Skip to content

Conduct Disorder in Prison: Search for Prospective and Retrospective Recurring and Contextual Elements

Passage à l'Acte en Maison d'arrêt : Recherche d'éléments Contextuels récurrents Prospectifs et rétrospectifs

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02493088
Acronym
CoDiRCE
Enrollment
11
Registered
2015-07-09
Start date
2015-03-31
Completion date
2015-09-30
Last updated
2017-04-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mental Disorders

Brief summary

The prediction of dangerousness remains a delicate subject, relevant in current psychiatry. Scalable psychopathological elements identified in schizophrenia and mood disorders are considered as most at risk for crime committing. The French High Authority of Health (HAS) recommends to identify and prevent risk situations of violence and to develop research at this level. Some authors have worked on criminal career and became interested in risk factors for aberrant driving behaviors but also in environmental or clinical elements accompanying these phases. To our knowledge, no specific study about contextual elements before misconduct and which could lead to aberrant driving behaviors among individuals diagnosed with antisocial personality disorder has been described to date The investigators propose to follow individuals diagnosed with antisocial personality disorder in prison during 6 months in order to list their conduct disorders and contextual elements upstream of these misconducts. The investigators will also study the effect of contextual factors related to judicial steps on the appearance of aberrant driving behaviors.

Detailed description

This study aims at identifying elements that can provoke frustration and lead to aberrant driving behaviors. The question is whether there are triggers that occur more frequently for the same subject. If so, these specific contextual elements could be detected in order to prevent violent acts.

Interventions

OTHERAntisocial personality recording of behavior and contextual elements

aberrant driving behaviors and upstream contextual elements of individuals diagnosed with antisocial personality disorder will be recorded during the study

Sponsors

Groupe Hospitalier de la Rochelle Ré Aunis
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male * Over 18 * Detention sentence in prison in Rochefort between March and August 2015 * Positive psychopathy score at PCL-R (Psychopathy Checklist-revised) test: score greater than or equal to 30

Exclusion criteria

* Chronic psychosis * Bipolar disorder * Women * Minors, * negative score at the PCL-R * Subject under protection measure (curator or guardian) * Refusal to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The Number of Individuals Diagnosed With Antisocial Personality Disorder in Rochefort Prison With Aberrant Driving Behaviors.6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Aberrant Driving Behaviors With Contextual Element Observed Before Aberrant Driving Behaviors6 monthsCollected contextual elements were : * Disorders in the institution (with a caregiver, frustration with the rules) * Difficulty / frustration with an inmate * Difficulty / frustration with the entourage * Consumption of alcohol or other toxic substances * Steps in the judicial process (refusal of parole, reduction of sentence ...) * Psychiatric symptoms: delirious, sleep disorders, nightmares The numerator for the percentage calculated is the number of aberrant driving behaviors with contextual element. The denominator for the percentage calculated is the total number of aberrant driving behaviors (with and without contextual element)
Number of Observed Situations Per Type of Aberrant Driving Behavior (Auto-aggressive, Aggressive or Other Hetero Transgression)6 monthsAuto-aggressive: attempted suicide, any gesture of mutilation (scarification, punching in a wall, etc.) Aggressive: rixes with fellow inmates or prison staff, attempted homicides, sexual assaults, etc. Other hetero transgression: Failure to comply with the rules of the institution, illegal entry of illicit objects into the establishment, consumption of toxic materials, destruction of property, etc.

Countries

France

Participant flow

Recruitment details

March 3 2015 to May 30 2015 Rochefort prison

Pre-assignment details

Patient with a negative psychopathy score at PCL-R were excluded A patient was transfered before assignment

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Antisocial Personality
Individuals Diagnosed with Antisocial Personality Disorder Antisocial personality recording of behavior and contextual elements: aberrant driving behaviors and upstream contextual elements of individuals diagnosed with antisocial personality disorder will be recorded during the study
11
Total11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAntisocial Personality
Age, Continuous28 years
Region of Enrollment
France
11 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 11
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 11

Outcome results

Primary

The Number of Individuals Diagnosed With Antisocial Personality Disorder in Rochefort Prison With Aberrant Driving Behaviors.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Antisocial PersonalityThe Number of Individuals Diagnosed With Antisocial Personality Disorder in Rochefort Prison With Aberrant Driving Behaviors.9 participants
Secondary

Number of Observed Situations Per Type of Aberrant Driving Behavior (Auto-aggressive, Aggressive or Other Hetero Transgression)

Auto-aggressive: attempted suicide, any gesture of mutilation (scarification, punching in a wall, etc.) Aggressive: rixes with fellow inmates or prison staff, attempted homicides, sexual assaults, etc. Other hetero transgression: Failure to comply with the rules of the institution, illegal entry of illicit objects into the establishment, consumption of toxic materials, destruction of property, etc.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Antisocial PersonalityNumber of Observed Situations Per Type of Aberrant Driving Behavior (Auto-aggressive, Aggressive or Other Hetero Transgression)aggressive15 number of observed situations
Antisocial PersonalityNumber of Observed Situations Per Type of Aberrant Driving Behavior (Auto-aggressive, Aggressive or Other Hetero Transgression)other hetero transgression31 number of observed situations
Antisocial PersonalityNumber of Observed Situations Per Type of Aberrant Driving Behavior (Auto-aggressive, Aggressive or Other Hetero Transgression)auto-aggressive0 number of observed situations
Secondary

Percentage of Aberrant Driving Behaviors With Contextual Element Observed Before Aberrant Driving Behaviors

Collected contextual elements were : * Disorders in the institution (with a caregiver, frustration with the rules) * Difficulty / frustration with an inmate * Difficulty / frustration with the entourage * Consumption of alcohol or other toxic substances * Steps in the judicial process (refusal of parole, reduction of sentence ...) * Psychiatric symptoms: delirious, sleep disorders, nightmares The numerator for the percentage calculated is the number of aberrant driving behaviors with contextual element. The denominator for the percentage calculated is the total number of aberrant driving behaviors (with and without contextual element)

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Antisocial PersonalityPercentage of Aberrant Driving Behaviors With Contextual Element Observed Before Aberrant Driving Behaviors67.4 percent of aberrant driving behaviors

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026