Skip to content

Study Evaluating the Impact of Mesh Pore Size on Chronic Pain After Lichtenstein Hernioplasty

Single-centre Single-blinded Randomised Study Evaluating the Impact of Mesh Pore Size on Chronic Pain After Lichtenstein Hernioplasty

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02500056
Enrollment
143
Registered
2015-07-16
Start date
2011-01-31
Completion date
2015-04-30
Last updated
2017-07-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Inguinal Hernia

Keywords

Inguinal hernia, Chronic pain, Mesh, Lichtenstein hernioplasty

Brief summary

The aim of the present study is to determine whether usage of mesh with larger pores, compared with mesh with smaller pores, would result in decreased rate of chronic pain after open inguinal hernia repair.

Detailed description

The aim of the present study is to determine whether usage of mesh with larger pores, compared with mesh with smaller pores, would result in decreased rate of chronic pain after open inguinal hernia repair. The patients are randomized into two study gropus receiving mesh with different pore size. Clinical follow-up examination will be performed 1 week, 1 month, 6 months and 3 years after the operation.

Interventions

DEVICEOptilene LP mesh

Lichtenstein hernioplasty

Lichtenstein hernioplasty

Sponsors

Tartu University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* age ≥18 years * unilateral primary reducible inguinal hernia * elective operation * consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* age \<18 years * irreducible * strangulated * recurrent hernia * inability to understand the questionnaire * unwillingness to participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Chronic Pain6-month follow-upOn visual analogue scale pain measurement at rest, on coughing, when rising from lying to sitting and during physical effort and exercise

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Chronic Pain3-year follow-upOn visual analogue scale pain measurement at rest, on coughing, when rising from lying to sitting and during physical effort and exercise
Foreign Body Feeling6-month follow-upThe question about foreign body feeling was a yes-or-no question

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
OM Group
Optilene LP mesh Optilene LP mesh: Lichtenstein hernioplasty
63
UM Group
Ultrapro mesh Ultrapro mesh: Lichtenstein hernioplasty
65
Total128

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath31
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up37
Overall StudyRecurrence10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOM GroupUM GroupTotal
Age, Customized
>=18 years
63 participants65 participants128 participants
Elective operation63 participants65 participants128 participants
Primary inguinal hernia63 participants65 participants128 participants
Reducible inguinal hernia63 participants65 participants128 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
3 participants10 participants13 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
60 participants55 participants115 participants
Unilateral inguinal hernia63 participants65 participants128 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 630 / 65
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 6310 / 65
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 630 / 65

Outcome results

Primary

Chronic Pain

On visual analogue scale pain measurement at rest, on coughing, when rising from lying to sitting and during physical effort and exercise

Time frame: 6-month follow-up

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
OM GroupChronic Pain34.3 percentage of patients with pain
UM GroupChronic Pain46.3 percentage of patients with pain
Secondary

Chronic Pain

On visual analogue scale pain measurement at rest, on coughing, when rising from lying to sitting and during physical effort and exercise

Time frame: 3-year follow-up

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
OM GroupChronic Pain15.9 percentage of patients with pain
UM GroupChronic Pain33.9 percentage of patients with pain
Secondary

Foreign Body Feeling

The question about foreign body feeling was a yes-or-no question

Time frame: 6-month follow-up

Population: Drop-outs at 6-month follow-up (3+6) not included

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
OM GroupForeign Body Feeling31.3 percentage of patients with foreign body
UM GroupForeign Body Feeling47.8 percentage of patients with foreign body

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026