Chronic Respiratory Failure
Conditions
Keywords
Invasive mechanical ventilation, Humidifying devices, Respiratory mechanics
Brief summary
This study compares the short-term effects of a new humidification system (Hygrovent Gold) and two other humidification devices (heated and moisture exchanger and heated humidifier) on respiratory pattern and work of breathing, during invasive ventilation.
Detailed description
Three humidifying devices are commonly and indifferently used during mechanical ventilation, but their impact on respiratory mechanics and, eventually, mechanical ventilation efficacy, particularly in patients highly dependent from mechanical ventilation, are not superimposable. It has already been described that heated and moisture exchangers (HME), increasing dead space, can negatively affect ventilatory function and gas exchange, in comparison to heated humidifiers (HH). The Hygrovent Gold, mainly because of its position between the tracheostomy and the Y-piece of the ventilatory circuit and its structure, may lead to analogous or even worse effects, determining and increase in inspiratory resistances and dead space and consequently an increase in the work of breathing.
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure (PaCO2 of 45 mmHg or more) * Long-term mechanical ventilation via tracheostomy * Clinical stability
Exclusion criteria
* Non collaborative subjects * Acute respiratory failure * Haemodynamic instability * Encephalopathy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Change in muscle pressure-time product (PTPoes) | Baseline and 60 minutes |
Countries
Italy