Skip to content

Programs To Support You During Chemotherapy

GI 1549: PROGRAMS TO SUPPORT YOU DURING CHEMOTHERAPY (PRO-YOU) A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study of Yoga Compared to an Attention Control in Patients Receiving Chemotherapy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02489422
Acronym
PRO-YOU
Enrollment
44
Registered
2015-07-03
Start date
2016-08-31
Completion date
2020-01-31
Last updated
2022-10-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anal Cancer, Appendix Cancer, Biliary Tract Cancer, Depression, Esophageal Cancer, Fatigue, Gallbladder Cancer, Gastrointestinal Stromal Cancer, Large Intestine Cancer, Liver Cancer, Pancreatic Cancer, Small Intestine Cancer, Stage IIA Colorectal Cancer, Stage IIB Colorectal Cancer, Stage IIC Colorectal Cancer, Stage IIIA Colorectal Cancer, Stage IIIB Colorectal Cancer, Stage IIIC Colorectal Cancer, Stage IVA Colorectal Cancer, Stage IVB Colorectal Cancer, Stomach Cancer

Brief summary

This randomized pilot trial studies how well two supportive programs work for improving fatigue and depressive symptoms in patients with GI undergoing chemotherapy. Possible mediators such as psychological stress, circadian disruption, and inflammation, will also be explored.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To conduct a pilot randomized controlled trial of the yoga skills training (YST) versus a caring attention control (AC) group among adults with colorectal cancer (CRC) receiving chemotherapy to determine preliminary efficacy for the primary outcome of fatigue, secondary outcome of depressive symptoms, and possible mediators (i.e., psychological stress, circadian disruption, inflammation) as assessed by standard measures. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To measure the impact of the YST versus the AC on daily assessments of fatigue, depressive symptoms, and proposed mediators in the same trial and explore relationships among daily and standard assessments. II. To qualitatively assess perceived efficacy of the YST and AC and acceptability of new methodology through semi-structured interviews in a subset of 20-40 participants. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 groups. GROUP I (YST): Patients participate in YST consisting of four 30 minute in-person yoga sessions at weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8 that instructs skills to enhance mindfulness and promote relaxation, through instruction of awareness, movement, breathing practices, and meditation. GROUP II (AC): Patients participate in four 30 minute in-person sessions of supportive conversation at weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8. After completion of study, patients are followed up at 4 weeks.

Interventions

OTHERLaboratory Biomarker Analysis

Correlative studies

OTHERQuestionnaire Administration

Ancillary studies

OTHERDaily Survey Administration

Ancillary studies

BEHAVIORALYoga Skills Training

The YST intervention consists of four 30 minute in-person sessions that instructs skills to enhance mindfulness and promote relaxation. Participants will also be encouraged to practice daily at home.

BEHAVIORALAttention Control

The AC intervention consists of four 30 minute in-person sessions of supportive conversation. In addition, the interventionist will recommend that the patients write brief diary entries daily at home.

OTHERActigraphy Assessment

Ancillary studies

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)
CollaboratorNIH
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Scheduled to receive first-line Fluorouracil (5FU)-based intravenous chemotherapy treatment for a gastrointestinal cancer (stages II-IV) * Have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of =\< 1 * Ability to understand and the willingness to sign and informed consent document in English

Exclusion criteria

* Has a self-reported history of diagnosed uncontrolled obstructive sleep apnea (ok if using CPAP), sleep-related seizures, sleep walking more than one time per week, restless leg syndrome, or a job with night shifts

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fatigue Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)At baseline, 8 weeks, 10 weeks and 14 weeks after start of interventionFatigue will be assessed with the 7-item measure of Fatigue from the PROMIS-cancer specifically designed for use in cancer patients. These tests will be evaluated using mixed-effects (or multilevel) generalized linear modeling procedures. Score range 1 - never, 2 - rarely, 3 - sometimes, 4 - often and 5 - always. Total scores can range from 24 to 86, with higher scores indicating greater fatigue.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Circadian Disruption (Recalled)At baseline, 8 weeks, 10 weeks and 14 weeks after start of interventionCircadian disruption will be assessed with measures of activity and rest. Activity will be measured using the 3-item Godin's leisure score index (LSI), previously used with colorectal cancer patients during chemotherapy. Rest will be assessed with the 8-item PROMIS sleep disturbance short-form. Each item on the measure is rated on a 5-point scale (1=never; 2=rarely; 3=sometimes; 4=often; and 5=always) with a range in score from 8 to 40 with higher scores indicating greater severity of sleep disturbance.
Depressive Symptoms Assessed by PROMISAt baseline, 8 weeks, 10 weeks and 14 weeks after start of interventionWill be assessed with the standardized 10-item PROMIS-cancer depressive symptoms short-form. These tests will be evaluated using mixed-effects (or multilevel) generalized linear modeling procedures. Scoring scale range from 1 - never, 2 - rarely, 3 - sometimes, 4 - often and 5 - always. The higher the score the more depressive the symptoms. Scores on the short form range from 10 to 81.3; 10-55 is normal, 55.1-59.9 mild, 60-64.25 moderate, and over 64.26 severe depression.
Fatigue (Daily)At 0-2 weeks and 8-10 weeks after start of interventionFatigue will be assessed with 3 items selected from the PROMIS measure of fatigue validated for use in daily diaries. Scoring scale range from 1 - never, 2 - rarely, 3 - sometimes, 4 - often and 5 - always. The higher the score the more fatigued the participants. Scores on the short form range from 0 to 81.3; 0-55 is normal, 55.1-59.9 mild, 60-64.25 moderate, and over 64.26 severe fatigue.
Depressive Symptoms (Daily)At 0-2 weeks and 8-10 weeks after start of interventionDepressive symptoms will be assessed with 3 items selected from the PROMIS measure of depression validated for use in daily diaries. Scoring scale range from 1 - never, 2 - rarely, 3 - sometimes, 4 - often and 5 - always. The higher the score the more depressive symptoms the participants exhibited. scores on the short form range from 0 to 81.3; 0-55 is normal, 55.1-59.9 mild, 60-64.25 moderate, and over 64.26 severe depression.
Interleukin 6 [IL-6] Measured Using High-sensitivity Quantikine Immunoassay KitsAt 2 weeks after start of interventionInflammatory cytokines (i.e., interleukin 6 \[IL-6\], soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 \[sTNF-R1\], and tumor necrosis factor alpha \[TNF-alpha\]) that have been associated with fatigue during treatment for gastrointestinal cancer and influenced by yoga practice will be measured using high-sensitivity Quantikine immunoassay kits.
Soluble Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor 1 [sTNF-R1] Measured Using High-sensitivity Quantikine Immunoassay KitsAt 2 weeks after start of interventionInflammatory cytokines (i.e., interleukin 6 \[IL-6\], soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 \[sTNF-R1\], and tumor necrosis factor alpha \[TNF-alpha\]) that have been associated with fatigue during treatment for gastrointestinal cancer and influenced by yoga practice will be measured using high-sensitivity Quantikine immunoassay kits.
Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha [TNF-alpha] Measured Using High-sensitivity Quantikine Immunoassay KitsAt 2 weeks after start of interventionInflammatory cytokines (i.e., interleukin 6 \[IL-6\], soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 \[sTNF-R1\], and tumor necrosis factor alpha \[TNF-alpha\]) that have been associated with fatigue during treatment for gastrointestinal cancer and influenced by yoga practice will be measured using high-sensitivity Quantikine immunoassay kits.
Circadian Disruption (Daily)At 0-2 weeks after start of interventionCircadian disruption will be assessed with actigraphy. Circadian disruption is defined as a ratio of nighttime activity to daytime activity with higher scores indicating greater circadian disruptions. Summaries of the proportion and frequency of missing daily assessments will inform the feasibility of collecting this type of data.
Psychological Stress Assessed by the PSS (Daily)At 0-2 weeks and 8-10 weeks after start of interventionPsychological stress will be assessed daily with two items from the 4-item PSS that would be on the same factor to optimize internal consistency. Scoring scale range from 1 - never, 2 - rarely, 3 - sometimes, 4 - often and 5 - always. A mean of the participants scores was taken.
Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed by the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-Expanded Form (Daily)At 0-2 weeks and 8-10 weeks after start of interventionRegulation of psychological stress will be assessed daily with the 3-item serenity subscale (calm, relaxed, at ease) from the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-Expanded Form. Each item is rated on a five-point Likert Scale, ranging from 1 = Very Slightly or Not at all to 5 = Extremely. Positive Affect Score: Scores can range from 10 - 50, with higher scores representing higher levels of positive affect and lower scores representing lower levels of negative affect.
Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior InventoryAt baseline, 8 weeks, 10 weeks and 14 weeks after start of interventionRegulation of psychological stress will be determined by ratings on four of the seven factors of the Cancer Behavior Inventory, which assess self-efficacy for stress management, coping with treatment-related side-effects, accepting cancer/maintaining positive attitude, and affective regulation. Scale ranged from 1-9 (1 - 3 not at all confident; 4-6 moderately confident and 7-9 totally confident). 4 of the 7 items from the Cancer Behavior Inventory (V2.0) were used with each item's score ranges from 0-50 with higher scores indicating more confidence in the item.
Minutes of Home Practice CompletedUp 10 weeks after start of interventionParticipants will keep daily paper logs of their home practice. In addition, one item will ask via the daily automated survey how many minutes participants practiced the intervention that day for two weeks after completion of the intervention.
Percent of Planned In Person Intervention Sessions AttendedAt baseline, 2 weeks, 8 weeks, 10 weeks and 14 weeks after start of interventionPercent of all assessments completed and timeliness of completion will be tracked.
Number of Participants With Successful Qualitative Data CollectionAt 14 weeks after start of interventionQualitative feedback will be assessed with a semi-structured interview conducted after completion of all assessments. Qualitative information gained will enrich quantitative results and inform the protocol of a larger trial.
Psychological Stress Assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)At baseline, 8 weeks, 10 weeks and 14 weeks after start of interventionPsychological stress will be assessed by the 10-item PSS. The PSS has 2 factors (stress and counter stress). Scoring scale range from 0 - never, 1 - almost never, 2 - sometimes, 3 - fairly often and 4 - very often. Score range is 0-40. A higher score represents more of the concept being measured.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)
Patients participate in YST consisting of four 30 minute in-person yoga sessions at weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8 that instructs skills to enhance mindfulness and promote relaxation, through instruction of awareness, movement, breathing practices, and meditation. Laboratory Biomarker Analysis: Correlative studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies Daily Survey Administration: Ancillary studies Yoga Skills Training: The YST intervention consists of four 30 minute in-person sessions that instructs skills to enhance mindfulness and promote relaxation. Participants will also be encouraged to practice daily at home. Actigraphy Assessment: Ancillary studies
23
Group II (Attention Control)
Patients participate in four 30 minute in-person sessions of supportive conversation at weeks 2, 4, 6, 8. Laboratory Biomarker Analysis: Correlative studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies Daily Survey Administration: Ancillary studies Attention Control: The AC intervention consists of four 30 minute in-person sessions of supportive conversation. In addition, the interventionist will recommend that the patients write brief diary entries daily at home. Actigraphy Assessment: Ancillary studies
21
Total44

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup I (Yoga Skills Training)TotalGroup II (Attention Control)
Age, Continuous60.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
58.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7
56.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
23 Participants43 Participants20 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants6 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
20 Participants38 Participants18 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
23 participants44 participants21 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants23 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants21 Participants11 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 232 / 21
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 232 / 21
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 233 / 21

Outcome results

Primary

Fatigue Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)

Fatigue will be assessed with the 7-item measure of Fatigue from the PROMIS-cancer specifically designed for use in cancer patients. These tests will be evaluated using mixed-effects (or multilevel) generalized linear modeling procedures. Score range 1 - never, 2 - rarely, 3 - sometimes, 4 - often and 5 - always. Total scores can range from 24 to 86, with higher scores indicating greater fatigue.

Time frame: At baseline, 8 weeks, 10 weeks and 14 weeks after start of intervention

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Fatigue Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)Baseline53.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.8
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Fatigue Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)8 weeks53.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.1
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Fatigue Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)10 weeks51.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.2
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Fatigue Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)14 weeks55.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.2
Group II (Attention Control)Fatigue Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)14 weeks60.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.3
Group II (Attention Control)Fatigue Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)Baseline56.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.9
Group II (Attention Control)Fatigue Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)10 weeks57.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.4
Group II (Attention Control)Fatigue Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)8 weeks57.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.2
Secondary

Circadian Disruption (Daily)

Circadian disruption will be assessed with actigraphy. Circadian disruption is defined as a ratio of nighttime activity to daytime activity with higher scores indicating greater circadian disruptions. Summaries of the proportion and frequency of missing daily assessments will inform the feasibility of collecting this type of data.

Time frame: At 0-2 weeks after start of intervention

Population: Participants analyzed represents the number of participants that completed the analysis and had data for this outcome measure out of the total number of participants for the trial.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Circadian Disruption (Daily)11.5 daysStandard Error 2.8
Group II (Attention Control)Circadian Disruption (Daily)9.9 daysStandard Error 3.4
Secondary

Circadian Disruption (Daily)

Circadian disruption will be assessed with actigraphy. Circadian disruption is defined as a ratio of nighttime activity to daytime activity with higher scores indicating greater circadian disruptions. Summaries of the proportion and frequency of missing daily assessments will inform the feasibility of collecting this type of data.

Time frame: At 8-10 weeks after start of intervention

Population: The number of participants is the actual number that completed this portion of the outcome measure during this timeframe that had measurable data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Circadian Disruption (Daily)11.8 daysStandard Deviation 2.3
Group II (Attention Control)Circadian Disruption (Daily)11.9 daysStandard Deviation 2.3
Secondary

Circadian Disruption (Recalled)

Circadian disruption will be assessed with measures of activity and rest. Activity will be measured using the 3-item Godin's leisure score index (LSI), previously used with colorectal cancer patients during chemotherapy. Rest will be assessed with the 8-item PROMIS sleep disturbance short-form. Each item on the measure is rated on a 5-point scale (1=never; 2=rarely; 3=sometimes; 4=often; and 5=always) with a range in score from 8 to 40 with higher scores indicating greater severity of sleep disturbance.

Time frame: At baseline, 8 weeks, 10 weeks and 14 weeks after start of intervention

Population: Numbers may vary based on number of participants that actually completed intervention materials

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Circadian Disruption (Recalled)Baseline leisure score index (LSI)19.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 5.4
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Circadian Disruption (Recalled)10 weeks leisure score index (LSI)19.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 4.4
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Circadian Disruption (Recalled)14 weeks leisure score index24.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 5.5
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Circadian Disruption (Recalled)8 weeks leisure score index (LSI)24.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 7.1
Group II (Attention Control)Circadian Disruption (Recalled)14 weeks leisure score index38.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 12.8
Group II (Attention Control)Circadian Disruption (Recalled)Baseline leisure score index (LSI)19.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.6
Group II (Attention Control)Circadian Disruption (Recalled)8 weeks leisure score index (LSI)23.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 6.2
Group II (Attention Control)Circadian Disruption (Recalled)10 weeks leisure score index (LSI)29.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 12
Secondary

Depressive Symptoms Assessed by PROMIS

Will be assessed with the standardized 10-item PROMIS-cancer depressive symptoms short-form. These tests will be evaluated using mixed-effects (or multilevel) generalized linear modeling procedures. Scoring scale range from 1 - never, 2 - rarely, 3 - sometimes, 4 - often and 5 - always. The higher the score the more depressive the symptoms. Scores on the short form range from 10 to 81.3; 10-55 is normal, 55.1-59.9 mild, 60-64.25 moderate, and over 64.26 severe depression.

Time frame: At baseline, 8 weeks, 10 weeks and 14 weeks after start of intervention

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Depressive Symptoms Assessed by PROMISBaseline49.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.9
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Depressive Symptoms Assessed by PROMIS8 weeks47.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 2
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Depressive Symptoms Assessed by PROMIS10 weeks46.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.3
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Depressive Symptoms Assessed by PROMIS14 weeks49.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 2
Group II (Attention Control)Depressive Symptoms Assessed by PROMIS14 weeks50.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.1
Group II (Attention Control)Depressive Symptoms Assessed by PROMISBaseline51.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 2
Group II (Attention Control)Depressive Symptoms Assessed by PROMIS10 weeks50.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.5
Group II (Attention Control)Depressive Symptoms Assessed by PROMIS8 weeks51.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.1
Secondary

Depressive Symptoms (Daily)

Depressive symptoms will be assessed with 3 items selected from the PROMIS measure of depression validated for use in daily diaries. Scoring scale range from 1 - never, 2 - rarely, 3 - sometimes, 4 - often and 5 - always. The higher the score the more depressive symptoms the participants exhibited. scores on the short form range from 0 to 81.3; 0-55 is normal, 55.1-59.9 mild, 60-64.25 moderate, and over 64.26 severe depression.

Time frame: At 0-2 weeks and 8-10 weeks after start of intervention

Population: Numbers may vary based on number of participants that actually completed intervention materials

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Depressive Symptoms (Daily)0-2 weeks43.96 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.52
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Depressive Symptoms (Daily)8-10 weeks44.38 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.36
Group II (Attention Control)Depressive Symptoms (Daily)0-2 weeks45.49 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.82
Group II (Attention Control)Depressive Symptoms (Daily)8-10 weeks44.58 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.89
Secondary

Fatigue (Daily)

Fatigue will be assessed with 3 items selected from the PROMIS measure of fatigue validated for use in daily diaries. Scoring scale range from 1 - never, 2 - rarely, 3 - sometimes, 4 - often and 5 - always. The higher the score the more fatigued the participants. Scores on the short form range from 0 to 81.3; 0-55 is normal, 55.1-59.9 mild, 60-64.25 moderate, and over 64.26 severe fatigue.

Time frame: At 0-2 weeks and 8-10 weeks after start of intervention

Population: Numbers may vary based on number of participants that actually completed intervention materials

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Fatigue (Daily)0-2 weeks49.18 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.73
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Fatigue (Daily)8-10 weeks51.00 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.06
Group II (Attention Control)Fatigue (Daily)0-2 weeks53.27 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.92
Group II (Attention Control)Fatigue (Daily)8-10 weeks53.29 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.38
Secondary

Interleukin 6 [IL-6] Measured Using High-sensitivity Quantikine Immunoassay Kits

Inflammatory cytokines (i.e., interleukin 6 \[IL-6\], soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 \[sTNF-R1\], and tumor necrosis factor alpha \[TNF-alpha\]) that have been associated with fatigue during treatment for gastrointestinal cancer and influenced by yoga practice will be measured using high-sensitivity Quantikine immunoassay kits.

Time frame: At 2 weeks after start of intervention

Population: The number of participants represents the number that completed data to be analyzed for this particular outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Interleukin 6 [IL-6] Measured Using High-sensitivity Quantikine Immunoassay Kits5.6 pg/ml
Group II (Attention Control)Interleukin 6 [IL-6] Measured Using High-sensitivity Quantikine Immunoassay Kits4.6 pg/ml
Secondary

Interleukin 6 [IL-6] Measured Using High-sensitivity Quantikine Immunoassay Kits

Inflammatory cytokines (i.e., interleukin 6 \[IL-6\], soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 \[sTNF-R1\], and tumor necrosis factor alpha \[TNF-alpha\]) that have been associated with fatigue during treatment for gastrointestinal cancer and influenced by yoga practice will be measured using high-sensitivity Quantikine immunoassay kits. ). All samples will be assayed in duplicate and the average of the two measures will be used for data analyses.

Time frame: At 10 weeks after start of intervention

Population: The number of participants represents the number that completed data to be analyzed for this particular outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Interleukin 6 [IL-6] Measured Using High-sensitivity Quantikine Immunoassay Kits0.58 pg/ml
Group II (Attention Control)Interleukin 6 [IL-6] Measured Using High-sensitivity Quantikine Immunoassay Kits0.58 pg/ml
Secondary

Minutes of Home Practice Completed

Participants will keep daily paper logs of their home practice. In addition, one item will ask via the daily automated survey how many minutes participants practiced the intervention that day for two weeks after completion of the intervention.

Time frame: Up 10 weeks after start of intervention

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Minutes of Home Practice Completed11.2 minutesStandard Error 1.9
Group II (Attention Control)Minutes of Home Practice Completed12.1 minutesStandard Error 6.3
Secondary

Number of Participants With Successful Qualitative Data Collection

Qualitative feedback will be assessed with a semi-structured interview conducted after completion of all assessments. Qualitative information gained will enrich quantitative results and inform the protocol of a larger trial.

Time frame: At 14 weeks after start of intervention

Population: As per the protocol, this outcome was intended to be combined after all other data collection is complete to solicit feedback as a group on the acceptability of data collection methods, the participants' experience with both the interventions (e.g., expected efficacy, what was useful), and barriers and facilitators to home practice. It was not intended to be separated but as overall feedback.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Number of Participants With Successful Qualitative Data Collection30 Participants
Secondary

Percent of Planned In Person Intervention Sessions Attended

Percent of all assessments completed and timeliness of completion will be tracked.

Time frame: At baseline, 2 weeks, 8 weeks, 10 weeks and 14 weeks after start of intervention

Population: Four in-person interventions were performed per participant at weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8. A total of 92 interventions were available for completion for Group I. A total of 84 interventions were available for completion for Group II.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Percent of Planned In Person Intervention Sessions Attended68 total interventions actually completed
Group II (Attention Control)Percent of Planned In Person Intervention Sessions Attended72 total interventions actually completed
Secondary

Psychological Stress Assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)

Psychological stress will be assessed by the 10-item PSS. The PSS has 2 factors (stress and counter stress). Scoring scale range from 0 - never, 1 - almost never, 2 - sometimes, 3 - fairly often and 4 - very often. Score range is 0-40. A higher score represents more of the concept being measured.

Time frame: At baseline, 8 weeks, 10 weeks and 14 weeks after start of intervention

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Psychological Stress Assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)Baseline, mean14.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.5
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Psychological Stress Assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)10 weeks12.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.8
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Psychological Stress Assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)8 weeks11.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.8
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Psychological Stress Assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)14 weeks12.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.8
Group II (Attention Control)Psychological Stress Assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)14 weeks13.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.9
Group II (Attention Control)Psychological Stress Assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)Baseline, mean16.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.6
Group II (Attention Control)Psychological Stress Assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)8 weeks13.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.9
Group II (Attention Control)Psychological Stress Assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)10 weeks12.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.1
Secondary

Psychological Stress Assessed by the PSS (Daily)

Psychological stress will be assessed daily with two items from the 4-item PSS that would be on the same factor to optimize internal consistency. Scoring scale range from 1 - never, 2 - rarely, 3 - sometimes, 4 - often and 5 - always. A mean of the participants scores was taken.

Time frame: At 0-2 weeks and 8-10 weeks after start of intervention

Population: Numbers may vary based on number of participants that actually completed intervention materials

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Psychological Stress Assessed by the PSS (Daily)0-2 weeks, mean1.34 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Psychological Stress Assessed by the PSS (Daily)8-10 weeks, mean1.69 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.55
Group II (Attention Control)Psychological Stress Assessed by the PSS (Daily)0-2 weeks, mean1.58 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.42
Group II (Attention Control)Psychological Stress Assessed by the PSS (Daily)8-10 weeks, mean1.78 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.45
Secondary

Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed by the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-Expanded Form (Daily)

Regulation of psychological stress will be assessed daily with the 3-item serenity subscale (calm, relaxed, at ease) from the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-Expanded Form. Each item is rated on a five-point Likert Scale, ranging from 1 = Very Slightly or Not at all to 5 = Extremely. Positive Affect Score: Scores can range from 10 - 50, with higher scores representing higher levels of positive affect and lower scores representing lower levels of negative affect.

Time frame: At 0-2 weeks and 8-10 weeks after start of intervention

Population: Numbers may vary based on number of participants that actually completed intervention materials

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed by the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-Expanded Form (Daily)0-2 weeks, mean10.51 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.55
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed by the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-Expanded Form (Daily)8-10 weeks, mean10.53 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.74
Group II (Attention Control)Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed by the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-Expanded Form (Daily)0-2 weeks, mean9.59 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.66
Group II (Attention Control)Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed by the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-Expanded Form (Daily)8-10 weeks, mean10.36 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.84
Secondary

Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory

Regulation of psychological stress will be determined by ratings on four of the seven factors of the Cancer Behavior Inventory, which assess self-efficacy for stress management, coping with treatment-related side-effects, accepting cancer/maintaining positive attitude, and affective regulation. Scale ranged from 1-9 (1 - 3 not at all confident; 4-6 moderately confident and 7-9 totally confident). 4 of the 7 items from the Cancer Behavior Inventory (V2.0) were used with each item's score ranges from 0-50 with higher scores indicating more confidence in the item.

Time frame: At baseline, 8 weeks, 10 weeks and 14 weeks after start of intervention

Population: Numbers may vary based on number of participants that actually completed intervention materials

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior InventoryBaseline - Stress management34.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.4
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior InventoryBaseline - Coping with treatment-related side effects33.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.8
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior InventoryBaseline - Accepting cancer/maintaining positive attitude37.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.3
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior InventoryBaseline - Affective regulation28.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.6
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory8 weeks - Stress management38.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.3
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory8 weeks - Coping with treatment-related side effects37.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.7
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory8 weeks - Accepting cancer/maintaining positive attitude40.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.2
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory8 weeks - Affective regulation29.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.1
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory10 weeks - Stress management38.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.1
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory10 weeks - Coping with treatment-related side effects36.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.6
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory10 weeks - Accepting cancer/maintaining positive attitude40.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.9
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory10 weeks - Affective regulation30.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.2
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory14 weeks - Stress management39.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.4
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory14 weeks - Coping with treatment-related side effects37.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.7
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory14 weeks - Accepting cancer/maintaining positive attitude40.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.2
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory14 weeks - Affective regulation32.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.1
Group II (Attention Control)Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory14 weeks - Affective regulation34.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.9
Group II (Attention Control)Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior InventoryBaseline - Stress management34.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.5
Group II (Attention Control)Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory10 weeks - Stress management38.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.6
Group II (Attention Control)Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior InventoryBaseline - Coping with treatment-related side effects30.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.8
Group II (Attention Control)Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory14 weeks - Stress management40.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.1
Group II (Attention Control)Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior InventoryBaseline - Accepting cancer/maintaining positive attitude39.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.9
Group II (Attention Control)Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory10 weeks - Coping with treatment-related side effects37.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.3
Group II (Attention Control)Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior InventoryBaseline - Affective regulation29.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.6
Group II (Attention Control)Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory14 weeks - Accepting cancer/maintaining positive attitude41.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 1
Group II (Attention Control)Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory8 weeks - Stress management38.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.9
Group II (Attention Control)Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory10 weeks - Accepting cancer/maintaining positive attitude40.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.6
Group II (Attention Control)Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory8 weeks - Coping with treatment-related side effects35.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.1
Group II (Attention Control)Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory14 weeks - Coping with treatment-related side effects38.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.5
Group II (Attention Control)Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory8 weeks - Accepting cancer/maintaining positive attitude38.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.6
Group II (Attention Control)Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory10 weeks - Affective regulation33.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.3
Group II (Attention Control)Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory8 weeks - Affective regulation31.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.1
Secondary

Soluble Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor 1 [sTNF-R1] Measured Using High-sensitivity Quantikine Immunoassay Kits

Inflammatory cytokines (i.e., interleukin 6 \[IL-6\], soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 \[sTNF-R1\], and tumor necrosis factor alpha \[TNF-alpha\]) that have been associated with fatigue during treatment for gastrointestinal cancer and influenced by yoga practice will be measured using high-sensitivity Quantikine immunoassay kits.

Time frame: At 2 weeks after start of intervention

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Soluble Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor 1 [sTNF-R1] Measured Using High-sensitivity Quantikine Immunoassay Kits1633.8 pg/ml
Group II (Attention Control)Soluble Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor 1 [sTNF-R1] Measured Using High-sensitivity Quantikine Immunoassay Kits1727.5 pg/ml
Secondary

Soluble Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor 1 [sTNF-R1] Measured Using High-sensitivity Quantikine Immunoassay Kits

Inflammatory cytokines (i.e., interleukin 6 \[IL-6\], soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 \[sTNF-R1\], and tumor necrosis factor alpha \[TNF-alpha\]) that have been associated with fatigue during treatment for gastrointestinal cancer and influenced by yoga practice will be measured using high-sensitivity Quantikine immunoassay kits. All samples will be assayed in duplicate and the average of the two measures will be used for data analyses.

Time frame: At 10 weeks after start of intervention

Population: The number of participants represents the number that completed data to be analyzed for this particular outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Soluble Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor 1 [sTNF-R1] Measured Using High-sensitivity Quantikine Immunoassay Kits0.87 pg/ml
Group II (Attention Control)Soluble Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor 1 [sTNF-R1] Measured Using High-sensitivity Quantikine Immunoassay Kits0.87 pg/ml
Secondary

Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha [TNF-alpha] Measured Using High-sensitivity Quantikine Immunoassay Kits

Inflammatory cytokines (i.e., interleukin 6 \[IL-6\], soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 \[sTNF-R1\], and tumor necrosis factor alpha \[TNF-alpha\]) that have been associated with fatigue during treatment for gastrointestinal cancer and influenced by yoga practice will be measured using high-sensitivity Quantikine immunoassay kits. All samples will be assayed in duplicate and the average of the two measures will be used for data analyses.

Time frame: At 10 weeks after start of intervention

Population: Numbers may vary based on number of participants that actually completed intervention materials

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha [TNF-alpha] Measured Using High-sensitivity Quantikine Immunoassay Kits1.01 pg/ml
Group II (Attention Control)Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha [TNF-alpha] Measured Using High-sensitivity Quantikine Immunoassay Kits1.01 pg/ml
Secondary

Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha [TNF-alpha] Measured Using High-sensitivity Quantikine Immunoassay Kits

Inflammatory cytokines (i.e., interleukin 6 \[IL-6\], soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 \[sTNF-R1\], and tumor necrosis factor alpha \[TNF-alpha\]) that have been associated with fatigue during treatment for gastrointestinal cancer and influenced by yoga practice will be measured using high-sensitivity Quantikine immunoassay kits.

Time frame: At 2 weeks after start of intervention

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Group I (Yoga Skills Training)Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha [TNF-alpha] Measured Using High-sensitivity Quantikine Immunoassay Kits1.6 pg/ml
Group II (Attention Control)Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha [TNF-alpha] Measured Using High-sensitivity Quantikine Immunoassay Kits1.7 pg/ml

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026