Skip to content

Pilot Study: Randomized, Placebo-controlled Comparator Trial of IV vs Oral Iron Treatment of RLS With IDA. (IVOR-IDA)

Double-blind Comparator of Efficacy of Oral (Ferrous Sulfate) vs. Intravenous Iron (Ferumoxytol) for Treatment of the Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) Occurring With Iron Deficient Anemia (IDA)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02499354
Enrollment
100
Registered
2015-07-16
Start date
2014-08-31
Completion date
2022-05-31
Last updated
2024-01-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Iron Deficiency Anemia, Restless Legs Syndrome

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to determine the relative effect size of standard IV and oral iron treatment of RLS with Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) and to determine the time course of treatment response.

Detailed description

The restless legs syndrome (RLS) (also known as Willis Ekbom Disease) occurs in about 1/3rd of patients with iron deficiency anemia (IDA). Treatment correcting the IDA is expected to also be effective for reducing or eliminating the RLS with IDA. Two accepted treatments for IDA (oral ferrous sulfate, intravenous ferumoxytol) will be compared for efficacy and speed to response for treatment of RLS occurring with IDA (RLS-IDA). In this study 70 RLS-IDA patients will be randomly assigned 35 each to oral or IV iron treatment using double-blind procedures. Primary outcome with be determined at 6 weeks of treatment with a follow-up at 12 months after treatment. Non-responders at 6 weeks after treatment may, if they qualify, have an open-label IV iron treatment and they will be followed with the same evaluations used after the first set of IV iron treatments. Both oral and IV iron are considered standard treatments for IDA. These same treatments also reduce RLS symptoms. The treatment doses are those accepted for treatment of RLS and also appropriate for treatment for RLS-IDA. Choosing doses equivalent to those for the treatment of RLS without IDA will allow a comparison with that literature. The investigators will therefore use for oral iron ferrous sulfate 325mg taken twice a day matching the dose used in the study of oral iron treatment for RLS without anemia. For IV iron investigators will use ferumoxytol, provided by the sponsor, two doses of 510 mg spaced 2 to 7 days apart. This is the FDA approved dose for treatment of IDA with end stage renal disease. The study is a randomized, comparative open label study to evaluate effect size and time course of treatment response for RLS-IDA over 6 weeks with a 46-week follow-up extension. Two medications and placebos will be used, as described above, with equal random assignment to both groups.

Interventions

DRUGFerumoxytol intravenous

IV iron, 2 vials of 510 mg given 2-7 days apart

DRUGFerrous sulfate

Oral iron, 325 mg tabs taken morning and evening

Sponsors

AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Auerbach Hematology Oncology Associates P C
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of RLS based on questionnaire and confirmed by Hopkins telephone Diagnostic Interview conducted by investigators or clinicians part of the study. * Iron deficiency anemia defined as ID either ferritin \<20 mcg/l, Tsat \<19%, anemia Hgb \<13 for both males and females. * Willingness to use contraceptive to avoid pregnancy: Women have to be surgically sterile, post-menopausal, or use one of the following contraceptives during the whole study period and after the study has ended for at least 5 times plasma biological half-life of the investigational medicinal product: intrauterine devices or hormonal contraceptives (contraceptive pills, implants, transdermal patches, hormonal vaginal devices, or injections with prolonged release). * Willingness to participate and signing the informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

* Iron overload or disturbances in utilization of iron (e.g. haemochromatosis and haemosiderosis) * Decompensated liver cirrhosis or active hepatitis (ALAT \> 3 times upper limit of normal) * Serum ferritin \> 500 ng/mL or transferrin saturation \>40% * Active acute or chronic infections (assessed by clinical judgement that may be indicated by White Blood Cells (WBC) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP) when these are available) * Rheumatoid arthritis with symptoms or signs of active inflammation * Pregnant and nursing women * History of multiple allergies * Known hypersensitivity to parenteral or oral iron or any excipients in the drug products * Previous IV iron treatment for RLS * Other iron treatment or blood transfusion within 4 weeks prior to the screening or treatment visit * Planned elective surgery during the study * Current (past 4 weeks) use of drugs that treat RLS, e.g. opioids, alpha-2-delta anti-depressants, dopaminergics (dopamine promoters, dopamine antagonists/blockers) * Any other medical condition that, in the opinion of Investigator, may cause the subject to be unsuitable for the completion og the study or place the subject at potential risk from being in the study, e.g. a malignancy, uncontrolled hypertension, unstable ischemic heart disease, or uncontrolled diabetes mellitus.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in the Restless Legs Syndrome Rating ScaleBaseline and at 6 weeks after treatmentChange in International Restless Legs Severity Scale (IRLS) score reflecting RLS severity on the scale of 0-40. The higher the negative score the better the outcome
Percentage of Participants With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression ScaleSix weeksSeven questions ranging from Very Much Improved to Very Much Worse: Participant had to be at least Very Much Improved to be considered as having improved. The CGI scale consisted of one question.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Judged Related or Possibly Related to Treatment.Up to six weeksPatient reported gastrointestinal or constitutional adverse events

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Oral Iron
Ferrous Sulfate 325mg (oral) tabs morning and evening Ferrous sulfate: Oral iron, 325 mg tabs taken morning and evening In this arm participants also received intravenous normal saline as part of a double blind, double dummy design
46
IV Iron
Ferumoxytol intravenous (IV) 1020 mg - 2 vials of 510 mg (IV push, 2-3 mins) each given 2-7 days apart Ferumoxytol intravenous: IV iron, 2 vials of 510 mg given 2-7 days apart In this arm participants received oral vitamin C as part of a double blind, double dummy design
47
Total93

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOral IronIV IronTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
44 Participants45 Participants89 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
39 Participants42 Participants81 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
7 Participants5 Participants12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
46 participants47 participants93 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
44 Participants40 Participants84 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants7 Participants9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 460 / 47
other
Total, other adverse events
22 / 4611 / 47
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 460 / 47

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in the Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale

Change in International Restless Legs Severity Scale (IRLS) score reflecting RLS severity on the scale of 0-40. The higher the negative score the better the outcome

Time frame: Baseline and at 6 weeks after treatment

Population: Those participants with baseline data and at 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral IronChange From Baseline in the Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale-14.0000 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.75
IV IronChange From Baseline in the Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale-9.7353 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.33
p-value: 0.2742t-test, 1 sided
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression Scale

Seven questions ranging from Very Much Improved to Very Much Worse: Participant had to be at least Very Much Improved to be considered as having improved. The CGI scale consisted of one question.

Time frame: Six weeks

Population: Those participants with data at six weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Oral IronPercentage of Participants With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression Scale75 percentage of participants
IV IronPercentage of Participants With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression Scale68 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.55Chi-squared
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events Judged Related or Possibly Related to Treatment.

Patient reported gastrointestinal or constitutional adverse events

Time frame: Up to six weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Oral IronNumber of Participants With Adverse Events Judged Related or Possibly Related to Treatment.22 Participants
IV IronNumber of Participants With Adverse Events Judged Related or Possibly Related to Treatment.11 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026