Skip to content

HIV Prevention Toolkit for HIV-negative Male Couples

Development of a HIV Prevention Toolkit for At-risk HIV-negative Male Couples

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02494817
Acronym
MCAP
Enrollment
298
Registered
2015-07-10
Start date
2015-10-31
Completion date
2016-09-30
Last updated
2019-04-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV

Keywords

HIV prevention, Toolkit, Male couples, Sexual agreements

Brief summary

Though technology is integrated into the lives of our target population, use of any particular technology will depend on the content delivered, aesthetic appeal, and overall design. Based on the completion and analysis of data from Phase 1, the investigators were able to obtain feedback on HIV-negative male couples' attitudes toward the original content in the prevention toolkit modules. The research team, along with the web-developers, used this feedback to specifically tailor the content of the modules to fit the unique needs of the intervention's target population: at risk HIV-negative male couples. For Phase 2, the investigators conducted focus groups at each site to help identify strengths and potential areas for improvement of the prevention toolkit, which will be incorporated before piloting it in the intervention for Phase 3 of this project. After assessing the acceptability of the prevention toolkit, including the content of modules, aesthetic appeal, and overall design with HIV-negative male couples target population, the research team will pilot test whether the RCT with the prevention toolkit will help reduce HIV risk through formation and adherence to a sexual agreement, reduction in occurrences of condomless anal sex with casual sex partners, and increase testing behaviors among at-risk HIV-negative male couples. The interactive website, herein referred to as the HIV prevention toolkit will contain unique modules about sexual agreements and effective HIV prevention strategies.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALMale Couples Agreement Project

Couples assigned to the intervention group will first as individuals view general video about purpose of study and how to use website functions; timeline activity about their relationship; select top values about their relationship; learn about effective HIV prevention strategies; learn about sexual agreements; select what items they want to have in their agreement; explore a learning module about testing and view the sexual health resource center. As a couple, they will log back into the website to view and compare timelines and relationship values; watch a video about communicating more effectively; negotiate and decide together what items they want to include in their agreement; explore the sexual health resource center and/or any other modules from when they were logged into the website as individuals; download a corresponding smartphone app that will include a copy of their newly created agreement and sexual health resource center.

Sponsors

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Miami
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Eligible male couples: 1. are identified as two men (i.e., main partners) who had been in a sexual relationship together for \> 6 months; 2. are at least 18 years of age; 3. are self-reported as being HIV-negative; 4. had been practicing CAS in their relationship for \> 6 months; 5. report no recent history (\< 1 year) of intimate partner violence (IPV) or coercion; 6. have had no current sexual agreement; and 7. own a smartphone and have an alternate method to access the Internet (e.g., computer).

Exclusion criteria

1. Interested participants, including both men of a male couple, who did not meet the inclusion criteria above will be excluded from participating in Phase 3 of this study. 2. Individuals who participated in Phase 1 or 2 will be were excluded from participating in Phase 3 of this study. 3. Adults who are unable to consent; 4. Individuals who are not yet adults; 5. Pregnant and non-pregnant women, and prisoners.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Formation of a Sexual Agreement at 6 Months6 monthSelf-reports of yes/no to forming a sexual agreement via electronic survey
Adherence to a Sexual Agreement at 6 Months6 monthSelf-report of yes/no of adhering to a sexual agreement

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Had Condomless Anal Sex With Casual Male Sex Partner During Months 0-33 monthSelf-reports of yes/no of any anal sex with casual male sex partner between months and month 3 via electronic survey
Had Condomless Anal Sex With Casual Male Sex Partner Reported at Month 6month 6Self-reports of yes/no any anal sex with casual male sex partner, measured at month 6 via electronic survey (about the previous 3 months, i.e., timeframe between months 3-6).
Formation of a Sexual Agreement at 3 Months3 monthSelf-reports of yes/no to forming a sexual agreement via electronic survey
Test for HIV During the Last 3 Months (Months 3-6)month 6Self-reports of yes/no any test for HIV at month 6 assessment, collected via electronic survey for timeframe between months 3 and 6.
Test for HIV During Past 3 Months (Months 0-3)3 monthSelf-reports of yes/no via electronic survey taken at 3 month.
Adherence to a Sexual Agreement3 monthSelf-reports of yes/no to adhering to a sexual agreement via electronic survey

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Control Group
Couples assigned to the control group will be directed to the website that only has the following: 1) module about learning about effective HIV prevention strategies, 2) sexual health resource center, and 3) a link to download a corresponding smartphone app that will include the sexual health resource center.
162
Intervention Group
Couples assigned to the intervention group will first as individuals view general video about purpose of study and how to use website functions; timeline activity about their relationship; select top values about their relationship; learn about effective HIV prevention strategies; learn about sexual agreements; select what items they want to have in their agreement; explore a learning module about testing and view the sexual health resource center. As a couple, they will log back into the website to view and compare timelines and relationship values; watch a video about communicating more effectively; negotiate and decide together what items they want to include in their agreement; explore the sexual health resource center and/or any other modules from when they were logged into the website as individuals; download a corresponding smartphone app that will include a copy of their newly created agreement and sexual health resource center.
136
Total298

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControl GroupIntervention GroupTotal
Age, Continuous27.55 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.03
28.13 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.33
27.81 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.03
Education
Bachelors degree
45 Participants29 Participants74 Participants
Education
Graduate degree
14 Participants19 Participants33 Participants
Education
High School graduate / GED
20 Participants22 Participants42 Participants
Education
missing data
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Education
Some college / AA / trade
61 Participants56 Participants117 Participants
Education
Some grad school
13 Participants7 Participants20 Participants
Education
Some High School
7 Participants3 Participants10 Participants
Employment
Full time
106 Participants90 Participants196 Participants
Employment
On disability
8 Participants4 Participants12 Participants
Employment
Part time
18 Participants16 Participants34 Participants
Employment
Retired
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Employment
Student
21 Participants19 Participants40 Participants
Employment
Unemployed
8 Participants7 Participants15 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
24 Participants24 Participants48 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
138 Participants112 Participants250 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Had sex with casual male partner (outside relationship)
No, not within last 3 months
133 Participants98 Participants231 Participants
Had sex with casual male partner (outside relationship)
Yes within last 3 months
29 Participants38 Participants67 Participants
HIV testing frequency (before relationship)
Every 3-4 months
24 Participants15 Participants39 Participants
HIV testing frequency (before relationship)
Every 6 months
33 Participants28 Participants61 Participants
HIV testing frequency (before relationship)
Missing data
28 Participants20 Participants48 Participants
HIV testing frequency (before relationship)
No testing pattern
23 Participants21 Participants44 Participants
HIV testing frequency (before relationship)
Once a year
29 Participants30 Participants59 Participants
HIV testing frequency (before relationship)
When I dated someone new
6 Participants4 Participants10 Participants
HIV testing frequency (before relationship)
When I felt at risk for HIV
19 Participants18 Participants37 Participants
HIV testing frequency (since in relationship)
Every 3-4 months
8 Participants0 Participants8 Participants
HIV testing frequency (since in relationship)
Every 6 months
14 Participants11 Participants25 Participants
HIV testing frequency (since in relationship)
Missing data
60 Participants41 Participants101 Participants
HIV testing frequency (since in relationship)
No testing pattern
38 Participants41 Participants79 Participants
HIV testing frequency (since in relationship)
Once a year
26 Participants23 Participants49 Participants
HIV testing frequency (since in relationship)
When I felt at risk for HIV
16 Participants20 Participants36 Participants
Length of current relationship
10 + years
4 Participants8 Participants12 Participants
Length of current relationship
1-3 years
69 Participants42 Participants111 Participants
Length of current relationship
3-6 months
7 Participants8 Participants15 Participants
Length of current relationship
3-6 years
34 Participants37 Participants71 Participants
Length of current relationship
6-10 years
8 Participants16 Participants24 Participants
Length of current relationship
6-12 months
40 Participants25 Participants65 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants6 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
6 Participants3 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
6 Participants6 Participants12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
147 Participants119 Participants266 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
162 participants136 participants298 participants
Region of residence
Midwest
35 Participants48 Participants83 Participants
Region of residence
Northeast
19 Participants11 Participants30 Participants
Region of residence
South
67 Participants39 Participants106 Participants
Region of residence
US territory
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Region of residence
West
39 Participants36 Participants75 Participants
Relationship status
Domestic partnership
42 Participants28 Participants70 Participants
Relationship status
Engaged
27 Participants28 Participants55 Participants
Relationship status
Married
24 Participants40 Participants64 Participants
Relationship status
None of the above
62 Participants31 Participants93 Participants
Relationship status
Other
7 Participants9 Participants16 Participants
Relationship type
missing data
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Relationship type
Monogamous
153 Participants117 Participants270 Participants
Relationship type
No label and other
3 Participants5 Participants8 Participants
Relationship type
Open
5 Participants14 Participants19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
162 Participants136 Participants298 Participants
Sexual orientation
bisexual
6 Participants3 Participants9 Participants
Sexual orientation
gay
156 Participants133 Participants289 Participants
When started having anal sex in relationship5.24 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.25
5.96 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.59
5.57 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.95
When started having condomless anal sex in relationship10.98 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.09
22.91 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 44.38
16.42 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 31.18

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1620 / 136
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1620 / 136
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1620 / 136

Outcome results

Primary

Adherence to a Sexual Agreement at 6 Months

Self-report of yes/no of adhering to a sexual agreement

Time frame: 6 month

Population: Participants who provided data in outcome 1 as having a concordant agreement were analyzed.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Control GroupAdherence to a Sexual Agreement at 6 MonthsAdhered to the agreement48 Participants
Control GroupAdherence to a Sexual Agreement at 6 MonthsDid not adhere to the agreement8 Participants
Intervention GroupAdherence to a Sexual Agreement at 6 MonthsAdhered to the agreement60 Participants
Intervention GroupAdherence to a Sexual Agreement at 6 MonthsDid not adhere to the agreement6 Participants
Primary

Formation of a Sexual Agreement at 6 Months

Self-reports of yes/no to forming a sexual agreement via electronic survey

Time frame: 6 month

Population: For control, 115 men (52 dyads both partners provided data and 11 dyads where only one partner provided data) provided outcome data.~For intervention, 98 men (45 dyads where both partners provided data and 8 dyads where only one partner provided data) provided outcome data.~Only dyads where both partners provided data were included.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Control GroupFormation of a Sexual Agreement at 6 MonthsFormed an agreement56 Participants
Control GroupFormation of a Sexual Agreement at 6 MonthsDid not form an agreement48 Participants
Intervention GroupFormation of a Sexual Agreement at 6 MonthsFormed an agreement66 Participants
Intervention GroupFormation of a Sexual Agreement at 6 MonthsDid not form an agreement24 Participants
Secondary

Adherence to a Sexual Agreement

Self-reports of yes/no to adhering to a sexual agreement via electronic survey

Time frame: 3 month

Population: Participants who provided data in outcome 3 as having a concordant agreement were analyzed.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Control GroupAdherence to a Sexual AgreementAdhered to the agreement62 Participants
Control GroupAdherence to a Sexual AgreementDid not adhere to the agreement8 Participants
Intervention GroupAdherence to a Sexual AgreementAdhered to the agreement54 Participants
Intervention GroupAdherence to a Sexual AgreementDid not adhere to the agreement4 Participants
Secondary

Formation of a Sexual Agreement at 3 Months

Self-reports of yes/no to forming a sexual agreement via electronic survey

Time frame: 3 month

Population: 206 partnered men represent 44 dyads in the intervention arm and 59 dyads in the control arm, respectively. Couple-level findings are reported at the individual level.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Control GroupFormation of a Sexual Agreement at 3 MonthsFormed an agreement70 Participants
Control GroupFormation of a Sexual Agreement at 3 MonthsDid not form an agreement48 Participants
Intervention GroupFormation of a Sexual Agreement at 3 MonthsFormed an agreement58 Participants
Intervention GroupFormation of a Sexual Agreement at 3 MonthsDid not form an agreement30 Participants
Secondary

Had Condomless Anal Sex With Casual Male Sex Partner During Months 0-3

Self-reports of yes/no of any anal sex with casual male sex partner between months and month 3 via electronic survey

Time frame: 3 month

Population: 9 of 125 participants in control did not provide data, and 9 of 92 participants in intervention did not provide data.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Control GroupHad Condomless Anal Sex With Casual Male Sex Partner During Months 0-3Had CAS7 Participants
Control GroupHad Condomless Anal Sex With Casual Male Sex Partner During Months 0-3Did not have CAS109 Participants
Intervention GroupHad Condomless Anal Sex With Casual Male Sex Partner During Months 0-3Had CAS5 Participants
Intervention GroupHad Condomless Anal Sex With Casual Male Sex Partner During Months 0-3Did not have CAS78 Participants
Secondary

Had Condomless Anal Sex With Casual Male Sex Partner Reported at Month 6

Self-reports of yes/no any anal sex with casual male sex partner, measured at month 6 via electronic survey (about the previous 3 months, i.e., timeframe between months 3-6).

Time frame: month 6

Population: Of control participants, only 104 of 115 provided data for this outcome. Of intervention participants, only 90 of 98 provided data for this outcome.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Control GroupHad Condomless Anal Sex With Casual Male Sex Partner Reported at Month 6Had CAS5 Participants
Control GroupHad Condomless Anal Sex With Casual Male Sex Partner Reported at Month 6Did not have CAS99 Participants
Intervention GroupHad Condomless Anal Sex With Casual Male Sex Partner Reported at Month 6Had CAS4 Participants
Intervention GroupHad Condomless Anal Sex With Casual Male Sex Partner Reported at Month 6Did not have CAS86 Participants
Secondary

Test for HIV During Past 3 Months (Months 0-3)

Self-reports of yes/no via electronic survey taken at 3 month.

Time frame: 3 month

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Control GroupTest for HIV During Past 3 Months (Months 0-3)Yes, within last 3 months27 Participants
Control GroupTest for HIV During Past 3 Months (Months 0-3)No, not within last 3 months98 Participants
Intervention GroupTest for HIV During Past 3 Months (Months 0-3)Yes, within last 3 months15 Participants
Intervention GroupTest for HIV During Past 3 Months (Months 0-3)No, not within last 3 months77 Participants
Secondary

Test for HIV During the Last 3 Months (Months 3-6)

Self-reports of yes/no any test for HIV at month 6 assessment, collected via electronic survey for timeframe between months 3 and 6.

Time frame: month 6

Population: 213 partnered men who completed 6-month assessment

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Control GroupTest for HIV During the Last 3 Months (Months 3-6)Yes, within last 3 months27 Participants
Control GroupTest for HIV During the Last 3 Months (Months 3-6)No, not within last 3 months88 Participants
Intervention GroupTest for HIV During the Last 3 Months (Months 3-6)Yes, within last 3 months11 Participants
Intervention GroupTest for HIV During the Last 3 Months (Months 3-6)No, not within last 3 months87 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026