Skip to content

Comparing New Prothesis PROPRIO-FOOT® Versus Usual Prothesis Tasks Tibial Amputees

Comparaison du Pied Bionique Proprio-Foot® Versus le Pied Habituel Chez Les amputés Tibiaux

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02501408
Acronym
PROPRIO-FOOT
Enrollment
50
Registered
2015-07-17
Start date
2015-03-09
Completion date
2017-04-12
Last updated
2017-11-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lower Limb Amputation at Ankle (Injury)

Brief summary

Evaluate a new porosthetic device in lower limb amputees.

Detailed description

Randomisation between usual and new prosthesis Cross over study of walking performance and VO2 on treadmill with the two devices after 1 month adaptation to each system.

Interventions

DEVICEpropriofoot prosthesis

Adaptation of the device and evaluation after 1 month at home using the studied device

Sponsors

University Hospital, Angers
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Tibial amputation * Ability top walk on treadmill * Stable prosthesis for at least 3 months

Exclusion criteria

* Bilateral amputation * Cancer * Absence of consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
oxygen consumption1 mois after adpatation of the selected deviceMeasurement on treadmill

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026