Skip to content

Comparison of an Inexpensive Tablet-based Laparoscopic Box Trainer With a Standard Box Trainer

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02491710
Enrollment
32
Registered
2015-07-08
Start date
2015-08-31
Completion date
2015-09-30
Last updated
2018-03-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Basic Laparoscopic Skills Training

Keywords

Surgical education, Laparoscopy, Laparoscopic suturing

Brief summary

Training is of great importance in laparoscopy. There are different commercially available trainers which are quite expensive and are used by trainees only inside the hospital. The aim of this study is to find out whether basic laparoscopic skills training using an inexpensive tablet-based laparoscopic box trainer leads to equal training results (= improvement of skills) compared to practicing with a conventional commercial box trainer. Furthermore, trainee satisfaction with this home-made alternative compared to the standard trainer will be assessed.

Interventions

DEVICETraining on low-cost box trainer
DEVICETraining on standard box trainer

Sponsors

Medical University of Vienna
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Medical students of the Medical University of Vienna

Exclusion criteria

* Extensive experience with laparoscopic box trainers or laparoscopic surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Fundamentals of Laparoscopy (FLS) manual Skills ScoreAfter completion of training (4-6 weeks)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Trainee satisfaction with the two different training devicesAfter completion of training (4-6 weeks)Satisfaction will be measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026