Skip to content

An Interactive Gaming-based Intervention for Back Pain

Augmenting Back Pain Exercise Therapy Using an Interactive Gaming-based Intervention in the Home Setting

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02503410
Enrollment
7
Registered
2015-07-21
Start date
2015-09-30
Completion date
2017-06-30
Last updated
2019-05-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain

Keywords

lower back, pain

Brief summary

This study aims to compare the outcomes of a traditional, exercise-based rehabilitation intervention for chronic low back pain with the outcomes achieved by combining a traditional intervention with adjunct therapy delivered using an interactive gaming-based system for home-based therapy.

Detailed description

The study relies upon the Valedo system by Hocoma AG to implement an interactive gaming-based intervention (i.e. subjects receive part of their physical therapy by playing interactive video games). The system is similar to consumer electronics products for interactive gaming that track the subject's movements using body-worn sensors. The FDA has determined that the Valedo system is a 510(K) exempt device under the product code ION (i.e. exerciser, non-measuring device for Physical Medicine). In the study, subjects with non-specific chronic low back pain are randomized using a block design to one of two groups: group 1 receives usual care alone; group 2 receives an exercise-based rehabilitation intervention using interactive gaming in addition to usual care. Clinical assessments are performed at baseline and again 4 weeks and 8 weeks after baseline measures are gathered.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALUsual care

Subjects receive standard physical therapy, including outpatient visits as prescribed by the treating clinician and home-based exercises based on recommendations by the physical therapist.

BEHAVIORALInteractive gaming

Subjects receive a combination of standard physical therapy in the clinic and home-based exercises that they perform using the Valedo system.

Sponsors

Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Assessor is blinded to treatment assignment.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* English speaking * Back pain subject-rated \> 3 on an 11 point visual-analog scale (0-10), with pain reported for a time \> 6 months * Able to commit to all study visits * Low back pain attributable to mechanical etiology as opposed to infectious, neoplastic, or inflammatory causes. * BMI ≤ 40 * Familiar with tablet use

Exclusion criteria

* Vision or mobility impairment interfering with the performance of the interactive games * Current or anticipated receipt of payments from Worker's Compensation or other insurance for disability attributed to low back pain * Additional treatment for back pain during the period of the study, such as acupuncture * Unresolved musculoskeletal pathology of the lower limbs * Severe radiculopathic pain * Alcohol or substance abuse * Prior discectomy or implantation of rods, screws or plates (bulging disc without radicular pain is not exclusionary; hip or shoulder replacement is not exclusionary) * Current medication with coumadin or prednisone, chronic use of steroid medications, daily use of narcotic analgesics, or estrogen supplementation, tricyclic anti-depressants (if not on a regular steady dose at least one month prior to enrollment), or any substance that could impair balance. * Current diagnosis of: 1. Balance problems due to vestibular or other neurological impairments. 2. Osteoporosis (Osteopenia is not an exclusionary condition) 3. Fibromyalgia 4. Severe or progressive neurological deficits, including neuromotor impairment 5. Any hypercoagulation condition 6. Eczema, Psoriasis, or skin infections, and deep vein thrombosis 7. Burns or other acute trauma including unhealed bone fractures or open wounds 8. Psychiatric illness not well controlled, or current episode of exacerbated major depressive disorder 9. Rheumatoid arthritis * Any other major medical condition that would impair the subject's ability to complete the study visits * Any other major medical condition that has not been stabilized, or that would impair the subject's ability to complete the activities required by the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Frequency at 8 WeeksChange in pain frequency at 8 weeksSubjects are asked how many days they experienced low back pain during the week prior to the study visit.
Visual Analogue Pain Scale at 4 WeeksChange from baseline in Visual Analogue Pain Scale score at 4 weeksSubjects are asked to indicate their pain level using a visual analog scale, namely they are asked to choose the position on a horizontal line - drawn on a piece of paper - that corresponds to the pain level that they experience. The line is about 10 cm long and is divided into 10 intervals of equal length referred to as units. The minimum value on the scale is zero (meaning no pain). The maximum value on the scale is ten (meaning maximum ever experienced pain).
Visual Analogue Pain Scale at 8 WeeksChange from baseline in VAS score at 8 weeksSubjects are asked to indicate their pain level using a visual analog scale, namely they are asked to choose the position on a horizontal line - drawn on a piece of paper - that corresponds to the pain level that they experience. The line is about 10 cm long and is divided into 10 intervals of equal length referred to as units. The minimum value on the scale is zero (meaning no pain). The maximum value on the scale is ten (meaning maximum ever experienced pain).
Pain Frequency at 4 WeeksChange in pain frequency at 4 weeksSubjects are asked how many days they experienced low back pain during the week prior to the study visit.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire at 4 WeeksChange in disability score at 4 weeksSubjects are asked to fill in a questionnaire inquiring about how their pain interferes with their activities of daily living. Accordingly, they receive a disability score ranging between 0 and 100%. A score between 0 and 20% indicates minimal disability; a score between 21 and 40% indicates moderate disability; a score between 41 and 60% indicates severe disability; a score between 61 and 80% indicates that pain impinges on all aspects of the patient's life; and score between 81 and 100% indicates that the subject is bed-bound.
Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire at 8 WeeksChange in disability score at 8 weeksSubjects are asked to fill in a questionnaire inquiring about how their pain interferes with their activities of daily living. Accordingly, they receive a disability score ranging between 0 and 100%. A score between 0 and 20% indicates minimal disability; a score between 21 and 40% indicates moderate disability; a score between 41 and 60% indicates severe disability; a score between 61 and 80% indicates that pain impinges on all aspects of the patient's life; and score between 81 and 100% indicates that the subject is bed-bound.
SF36 at 4 WeeksChange in clinical score at 4 weeksThe SF36 is a clinical outcome measure based on the administration of a questionnaire inquiring about the quality of life and health status of the subject. It consists of eight normalized (so that they have the some weight) scores related to vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning, and mental health. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability. The score is provide as units on a scale from 0 to 100.
SF36 at 8 WeeksChange in clinical score at 8 weeksThe SF36 is a clinical outcome measure based on the administration of a questionnaire inquiring about the quality of life and health status of the subject. It consists of eight normalized (so that they have the some weight) scores related to vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning, and mental health. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability. The score is provide as units on a scale from 0 to 100

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were recruited primarily among the outpatient population of individuals with low back pain at Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Usual Care
Subjects receive physical therapy for low back pain as typically prescribed in the clinic.
4
Interactive Gaming
Subjects participate in an intervention combining usual care and home-based exercises using the Valedo system.
3
Total7

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicUsual CareInteractive GamingTotal
Age, Continuous36.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
31.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8
34.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Pain Frequency5.3 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9
6.0 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7
5.8 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
2 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
4 Participants3 Participants7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Visual Analog Pain Scale3.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.3
4.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
3.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 40 / 3
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 40 / 3
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 40 / 3

Outcome results

Primary

Pain Frequency at 4 Weeks

Subjects are asked how many days they experienced low back pain during the week prior to the study visit.

Time frame: Change in pain frequency at 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual Care GroupPain Frequency at 4 Weeks2.5 daysStandard Deviation 2.4
Interactive Home-Based System GroupPain Frequency at 4 Weeks-0.3 daysStandard Deviation 0.6
Primary

Pain Frequency at 8 Weeks

Subjects are asked how many days they experienced low back pain during the week prior to the study visit.

Time frame: Change in pain frequency at 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual Care GroupPain Frequency at 8 Weeks-0.2 daysStandard Deviation 2.1
Interactive Home-Based System GroupPain Frequency at 8 Weeks0.0 daysStandard Deviation 0
Primary

Visual Analogue Pain Scale at 4 Weeks

Subjects are asked to indicate their pain level using a visual analog scale, namely they are asked to choose the position on a horizontal line - drawn on a piece of paper - that corresponds to the pain level that they experience. The line is about 10 cm long and is divided into 10 intervals of equal length referred to as units. The minimum value on the scale is zero (meaning no pain). The maximum value on the scale is ten (meaning maximum ever experienced pain).

Time frame: Change from baseline in Visual Analogue Pain Scale score at 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual Care GroupVisual Analogue Pain Scale at 4 Weeks0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Interactive Home-Based System GroupVisual Analogue Pain Scale at 4 Weeks0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Primary

Visual Analogue Pain Scale at 8 Weeks

Subjects are asked to indicate their pain level using a visual analog scale, namely they are asked to choose the position on a horizontal line - drawn on a piece of paper - that corresponds to the pain level that they experience. The line is about 10 cm long and is divided into 10 intervals of equal length referred to as units. The minimum value on the scale is zero (meaning no pain). The maximum value on the scale is ten (meaning maximum ever experienced pain).

Time frame: Change from baseline in VAS score at 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual Care GroupVisual Analogue Pain Scale at 8 Weeks0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Interactive Home-Based System GroupVisual Analogue Pain Scale at 8 Weeks1.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Secondary

Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire at 4 Weeks

Subjects are asked to fill in a questionnaire inquiring about how their pain interferes with their activities of daily living. Accordingly, they receive a disability score ranging between 0 and 100%. A score between 0 and 20% indicates minimal disability; a score between 21 and 40% indicates moderate disability; a score between 41 and 60% indicates severe disability; a score between 61 and 80% indicates that pain impinges on all aspects of the patient's life; and score between 81 and 100% indicates that the subject is bed-bound.

Time frame: Change in disability score at 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual Care GroupOswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire at 4 Weeks1.0 percentage disabilityStandard Deviation 3.5
Interactive Home-Based System GroupOswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire at 4 Weeks4.7 percentage disabilityStandard Deviation 4.6
Secondary

Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire at 8 Weeks

Subjects are asked to fill in a questionnaire inquiring about how their pain interferes with their activities of daily living. Accordingly, they receive a disability score ranging between 0 and 100%. A score between 0 and 20% indicates minimal disability; a score between 21 and 40% indicates moderate disability; a score between 41 and 60% indicates severe disability; a score between 61 and 80% indicates that pain impinges on all aspects of the patient's life; and score between 81 and 100% indicates that the subject is bed-bound.

Time frame: Change in disability score at 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual Care GroupOswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire at 8 Weeks12.7 percentage disabilityStandard Deviation 10.6
Interactive Home-Based System GroupOswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire at 8 Weeks11.3 percentage disabilityStandard Deviation 7
Secondary

SF36 at 4 Weeks

The SF36 is a clinical outcome measure based on the administration of a questionnaire inquiring about the quality of life and health status of the subject. It consists of eight normalized (so that they have the some weight) scores related to vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning, and mental health. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability. The score is provide as units on a scale from 0 to 100.

Time frame: Change in clinical score at 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual Care GroupSF36 at 4 Weeks2.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.6
Interactive Home-Based System GroupSF36 at 4 Weeks6.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.2
Secondary

SF36 at 8 Weeks

The SF36 is a clinical outcome measure based on the administration of a questionnaire inquiring about the quality of life and health status of the subject. It consists of eight normalized (so that they have the some weight) scores related to vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning, and mental health. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability. The score is provide as units on a scale from 0 to 100

Time frame: Change in clinical score at 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual Care GroupSF36 at 8 Weeks13.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.1
Interactive Home-Based System GroupSF36 at 8 Weeks9.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.7

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026