Skip to content

Patient Anxiety During Radiological Examination

The Prevalence of Anxiety in Patients Undergoing Radiologic Exam

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02496533
Enrollment
217
Registered
2015-07-14
Start date
2014-02-28
Completion date
2015-01-31
Last updated
2017-01-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anxiety

Brief summary

This clinical trial design evaluates whether hand massage reduces anxiety levels in cancer patients as they undergo radiological examination to evaluate tumor response. Anxiety levels will be investigated before massage, after massage, and following the completion of the radiological exam. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a validated anxiety assessment tool, will be used to measure anxiety.

Interventions

PROCEDUREHand Massage

The hand massage procedure comprises 4 minutes of manipulation of the subject's hands (2 minutes per hand) by a skilled massage therapist or appropriately trained staff.

Sponsors

Midwestern Regional Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Signed informed consent * Age ≥ 18 years * Scheduled to undergo radiologic imaging evaluation of a tumor

Exclusion criteria

* Known hand injury within 30 days prior to study participation * Known pregnancy * Mental disability as determined by the treating physician * Actively receiving radiation therapy * Actively receiving chemotherapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Anxiety as Measured by Visual Analog ScaleBaseline and After ImagingSubjects self-reported their perceived anxiety by marking a visual analog scale (VAS). The VAS covers the range 0 to 10. Higher values indicate greater anxiety (worse outcome). Analysis based on difference reported anxiety score between Baseline and after imaging.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Blood Pressure in mmHgBaseline and After ImagingA trained clinician will measure and record the subject's blood pressure using standard practices.
Change in Respiration Rate in Breaths Per MinuteBaseline and After ImagingA trained clinician will measure and record the subject's respiration rate using standard practices.
Change in Pulse RateBaseline and After ImagingA trained clinician will measure and record the subject's radial pulse rate using standard practices.

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Hand Massage
Subjects in this arm will complete rate their anxiety by visual analog scale (VAS). Blood pressure, pulse and respiration will be recorded before massage, after massage but before imaging, and after imaging.The subjects will receive hand massage prior to the imaging procedure. The anxiety VAS will be repeated after the imaging procedure. Hand Massage: The hand massage procedure comprises 4 minutes of manipulation of the subject's hands (2 minutes per hand) by a skilled massage therapist or appropriately trained staff.
105
No Massage
Subjects in this arm will complete rate their anxiety by visual analog scale (VAS). Blood pressure, pulse and respiration will be recorded before and after imaging. The anxiety VAS will be repeated after the imaging procedure. Subjects in this arm will not receive the hand massage prior to the imaging procedure.
112
Total217

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLack of data on outcome30
Overall StudyLate for radiologic testing02
Overall StudyPatient did not complete all measures04

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHand MassageNo MassageTotal
Age, Customized
Age ≥18 years
105 participants112 participants217 participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants5 Participants11 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
99 Participants105 Participants204 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Gender
Female
43 Participants46 Participants89 Participants
Gender
Male
62 Participants66 Participants128 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
21 Participants20 Participants41 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
9 Participants6 Participants15 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
75 Participants86 Participants161 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
105 participants112 participants217 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1050 / 112
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1050 / 112

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Anxiety as Measured by Visual Analog Scale

Subjects self-reported their perceived anxiety by marking a visual analog scale (VAS). The VAS covers the range 0 to 10. Higher values indicate greater anxiety (worse outcome). Analysis based on difference reported anxiety score between Baseline and after imaging.

Time frame: Baseline and After Imaging

Population: All patients completing the study per protocol were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Hand MassageChange in Anxiety as Measured by Visual Analog ScaleBaseline3.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
Hand MassageChange in Anxiety as Measured by Visual Analog ScaleAfter Imaging1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
No MassageChange in Anxiety as Measured by Visual Analog ScaleBaseline2.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
No MassageChange in Anxiety as Measured by Visual Analog ScaleAfter Imaging1.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Comparison: H0: No difference in reported anxiety as self-reported change of VAS between Baseline and After Imaging time points between the Massage and No Massage groups After Imaging.p-value: <0.001ANOVA
Secondary

Change in Blood Pressure in mmHg

A trained clinician will measure and record the subject's blood pressure using standard practices.

Time frame: Baseline and After Imaging

Population: All patients completing the study per protocol were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Hand MassageChange in Blood Pressure in mmHgSystolic Blood Pressure Baseline132.9 mmHgStandard Deviation 17.6
Hand MassageChange in Blood Pressure in mmHgSystolic Blood Pressure After Imaging135.1 mmHgStandard Deviation 16.7
Hand MassageChange in Blood Pressure in mmHgDiastolic Blood Pressure Baseline74.9 mmHgStandard Deviation 10.3
Hand MassageChange in Blood Pressure in mmHgDiastoloc Blood Pressure After Imaging72.6 mmHgStandard Deviation 10.2
No MassageChange in Blood Pressure in mmHgDiastoloc Blood Pressure After Imaging74.7 mmHgStandard Deviation 11.3
No MassageChange in Blood Pressure in mmHgSystolic Blood Pressure Baseline129.9 mmHgStandard Deviation 19.9
No MassageChange in Blood Pressure in mmHgDiastolic Blood Pressure Baseline75.1 mmHgStandard Deviation 10.8
No MassageChange in Blood Pressure in mmHgSystolic Blood Pressure After Imaging136.9 mmHgStandard Deviation 20.4
Comparison: H0: No difference in reported systolic blood pressure measurements between Baseline and After Imaging time points between the Massage and No Massage groups After Imaging.p-value: <0.02ANOVA
Comparison: H0: No difference in reported diastolic blood pressure between Baseline and After Imaging time points between the Massage and No Massage groups After Imaging.p-value: <0.09ANOVA
Secondary

Change in Pulse Rate

A trained clinician will measure and record the subject's radial pulse rate using standard practices.

Time frame: Baseline and After Imaging

Population: All patients completing the study per protocol were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Hand MassageChange in Pulse RatePulse Rate Baseline78.3 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 14.6
Hand MassageChange in Pulse RatePulse Rate After Imaging77.0 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 14
No MassageChange in Pulse RatePulse Rate Baseline80.6 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 14.2
No MassageChange in Pulse RatePulse Rate After Imaging80.1 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 15.1
Comparison: H0: No difference in reported pulse rate between Baseline and After Imaging time points between the Massage and No Massage groups After Imaging.p-value: <0.45ANOVA
Secondary

Change in Respiration Rate in Breaths Per Minute

A trained clinician will measure and record the subject's respiration rate using standard practices.

Time frame: Baseline and After Imaging

Population: All patients completing the study per protocol were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Hand MassageChange in Respiration Rate in Breaths Per MinuteRespiration Rate Baseline17.2 breaths per minuteStandard Deviation 2.8
Hand MassageChange in Respiration Rate in Breaths Per MinuteRespiration Rate After Imaging16.6 breaths per minuteStandard Deviation 2.5
No MassageChange in Respiration Rate in Breaths Per MinuteRespiration Rate Baseline17.2 breaths per minuteStandard Deviation 2.5
No MassageChange in Respiration Rate in Breaths Per MinuteRespiration Rate After Imaging17.5 breaths per minuteStandard Deviation 2.4
Comparison: H0: No difference in reported respiration rate between Baseline and After Imaging time points between the Massage and No Massage groups After Imaging.p-value: <0.009ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026