Skip to content

A Multimodal Intervention to Address Sexual Dysfunction in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Survivors

A Multimodal Intervention to Address Sexual Dysfunction in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Survivors

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02492100
Enrollment
47
Registered
2015-07-08
Start date
2015-06-30
Completion date
2017-12-31
Last updated
2019-11-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sexual Dysfunction

Keywords

Sexual Dysfunction Post-Bone Marrow Transplant

Brief summary

This research study is evaluating the feasibility and impact of an intervention to improve sexual function in stem cell transplant survivors on participants' sexual function, quality of life, and mood. \- It is expected that about 50 stem cell transplant survivors will take part in this research study.

Detailed description

Frequently survivors of stem cell transplantation report significant problems with their sexual function that impacts their quality of life, mood, and their intimacy and relationship with their partners. These issues can be very distressing to patients and their loved ones. The study doctors want to know if the introduction of an intervention focused on improving sexual function may improve a participant's overall care and quality of life. The intervention includes a comprehensive assessment by a transplant clinician who is trained in sexual dysfunction assessment to explore the reasons for sexual dysfunction and focus on ways to improve the participant's symptoms. The study will use a series of questionnaires to measure a participant's sexual function, quality of life, and mood. The main purpose of this study is examine whether this intervention is feasible and helpful for participants in terms of improving their symptoms and overall quality of life.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALMulti-modality sexual dysfunction intervention

Sponsors

Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients (≥18 years) with hematologic malignancy who underwent an allogeneic HCT at least 6 months prior to study enrollment. * Ability to speak English or able to complete questionnaires with assistance required from an interpreter or family member. * Positive screen for sexual dysfunction that is causing distress based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network survivorship guidelines

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with relapsed disease post-HCT. * Significant psychiatric or other co-morbid disease, which the treating clinician believes prohibits the patient's ability to participate in the informed consent procedures.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility Primary Endpoint6 monthsintervention deemed feasible if at least 75% of patients screening positive for sexual dysfunction causing distress agree to participate and at least 80% complete at least one additional follow-up visit. This is not a composite outcome. Study is deemed feasible (yes) if both criteria are met.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Sexual Function: Promis Sexual Function and Satisfaction MeasureBaseline to 6 MonthsInterest in sex at 6 months, raw score range 2-20 with higher scores indicating higher interest.
Change in Quality of Life: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy- Bone Marrow TransplantBaseline to 6 Monthsquality of life at 6 months compared to baseline using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bone Marrow Transplant. Score range 0-164 with higher score indicating better quality of life.
Change in Psychological Distress Scores - Hospital and Anxiety Depression Scale and Patient Health Questionnaire-9Baseline to 6 Monthschange in HADS depression score, depression subscale of the HADS has a score range of 0-21, with higher scores indicating more depression symptoms.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Multi-modality Sexual Dysfunction Intervention
\- Patients in remission \> 6 months after allogeneic bone marrow transplant * Patient Enrollment and Baseline Data Collection * First Intervention Visit: * Comprehensive assessment of sexual dysfunction * Normalization & Education * Therapeutic interventions * Referral to Sexual Health Clinic if applicable * Follow-Up Intervention Visit --- Referral to Sexual Health Clinic if applicable Multi-modality sexual dysfunction intervention
47
Total47

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMulti-modality Sexual Dysfunction Intervention
Age, Continuous52.5 years
Anxiety (HADS)4.59 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.32
Depression (HADS)4.28 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.1
Global satisfaction with sex16.07 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.16
Interest in sex10.98 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.88
quality of life107.98 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
44 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
24 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
23 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 47
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 47
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 47

Outcome results

Primary

Feasibility Primary Endpoint

intervention deemed feasible if at least 75% of patients screening positive for sexual dysfunction causing distress agree to participate and at least 80% complete at least one additional follow-up visit. This is not a composite outcome. Study is deemed feasible (yes) if both criteria are met.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: overall 94% (47 of 50) patients who screened positive for sexual dysfunction agreed to participate in the study and 80% attended at least 2 intervention visits

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Single Arm StudyFeasibility Primary Endpoint38 Participants
Secondary

Change in Psychological Distress Scores - Hospital and Anxiety Depression Scale and Patient Health Questionnaire-9

change in HADS depression score, depression subscale of the HADS has a score range of 0-21, with higher scores indicating more depression symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline to 6 Months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Single Arm StudyChange in Psychological Distress Scores - Hospital and Anxiety Depression Scale and Patient Health Questionnaire-92.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.56
Secondary

Change in Quality of Life: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy- Bone Marrow Transplant

quality of life at 6 months compared to baseline using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bone Marrow Transplant. Score range 0-164 with higher score indicating better quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline to 6 Months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Single Arm StudyChange in Quality of Life: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy- Bone Marrow Transplant123.88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.1
Secondary

Change in Sexual Function: Promis Sexual Function and Satisfaction Measure

Interest in sex at 6 months, raw score range 2-20 with higher scores indicating higher interest.

Time frame: Baseline to 6 Months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Single Arm StudyChange in Sexual Function: Promis Sexual Function and Satisfaction Measure15.39 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.69

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026