Skip to content

CREATE-1: A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of AXS-02 in Patients With CRPS-1

CREATE-1 Study: CRPS Treatment Evaluation 1 Study. A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of AXS-02 (Oral Zoledronate) Administered Orally to Subjects With Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type I (CRPS-I)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02504008
Acronym
CREATE-1
Enrollment
190
Registered
2015-07-21
Start date
2015-07-31
Completion date
2019-01-31
Last updated
2018-03-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy

Keywords

bisphosphonate, CRPS, RSD, non-opioid, CRPS-1, acute on chronic pain, chronic pain, zoledronic acid

Brief summary

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 24-week study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AXS-02 in patients with CRPS-I.

Interventions

DRUGAXS-02 (oral zoledronate)

Once weekly for 6 weeks

DRUGPlacebo

Once weekly for 6 weeks

Sponsors

Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Male or female of at least 18 years of age * Recently confirmed diagnosis of CRPS-1 (Budapest criteria) * Average pain intensity score of ≥ 5 (based on an 11-point scale \[0 - 10\]) * Willing and able to provide written informed consent Key

Exclusion criteria

* Received chronic opioid therapy within 4 weeks * Received a sympathetic nerve block within 3 weeks * Active litigation or a pending workers' compensation decision * Any other clinically significant medical or pain condition (eg, Parkinson's disease, cognitive impairment, or fibromyalgia) or clinical laboratory abnormality that would in the investigator's judgment interfere with the subject's ability to participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in patient reported pain intensityBaseline to Week 12Patient reported pain intensity is recorded as an average daily pain intensity using an 11-point scale (0 = no pain to 10 = worst pain possible).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patients' Global Impression of Change (PGI-C)Baseline to Week 12The PGI-C is a patient/patient's caregiver rated scale to assess the patients overall treatment response. PGI-C is a 7-point (1-7) scale rated as; very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, or very much worse.
Clinicians' Global Impression of Change (CGI-C)Baseline to Week 12The CGI-C is an investigator-rated scale to assess the overall treatment response. CGI-C is a 7-point (1-7) scale rated as; very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, or very much worse.
Change in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Pain ScoreBaseline to Week 12The BPI is a nine-question survey completed by the patient that assesses quality of life and health status. BPI scores range from 0 to 10, with higher values indicating greater pain.
Change in Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ-2)Baseline to Week 12The SF-MPQ-2 measures both neuropathic and nonneuropathic pain. It contains a total of 22 descriptors, which are rated on an intensity scale of 0 = None, to 10 = Worst Possible.
Change in bone turnover markersBaseline to Week 52Bone turnover is measured from 2 biomarkers collected from peripheral blood samples: serum carboxy terminal telopeptide of collagen type I (CTX) and serum procollagen type I N terminal propeptide (s-P1NP).
Change in EuroQOL 5-dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D)Baseline to Week 12The EQ-5D descriptive system comprised the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is rated by the patient at one of 5 levels, with level 1 indicating the best health state (no problems) and level 5 indicating worst health state (e.g., unable to walk about).

Countries

Australia, Canada, United Kingdom, United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026