visits) through 16 weeks post baseline. • Hypothesis 1: Intervention participants will experience higher QOL and mood, and lower symptom burden and resource use through 16 weeks post baseline compared with those receiving usual HF care. Specific Aim 2: Determine whether ENABLE CHF-PC leads to higher caregiver-reported QOL, mood (anxiety/depression), and self-reported health and lower caregiver burden through 16 weeks post baseline. • Hypothesis 2: Intervention caregivers will report higher QOL, mood, and self-reported health, and lower caregiver burden through 16 weeks post baseline.
Detailed description
As described.
Interventions
ENABLE CHF-PC includes: 1. In-person comprehensive Palliative Care Team (PCT) Consultation- as soon as feasible after enrollment. 2. Palliative Care Nurse Coach (PNC) embedded within HF teams, instituting a phone-based 6-session patient and a 4-session caregiver curriculum followed by monthly phone-based supportive care for 48 weeks or patient death. The PNC uses the manualized curriculum: Charting Your Course (CYC): An Intervention for Patients with Heart Failure and their Families. Usual Care: Usual heart failure care includes any available supportive care resources and heart failure patient medical management based on national HF guidelines.
Usual heart failure care includes any available supportive care resources and heart failure patient medical management based on national HF guidelines.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Able to read and understand English 2. NYHF III/IV heart failure (physician-determined)
Exclusion criteria
1. Dementia or significant confusion (Callahan 6-Item Cognitive Screening score ≤ 3) 2. DSM-IV Axis I diagnosis (e.g. schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or active substance use disorder) 3. Patients will not be excluded if they do not identify a caregiver 4. Uncorrectable hearing loss.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Caregiver Burden - Stress- as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) | 16 weeks | Caregiver-reported Stress burden was measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) at 16 weeks. This subscale indicates the stress burden or emotional stress from the demands of caregiving. Score range: 6-30, Greater than 23 indicates high burden. |
| Patient Quality of Life as Measured on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Clinical Summary Score | Baseline | Baseline patient-reported Quality of Life (QOL) was measured on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Clinical Summary Score, a heart failure-specific 23-item instrument. The KCCQ consists of 4 clinical domains: symptoms - frequency & severity; Physical Limitation; Quality of Life and Social Limitation and captures the patient's perspective of heart failure. Clinical summary scores range from 0 to 100. Higher KCCQ scores indicate better perceived health status. KCCQ clinical summary scores greater than or equal to 50 indicate good QOL. |
| Patient Quality of Life as Measured on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative Care Scale (FACIT-PAL-14) | Baseline | Baseline patient-reported Quality of Life (QOL) was measured on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative Care Scale (FACIT-PAL-14). Scores range from 0 to 56; higher scores indicate better quality of life. |
| Patient & Caregiver Mood - Anxiety - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) | Baseline | Baseline patient & caregiver-reported mood - Anxiety - was measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). 7 items measure anxiety symptoms.Scores range from 0 to 21; higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. |
| Patient & Caregiver Mood - Depression - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) | Baseline | Baseline patient and caregiver-reported depression was measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). 7 items measure depression symptoms. Scores range from 0 to 21; higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. |
| Caregiver Quality of Life as Measured on the Bakas Caregiving Outcomes Scale (BCOS) | Baseline | Baseline caregiver-reported quality of life (QOL) was measured on the Bakas Caregiving Outcomes Scale (BCOS). Score range: 15-105; higher scores indicate higher quality of life. |
| Caregiver Burden - Objective - as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) | Baseline | Baseline caregiver-reported Objective burden was measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB). This subscale measures the object burden, interference with the caregiver's day-to-day activities given caregiving demands. Score range: 6-30, Greater than 23 indicates high burden. |
| Caregiver Burden - Demand - as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) | Baseline | Baseline caregiver-reported Demand burden was measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB). This subscale measures the demand burden or the strain among caregivers from meeting the needs of the care recipient. Score range: 6-30, Greater than 23 indicates high burden. |
| Caregiver Burden - Stress - as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) | Baseline | Baseline caregiver-reported Stress burden was measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB). his subscale indicates the stress burden or emotional stress from the demands of caregiving. Score range: 6-30, Greater than 23 indicates high burden. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Patient and Caregiver MENTAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-10 | Baseline | Baseline patient- and caregiver-reported MENTAL health status was measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health. The PROMIS SF Global Health-10 measures general domains of health including physical, mental, and social health, symptoms, overall quality of life. Summed scores for PROMIS measures are converted to T scores with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the general US population; higher scores indicate better functioning. |
| Patient Symptom Burden as Measured on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Symptom Items | Baseline | Baseline patient-reported symptom burden was measured on symptom-based items from the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). Higher KCCQ scores indicate better perceived health status. The KCCQ Symptom burden domain consists of 8 items and quantifies the frequency, severity and change over time with clinical symptoms in heart failure, including fatigue, shortness of breath, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea and patients' edema/swelling. KCCQ symptom domain scores range from 0 to 100; A score of 50 is the threshold between unstable heart failure symptoms (\<50) or stable heart failure symptoms (\>=50). |
| Patient Symptom Burden Items as Measured on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Symptom Items. | 16 weeks | Patient-reported symptom burden was measured on symptom-based items from the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) at 16 weeks. Higher KCCQ scores indicate better perceived health status. The KCCQ Symptom burden domain consists of 8 items and quantifies the frequency, severity and change over time for clinical symptoms in heart failure, including fatigue, shortness of breath, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea and patients' edema/swelling. KCCQ symptom domain scores range from 0 to 100; A score of 50 is the threshold between unstable heart failure symptoms (\<50) or stable heart failure symptoms (\>=50). |
| Patient Pain Intensity as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 3-item Pain Intensity Scale | Baseline | Baseline patient-reported PAIN INTENSITY was measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity Scale. Higher pain scores indicate more pain. Score range: 0-100; Scores greater than 50 indicate high pain. |
| Patient Pain Interference as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 2-item Pain Interference Scale | Baseline | Baseline patient-reported PAIN INTERFERENCE was measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity Scale. Higher pain interference scores indicate more interference in daily life. Score range: 0-100; Scores greater than 50 indicate high pain. |
| Patient Resource Use - Days in Hospital - as Measured on the Investigator-developed Instrument | Baseline | Baseline patient-reported health care utilization - Number of Days in Hospital, last two months - was measured on the Resource Use Questionnaire. This measure is an investigator-developed instrument to capture number of Inpatient days, ICU days, ED visits, hospice use, palliative care provider visits, AD completion, and DNR orders. The possible range of Days in Hospital is 0 Days to 60 Days (last/previous two months prior to this measure). |
| Patient Resource Use - Emergency Department Visits - as Measured on the Investigator-developed Instrument | Baseline | Baseline patient-reported health care utilization - Number of Emergency Department Visits, last two months - was measured on the Resource Use Questionnaire. This measure is an investigator-developed instrument to capture number of Inpatient days, ICU days, ED visits, hospice use, palliative care provider visits, AD completion, and DNR orders. The possible range of Visits to ED is 0 Visits to 60 Visits (in the last/previous two months prior to this measure). |
| Patient and Caregiver PHYSICAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-10 | Baseline | Baseline patient- and caregiver-reported PHYSICAL health status was measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-10. The PROMIS SF Global Health-10 measures general domains of health including physical, mental, and social health, symptoms, overall quality of life. Summed scores for PROMIS measures are converted to T scores with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the general US population; higher scores indicate better functioning. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
The study recruitment period was from October 2015 thru October 2018. Recruitment occurred at two sites: the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) and the Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center (BVAMC).
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Active Intervention for Patients Behavioral: behavioral support
Usual HF Care + ENABLE CHF-PC
Behavioral Support: ENABLE CHF-PC includes:
1. In-person comprehensive Palliative Care Team (PCT) Consultation- as soon as feasible after enrollment.
2. Palliative Care Nurse Coach (PNC) embedded within HF teams, instituting a phone-based 6-session patient and a 4-session caregiver curriculum followed by monthly phone-based supportive care for 48 weeks or patient death.
The PNC uses the manualized curriculum: Charting Your Course (CYC): An Intervention for Patients with Heart Failure and their Families.
Usual Care: Usual heart failure care includes any available supportive care resources and heart failure patient medical management based on national HF guidelines. | 208 |
| Usual HF Care for Patients Usual heart failure care includes any available supportive care resources and heart failure patient medical management based on national HF guidelines.
Usual HF Care: Usual heart failure care includes any available supportive care resources and heart failure patient medical management based on national HF guidelines. | 207 |
| Active Intervention for Caregivers Behavioral: behavioral support
Usual HF Care + ENABLE CHF-PC
Behavioral Support: ENABLE CHF-PC includes:
1. In-person comprehensive Palliative Care Team (PCT) Consultation- as soon as feasible after enrollment.
2. Palliative Care Nurse Coach (PNC) embedded within HF teams, instituting a phone-based 6-session patient and a 4-session caregiver curriculum followed by monthly phone-based supportive care for 48 weeks or patient death.
The PNC uses the manualized curriculum: Charting Your Course (CYC): An Intervention for Patients with Heart Failure and their Families.
Usual Care: Usual heart failure care includes any available supportive care resources and heart failure patient medical management based on national HF guidelines. | 82 |
| Usual HF Care for Caregivers Usual heart failure care includes any available supportive care resources and heart failure patient medical management based on national HF guidelines.
Usual HF Care: Usual heart failure care includes any available supportive care resources and heart failure patient medical management based on national HF guidelines. | 76 |
| Total | 573 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 8 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 41 | 61 | 31 | 19 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 39 | 9 | 19 | 7 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Total | Active Intervention for Patients | Usual HF Care for Patients | Active Intervention for Caregivers | Usual HF Care for Caregivers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 60.85 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1 | 63.5 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8 | 64.1 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1 | 58.2 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4 | 57.6 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8 |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 308 Participants | 113 Participants | 113 Participants | 46 Participants | 36 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 10 Participants | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 3 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 254 Participants | 92 Participants | 92 Participants | 32 Participants | 38 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 573 Participants | 208 Participants | 207 Participants | 82 Participants | 76 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 329 Participants | 97 Participants | 97 Participants | 73 Participants | 62 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 244 Participants | 111 Participants | 110 Participants | 9 Participants | 14 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 8 / 208 | 12 / 207 | 0 / 82 | 0 / 76 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 208 | 0 / 207 | 0 / 82 | 0 / 76 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 208 | 0 / 207 | 0 / 82 | 0 / 76 |
Outcome results
Caregiver Burden - Demand - as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB)
Caregiver-reported Demand burden was measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) at 16 weeks. This subscale measures the demand burden or the strain among caregivers from meeting the needs of the care recipient. Score range: 6-30, Greater than 23 indicates high burden.
Time frame: 16 weeks
Population: Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) was measured among Caregivers only.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Intervention for Caregivers | Caregiver Burden - Demand - as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) | 11.1 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.4 |
| Usual HF Care for Caregivers | Caregiver Burden - Demand - as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) | 11.6 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.3 |
Caregiver Burden - Demand - as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB)
Baseline caregiver-reported Demand burden was measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB). This subscale measures the demand burden or the strain among caregivers from meeting the needs of the care recipient. Score range: 6-30, Greater than 23 indicates high burden.
Time frame: Baseline
Population: Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) was measured among Caregivers only.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Intervention for Caregivers | Caregiver Burden - Demand - as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) | 11.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.5 |
| Usual HF Care for Caregivers | Caregiver Burden - Demand - as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) | 11.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.8 |
Caregiver Burden - Objective - as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB)
Baseline caregiver-reported Objective burden was measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB). This subscale measures the object burden, interference with the caregiver's day-to-day activities given caregiving demands. Score range: 6-30, Greater than 23 indicates high burden.
Time frame: Baseline
Population: Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) was measured among Caregivers only.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Intervention for Caregivers | Caregiver Burden - Objective - as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) | 20.1 score on a scale | Standard Error 2.8 |
| Usual HF Care for Caregivers | Caregiver Burden - Objective - as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) | 20.0 score on a scale | Standard Error 2.9 |
Caregiver Burden - Objective - as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB)
Caregiver-reported Objective burden was measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) at 16 weeks. This subscale measures the object burden, interference with the caregiver's day-to-day activities given caregiving demands.Score range: 6-30, Greater than 23 indicates high burden.
Time frame: 16 weeks
Population: Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) was measured among Caregivers only.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Intervention for Caregivers | Caregiver Burden - Objective - as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) | 20.2 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.5 |
| Usual HF Care for Caregivers | Caregiver Burden - Objective - as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) | 19.7 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.4 |
Caregiver Burden - Stress - as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB)
Baseline caregiver-reported Stress burden was measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB). his subscale indicates the stress burden or emotional stress from the demands of caregiving. Score range: 6-30, Greater than 23 indicates high burden.
Time frame: Baseline
Population: Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) was conducted among Caregivers only.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Intervention for Caregivers | Caregiver Burden - Stress - as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) | 12.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.4 |
| Usual HF Care for Caregivers | Caregiver Burden - Stress - as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) | 12.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.2 |
Caregiver Burden - Stress- as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB)
Caregiver-reported Stress burden was measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) at 16 weeks. This subscale indicates the stress burden or emotional stress from the demands of caregiving. Score range: 6-30, Greater than 23 indicates high burden.
Time frame: 16 weeks
Population: Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) was measured among Caregivers only.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Intervention for Caregivers | Caregiver Burden - Stress- as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) | 11.7 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.4 |
| Usual HF Care for Caregivers | Caregiver Burden - Stress- as Measured on the Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale (MBCB) | 12.2 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.3 |
Caregiver Quality of Life as Measured on the Bakas Caregiving Outcomes Scale (BCOS)
Caregiver-reported quality of life (QOL) was measured on the Bakas Caregiving Outcomes Scale (BCOS) at 16 weeks. Score range: 15-105; higher scores indicate higher quality of life.
Time frame: 16 weeks
Population: This measure conducted among Caregiver participants only.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Intervention for Caregivers | Caregiver Quality of Life as Measured on the Bakas Caregiving Outcomes Scale (BCOS) | 66.9 score on a scale | Standard Error 2.1 |
| Usual HF Care for Caregivers | Caregiver Quality of Life as Measured on the Bakas Caregiving Outcomes Scale (BCOS) | 63.9 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.7 |
Caregiver Quality of Life as Measured on the Bakas Caregiving Outcomes Scale (BCOS)
Baseline caregiver-reported quality of life (QOL) was measured on the Bakas Caregiving Outcomes Scale (BCOS). Score range: 15-105; higher scores indicate higher quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline
Population: This measure was conducted among Caregiver participants only.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Intervention for Caregivers | Caregiver Quality of Life as Measured on the Bakas Caregiving Outcomes Scale (BCOS) | 65.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.9 |
| Usual HF Care for Caregivers | Caregiver Quality of Life as Measured on the Bakas Caregiving Outcomes Scale (BCOS) | 60.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.4 |
Patient & Caregiver Mood - Anxiety - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Change from baseline in patient & caregiver-reported mood - Anxiety was measured on the HADS. 7 items measure anxiety symptoms. Scores range from 0 to 21; higher scores indicate more severe symptoms.
Time frame: 16 weeks
Population: This measure pertains to Patient \& Caregiver Mood - Anxiety HADS. One intervention patient and three usual care patients did not provide sufficient responses to contribute to this outcomes measure score at 16 weeks.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Intervention for Patients | Patient & Caregiver Mood - Anxiety - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) | 6.6 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.3 |
| Usual HF Care for Patients | Patient & Caregiver Mood - Anxiety - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) | 7.1 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.3 |
| Active Intervention for Caregivers | Patient & Caregiver Mood - Anxiety - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) | 3.8 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.5 |
| Usual HF Care for Caregivers | Patient & Caregiver Mood - Anxiety - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) | 4.2 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.4 |
Patient & Caregiver Mood - Anxiety - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Baseline patient & caregiver-reported mood - Anxiety - was measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). 7 items measure anxiety symptoms.Scores range from 0 to 21; higher scores indicate more severe symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline
Population: This measure pertains to Patient \& Caregiver Mood - Anxiety HADS
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Intervention for Patients | Patient & Caregiver Mood - Anxiety - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) | 6.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.5 |
| Usual HF Care for Patients | Patient & Caregiver Mood - Anxiety - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) | 6.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.7 |
| Active Intervention for Caregivers | Patient & Caregiver Mood - Anxiety - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) | 3.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.1 |
| Usual HF Care for Caregivers | Patient & Caregiver Mood - Anxiety - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) | 3.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.9 |
Patient & Caregiver Mood - Depression - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Baseline patient and caregiver-reported depression was measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). 7 items measure depression symptoms. Scores range from 0 to 21; higher scores indicate more severe symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline
Population: This measure pertains to Patient and Caregiver Mood - Depression Scale.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Intervention for Patients | Patient & Caregiver Mood - Depression - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) | 5.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.3 |
| Usual HF Care for Patients | Patient & Caregiver Mood - Depression - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) | 5.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.2 |
| Active Intervention for Caregivers | Patient & Caregiver Mood - Depression - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) | 4.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.1 |
| Usual HF Care for Caregivers | Patient & Caregiver Mood - Depression - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) | 4.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.3 |
Patient & Caregiver Mood - Depression - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Patient and caregiver-reported depression was measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at 16 weeks. 7 items measure depression symptoms. Scores range from 0 to 21; higher scores indicate more severe symptoms.
Time frame: 16 weeks
Population: This measure pertains to Patient and Caregiver Mood - Depression Scale. One intervention patient and three usual care patients did not provide sufficient responses to contribute to this outcomes measure score at 16 weeks.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Intervention for Patients | Patient & Caregiver Mood - Depression - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) | 4.9 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.3 |
| Usual HF Care for Patients | Patient & Caregiver Mood - Depression - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) | 5.6 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.3 |
| Active Intervention for Caregivers | Patient & Caregiver Mood - Depression - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) | 4.5 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.5 |
| Usual HF Care for Caregivers | Patient & Caregiver Mood - Depression - as Measured on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) | 4.4 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.4 |
Patient Quality of Life as Measured on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative Care Scale (FACIT-PAL-14)
Patient-reported Quality of Life (QOL) was measured on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative Care Scale (FACIT-PAL-14) at 16 weeks. Scores range from 0 to 56; higher scores indicate better quality of life.
Time frame: 16 weeks
Population: This measure pertains to Patient Quality of Life (QOL). Caregiver QOL was analyzed using a different measure. One intervention participant and two usual care participants did not provide sufficient responses to contribute to this outcomes measure score at 16 weeks.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Intervention for Patients | Patient Quality of Life as Measured on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative Care Scale (FACIT-PAL-14) | 38.5 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.8 |
| Usual HF Care for Patients | Patient Quality of Life as Measured on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative Care Scale (FACIT-PAL-14) | 36.8 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.8 |
Patient Quality of Life as Measured on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative Care Scale (FACIT-PAL-14)
Baseline patient-reported Quality of Life (QOL) was measured on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative Care Scale (FACIT-PAL-14). Scores range from 0 to 56; higher scores indicate better quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline
Population: This measure pertains to Patient Quality of Life (QOL). Caregiver QOL was analyzed using a different measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Intervention for Patients | Patient Quality of Life as Measured on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative Care Scale (FACIT-PAL-14) | 36.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.3 |
| Usual HF Care for Patients | Patient Quality of Life as Measured on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative Care Scale (FACIT-PAL-14) | 36.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.7 |
Patient Quality of Life as Measured on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Clinical Summary Score
Baseline patient-reported Quality of Life (QOL) was measured on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Clinical Summary Score, a heart failure-specific 23-item instrument. The KCCQ consists of 4 clinical domains: symptoms - frequency & severity; Physical Limitation; Quality of Life and Social Limitation and captures the patient's perspective of heart failure. Clinical summary scores range from 0 to 100. Higher KCCQ scores indicate better perceived health status. KCCQ clinical summary scores greater than or equal to 50 indicate good QOL.
Time frame: Baseline
Population: This measure pertains to Patient Quality of Life (QOL). Caregiver QOL was analyzed using a different measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Intervention for Patients | Patient Quality of Life as Measured on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Clinical Summary Score | 54.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.5 |
| Usual HF Care for Patients | Patient Quality of Life as Measured on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Clinical Summary Score | 51.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.5 |
Patient Quality of Life as Measured on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Clinical Summary Score
Patient-reported Quality of Life (QOL) was measured on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) at 16 weeks. The KCCQ consists of 4 clinical domains: symptoms - frequency & severity; Physical Limitation; Quality of Life and Social Limitation and captures the patient's perspective of heart failure. Clinical summary scores range from 0 to 100. Higher KCCQ scores indicate better perceived health status. KCCQ clinical summary scores greater than or equal to 50 indicate good QOL.
Time frame: 16 weeks
Population: This measure pertains to Patient Quality of Life (QOL) using the KCCQ. Caregiver QOL was analyzed using a different measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Intervention for Patients | Patient Quality of Life as Measured on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Clinical Summary Score | 59.7 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.8 |
| Usual HF Care for Patients | Patient Quality of Life as Measured on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Clinical Summary Score | 54.8 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.8 |
Patient and Caregiver MENTAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-10
Patient- and caregiver-reported MENTAL health status was measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health at 16 weeks. The PROMIS SF Global Health-10 measures general domains of health including physical, mental, and social health, symptoms, overall quality of life. Summed scores for PROMIS measures are converted to T scores with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the general US population; higher scores indicate better functioning.
Time frame: 16 weeks
Population: One intervention patient and three usual care patients did not provide sufficient responses to contribute to this outcomes measure score at 16 weeks.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Intervention for Patients | Patient and Caregiver MENTAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-10 | 45.9 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.7 |
| Usual HF Care for Patients | Patient and Caregiver MENTAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-10 | 44.7 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.7 |
| Active Intervention for Caregivers | Patient and Caregiver MENTAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-10 | 47.7 score on a scale | Standard Error 1 |
| Usual HF Care for Caregivers | Patient and Caregiver MENTAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-10 | 48.2 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.9 |
Patient and Caregiver MENTAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-10
Baseline patient- and caregiver-reported MENTAL health status was measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health. The PROMIS SF Global Health-10 measures general domains of health including physical, mental, and social health, symptoms, overall quality of life. Summed scores for PROMIS measures are converted to T scores with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the general US population; higher scores indicate better functioning.
Time frame: Baseline
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Intervention for Patients | Patient and Caregiver MENTAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-10 | 45.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.6 |
| Usual HF Care for Patients | Patient and Caregiver MENTAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-10 | 44.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.7 |
| Active Intervention for Caregivers | Patient and Caregiver MENTAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-10 | 48.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.1 |
| Usual HF Care for Caregivers | Patient and Caregiver MENTAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-10 | 48.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.9 |
Patient and Caregiver PHYSICAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-10
Patient- and caregiver-reported PHYSICAL health status was measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health at 16 weeks. The PROMIS SF Global Health-10 measures general domains of health including physical, mental, and social health, symptoms, overall quality of life. Summed scores for PROMIS measures are converted to T scores with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the general US population; higher scores indicate better functioning.
Time frame: 16 weeks
Population: One intervention and three usual care patients did not provide sufficient responses to contribute to this outcomes measure score at 16 weeks. One intervention patient and three usual care patients did not provide sufficient responses to contribute to this outcomes measure score at 16 weeks.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Intervention for Patients | Patient and Caregiver PHYSICAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-10 | 39.4 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.7 |
| Usual HF Care for Patients | Patient and Caregiver PHYSICAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-10 | 38.8 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.7 |
| Active Intervention for Caregivers | Patient and Caregiver PHYSICAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-10 | 46.9 score on a scale | Standard Error 8.9 |
| Usual HF Care for Caregivers | Patient and Caregiver PHYSICAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-10 | 48.0 score on a scale | Standard Error 8.6 |
Patient and Caregiver PHYSICAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-10
Baseline patient- and caregiver-reported PHYSICAL health status was measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-10. The PROMIS SF Global Health-10 measures general domains of health including physical, mental, and social health, symptoms, overall quality of life. Summed scores for PROMIS measures are converted to T scores with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the general US population; higher scores indicate better functioning.
Time frame: Baseline
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Intervention for Patients | Patient and Caregiver PHYSICAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-10 | 38.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8 |
| Usual HF Care for Patients | Patient and Caregiver PHYSICAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-10 | 38.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8 |
| Active Intervention for Caregivers | Patient and Caregiver PHYSICAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-10 | 46.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.9 |
| Usual HF Care for Caregivers | Patient and Caregiver PHYSICAL Health Status as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form Global Health-10 | 48.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.6 |
Patient Pain Intensity as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 3-item Pain Intensity Scale
Patient-reported PAIN INTENSITY was measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity Scale at 16 weeks. Higher pain scores indicate more pain. Score range: 0-100; Scores greater than 50 indicate high pain.
Time frame: 16 weeks
Population: Measure conducted among patients only. One intervention participant and three usual care participants did not provide sufficient responses to contribute to this outcomes measure score at 16 weeks.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Intervention for Patients | Patient Pain Intensity as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 3-item Pain Intensity Scale | 45.8 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.9 |
| Usual HF Care for Patients | Patient Pain Intensity as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 3-item Pain Intensity Scale | 47.4 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.9 |
Patient Pain Intensity as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 3-item Pain Intensity Scale
Baseline patient-reported PAIN INTENSITY was measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity Scale. Higher pain scores indicate more pain. Score range: 0-100; Scores greater than 50 indicate high pain.
Time frame: Baseline
Population: Measure conducted among patients only.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Intervention for Patients | Patient Pain Intensity as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 3-item Pain Intensity Scale | 46.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.8 |
| Usual HF Care for Patients | Patient Pain Intensity as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 3-item Pain Intensity Scale | 45.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.5 |
Patient Pain Interference as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 2-item Pain Interference Scale
Baseline patient-reported PAIN INTERFERENCE was measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity Scale. Higher pain interference scores indicate more interference in daily life. Score range: 0-100; Scores greater than 50 indicate high pain.
Time frame: Baseline
Population: This measure was conducted among patients only.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Intervention for Patients | Patient Pain Interference as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 2-item Pain Interference Scale | 55.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.9 |
| Usual HF Care for Patients | Patient Pain Interference as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 2-item Pain Interference Scale | 54.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.7 |
Patient Pain Interference as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 2-item Pain Interference Scale
Patient-reported PAIN INTERFERENCE was measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity Scale at 16 weeks. Higher pain interference scores indicate more interference in daily life. Score range: 0-100; Scores greater than 50 indicate high pain.
Time frame: 16 weeks
Population: Conducted among patients only. One intervention participant and three usual care participants did not provide sufficient responses to contribute to this outcomes measure score at 16 weeks.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Intervention for Patients | Patient Pain Interference as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 2-item Pain Interference Scale | 54.3 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.9 |
| Usual HF Care for Patients | Patient Pain Interference as Measured on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 2-item Pain Interference Scale | 57.7 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.9 |
Patient Resource Use - Days in Hospital - as Measured on the Investigator-developed Instrument
Baseline patient-reported health care utilization - Number of Days in Hospital, last two months - was measured on the Resource Use Questionnaire. This measure is an investigator-developed instrument to capture number of Inpatient days, ICU days, ED visits, hospice use, palliative care provider visits, AD completion, and DNR orders. The possible range of Days in Hospital is 0 Days to 60 Days (last/previous two months prior to this measure).
Time frame: Baseline
Population: Patient resource use (e.g. hospital admissions and days, emergency visits) was only captured among patients.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Active Intervention for Patients | Patient Resource Use - Days in Hospital - as Measured on the Investigator-developed Instrument | 2.59 days |
| Usual HF Care for Patients | Patient Resource Use - Days in Hospital - as Measured on the Investigator-developed Instrument | 2.75 days |
Patient Resource Use - Days in Hospital - as Measured on the Investigator-developed Instrument
Patient-reported health care utilization - Number of Days in Hospital, last two months - was measured on the Resource Use Questionnaire at 16 weeks. This measure is an investigator-developed instrument to capture number of Inpatient days, ICU days, ED visits, hospice use, palliative care provider visits, AD completion, and DNR orders. The possible range of Days in Hospital is 0 Days to 60 Days (last/previous two months prior to this measure).
Time frame: 16 weeks
Population: Patient resource use (e.g. hospital admissions and days, emergency visits) was only captured among patients. One intervention participant and one usual care participant did not provide sufficient responses to contribute to this outcomes measure at 16 weeks.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Active Intervention for Patients | Patient Resource Use - Days in Hospital - as Measured on the Investigator-developed Instrument | 1.51 days |
| Usual HF Care for Patients | Patient Resource Use - Days in Hospital - as Measured on the Investigator-developed Instrument | 1.29 days |
Patient Resource Use - Emergency Department Visits - as Measured on the Investigator-developed Instrument
Patient-reported health care utilization - Number of Emergency Department Visits, last two months - was measured on the Resource Use Questionnaire at 16 weeks. This measure is an investigator-developed instrument to capture number of Inpatient days, ICU days, ED visits, hospice use, palliative care provider visits, AD completion, and DNR orders. The possible range of Visits to ED is 0 Visits to 60 Visits (in the last/previous two months prior to this measure).
Time frame: 16 weeks
Population: Patient resource use (e.g. hospital admissions and days, emergency visits) was only captured among patients. One intervention participant did not provide sufficient responses to contribute to this outcomes measure score at 16 weeks.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Active Intervention for Patients | Patient Resource Use - Emergency Department Visits - as Measured on the Investigator-developed Instrument | 0.17 visits |
| Usual HF Care for Patients | Patient Resource Use - Emergency Department Visits - as Measured on the Investigator-developed Instrument | 0.19 visits |
Patient Resource Use - Emergency Department Visits - as Measured on the Investigator-developed Instrument
Baseline patient-reported health care utilization - Number of Emergency Department Visits, last two months - was measured on the Resource Use Questionnaire. This measure is an investigator-developed instrument to capture number of Inpatient days, ICU days, ED visits, hospice use, palliative care provider visits, AD completion, and DNR orders. The possible range of Visits to ED is 0 Visits to 60 Visits (in the last/previous two months prior to this measure).
Time frame: Baseline
Population: Patient resource use (e.g. hospital admissions and days, emergency visits) was only captured among patients. One participant in the Usual Care group did not respond to this survey item.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Active Intervention for Patients | Patient Resource Use - Emergency Department Visits - as Measured on the Investigator-developed Instrument | 0.3 visits |
| Usual HF Care for Patients | Patient Resource Use - Emergency Department Visits - as Measured on the Investigator-developed Instrument | 0.28 visits |
Patient Symptom Burden as Measured on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Symptom Items
Baseline patient-reported symptom burden was measured on symptom-based items from the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). Higher KCCQ scores indicate better perceived health status. The KCCQ Symptom burden domain consists of 8 items and quantifies the frequency, severity and change over time with clinical symptoms in heart failure, including fatigue, shortness of breath, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea and patients' edema/swelling. KCCQ symptom domain scores range from 0 to 100; A score of 50 is the threshold between unstable heart failure symptoms (\<50) or stable heart failure symptoms (\>=50).
Time frame: Baseline
Population: This outcomes measure pertains to patient-reported symptom burden.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Intervention for Patients | Patient Symptom Burden as Measured on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Symptom Items | 52.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.1 |
| Usual HF Care for Patients | Patient Symptom Burden as Measured on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Symptom Items | 50.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.2 |
Patient Symptom Burden Items as Measured on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Symptom Items.
Patient-reported symptom burden was measured on symptom-based items from the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) at 16 weeks. Higher KCCQ scores indicate better perceived health status. The KCCQ Symptom burden domain consists of 8 items and quantifies the frequency, severity and change over time for clinical symptoms in heart failure, including fatigue, shortness of breath, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea and patients' edema/swelling. KCCQ symptom domain scores range from 0 to 100; A score of 50 is the threshold between unstable heart failure symptoms (\<50) or stable heart failure symptoms (\>=50).
Time frame: 16 weeks
Population: This outcomes measure pertains to patient-reported symptom burden.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Intervention for Patients | Patient Symptom Burden Items as Measured on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Symptom Items. | 59.6 score on a scale | Standard Error 2 |
| Usual HF Care for Patients | Patient Symptom Burden Items as Measured on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Symptom Items. | 55.3 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.9 |