Skip to content

The Impact of Insulin Therapy on Protein Turnover in Pre-Diabetic Cystic Fibrosis Patients

The Impact of Insulin Therapy on Protein Turnover in Pre-Diabetic Cystic Fibrosis Patients

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02496780
Enrollment
65
Registered
2015-07-14
Start date
2015-08-31
Completion date
2022-07-31
Last updated
2025-03-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cystic Fibrosis

Brief summary

Insulin replacement therapy may be effective in breaking the cycle of protein catabolism, undernutrition and overall clinical deterioration in pre-diabetic, insulin insufficient CF youth because of its potent anabolic effect. A significant number of CF patients might benefit from this therapeutic approach with a substantial impact on morbidity and mortality.

Detailed description

Insulin insufficiency related to pancreatic fibrosis and β-cell dysfunction is present in almost every cystic fibrosis (CF) patient. Progressive abnormalities in insulin secretion begin in childhood, and, in adults, CF related diabetes (CFRD) is eventually present in more than half of the CF population. CFRD is associated with weight loss, protein catabolism, loss of lean body mass (LBM), and early death from lung disease and malnutrition. The negative consequences of diabetes are just the tip of the iceberg, since clinical deterioration has been documented to begin in the pre-diabetic period. Non-diabetic glucose tolerance abnormalities in CF are associated with protein catabolism, weight loss and lung function decline, all of which correlate with the severity of insulin secretory defects, suggesting a key pathologic role for insulin insufficiency. Insulin is a potent anabolic hormone, critical for maintenance of body weight and muscle mass. In a placebo-controlled clinical trial, insulin therapy improved body mass index (BMI) and LBM in patients with very early CFRD (CFRD without fasting hyperglycemia), and this is now standard care for these patients. There is growing preliminary evidence that insulin therapy is beneficial even earlier, in CF patients with pre-diabetes due to insulin insufficiency. Given the universal prevalence of insulin insufficiency in CF, the high lifetime risk of developing diabetes, the clinical impact of insulin insufficiency on protein catabolism and survival in CF, and the critical importance of maintaining body weight and LBM in this population, there is an urgent need to determine whether insulin replacement therapy should be instituted for anabolic purposes prior to the actual onset of diabetes and, if so, to ascertain the optimal regimen. The current protocol describes a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to determine whether insulin therapy improves protein catabolism in youth with CF and abnormal glucose tolerance, and to explore differences in efficacy between multiple daily pre-meal insulin dosing (as is currently standard for early CFRD) versus a more convenient once daily basal insulin dose (as has been used in small uncontrolled pilot studies). The findings of this study will provide a mechanistic rationale for instituting insulin in youth with CF and pre-diabetes, and will inform both research studies and clinical practice as to the best regimen for insulin delivery in this population.

Interventions

DRUGnovolog insulin

3x daily rapid-acting insulin

DRUGlevemir insulin

basal insulin once a day

DRUGplacebo

once or 3x daily

Sponsors

University of Minnesota
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
10 Years to 25 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Diagnosis of cystic fibrosis, age 10-25 years 2. A standard routine annual OGTT performed within 12 months of randomization 3. Abnormal glucose tolerance, with a fasting glucose level \<126 mg/dl and * The 1-hr OGTT glucose is ≥200 mg/dl but the 2-hr glucose is \<140 (INDET), OR * The 2-hour OGTT glucose is 140-199 mg/dl (impaired glucose tolerance, IGT).

Exclusion criteria

1. Diagnosis of CFRD, Consensus Conference definition (45) 2. Previous organ transplant, or transplant imminent during study period 3. BMI percentile \>95 4. Treatment with systemic glucocorticoids (nasal or inhaled glucocorticoids are acceptable) 5. Therapy with growth hormone or Megace 6. Nighttime continuous drip gastrostomy/jejunostomy feedings 7. Pregnancy or breast-feeding or plans to become pregnant during study period 8. Any change in medications during the 3 months prior to the study • Exception: the new corrector/potentiator combination drug lumacaftor/ivacaftor is expected to get FDA approval in early 2015, and most CF patients with severe genotypes, including many eligible for this proposal, will receive this drug. This is not a contraindication to participation in the current proposal (and participation in other studies is not contraindicated in the PROSPECT post-marketing drug study). Though the primary effects of the combination therapy appear to be apparent after 1 month, we will wait 6 months after initiation of lumacaftor/ivacaftor before enrollment in this study to make sure subjects are in a steady state. 9. Any anticipated change in medication during the 3 month study period 10. Acute illness in the 6 weeks prior to enrollment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Endogenous Protein Breakdown (Flux) After 4 Weeks of Insulin/Placebo Therapy, CF Patients4 weeksPrimary endpoint. Determined from a stable isotope-labelled test meal. In the primary analysis, patients on both forms of insulin were first combined and compared to CF patients on placebo. In a second analysis, the two insulin types were separately compared to eachother and to placebo. Change in rate of endogenous protein breakdown (Ra-end) change from baseline (pre-treatment) and after 4 wks of study drug

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Baseline Protein Turnover (Flux), CF Patients vs Healthy ControlsbaselineEndogenous protein breakdown at baseline (Ra-end). CF patients vs healthy controls. Rate of endogenous protein breakdown (Ra-end), nadir (µmol/kg(LBM)/min)

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
once or 3x daily injectable placebo (insulin diluent) placebo: once or 3x daily
11
Basal Insulin Levemir
once daily basal insulin therapy with insulin levemir levemir insulin: basal insulin once a day
11
Rapid-acting Insulin Novolog
pre-meal rapid-acting insulin 3x/day with insulin novolog novolog insulin: 3x daily rapid-acting insulin
15
Healthy Controls
Healthy controls matched by age, gender and BMI to CF participants. These participants are only used for baseline information, no intervention or outcome measure collected
20
Total57

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBasal Insulin LevemirRapid-acting Insulin NovologPlaceboHealthy ControlsTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
5 Participants6 Participants4 Participants10 Participants25 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
6 Participants9 Participants7 Participants10 Participants32 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
10 Participants13 Participants11 Participants18 Participants52 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants7 Participants4 Participants9 Participants26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants8 Participants7 Participants11 Participants31 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 120 / 130 / 150 / 25
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 124 / 134 / 155 / 25
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 120 / 130 / 150 / 25

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Endogenous Protein Breakdown (Flux) After 4 Weeks of Insulin/Placebo Therapy, CF Patients

Primary endpoint. Determined from a stable isotope-labelled test meal. In the primary analysis, patients on both forms of insulin were first combined and compared to CF patients on placebo. In a second analysis, the two insulin types were separately compared to eachother and to placebo. Change in rate of endogenous protein breakdown (Ra-end) change from baseline (pre-treatment) and after 4 wks of study drug

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Healthy controls did not participant in the primary aim

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Endogenous Protein Breakdown (Flux) After 4 Weeks of Insulin/Placebo Therapy, CF Patients-0.01 µmol/kg(LBM)/minStandard Error 0.047
Basal Insulin LevemirChange From Baseline in Endogenous Protein Breakdown (Flux) After 4 Weeks of Insulin/Placebo Therapy, CF Patients0.022 µmol/kg(LBM)/minStandard Error 0.046
Rapid-acting Insulin NovologChange From Baseline in Endogenous Protein Breakdown (Flux) After 4 Weeks of Insulin/Placebo Therapy, CF Patients0.0004 µmol/kg(LBM)/minStandard Error 0.06
Secondary

Baseline Protein Turnover (Flux), CF Patients vs Healthy Controls

Endogenous protein breakdown at baseline (Ra-end). CF patients vs healthy controls. Rate of endogenous protein breakdown (Ra-end), nadir (µmol/kg(LBM)/min)

Time frame: baseline

Population: Note that for this secondary endpoint we assessed the baseline data of the entire CF population versus controls. Thus, in this pre-treatment population, all CF patients were included as a group regardless of what arm they were later randomized to. This was the only comparison between CF and healthy controls, who were matched for age, gender and BMI to CF participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboBaseline Protein Turnover (Flux), CF Patients vs Healthy Controls0.963 µmol/kg(LBM)/minStandard Error 0.135
Basal Insulin LevemirBaseline Protein Turnover (Flux), CF Patients vs Healthy Controls0.921 µmol/kg(LBM)/minStandard Error 0.219

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026