Skip to content

Continuous Diffusion of Oxygen (CDO) Treatment for Healing of Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Continuous Diffusion of Oxygen (CDO) Treatment for Healing of Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02501538
Acronym
EO2
Enrollment
23
Registered
2015-07-17
Start date
2015-06-30
Completion date
2020-01-10
Last updated
2023-07-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Foot Ulcer, Diabetic

Brief summary

This is a pilot study. Maximum 30 subjects with a diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) or surgical foot wound will be consented in order to have 20 eligible subjects who will be enrolled and completed the study. Study duration will be three weeks. Patients will be consented and undergo debridement as standard of care at day 0. Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI), Monofilament Sensory Test and Vibration Perception Threshold(VPT) test will be performed only at day 0. Tissue samples will be taken at this visit during standard of care wound debridement and these tissue samples of the wound would normally be removed as part of routine debridement. These tissue samples of the wound will be used for gene expression and bacterial analysis(research). The patient will then receive topical oxygen therapy using the Transcutaneous O2 device (research) with moist wound dressings for 21 days. Moist wound dressings are used as standard of care. Treatment will be initiated during Screening/Baseline visit(day 0) after routine wound debridement, and patient will receive instructions for home use of the device. The patient will be seen for routine wound debridement at days 7, 14, and 21 with a study window of 5 days., Digital photos of the wound, and vascular evaluations (Transcutaneous oxygen measurements and Hyperspectral imaging. will be performed at each study visit(research). Tissue samples will be taken during standard of care wound debridement at every study visit. Results of the data analysis from this project will be used to inform the design of a larger randomized clinical trial.

Detailed description

Patients seen at the University of Texas (UT) Southwestern Wound Clinic with a diabetic foot wound will be identified, consented, and screened for the study. Upon signing consent, patients will be assigned a unique screening number. The screening number given to the first patient will be 01 and increasing sequentially with each subject screened. Screened subjects will be entered onto a screening log. Once a number is assigned it cannot be re-assigned to another subject. At Day 0, a vascular evaluation including ABI, Sensilase, Transcutaneous oxygen measurements, and hyperspectral imaging will be performed. Monofilament Sensory Test and Vibration Perception Threshold(VPT) test will also be performed at day 0.Patients will undergo standard of care wound debridement. Tissue samples will be taken routinely as standard of care. A wound assessment will be performed, including the debridement as standard of care, wound measurements, and digital photos. Gene expression and bacterial analysis will be performed on tissue samples. After tests are performed, patient will receive topical oxygen therapy using the Transcutaneous O2 device with moist wound dressings. Moist wound dressings are used as standard of care. Patient will receive instructions to continue treatment at home. Patient will return for an appointment at days 7, 14, and 21, where vascular assessment (Sensilase, Transcutaneous oxygen measurements, Hyperspectral imaging) ,wound assessment (wound measurements, digital photos and acetate tracings) and tissue sampling will be performed following standard of care debridement, Patient will cease topical oxygen treatment at day 21, and study will be concluded.

Interventions

DEVICETranscutaneous O2 device

A portable device that delivers continuous diffusion of oxygen.

Sponsors

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 89 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female subjects of all races and ethnicities, age 18-89 * Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus * Has a diabetic foot ulcer

Exclusion criteria

* End-stage renal disease (ESRD) * Has untreated foot ulcer at time of study * HIV, hepatitis, autoimmune disease, Systemic lupus erythematous (SLE), Raynaud's disease * Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI) \< 0.4 * Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tissue Oxygenation as Measured by Hyperspectral Imaging21 daysHyperspectral (HyperMed, Inc.) images were taken for evaluation of tissue oxygenation following debridement at Visit 1 (day 0), visit 2 (day 7), visit 3 (day 14), visit 4 (day 21). Two images were taken of the study foot - one of the plantar surface and one of the dorsal surface to evaluate the oxygenation of the entire foot. Measurements of oxygenated hemoglobin are generated by the camera for each image. Results are reported in aggregate as mean/standard error for all time points.
Tissue Perfusion as Measured by TCPO221 daysTranscutaneous oxygen pressure (TCPO2) was measured at visit 1 (day 0), visit 2 (day 7), visit 3 (day 14), visit 4 (day 21) to assess perfusion of the tissue. This is measured at the medial and lateral foot to include both major blood vessels to the foot. Reported here as aggregate mean over all time points.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Levels of Growth Factors and Cytokines Involved in Wound Healing21 daysComparison of measurements inflammatory cytokines: Interleukin 6 (IL-6), Interleukin 8 (IL-8), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and growth factors: vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), platelet derived growth factor (PDGF), insulin derived growth factor (IGF), transforming growth factor beta (TGF)-β. These are reported as log fold change by delta delta ct. Evaluated from tissue samples obtained at visit 1 (day 0), visit 2 (day 7), visit 3 (day 14), visit 4 (day 21).
Evaluate Changes in Bacterial Infection21 daysTissue samples sent for 16s rRNA quantitative culture. Reported in aggregate for each visit that corresponds to Visit 1 (day 0), visit 2 (day 7), visit 3 (day 14), visit 4 (day 21).
Percent Wound Area Reduction21 daysPercent change of the wound area (measured in cm\^2) of visit 2 (day 7), visit 3 (day 14), and visit 4 (day 21) compared to baseline. Percent area reduction = initial surface area (length in cm x width in cm) minus current surface area (length in cm x width in cm), divided by initial surface area. multiplied by 100 to get percentage.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Transcutaneous O2 Device
Continuous diffusion of oxygen (CDO) (topical oxygen) therapy, which will be administered using a portable device. Transcutaneous O2 device: A portable device that delivers continuous diffusion of oxygen.
23
Total23

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTranscutaneous O2 Device
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
3 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
20 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American
5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
11 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 23
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 23
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 23

Outcome results

Primary

Tissue Oxygenation as Measured by Hyperspectral Imaging

Hyperspectral (HyperMed, Inc.) images were taken for evaluation of tissue oxygenation following debridement at Visit 1 (day 0), visit 2 (day 7), visit 3 (day 14), visit 4 (day 21). Two images were taken of the study foot - one of the plantar surface and one of the dorsal surface to evaluate the oxygenation of the entire foot. Measurements of oxygenated hemoglobin are generated by the camera for each image. Results are reported in aggregate as mean/standard error for all time points.

Time frame: 21 days

Population: There was no control arm for this study. For analysis, groups were analyzed as healer and nonhealer. Healers are defined by those patients who achieved a 50% wound area reduction in the study time frame and are likely to heal within 12 weeks. Nonhealers did not reach a 50% wound area reduction in the study time frame.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Transcutaneous O2 DeviceTissue Oxygenation as Measured by Hyperspectral ImagingDorsal oxyhemoglobin - healer63.58 percent concentration of oxyhemoglobinStandard Error 11.17
Transcutaneous O2 DeviceTissue Oxygenation as Measured by Hyperspectral ImagingDorsal oxyhemoglobin - nonhealer61.91 percent concentration of oxyhemoglobinStandard Error 9.14
Transcutaneous O2 DeviceTissue Oxygenation as Measured by Hyperspectral ImagingPlantar oxyhemoglobin - healer76.33 percent concentration of oxyhemoglobinStandard Error 4.86
Transcutaneous O2 DeviceTissue Oxygenation as Measured by Hyperspectral ImagingPlantar oxyhemoglobin - nonhealer77.55 percent concentration of oxyhemoglobinStandard Error 5.9
Primary

Tissue Perfusion as Measured by TCPO2

Transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TCPO2) was measured at visit 1 (day 0), visit 2 (day 7), visit 3 (day 14), visit 4 (day 21) to assess perfusion of the tissue. This is measured at the medial and lateral foot to include both major blood vessels to the foot. Reported here as aggregate mean over all time points.

Time frame: 21 days

Population: There was no control arm for this study. For analysis, groups were analyzed as healer and nonhealer. Healers are defined by those patients who achieved a 50% wound area reduction in the study time frame and are likely to heal within 12 weeks. Nonhealers did not reach a 50% wound area reduction in the study time frame

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Transcutaneous O2 DeviceTissue Perfusion as Measured by TCPO2Transcutaneous oxygen - medial foot - nonhealer53.64 mmHgStandard Error 3.97
Transcutaneous O2 DeviceTissue Perfusion as Measured by TCPO2Transcutaneous oxygen - lateral foot - healer55.21 mmHgStandard Error 3.46
Transcutaneous O2 DeviceTissue Perfusion as Measured by TCPO2Transcutaneous oxygen - medial foot - healer53.31 mmHgStandard Error 4.33
Transcutaneous O2 DeviceTissue Perfusion as Measured by TCPO2Transcutaneous oxygen - lateral foot - nonhealer59.31 mmHgStandard Error 4.68
Secondary

Change in Levels of Growth Factors and Cytokines Involved in Wound Healing

Comparison of measurements inflammatory cytokines: Interleukin 6 (IL-6), Interleukin 8 (IL-8), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and growth factors: vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), platelet derived growth factor (PDGF), insulin derived growth factor (IGF), transforming growth factor beta (TGF)-β. These are reported as log fold change by delta delta ct. Evaluated from tissue samples obtained at visit 1 (day 0), visit 2 (day 7), visit 3 (day 14), visit 4 (day 21).

Time frame: 21 days

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Transcutaneous O2 DeviceChange in Levels of Growth Factors and Cytokines Involved in Wound HealingIL-6 Visit 211.37 log fold changeStandard Error 5.11
Transcutaneous O2 DeviceChange in Levels of Growth Factors and Cytokines Involved in Wound HealingPDGF visit 11.40 log fold changeStandard Error 0.23
Transcutaneous O2 DeviceChange in Levels of Growth Factors and Cytokines Involved in Wound HealingPDGF visit 23.92 log fold changeStandard Error 1.31
Transcutaneous O2 DeviceChange in Levels of Growth Factors and Cytokines Involved in Wound HealingPDGF visit 31.76 log fold changeStandard Error 0.37
Transcutaneous O2 DeviceChange in Levels of Growth Factors and Cytokines Involved in Wound HealingIL-6 visit 12.68 log fold changeStandard Error 0.82
Transcutaneous O2 DeviceChange in Levels of Growth Factors and Cytokines Involved in Wound HealingIL-6 Visit 318.24 log fold changeStandard Error 6.48
Transcutaneous O2 DeviceChange in Levels of Growth Factors and Cytokines Involved in Wound HealingIL-6 Visit 49.12 log fold changeStandard Error 2.53
Transcutaneous O2 DeviceChange in Levels of Growth Factors and Cytokines Involved in Wound HealingIL8 visit 13.97 log fold changeStandard Error 1.9
Transcutaneous O2 DeviceChange in Levels of Growth Factors and Cytokines Involved in Wound HealingIL8 visit 23.12 log fold changeStandard Error 1.31
Transcutaneous O2 DeviceChange in Levels of Growth Factors and Cytokines Involved in Wound HealingIL8 visit 37.51 log fold changeStandard Error 2.89
Transcutaneous O2 DeviceChange in Levels of Growth Factors and Cytokines Involved in Wound HealingIL8 visit 45.22 log fold changeStandard Error 2.38
Transcutaneous O2 DeviceChange in Levels of Growth Factors and Cytokines Involved in Wound HealingTNFa visit 11.82 log fold changeStandard Error 0.41
Transcutaneous O2 DeviceChange in Levels of Growth Factors and Cytokines Involved in Wound HealingTNFa visit 28.17 log fold changeStandard Error 2.26
Transcutaneous O2 DeviceChange in Levels of Growth Factors and Cytokines Involved in Wound HealingTNFa visit 35.03 log fold changeStandard Error 1.73
Transcutaneous O2 DeviceChange in Levels of Growth Factors and Cytokines Involved in Wound HealingTNFa visit 43.27 log fold changeStandard Error 1.19
Transcutaneous O2 DeviceChange in Levels of Growth Factors and Cytokines Involved in Wound HealingVEGF visit 11.37 log fold changeStandard Error 0.26
Transcutaneous O2 DeviceChange in Levels of Growth Factors and Cytokines Involved in Wound HealingVEGF visit 25.85 log fold changeStandard Error 1.4
Transcutaneous O2 DeviceChange in Levels of Growth Factors and Cytokines Involved in Wound HealingVEGF visit 34.35 log fold changeStandard Error 1.42
Transcutaneous O2 DeviceChange in Levels of Growth Factors and Cytokines Involved in Wound HealingVEGF visit 43.29 log fold changeStandard Error 0.99
Transcutaneous O2 DeviceChange in Levels of Growth Factors and Cytokines Involved in Wound HealingPDGF visit 41.81 log fold changeStandard Error 0.52
Transcutaneous O2 DeviceChange in Levels of Growth Factors and Cytokines Involved in Wound HealingIGF1 visit 13.04 log fold changeStandard Error 1.18
Transcutaneous O2 DeviceChange in Levels of Growth Factors and Cytokines Involved in Wound HealingIGF1 visit 219.91 log fold changeStandard Error 9.1
Transcutaneous O2 DeviceChange in Levels of Growth Factors and Cytokines Involved in Wound HealingIGF1 visit 35.47 log fold changeStandard Error 2.46
Transcutaneous O2 DeviceChange in Levels of Growth Factors and Cytokines Involved in Wound HealingIGF1 visit 45.25 log fold changeStandard Error 2
Transcutaneous O2 DeviceChange in Levels of Growth Factors and Cytokines Involved in Wound HealingTGFb visit 11.27 log fold changeStandard Error 0.19
Transcutaneous O2 DeviceChange in Levels of Growth Factors and Cytokines Involved in Wound HealingTGFb visit 210.42 log fold changeStandard Error 3.05
Transcutaneous O2 DeviceChange in Levels of Growth Factors and Cytokines Involved in Wound HealingTGFb visit 34.65 log fold changeStandard Error 1.22
Transcutaneous O2 DeviceChange in Levels of Growth Factors and Cytokines Involved in Wound HealingTGFb visit 43.96 log fold changeStandard Error 1.26
Secondary

Evaluate Changes in Bacterial Infection

Tissue samples sent for 16s rRNA quantitative culture. Reported in aggregate for each visit that corresponds to Visit 1 (day 0), visit 2 (day 7), visit 3 (day 14), visit 4 (day 21).

Time frame: 21 days

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Transcutaneous O2 DeviceEvaluate Changes in Bacterial InfectionVisit 4598557.90 CFU/mlStandard Deviation 2303848.45
Transcutaneous O2 DeviceEvaluate Changes in Bacterial InfectionVisit 1137071.35 CFU/mlStandard Deviation 204854.93
Transcutaneous O2 DeviceEvaluate Changes in Bacterial InfectionVisit 2433719.88 CFU/mlStandard Deviation 1009663.23
Transcutaneous O2 DeviceEvaluate Changes in Bacterial InfectionVisit 3276842.20 CFU/mlStandard Deviation 603627.08
Secondary

Percent Wound Area Reduction

Percent change of the wound area (measured in cm\^2) of visit 2 (day 7), visit 3 (day 14), and visit 4 (day 21) compared to baseline. Percent area reduction = initial surface area (length in cm x width in cm) minus current surface area (length in cm x width in cm), divided by initial surface area. multiplied by 100 to get percentage.

Time frame: 21 days

Population: There was no control arm for this study. For analysis, groups were analyzed as healer and nonhealer. Healers are defined by those patients who achieved a 50% wound area reduction in the study time frame and are likely to heal within 12 weeks. Nonhealers did not reach a 50% wound area reduction in the study time frame.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Transcutaneous O2 DevicePercent Wound Area ReductionWound area reduction - visit 1 - healers40.75 percent change of wound area (cm^2)Standard Error 8.26
Transcutaneous O2 DevicePercent Wound Area ReductionWound area reduction - visit 3 - healers48.64 percent change of wound area (cm^2)Standard Error 6.82
Transcutaneous O2 DevicePercent Wound Area ReductionWound area reduction - visits 4 - healers59.91 percent change of wound area (cm^2)Standard Error 7.55
Transcutaneous O2 DevicePercent Wound Area ReductionWound area reduction - visit 2 - nonhealers7.59 percent change of wound area (cm^2)Standard Error 6.32
Transcutaneous O2 DevicePercent Wound Area ReductionWound area reduction - visit 3 - nonhealers-30.07 percent change of wound area (cm^2)Standard Error 17.25
Transcutaneous O2 DevicePercent Wound Area Reductionound area reduction- visit 4 - nonhealers-11.21 percent change of wound area (cm^2)Standard Error 14.5

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026