Autism, Intellectual Disability, Multiple Congenital Anomalies
Conditions
Keywords
Whole Genome Sequencing, Laboratory Report, Patient Centered, Communication of Results, Patient Provider Communication
Brief summary
Current lab reports are designed to communicate results from the laboratory to the provider; they are not designed to be accessible to patients. The investigators believe that a new type of genomic test report, tailored for patient- as well as provider-use, will enable patients to have access to information they can understand allowing them to be more involved in the management of their disorders, better navigate the health care system, and make more informed decisions about their health and health care in conjunction with their providers. This approach has the potential to improve outcomes from both the patient and provider perspectives. The investigators propose to study the research question, Can a genomic laboratory report tailored for both providers and families of patients improve interpretation of complex results and facilitate recommended care by enhancing communication and shared decision making?
Detailed description
This is a mixed-methods will be conducted in multiple phases: Phase 1: development of an enhanced genomic test result report through in-depth interviews with parents and providers Phase 2: refine the report through parental focus groups and provider interviews and create the final report and delivery method. Phase 3: implement the enhanced test report and evaluate the impact on patient and providers Subjects for the study are parents of affected children enrolled in the Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) Clinical Research Pilot Study (study within a study). All parents receive routine clinical care for WGS and clinical return of results per protocol of the WGS study. Parents from the WGS study were invited to participate in phases 1 and 2 of this study to help design and test an enhanced genomic test report that would meet their needs for information about their child's condition and communication with providers, caregivers, teachers, and family. This report in clinicaltrials.gov reports on phase 3 data only. The experimental design to be used for phase 3 of the project is a randomized, single-blinded pre- post-intervention trial with crossover. According to the WGS study protocol all results of the WGS testing will be provided by a geneticist and genetic counselor at an informing session. At this session, results will be returned and explained, recommendations provided and questions answered (routine clinical care). Following this session, parents will be randomized as couples based on whether their child received a result of a causal variant or non-causal variant to receive either routine clinical care with an enhanced report (intervention arm) or routine clinical care first followed by enhanced report (control with crossover). Randomizing parents as couples is necessary as randomization at the individual level would lead to contamination and spillover if one member of the couple were in the usual care arm and the other in the intervention arm. After routine clinical care to deliver the WGS test results and randomization, parents will be invited to participate in phase 3 to test the impact of the enhanced report on parental and provider satisfaction, communication, and knowledge. Parents will enter into phase 3 of the study (experimental design) by completing baseline surveys. Upon completion of baseline surveys, parents will be provided the enhanced report (intervention) or another copy of their standard lab report (control with crossover). All parents will be surveyed at 3 months. Parents in the control with crossover arm will be provided the enhanced report at this time and sent another survey 3 month post enhanced report (6 month post baseline). Standard, validated, survey instruments will be utilized for the baseline and follow-up surveys; therefore, it is possible that important differences between the routine clinical care with crossover and intervention arms could be missed. To insure capture of all important differences and all impact of the enhanced genomic test result report, additional in-depth qualitative interviews will take place after the final survey post enhanced report is administered.
Interventions
a patient-centered version of a genomic results report delivered to patient through the electronic record portal
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
participants do not know whether they are in the intervention (enhanced report) or control (routine clinical care with delayed access to the enhanced report) arm
Intervention model description
intervention = routine clinical care for return of results per whole genome sequencing study with enhanced genetic test results report developed through phase 1 and 2 of this study. Control with delayed intervention = routine clinical care for return of results per whole genome sequencing study with crossover to receipt of enhanced report upon completion of baseline and 3 month post-baseline followup surveys. Participants in this arm will complete a third survey at 3 months post receipt of enhanced report
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Research participants who are consented to participate in the WGS Study (#2012-0187). * Providers who have referred participants to the WGS Study (#2012-0187) and who have participated in the WGS genomic medicine workgroup or who have participated in the WGS Program Oversight Committee.
Exclusion criteria
* Participants who are not consented to participate in the WGS Study (#2012-0187) * Providers who have not referred patients to the WGS Study (#2012-0187). * Providers who have not had a relationship with the oversight of the WGS study (#2012- 0187).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Satisfaction With Genomic Test Report | 3 months after receipt of enhanced report | 3 questions on how helpful various parts of the test report were for parents who opened the enhanced report. |
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Subjects participating in the whole genome sequencing study for undiagnosed developmental delay at Geisinger Health System were invited to participate.
Pre-assignment details
parents were randomized together (e.g. parents were both randomized to the same arm). parents were grouped by genomic sequencing finding (causal variant found vs. non-causal variant found) prior to randomization to ensure equal number of causal variants and non-causal variants in each arm.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Control With Delayed Access Those resulting in variants of significance will receive routine clinical care and receive the enhanced genomic report after returning 3 month survey.
Routine Clinical Care: Participants will receive routine clinical care. After returning the 3 month survey the participants will also receive the enhanced genomic report. | 24 |
| Enhanced Genomic Report Those resulting in variants of significance will received routine clinical care and access to the enhanced genomic lab report.
Enhanced Genomic Report: Routine clinical care vs. enhanced genomic report | 28 |
| Total | 52 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossover to Enhanced Report | Lost to Follow-up | 5 | 0 |
| Routine Care vs. Enhanced Report | Lost to Follow-up | 4 | 7 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Control With Delayed Access | Enhanced Genomic Report | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Access to Child's Record 10 or more times | 4 Participants | 3 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Access to Child's Record 1-2 times | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Access to Child's Record 3-5 times | 5 Participants | 3 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Access to Child's Record 6-9 times | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Access to Child's Record Missing | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Access to Child's Record None | 12 Participants | 17 Participants | 29 Participants |
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 24 Participants | 28 Participants | 52 Participants |
| Child's WGS Result Causal Variant Result | 4 Participants | 3 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Child's WGS Result Non-Causal Variant Result | 20 Participants | 25 Participants | 45 Participants |
| Education Bachelor's degree or equivalent | 3 Participants | 6 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Education Doctor or other professional degree | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Education High school graduate or GED | 3 Participants | 7 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Education Master's degree | 4 Participants | 4 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Education Post high school training other than college | 2 Participants | 5 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Education Some college | 7 Participants | 6 Participants | 13 Participants |
| Education Some high school (9-12) | 4 Participants | 0 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 23 Participants | 26 Participants | 49 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Health Literacy Always | 14 Participants | 15 Participants | 29 Participants |
| Health Literacy Missing | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Health Literacy Never | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Health Literacy Occasionally | 2 Participants | 4 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Health Literacy Often | 2 Participants | 4 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Health Literacy Sometimes | 5 Participants | 4 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Income $150,000 to $199,999 | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Income $15,000 to $29,999 | 3 Participants | 1 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Income $200,000 or above | 3 Participants | 0 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Income $30,000 to $44,999 | 2 Participants | 4 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Income $45,000 to $59,999 | 6 Participants | 2 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Income $60,000 to $89,999 | 4 Participants | 14 Participants | 18 Participants |
| Income $90,000 to $149,999 | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Income Less than $15,000 | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Income Missing | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Numeracy Easy | 13 Participants | 12 Participants | 25 Participants |
| Numeracy Hard | 6 Participants | 9 Participants | 15 Participants |
| Numeracy Missing | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Numeracy Very Easy | 5 Participants | 6 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Numeracy Very Hard | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 23 Participants | 26 Participants | 49 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 24 Participants | 28 Participants | 52 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 13 Participants | 16 Participants | 29 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 11 Participants | 12 Participants | 23 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 24 | 0 / 28 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 24 | 0 / 28 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 24 | 0 / 28 |
Outcome results
Satisfaction With Genomic Test Report
3 questions on how helpful various parts of the test report were for parents who opened the enhanced report.
Time frame: 3 months after receipt of enhanced report
Population: parents who opened the enhanced report per electronic confirmation. For Clinical care then enhanced report N=4 CV; 2NCV - these 2 NCV parents did not answer the survey questions about the report (missing). For routine care with enhanced report first N=9 NCV.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Routine Clinical Care First, Then Enhanced Report | Satisfaction With Genomic Test Report | Summary | Not Helpful | 0 Participants |
| Routine Clinical Care First, Then Enhanced Report | Satisfaction With Genomic Test Report | Summary | A little bit helpfu | 1 Participants |
| Routine Clinical Care First, Then Enhanced Report | Satisfaction With Genomic Test Report | Summary | Somewhat helpful | 1 Participants |
| Routine Clinical Care First, Then Enhanced Report | Satisfaction With Genomic Test Report | Summary | Quite a bit helpful | 2 Participants |
| Routine Clinical Care First, Then Enhanced Report | Satisfaction With Genomic Test Report | Summary | Missing | 2 Participants |
| Routine Clinical Care First, Then Enhanced Report | Satisfaction With Genomic Test Report | Summary | Very helpful | 0 Participants |
| Routine Clinical Care First, Then Enhanced Report | Satisfaction With Genomic Test Report | Detailed Explanation | Not Helpful | 0 Participants |
| Routine Clinical Care First, Then Enhanced Report | Satisfaction With Genomic Test Report | Detailed Explanation | A little bit helpfu | 1 Participants |
| Routine Clinical Care First, Then Enhanced Report | Satisfaction With Genomic Test Report | Detailed Explanation | Somewhat helpful | 1 Participants |
| Routine Clinical Care First, Then Enhanced Report | Satisfaction With Genomic Test Report | Detailed Explanation | Quite a bit helpful | 2 Participants |
| Routine Clinical Care First, Then Enhanced Report | Satisfaction With Genomic Test Report | Detailed Explanation | Very helpful | 0 Participants |
| Routine Clinical Care First, Then Enhanced Report | Satisfaction With Genomic Test Report | Detailed Explanation | Missing | 2 Participants |
| Routine Clinical Care First, Then Enhanced Report | Satisfaction With Genomic Test Report | Care Instructions | Not Helpful | 0 Participants |
| Routine Clinical Care First, Then Enhanced Report | Satisfaction With Genomic Test Report | Care Instructions | A little bit helpfu | 2 Participants |
| Routine Clinical Care First, Then Enhanced Report | Satisfaction With Genomic Test Report | Care Instructions | Somewhat helpful | 1 Participants |
| Routine Clinical Care First, Then Enhanced Report | Satisfaction With Genomic Test Report | Care Instructions | Quite a bit helpful | 1 Participants |
| Routine Clinical Care First, Then Enhanced Report | Satisfaction With Genomic Test Report | Care Instructions | Very helpful | 0 Participants |
| Routine Clinical Care First, Then Enhanced Report | Satisfaction With Genomic Test Report | Care Instructions | Missing | 2 Participants |
| Routine Clinical Care Plus Enhanced Genomic Report | Satisfaction With Genomic Test Report | Care Instructions | A little bit helpfu | 1 Participants |
| Routine Clinical Care Plus Enhanced Genomic Report | Satisfaction With Genomic Test Report | Summary | Not Helpful | 2 Participants |
| Routine Clinical Care Plus Enhanced Genomic Report | Satisfaction With Genomic Test Report | Detailed Explanation | Quite a bit helpful | 1 Participants |
| Routine Clinical Care Plus Enhanced Genomic Report | Satisfaction With Genomic Test Report | Summary | A little bit helpfu | 1 Participants |
| Routine Clinical Care Plus Enhanced Genomic Report | Satisfaction With Genomic Test Report | Care Instructions | Missing | 1 Participants |
| Routine Clinical Care Plus Enhanced Genomic Report | Satisfaction With Genomic Test Report | Summary | Somewhat helpful | 1 Participants |
| Routine Clinical Care Plus Enhanced Genomic Report | Satisfaction With Genomic Test Report | Detailed Explanation | Very helpful | 3 Participants |
| Routine Clinical Care Plus Enhanced Genomic Report | Satisfaction With Genomic Test Report | Care Instructions | Somewhat helpful | 2 Participants |
| Routine Clinical Care Plus Enhanced Genomic Report | Satisfaction With Genomic Test Report | Summary | Quite a bit helpful | 3 Participants |
| Routine Clinical Care Plus Enhanced Genomic Report | Satisfaction With Genomic Test Report | Detailed Explanation | Missing | 1 Participants |
| Routine Clinical Care Plus Enhanced Genomic Report | Satisfaction With Genomic Test Report | Summary | Very helpful | 1 Participants |
| Routine Clinical Care Plus Enhanced Genomic Report | Satisfaction With Genomic Test Report | Summary | Missing | 1 Participants |
| Routine Clinical Care Plus Enhanced Genomic Report | Satisfaction With Genomic Test Report | Care Instructions | Very helpful | 1 Participants |
| Routine Clinical Care Plus Enhanced Genomic Report | Satisfaction With Genomic Test Report | Detailed Explanation | Not Helpful | 2 Participants |
| Routine Clinical Care Plus Enhanced Genomic Report | Satisfaction With Genomic Test Report | Care Instructions | Not Helpful | 4 Participants |
| Routine Clinical Care Plus Enhanced Genomic Report | Satisfaction With Genomic Test Report | Detailed Explanation | A little bit helpfu | 1 Participants |
| Routine Clinical Care Plus Enhanced Genomic Report | Satisfaction With Genomic Test Report | Care Instructions | Quite a bit helpful | 0 Participants |
| Routine Clinical Care Plus Enhanced Genomic Report | Satisfaction With Genomic Test Report | Detailed Explanation | Somewhat helpful | 1 Participants |