Skip to content

The VERISMART Trial

Randomised Trial Comparing Conventional Versus Contact Force and Electrical Coupling Index in Atrial Flutter Ablation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02490033
Acronym
VERISMART
Enrollment
133
Registered
2015-07-03
Start date
2015-04-01
Completion date
2018-10-28
Last updated
2019-08-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Flutter

Brief summary

Catheter ablation is now routinely used in the management of heart rhythm disorders. One of the problems with the approach is that it has not been possible to determine whether the ablation catheter is in direct contact with the heart tissue or not. This is important because too much contact has safety implications and too little means that the therapy will be ineffective. Recently two different technologies have been developed to determine contact. Currently it is not know if one is superior to the other, and the objective of this trial is to determine whether there is a difference when treating a rhythm called atrial flutter.

Interventions

Sponsors

Biosense Webster, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥18 years * Documented paroxysmal or persistent atrial flutter

Exclusion criteria

* Inability or unwillingness to receive oral anticoagulation * Previous ablation procedure for AFL * Unwillingness or inability to complete the required follow up arrangements * Concomitant atrial fibrillation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to achieve bi-directional blockup to 60 SecondsTime to achieve bi-directional block (secs) . This is defined as the time from the first lesion to the time that consistent (\< one minute) bidirectional block is achieved. Total RF energy required for the whole procedure (sec), and total energy required for ablation (power x ablation time in secs).

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026