Skip to content

Enhancing Genomic Laboratory Reports to Enhance Communication and Empower Patients

Enhancing Genomic Laboratory Reports to Enhance Communication and Empower Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02504502
Enrollment
52
Registered
2015-07-22
Start date
2015-08-31
Completion date
2017-01-01
Last updated
2018-02-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Autism, Intellectual Disability, Multiple Congenital Anomalies

Keywords

Whole Genome Sequencing, Laboratory Report, Patient Centered, Communication of Results, Patient Provider Communication

Brief summary

Current lab reports are designed to communicate results from the laboratory to the provider; they are not designed to be accessible to patients. The investigators believe that a new type of genomic test report, tailored for patient- as well as provider-use, will enable patients to have access to information they can understand allowing them to be more involved in the management of their disorders, better navigate the health care system, and make more informed decisions about their health and health care in conjunction with their providers. This approach has the potential to improve outcomes from both the patient and provider perspectives. The investigators propose to study the research question, Can a genomic laboratory report tailored for both providers and families of patients improve interpretation of complex results and facilitate recommended care by enhancing communication and shared decision making?

Detailed description

This is a mixed-methods will be conducted in multiple phases: Phase 1: development of an enhanced genomic test result report through in-depth interviews with parents and providers Phase 2: refine the report through parental focus groups and provider interviews and create the final report and delivery method. Phase 3: implement the enhanced test report and evaluate the impact on patient and providers Subjects for the study are parents of affected children enrolled in the Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) Clinical Research Pilot Study (study within a study). All parents receive routine clinical care for WGS and clinical return of results per protocol of the WGS study. Parents from the WGS study were invited to participate in phases 1 and 2 of this study to help design and test an enhanced genomic test report that would meet their needs for information about their child's condition and communication with providers, caregivers, teachers, and family. This report in clinicaltrials.gov reports on phase 3 data only. The experimental design to be used for phase 3 of the project is a randomized, single-blinded pre- post-intervention trial with crossover. According to the WGS study protocol all results of the WGS testing will be provided by a geneticist and genetic counselor at an informing session. At this session, results will be returned and explained, recommendations provided and questions answered (routine clinical care). Following this session, parents will be randomized as couples based on whether their child received a result of a causal variant or non-causal variant to receive either routine clinical care with an enhanced report (intervention arm) or routine clinical care first followed by enhanced report (control with crossover). Randomizing parents as couples is necessary as randomization at the individual level would lead to contamination and spillover if one member of the couple were in the usual care arm and the other in the intervention arm. After routine clinical care to deliver the WGS test results and randomization, parents will be invited to participate in phase 3 to test the impact of the enhanced report on parental and provider satisfaction, communication, and knowledge. Parents will enter into phase 3 of the study (experimental design) by completing baseline surveys. Upon completion of baseline surveys, parents will be provided the enhanced report (intervention) or another copy of their standard lab report (control with crossover). All parents will be surveyed at 3 months. Parents in the control with crossover arm will be provided the enhanced report at this time and sent another survey 3 month post enhanced report (6 month post baseline). Standard, validated, survey instruments will be utilized for the baseline and follow-up surveys; therefore, it is possible that important differences between the routine clinical care with crossover and intervention arms could be missed. To insure capture of all important differences and all impact of the enhanced genomic test result report, additional in-depth qualitative interviews will take place after the final survey post enhanced report is administered.

Interventions

OTHERenhanced genomic report

a patient-centered version of a genomic results report delivered to patient through the electronic record portal

Sponsors

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
Geisinger Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

participants do not know whether they are in the intervention (enhanced report) or control (routine clinical care with delayed access to the enhanced report) arm

Intervention model description

intervention = routine clinical care for return of results per whole genome sequencing study with enhanced genetic test results report developed through phase 1 and 2 of this study. Control with delayed intervention = routine clinical care for return of results per whole genome sequencing study with crossover to receipt of enhanced report upon completion of baseline and 3 month post-baseline followup surveys. Participants in this arm will complete a third survey at 3 months post receipt of enhanced report

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 21 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Research participants who are consented to participate in the WGS Study (#2012-0187). * Providers who have referred participants to the WGS Study (#2012-0187) and who have participated in the WGS genomic medicine workgroup or who have participated in the WGS Program Oversight Committee.

Exclusion criteria

* Participants who are not consented to participate in the WGS Study (#2012-0187) * Providers who have not referred patients to the WGS Study (#2012-0187). * Providers who have not had a relationship with the oversight of the WGS study (#2012- 0187).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Satisfaction With Genomic Test Report3 months after receipt of enhanced report3 questions on how helpful various parts of the test report were for parents who opened the enhanced report.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects participating in the whole genome sequencing study for undiagnosed developmental delay at Geisinger Health System were invited to participate.

Pre-assignment details

parents were randomized together (e.g. parents were both randomized to the same arm). parents were grouped by genomic sequencing finding (causal variant found vs. non-causal variant found) prior to randomization to ensure equal number of causal variants and non-causal variants in each arm.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Control With Delayed Access
Those resulting in variants of significance will receive routine clinical care and receive the enhanced genomic report after returning 3 month survey. Routine Clinical Care: Participants will receive routine clinical care. After returning the 3 month survey the participants will also receive the enhanced genomic report.
24
Enhanced Genomic Report
Those resulting in variants of significance will received routine clinical care and access to the enhanced genomic lab report. Enhanced Genomic Report: Routine clinical care vs. enhanced genomic report
28
Total52

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Crossover to Enhanced ReportLost to Follow-up50
Routine Care vs. Enhanced ReportLost to Follow-up47

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControl With Delayed AccessEnhanced Genomic ReportTotal
Access to Child's Record
10 or more times
4 Participants3 Participants7 Participants
Access to Child's Record
1-2 times
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Access to Child's Record
3-5 times
5 Participants3 Participants8 Participants
Access to Child's Record
6-9 times
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Access to Child's Record
Missing
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Access to Child's Record
None
12 Participants17 Participants29 Participants
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
24 Participants28 Participants52 Participants
Child's WGS Result
Causal Variant Result
4 Participants3 Participants7 Participants
Child's WGS Result
Non-Causal Variant Result
20 Participants25 Participants45 Participants
Education
Bachelor's degree or equivalent
3 Participants6 Participants9 Participants
Education
Doctor or other professional degree
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Education
High school graduate or GED
3 Participants7 Participants10 Participants
Education
Master's degree
4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Education
Post high school training other than college
2 Participants5 Participants7 Participants
Education
Some college
7 Participants6 Participants13 Participants
Education
Some high school (9-12)
4 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
23 Participants26 Participants49 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Health Literacy
Always
14 Participants15 Participants29 Participants
Health Literacy
Missing
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Health Literacy
Never
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Health Literacy
Occasionally
2 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Health Literacy
Often
2 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Health Literacy
Sometimes
5 Participants4 Participants9 Participants
Income
$150,000 to $199,999
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Income
$15,000 to $29,999
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Income
$200,000 or above
3 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Income
$30,000 to $44,999
2 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Income
$45,000 to $59,999
6 Participants2 Participants8 Participants
Income
$60,000 to $89,999
4 Participants14 Participants18 Participants
Income
$90,000 to $149,999
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Income
Less than $15,000
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Income
Missing
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Numeracy
Easy
13 Participants12 Participants25 Participants
Numeracy
Hard
6 Participants9 Participants15 Participants
Numeracy
Missing
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Numeracy
Very Easy
5 Participants6 Participants11 Participants
Numeracy
Very Hard
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
23 Participants26 Participants49 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
24 Participants28 Participants52 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants16 Participants29 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants12 Participants23 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 240 / 28
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 240 / 28
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 240 / 28

Outcome results

Primary

Satisfaction With Genomic Test Report

3 questions on how helpful various parts of the test report were for parents who opened the enhanced report.

Time frame: 3 months after receipt of enhanced report

Population: parents who opened the enhanced report per electronic confirmation. For Clinical care then enhanced report N=4 CV; 2NCV - these 2 NCV parents did not answer the survey questions about the report (missing). For routine care with enhanced report first N=9 NCV.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Routine Clinical Care First, Then Enhanced ReportSatisfaction With Genomic Test ReportSummaryNot Helpful0 Participants
Routine Clinical Care First, Then Enhanced ReportSatisfaction With Genomic Test ReportSummaryA little bit helpfu1 Participants
Routine Clinical Care First, Then Enhanced ReportSatisfaction With Genomic Test ReportSummarySomewhat helpful1 Participants
Routine Clinical Care First, Then Enhanced ReportSatisfaction With Genomic Test ReportSummaryQuite a bit helpful2 Participants
Routine Clinical Care First, Then Enhanced ReportSatisfaction With Genomic Test ReportSummaryMissing2 Participants
Routine Clinical Care First, Then Enhanced ReportSatisfaction With Genomic Test ReportSummaryVery helpful0 Participants
Routine Clinical Care First, Then Enhanced ReportSatisfaction With Genomic Test ReportDetailed ExplanationNot Helpful0 Participants
Routine Clinical Care First, Then Enhanced ReportSatisfaction With Genomic Test ReportDetailed ExplanationA little bit helpfu1 Participants
Routine Clinical Care First, Then Enhanced ReportSatisfaction With Genomic Test ReportDetailed ExplanationSomewhat helpful1 Participants
Routine Clinical Care First, Then Enhanced ReportSatisfaction With Genomic Test ReportDetailed ExplanationQuite a bit helpful2 Participants
Routine Clinical Care First, Then Enhanced ReportSatisfaction With Genomic Test ReportDetailed ExplanationVery helpful0 Participants
Routine Clinical Care First, Then Enhanced ReportSatisfaction With Genomic Test ReportDetailed ExplanationMissing2 Participants
Routine Clinical Care First, Then Enhanced ReportSatisfaction With Genomic Test ReportCare InstructionsNot Helpful0 Participants
Routine Clinical Care First, Then Enhanced ReportSatisfaction With Genomic Test ReportCare InstructionsA little bit helpfu2 Participants
Routine Clinical Care First, Then Enhanced ReportSatisfaction With Genomic Test ReportCare InstructionsSomewhat helpful1 Participants
Routine Clinical Care First, Then Enhanced ReportSatisfaction With Genomic Test ReportCare InstructionsQuite a bit helpful1 Participants
Routine Clinical Care First, Then Enhanced ReportSatisfaction With Genomic Test ReportCare InstructionsVery helpful0 Participants
Routine Clinical Care First, Then Enhanced ReportSatisfaction With Genomic Test ReportCare InstructionsMissing2 Participants
Routine Clinical Care Plus Enhanced Genomic ReportSatisfaction With Genomic Test ReportCare InstructionsA little bit helpfu1 Participants
Routine Clinical Care Plus Enhanced Genomic ReportSatisfaction With Genomic Test ReportSummaryNot Helpful2 Participants
Routine Clinical Care Plus Enhanced Genomic ReportSatisfaction With Genomic Test ReportDetailed ExplanationQuite a bit helpful1 Participants
Routine Clinical Care Plus Enhanced Genomic ReportSatisfaction With Genomic Test ReportSummaryA little bit helpfu1 Participants
Routine Clinical Care Plus Enhanced Genomic ReportSatisfaction With Genomic Test ReportCare InstructionsMissing1 Participants
Routine Clinical Care Plus Enhanced Genomic ReportSatisfaction With Genomic Test ReportSummarySomewhat helpful1 Participants
Routine Clinical Care Plus Enhanced Genomic ReportSatisfaction With Genomic Test ReportDetailed ExplanationVery helpful3 Participants
Routine Clinical Care Plus Enhanced Genomic ReportSatisfaction With Genomic Test ReportCare InstructionsSomewhat helpful2 Participants
Routine Clinical Care Plus Enhanced Genomic ReportSatisfaction With Genomic Test ReportSummaryQuite a bit helpful3 Participants
Routine Clinical Care Plus Enhanced Genomic ReportSatisfaction With Genomic Test ReportDetailed ExplanationMissing1 Participants
Routine Clinical Care Plus Enhanced Genomic ReportSatisfaction With Genomic Test ReportSummaryVery helpful1 Participants
Routine Clinical Care Plus Enhanced Genomic ReportSatisfaction With Genomic Test ReportSummaryMissing1 Participants
Routine Clinical Care Plus Enhanced Genomic ReportSatisfaction With Genomic Test ReportCare InstructionsVery helpful1 Participants
Routine Clinical Care Plus Enhanced Genomic ReportSatisfaction With Genomic Test ReportDetailed ExplanationNot Helpful2 Participants
Routine Clinical Care Plus Enhanced Genomic ReportSatisfaction With Genomic Test ReportCare InstructionsNot Helpful4 Participants
Routine Clinical Care Plus Enhanced Genomic ReportSatisfaction With Genomic Test ReportDetailed ExplanationA little bit helpfu1 Participants
Routine Clinical Care Plus Enhanced Genomic ReportSatisfaction With Genomic Test ReportCare InstructionsQuite a bit helpful0 Participants
Routine Clinical Care Plus Enhanced Genomic ReportSatisfaction With Genomic Test ReportDetailed ExplanationSomewhat helpful1 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026