Skip to content

Efficacy of High-dose Dual Therapy vs Bismuth-containing Quadruple Therapy for Rescue Treatment of Hp Infection

Efficacy of High-dose Dual Therapy Versus Bismuth-containing Quadruple Therapy for Rescue Treatment of Helicobacter Pylori Infection - A Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02490839
Enrollment
450
Registered
2015-07-07
Start date
2015-07-31
Completion date
2019-01-31
Last updated
2020-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Helicobacter Pylori Infection

Keywords

Helicobacter pylori, high dose dual therapy, bismuth-containing quadruple therapy, antibiotic resistance

Brief summary

Up to now, there is few randomized, large scale study prospectively and simultaneously comparing the efficacy, adverse effects and patient adherence of high-dose dual therapy (HDDT) and bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (BQT) as rescue regimens for H. pylori eradication. The aims of this study are: 1. to compare the efficacy of HDDT, and BQT as rescue regimen in H. pylori eradication; 2. to compare the patient adherence and adverse effects of these treatment regimens; 3. to investigate factors that may influence H. pylori eradication by these treatment regimens.

Detailed description

Participants, aged ≥ 20, having H. pylori-positive chronic gastritis with/without peptic ulcers (duodenal or gastric ulcers) will be recruited. All undergo endoscopy with biopsy for rapid urease teat, histology, and bacterial culture before treatment. Four to eight weeks after termination of treatment, H. pylori infection status will be examined by the 13C-urea breath test. The CYP2C19 genotype of each participant will be analyzed by the polymerase chain reaction-based restriction fragment length polymerase (PCR-RFLP) method. A computed generated random numbers sequence will be blocked into two subgroups, say A, and B. If the patients failed anti-H. pylori therapy previously, they will be invited to enter this study for evaluating the efficacy of these rescue regimens. Participant who meet the inclusion criteria and do not have any one of the exclusion criteria will be randomized to receive one of the following regimens: group A- HDDT (rabeprazole 20 mg qid + amoxicillin 750 mg qid for 14 days); group B- BQT ( rabeprazole 20 mg qid + tripotassium dicitrate bismuthate 300 mg qid + metronidazole 250 mg qid + tetracycline 500 mg qid for 10 days); All participants will be asked to complete a questionnaire and to record symptoms and drug consumption daily during the treatment period. Post-treatment, the participants will be followed up at the Outpatients Clinic to investigate patient adherence and adverse effect of treatment.

Interventions

High-dose dual therapy ( rabeprazole 20 mg qid + amoxicillin 750 mg qid for 14 days)

Bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (rabeprazole 20 mg bid + tripotassium dicitrate bismuthate 300 mg qid + metronidazole 250 mg qid + tetracycline 500 mg qid for 10 days)

Sponsors

National Taiwan University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1\. Participants having H. pylori related chronic gastritis with/without peptic ulcers who are aged greater than 20 years old and are willing to received eradication therapy.

Exclusion criteria

1. pregnant or nursing woman 2. serious concomitant illness and malignant tumor of any kind 3. history of hypersensitivity to test drugs 4. serious bleeding during the course of the ulcer 5. previous gastric surgery 6. receiving bismuth salts, PPIs, or antibiotics in the previous month.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The eradication rates as a measure of the efficacy of HDDT, and BQT3.5 yearsThe eradication rates (efficacy) will be evaluated by intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of participants with adverse effects as a measure of safety3.5 yearsThe safety will be evaluated by counting the number of participant with adverse events.
Amount of unused medication post treatment as a measure of patient adherence.3.5 yearsThe patient adherence will be evaluated by counting unused medication after the treatment.

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026