Skip to content

Playware Technology for Balance Training

Efficacy of Interactive Modular Tiles Training Versus Usual Care on Physical Attributes Among Elder Adults 70+. A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02496702
Acronym
IMT
Enrollment
60
Registered
2015-07-14
Start date
2015-07-31
Completion date
2016-05-31
Last updated
2018-07-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Accidental Falls

Keywords

exergaming, Senior Fitness Test

Brief summary

This study evaluates the use of Playware technology for balance training. Falling among elder is a costly problem. Research shows that training can help prevent falls. Pilot studies of the use of Interactive Modular Tiles (IMT) show that the participants can highly increase their physical abilities. The interventions group will train using interactive modular tiles. The tiles include preprogrammed games that create playful training for the participants. The control group will receive usual care, which here refers to normal day activities. The intervention will be done 2 times a week for 12 weeks, each session lasting 1 hour and each participant receiving 13 minutes of training each time.

Detailed description

This study will investigate the use of one form of exergames called IMT how this compared to usual care of elderly people 70+. The trial will consist of two groups, one for training with the IMT and usual care that will receive the care provided to non-patients elderly, which at this moment is no additional treatment other than recommendations. The study will be single blinded, randomized controlled trial. It will be funded by the patient@home project and Entertainment robotics. Concealed allocation and intention-to-treat analysis will be used. Measurements will be taken at baseline and after intervention. Upon acceptance the protocol will be registered in clinicaltrials.gov. The trial's results will be reported using domains and categories described in the taxonomy developed by the Prevention of Falls Network Europe, to allow future synthesis of evidence, or study replication. The intervention is done in the form of groups of 4-5 participants per set of tiles, with 2-3 set of tiles at a time. As more set can be used it is possible to make groups of more people. The training will consist of 1.5-3 minutes of training (depending on the game) on tiles and the rest while the other 2-3 participants train (4-6 minutes of break). Then the participants will train for 1.5-3 minutes again until each participant have received a total of 13 minutes of training. The control group will not train.

Interventions

DEVICETraining on Interactive Modulare Tiles

Training with the Interactive Modulare Tiles

Sponsors

Technical University of Denmark
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
70 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Community-dwelling * 70+ years

Exclusion criteria

* A previous diagnosis of strong dementia or a cognitive decline that prevents the understanding of simple instructions or guidelines; * A previous stroke with a severe neurological impairment, such as loss of strength, and perceptual or language limitations; * A severe visual deficiency; * Inability to maintain a standing position, even with the use of a walking aid or other device; * Participating in rehabilitative training.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Test Score of 6 Minute Walking Test at Week 14.Baseline and at week 14Numbers of meters that can be walked in 6 minutes around a 50-yard (45.7 meters) course. Baseline score compared to score at week 14.
Change From Baseline in Test Score of 30-second Chair Stand at Week 14.Baseline and at week 14Number of full stands that can be completed in 30 seconds with arms folded across chest. Baseline score compared to score at week 14.
Change From Baseline in Test Score of 8-Foot Up-and-Go at Week 14.Baseline and at week 14Number of seconds required to get up from a seated position, walk 8 feet (2.44 meters), turn, and return to seated position. Baseline score compared to score at week 14.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Motivation for TrainingAt week 14.Semi-structured interviews will be done with the participant after the intervention to investigate the motivation of the IMT.
Change From Baseline in Test Score of Line Walk at Week 14.Baseline and at week 14Number of steps a person can do on a line directly after the foot without touching outside the line. Baseline score compared to score at week 14.
Acceptability of IMTAt week 14.Semi-structured interviews will be done with the participant after the intervention to investigate the acceptability of the IMT
Change From Baseline in Test Score of Static Balance at Week 14.Baseline and at week 14Static Balance will be measured using Wii Balance Board, which have proven to be a valid measure of balance (Sgró 2014). This measure will be done using an application developed by Francesco Sgró and colleagues (Sgró 2014). Baseline score compared to score at week 14.
Adherence to Training, Composite Outcome Measure.At week 14Adherence to the training will be measured by registering the number of times the participants participate and how much they participate at each session.

Countries

Denmark

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Training
The intervention is done in the form of groups of 4-5 participants per set of tiles, with 2-3 set of tiles at a time. As more set can be used it is possible to make groups of more people. The training will consist of 1.5-3 minutes of training (depending on the game) on tiles and the rest while the other 2-3 participants train (4-6 minutes of break). Then the participants will train for 1.5-3 minutes again until each participant have received a total of 13 minutes of training. The intervention will be done 2 times a week for 12 weeks, each session lasting 1 hour and each participant receiving 13 minutes of training each time (see training plan). Training on Interactive Modulare Tiles: Training with the Interactive Modulare Tiles
30
Control
No training.
30
Total60

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up86
Overall StudyOnly partially tested02

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalControlTraining
6 Minute Walking Test238.73 Meters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 83.12
237.18 Meters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 94.77
240.28 Meters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 71.21
Age, Continuous82.73 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.57
82.37 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.61
83.14 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.69
BMI26.16 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.8
26.16 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.45
26.17 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.21
Chair Stand9 Chair stands per 30 seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.17
8.77 Chair stands per 30 seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.91
9.23 Chair stands per 30 seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.47
Height1.63 cm1.65 cm1.62 cm
Line Walk2.93 Steps
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.56
3.50 Steps
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.49
2.37 Steps
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.36
Sex: Female, Male
Female
53 Participants25 Participants28 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
Timed Up and Go12.80 Seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.96
13.35 Seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
12.24 Seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.13
Weight69.73 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.25
71.13 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.34
68.33 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.22

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 300 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 300 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Test Score of 30-second Chair Stand at Week 14.

Number of full stands that can be completed in 30 seconds with arms folded across chest. Baseline score compared to score at week 14.

Time frame: Baseline and at week 14

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
TrainingChange From Baseline in Test Score of 30-second Chair Stand at Week 14.2.05 Full chair stands per 30 seconds
ControlChange From Baseline in Test Score of 30-second Chair Stand at Week 14.0.455 Full chair stands per 30 seconds
Primary

Change From Baseline in Test Score of 6 Minute Walking Test at Week 14.

Numbers of meters that can be walked in 6 minutes around a 50-yard (45.7 meters) course. Baseline score compared to score at week 14.

Time frame: Baseline and at week 14

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
TrainingChange From Baseline in Test Score of 6 Minute Walking Test at Week 14.1.07 m
ControlChange From Baseline in Test Score of 6 Minute Walking Test at Week 14.0.568 m
Primary

Change From Baseline in Test Score of 8-Foot Up-and-Go at Week 14.

Number of seconds required to get up from a seated position, walk 8 feet (2.44 meters), turn, and return to seated position. Baseline score compared to score at week 14.

Time frame: Baseline and at week 14

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
TrainingChange From Baseline in Test Score of 8-Foot Up-and-Go at Week 14.-1.38 seconds
ControlChange From Baseline in Test Score of 8-Foot Up-and-Go at Week 14.-0.0473 seconds
Secondary

Acceptability of IMT

Semi-structured interviews will be done with the participant after the intervention to investigate the acceptability of the IMT

Time frame: At week 14.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TrainingAcceptability of IMT90 percentage of happy to train on IMT
Secondary

Adherence to Training, Composite Outcome Measure.

Adherence to the training will be measured by registering the number of times the participants participate and how much they participate at each session.

Time frame: At week 14

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
TrainingAdherence to Training, Composite Outcome Measure.90.6 percentage of sessions
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Test Score of Line Walk at Week 14.

Number of steps a person can do on a line directly after the foot without touching outside the line. Baseline score compared to score at week 14.

Time frame: Baseline and at week 14

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
TrainingChange From Baseline in Test Score of Line Walk at Week 14.2.23 Steps
ControlChange From Baseline in Test Score of Line Walk at Week 14.1.09 Steps
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Test Score of Static Balance at Week 14.

Static Balance will be measured using Wii Balance Board, which have proven to be a valid measure of balance (Sgró 2014). This measure will be done using an application developed by Francesco Sgró and colleagues (Sgró 2014). Baseline score compared to score at week 14.

Time frame: Baseline and at week 14

Population: Data were not collected.

Secondary

Motivation for Training

Semi-structured interviews will be done with the participant after the intervention to investigate the motivation of the IMT.

Time frame: At week 14.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TrainingMotivation for Training85 percentage of wanting to continue

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 11, 2026