Skip to content

Optimal Dose of Combination of Rocuronium and Cisatracurium

Optimal Dose of Combination of Rocuronium and Cisatracurium: A Randomized Double-blinded Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02495038
Acronym
CRC
Enrollment
81
Registered
2015-07-13
Start date
2014-03-31
Completion date
2015-02-28
Last updated
2018-03-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia, Chronic Otitis Media

Keywords

combination, rocuronium, cisatracurium, neuromuscular blockade monitoring, drug synergism

Brief summary

BACKGROUND: The combinations of rocuronium and cisatracurium have a synergic effect. The investigators studied whether the prediction is possible to have a sufficient effect of reducing the dose when combining the two neuromuscular blocking agents through monitoring neuromuscular relaxation during surgery. METHODS: Each group were intubating dose group (Group I, n=27) combined Effective Dose (ED)95 rocuronium and ED95 cisatracurium, small amount reducing group (Group S, n=27) reduced 10% of each ED95 and large amount reducing group (Group L, n=27) reduced 20% of each ED95. Before patients arrived in the operating room, rocuronium and cisatracurium were prepared by a nurse who was not involved in this study. Each study drug was administrated to the patient and timer was started with TOF-Watch® monitoring. Train-of-four (TOF) of the ulnar nerve was used as setting of 2 Hz per 12 sec. The investigators checked time to TOF ratio=0 (Onset), time to 1st TOF ratio\>25% (Duration 25%) and TOF 25-75% (recovery index) under total i.v. anesthesia (TIVA). One way ANOVA was used for statistical analysis (α=0.05, β=0.2).

Detailed description

Introduction: Rocuronium and cisatracurium are representative neuromuscular blocking agents used widely because the former have features of fast onset of peak effect and short duration of muscle relaxation relatively while the latter have comparatively long duration relaxation time and break down by Hofmann elimination and ester hydrolysis. A combination of the two have a synergic effect may be also used with either the priming method for rapid sequence intubation. It would contribute both to determine the effective combination rate clinically and to predict the pharmacokinetic characteristics that determine how much the synergistic effect of this combination. The investigators studied whether the prediction is possible to have a sufficient effect of reducing the dose when combining the two muscle relaxants through monitoring muscle relaxation during surgery. Materials and methods: This study was conducted to 81 patients scheduled for elective mastoidectomy and tympanoplasty after obtaining written informed consent. All patients included the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II, aged 20-60, BMI 20-30 kg/m2. The exclusion criteria were as follows: a history of allergy to the study drugs, neuromuscular disease, pregnancy or breast-feeding, preoperative medication of antipsychotics or neuroleptics known to interact with non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs), serum creatinine level\>1.2 mg/dL, liver transaminase\>40 U/L. Anthropometric variables such as height, weight were measured in ward before surgery. BMI calculated as total body weight divided by the squared height. Ideal body weight (IBW) was calculated by the formula of Devine {50 kg + 2.3 × (height \[inch\]-60) for man and 45.5 kg + 2.3 × (height \[inch\]-60) for woman} and used to administrate NMBAs of initial dose. Lean body weight (LBW) was calculated by the formula of James {LBW (men) = (1.10 × Weight(kg)) - 128 × ( Weight2 / (100 × Height(m))2), (women) = (1.07 × Weight(kg)) - 148 × ( Weight2 / (100 × Height(m))2)}. Additive dose of NMBAs was administrated by LBW. Patients were randomly assigned to each group by opening of sealed allocation envelope. Each group were intubating dose group (Group I, n=27) combined ED95 rocuronium and ED95 cisatracurium, small amount reducing group (Group S, n=27) reduced 10% of each ED95 and large amount reducing group (Group L, n=27) reduced 20% of each ED95. Monitoring and Medication: In the operating room, monitoring was accomplished to patients with a noninvasive blood pressure, pulse oximetry, electrocardiography, thermometer, Bispectral Index (BIS VISTA Monitoring System; Aspect Medical Systems Inc, Norwood, MA, USA), and T1/T4 ratio used TOF-Watch® (Organon, Teknica B.V., Boxtel, the Netherlands). Every 5 min, measured things are recorded. Premedications with midazolam 2 mg and glycopyrrolate 0.2 mg were administrated to patients intramuscularly 1 h before surgery. Before patients arrived in the operating room, rocuronium and cisatracurium were prepared by a nurse who was not involved in this study. The syringe containing each study drug was conveyed to the performer of this study as the status of shielding the scale. The syringes of rocuronium and cisatracurium used each other syringe. Anesthesia was induced with propofol 1.5-2.5 mg/kg, remifentanil 0.4-0.6 mcg/kg, afterward maintained with target controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol 5-10 mg/kg/hr and remifentanil 0.05-2 mcg/kg/min. The infusion pump (Orchestra Module DPS, Fresenius-Vial, Brezins, France) was operated with Minto's and Marshall's pharmacokinetic model for effect site TCI of remifentanil and propofol. The opposite arm against operation side was used for neuromuscular monitoring and attached to armboard of TOF-Watch®. Each study drug was administrated to the patient and timer was started with T1/T4 ratio monitoring. The surface electrodes of ulnar nerve placed at the wrist and Train-of-four (TOF) stimulation was used as setting of supramaximal square wave impulses with 200μs duration, 2 Hz per 12sec. The investigators checked times to TOF ratio=0 (Onset), 1st TOF ratio\>25% (Duration 25%) and TOF 25-75% (Recovery Index), recovery time of 90% (TOF 25-90%) under total i.v. anesthesia (TIVA). Also the investigators checked the rate of additional rescue dose administrated with 10% of initial NMBAs dose, operation time from incision to surgical wound dressing, anesthesia time from entering to going out the operation room. Body temperature was maintained above 35°C using warm air blanket. The arterial pressure cuff was placed on the opposite arm against TOF monitoring. Adverse Events and Management: In all patients, anesthesia level was assessed based on a BIS score of 40-60. Moderate hypertension (\>120% of baseline) or hypotension (\<80% of baseline) was treated by increasing or decreasing rate of propofol infusion with fluid supplement. Severe hemodynamic change (systolic pressure \< 90 mmHg or \> 200 mmHg) was controlled by intravenous (IV) administration of phenylephrine 50 mcg or nicardipine 250 mcg repeatedly until being hemodynamic stable status. Unexpectedly, when hiccup or self-contained respiration was showed, additional rescue dose of NMBAs was administrated to the patient even though T1/T4 ratio was lower than 25%. Statistical Analysis: All data are expressed as means ± standard deviations (SDs), numbers (percentages), or medians (upper and lower quartiles), as appropriate. Data between the groups were compared using the χ2 test, Fisher exact test, independent t test, or the Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate. To assess data normality, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was performed on the data set. According to a preliminary study, 24 patients would be required in each group with a power of 0.9 and a type I error of 0.05. Factoring in a drop-out rate of 10%, the investigators calculated that 27 patients would be required for each group. All statistical analyses were performed with the SPSS 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) program. A P value \<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Interventions

DRUG10% reduction of combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®

Patients were randomly assigned to each group by opening of sealed allocation envelope. After collection of data, allocation number was matched with each group. The participants matched at Group S were administered with NMBAs reduced 10% of each ED95. Before patients arrived in the operating room, rocuronium and cisatracurium were prepared by a nurse who was not involved in this study. Each drug dosage was determined by allocation number. The syringe containing each study drug was conveyed to the performer of this study as the status of shielding the scale. The syringes of rocuronium and cisatracurium used each other syringe.

DRUG20% reduction of combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®

The participants matched at Group L were administered with NMBAs reduced 20% of each ED95.

Sponsors

Yonsei University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II * BMI 20-30 kg/m2 * Patients scheduled for mastoidectomy and tympanoplasty.

Exclusion criteria

* a history of allergy to the study drugs, * neuromuscular disease, * pregnancy * breast-feeding, * preoperative medication of antipsychotics or neuroleptics known to interact with NMBAs * serum creatinine level\>1.2 mg/dL, * liver transaminase\>40 U/L.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Onset of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents(NMBAs)Intraoperative, an average of 5 minutesTime from administration of initial NMBAs to Train-of-four (TOF) ratio=0, assessed up to 15 minutes during general anesthesia.
Recovery Index of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents(NMBAs)Intraoperative, an average of 20 minutesTime from TOF ratio 25% to 75%, assessed up to 1 hour during general anesthesia.
Duration 25% of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents(NMBAs)Intraoperative, an average of 1 hoursTime from administration of initial NMBAs to Train-of-four (TOF) ratio \>25%, assessed up to 2 hours during general anesthesia.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Anesthetic TimeIntraoperative, an average 4 hours.Time from induction to recovery of anesthesia, asessed up to 3 hours.
Operation TimeIntraoperative, an average of 3 hours.Time from skin incision to wound dressing assessed up to 8 hours.
Additional Rescue Doses Per Hour Ratio.Intraoperative, an average of 3 hours.Additional Rescue Doses Per Hour Ratio is the number per hour of addition of rescue dose administrated with 10% of initial NMBAs dose. The formula is {(Addition number + 1 / Anesthetic time) x 60}.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Peripheral Oxygen SaturationBefore and after induction of anesthesia, an average 10 min.Before induction of anesthesia, peripheral oxygen saturation was measured for baseline. And after injection of NMBAs, peripheral oxygen saturation was measured at 10 min.
Bispectral IndexBefore and after induction of anesthesia, an average 10 min.The BIS monitor provides a single dimensionless number, which ranges from 0 (equivalent to EEG silence) to 100. A BIS value between 40 and 60 indicates an appropriate level for general anesthesia, as recommended by the manufacturer. Before induction of anesthesia, bispectral index was measured for baseline. And after injection of NMBAs, bispectral index was measured at 10 min.
Body TemperatureBefore and after induction of anesthesia, an average 10 min.Before induction of anesthesia, body temperature was measured for baseline by oral temperature probe. And after injection of NMBAs, non invasive blood pressure was measured at 10 min by esophageal temperature probe.
Non Invasive Blood Pressure,Before and after induction of anesthesia, an average 10 min.Before induction of anesthesia, non invasive blood pressure was measured for baseline. And after injection of NMBAs, non invasive blood pressure was measured at 10 min.

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Intubating Dose, Group I
combined ED95 rocuronium and ED95 cisatracurium ED95, dose causing on average 95% suppression of neuromuscular response.
27
10% Reduction of Combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®, Group S
This arm reduced 10% of combined ED95 rocuronium and ED95 cisatracurium 10% reduction of combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®: Patients were randomly assigned to each group by opening of sealed allocation envelope. After collection of data, allocation number was matched with each group. The participants matched at Group S were administered with NMBAs reduced 10% of each ED95. Before patients arrived in the operating room, rocuronium and cisatracurium were prepared by a nurse who was not involved in this study. Each drug dosage was determined by allocation number. The syringe containing each study drug was conveyed to the performer of this study as the status of shielding the scale. The syringes of rocuronium and cisatracurium used each other syringe.
27
20% Reduction of Combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®, Group L
This arm reduced 20% of combined ED95 rocuronium and ED95 cisatracurium 20% reduction of combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®: The participants matched at Group L were administered with NMBAs reduced 20% of each ED95.
27
Total81

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIntubating Dose, Group I10% Reduction of Combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®, Group S20% Reduction of Combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®, Group LTotal
Age, Continuous47.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
50.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
49.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
49.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
Region of Enrollment
Korea, Republic of
27 participants27 participants27 participants81 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants18 Participants20 Participants56 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants9 Participants7 Participants25 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 270 / 270 / 27
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 270 / 273 / 27
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 270 / 270 / 27

Outcome results

Primary

Duration 25% of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents(NMBAs)

Time from administration of initial NMBAs to Train-of-four (TOF) ratio \>25%, assessed up to 2 hours during general anesthesia.

Time frame: Intraoperative, an average of 1 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intubating Dose, Group IDuration 25% of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents(NMBAs)51.3 MinuteStandard Deviation 8.4
10% Reduction of Combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®, Group SDuration 25% of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents(NMBAs)47.9 MinuteStandard Deviation 10.7
20% Reduction of Combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®, Group LDuration 25% of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents(NMBAs)39.4 MinuteStandard Deviation 6.8
Primary

Onset of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents(NMBAs)

Time from administration of initial NMBAs to Train-of-four (TOF) ratio=0, assessed up to 15 minutes during general anesthesia.

Time frame: Intraoperative, an average of 5 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intubating Dose, Group IOnset of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents(NMBAs)212.8 SecondStandard Deviation 56
10% Reduction of Combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®, Group SOnset of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents(NMBAs)230.1 SecondStandard Deviation 60.6
20% Reduction of Combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®, Group LOnset of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents(NMBAs)399.3 SecondStandard Deviation 147.8
Primary

Recovery Index of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents(NMBAs)

Time from TOF ratio 25% to 75%, assessed up to 1 hour during general anesthesia.

Time frame: Intraoperative, an average of 20 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intubating Dose, Group IRecovery Index of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents(NMBAs)15.9 MinuteStandard Deviation 3.8
10% Reduction of Combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®, Group SRecovery Index of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents(NMBAs)16.2 MinuteStandard Deviation 4.8
20% Reduction of Combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®, Group LRecovery Index of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents(NMBAs)14.1 MinuteStandard Deviation 3.4
Secondary

Additional Rescue Doses Per Hour Ratio.

Additional Rescue Doses Per Hour Ratio is the number per hour of addition of rescue dose administrated with 10% of initial NMBAs dose. The formula is {(Addition number + 1 / Anesthetic time) x 60}.

Time frame: Intraoperative, an average of 3 hours.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intubating Dose, Group IAdditional Rescue Doses Per Hour Ratio.1.43455 ratioStandard Deviation 0.49108
10% Reduction of Combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®, Group SAdditional Rescue Doses Per Hour Ratio.1.21014 ratioStandard Deviation 0.43501
20% Reduction of Combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®, Group LAdditional Rescue Doses Per Hour Ratio.0.82128 ratioStandard Deviation 0.26596
Secondary

Anesthetic Time

Time from induction to recovery of anesthesia, asessed up to 3 hours.

Time frame: Intraoperative, an average 4 hours.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intubating Dose, Group IAnesthetic Time163.0 MinuteStandard Deviation 26.8
10% Reduction of Combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®, Group SAnesthetic Time159.9 MinuteStandard Deviation 30.6
20% Reduction of Combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®, Group LAnesthetic Time161.4 MinuteStandard Deviation 25.9
Secondary

Operation Time

Time from skin incision to wound dressing assessed up to 8 hours.

Time frame: Intraoperative, an average of 3 hours.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intubating Dose, Group IOperation Time151.8 MinuteStandard Deviation 27.2
10% Reduction of Combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®, Group SOperation Time147.0 MinuteStandard Deviation 31.4
20% Reduction of Combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®, Group LOperation Time145.9 MinuteStandard Deviation 27.6
Other Pre-specified

Bispectral Index

The BIS monitor provides a single dimensionless number, which ranges from 0 (equivalent to EEG silence) to 100. A BIS value between 40 and 60 indicates an appropriate level for general anesthesia, as recommended by the manufacturer. Before induction of anesthesia, bispectral index was measured for baseline. And after injection of NMBAs, bispectral index was measured at 10 min.

Time frame: Before and after induction of anesthesia, an average 10 min.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intubating Dose, Group IBispectral Index46.0 BIS scoreStandard Deviation 8.2
10% Reduction of Combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®, Group SBispectral Index46.1 BIS scoreStandard Deviation 7.5
20% Reduction of Combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®, Group LBispectral Index44.3 BIS scoreStandard Deviation 9.4
Other Pre-specified

Body Temperature

Before induction of anesthesia, body temperature was measured for baseline by oral temperature probe. And after injection of NMBAs, non invasive blood pressure was measured at 10 min by esophageal temperature probe.

Time frame: Before and after induction of anesthesia, an average 10 min.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intubating Dose, Group IBody Temperature36.3 Celcius degreeStandard Deviation 0.3
10% Reduction of Combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®, Group SBody Temperature36.3 Celcius degreeStandard Deviation 0.2
20% Reduction of Combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®, Group LBody Temperature36.3 Celcius degreeStandard Deviation 0.2
Other Pre-specified

Non Invasive Blood Pressure,

Before induction of anesthesia, non invasive blood pressure was measured for baseline. And after injection of NMBAs, non invasive blood pressure was measured at 10 min.

Time frame: Before and after induction of anesthesia, an average 10 min.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intubating Dose, Group INon Invasive Blood Pressure,Systolic pressure128.3 mmHgStandard Deviation 17.7
Intubating Dose, Group INon Invasive Blood Pressure,Diastolic pressure75.6 mmHgStandard Deviation 9.7
10% Reduction of Combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®, Group SNon Invasive Blood Pressure,Systolic pressure128.3 mmHgStandard Deviation 20.7
10% Reduction of Combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®, Group SNon Invasive Blood Pressure,Diastolic pressure76.7 mmHgStandard Deviation 9.2
20% Reduction of Combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®, Group LNon Invasive Blood Pressure,Systolic pressure128.4 mmHgStandard Deviation 19.1
20% Reduction of Combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®, Group LNon Invasive Blood Pressure,Diastolic pressure74.8 mmHgStandard Deviation 9
Other Pre-specified

Peripheral Oxygen Saturation

Before induction of anesthesia, peripheral oxygen saturation was measured for baseline. And after injection of NMBAs, peripheral oxygen saturation was measured at 10 min.

Time frame: Before and after induction of anesthesia, an average 10 min.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intubating Dose, Group IPeripheral Oxygen Saturation100 PercentageStandard Deviation 0
10% Reduction of Combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®, Group SPeripheral Oxygen Saturation99.9 PercentageStandard Deviation 0.2
20% Reduction of Combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®, Group LPeripheral Oxygen Saturation100 PercentageStandard Deviation 0

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026