Anal Cancer, Appendix Cancer, Biliary Tract Cancer, Depression, Esophageal Cancer, Fatigue, Gallbladder Cancer, Gastrointestinal Stromal Cancer, Large Intestine Cancer, Liver Cancer, Pancreatic Cancer, Small Intestine Cancer, Stage IIA Colorectal Cancer, Stage IIB Colorectal Cancer, Stage IIC Colorectal Cancer, Stage IIIA Colorectal Cancer, Stage IIIB Colorectal Cancer, Stage IIIC Colorectal Cancer, Stage IVA Colorectal Cancer, Stage IVB Colorectal Cancer, Stomach Cancer
Conditions
Brief summary
This randomized pilot trial studies how well two supportive programs work for improving fatigue and depressive symptoms in patients with GI undergoing chemotherapy. Possible mediators such as psychological stress, circadian disruption, and inflammation, will also be explored.
Detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To conduct a pilot randomized controlled trial of the yoga skills training (YST) versus a caring attention control (AC) group among adults with colorectal cancer (CRC) receiving chemotherapy to determine preliminary efficacy for the primary outcome of fatigue, secondary outcome of depressive symptoms, and possible mediators (i.e., psychological stress, circadian disruption, inflammation) as assessed by standard measures. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To measure the impact of the YST versus the AC on daily assessments of fatigue, depressive symptoms, and proposed mediators in the same trial and explore relationships among daily and standard assessments. II. To qualitatively assess perceived efficacy of the YST and AC and acceptability of new methodology through semi-structured interviews in a subset of 20-40 participants. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 groups. GROUP I (YST): Patients participate in YST consisting of four 30 minute in-person yoga sessions at weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8 that instructs skills to enhance mindfulness and promote relaxation, through instruction of awareness, movement, breathing practices, and meditation. GROUP II (AC): Patients participate in four 30 minute in-person sessions of supportive conversation at weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8. After completion of study, patients are followed up at 4 weeks.
Interventions
Correlative studies
Ancillary studies
Ancillary studies
The YST intervention consists of four 30 minute in-person sessions that instructs skills to enhance mindfulness and promote relaxation. Participants will also be encouraged to practice daily at home.
The AC intervention consists of four 30 minute in-person sessions of supportive conversation. In addition, the interventionist will recommend that the patients write brief diary entries daily at home.
Ancillary studies
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Scheduled to receive first-line Fluorouracil (5FU)-based intravenous chemotherapy treatment for a gastrointestinal cancer (stages II-IV) * Have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of =\< 1 * Ability to understand and the willingness to sign and informed consent document in English
Exclusion criteria
* Has a self-reported history of diagnosed uncontrolled obstructive sleep apnea (ok if using CPAP), sleep-related seizures, sleep walking more than one time per week, restless leg syndrome, or a job with night shifts
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Fatigue Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) | At baseline, 8 weeks, 10 weeks and 14 weeks after start of intervention | Fatigue will be assessed with the 7-item measure of Fatigue from the PROMIS-cancer specifically designed for use in cancer patients. These tests will be evaluated using mixed-effects (or multilevel) generalized linear modeling procedures. Score range 1 - never, 2 - rarely, 3 - sometimes, 4 - often and 5 - always. Total scores can range from 24 to 86, with higher scores indicating greater fatigue. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Circadian Disruption (Recalled) | At baseline, 8 weeks, 10 weeks and 14 weeks after start of intervention | Circadian disruption will be assessed with measures of activity and rest. Activity will be measured using the 3-item Godin's leisure score index (LSI), previously used with colorectal cancer patients during chemotherapy. Rest will be assessed with the 8-item PROMIS sleep disturbance short-form. Each item on the measure is rated on a 5-point scale (1=never; 2=rarely; 3=sometimes; 4=often; and 5=always) with a range in score from 8 to 40 with higher scores indicating greater severity of sleep disturbance. |
| Depressive Symptoms Assessed by PROMIS | At baseline, 8 weeks, 10 weeks and 14 weeks after start of intervention | Will be assessed with the standardized 10-item PROMIS-cancer depressive symptoms short-form. These tests will be evaluated using mixed-effects (or multilevel) generalized linear modeling procedures. Scoring scale range from 1 - never, 2 - rarely, 3 - sometimes, 4 - often and 5 - always. The higher the score the more depressive the symptoms. Scores on the short form range from 10 to 81.3; 10-55 is normal, 55.1-59.9 mild, 60-64.25 moderate, and over 64.26 severe depression. |
| Fatigue (Daily) | At 0-2 weeks and 8-10 weeks after start of intervention | Fatigue will be assessed with 3 items selected from the PROMIS measure of fatigue validated for use in daily diaries. Scoring scale range from 1 - never, 2 - rarely, 3 - sometimes, 4 - often and 5 - always. The higher the score the more fatigued the participants. Scores on the short form range from 0 to 81.3; 0-55 is normal, 55.1-59.9 mild, 60-64.25 moderate, and over 64.26 severe fatigue. |
| Depressive Symptoms (Daily) | At 0-2 weeks and 8-10 weeks after start of intervention | Depressive symptoms will be assessed with 3 items selected from the PROMIS measure of depression validated for use in daily diaries. Scoring scale range from 1 - never, 2 - rarely, 3 - sometimes, 4 - often and 5 - always. The higher the score the more depressive symptoms the participants exhibited. scores on the short form range from 0 to 81.3; 0-55 is normal, 55.1-59.9 mild, 60-64.25 moderate, and over 64.26 severe depression. |
| Interleukin 6 [IL-6] Measured Using High-sensitivity Quantikine Immunoassay Kits | At 2 weeks after start of intervention | Inflammatory cytokines (i.e., interleukin 6 \[IL-6\], soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 \[sTNF-R1\], and tumor necrosis factor alpha \[TNF-alpha\]) that have been associated with fatigue during treatment for gastrointestinal cancer and influenced by yoga practice will be measured using high-sensitivity Quantikine immunoassay kits. |
| Soluble Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor 1 [sTNF-R1] Measured Using High-sensitivity Quantikine Immunoassay Kits | At 2 weeks after start of intervention | Inflammatory cytokines (i.e., interleukin 6 \[IL-6\], soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 \[sTNF-R1\], and tumor necrosis factor alpha \[TNF-alpha\]) that have been associated with fatigue during treatment for gastrointestinal cancer and influenced by yoga practice will be measured using high-sensitivity Quantikine immunoassay kits. |
| Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha [TNF-alpha] Measured Using High-sensitivity Quantikine Immunoassay Kits | At 2 weeks after start of intervention | Inflammatory cytokines (i.e., interleukin 6 \[IL-6\], soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 \[sTNF-R1\], and tumor necrosis factor alpha \[TNF-alpha\]) that have been associated with fatigue during treatment for gastrointestinal cancer and influenced by yoga practice will be measured using high-sensitivity Quantikine immunoassay kits. |
| Circadian Disruption (Daily) | At 0-2 weeks after start of intervention | Circadian disruption will be assessed with actigraphy. Circadian disruption is defined as a ratio of nighttime activity to daytime activity with higher scores indicating greater circadian disruptions. Summaries of the proportion and frequency of missing daily assessments will inform the feasibility of collecting this type of data. |
| Psychological Stress Assessed by the PSS (Daily) | At 0-2 weeks and 8-10 weeks after start of intervention | Psychological stress will be assessed daily with two items from the 4-item PSS that would be on the same factor to optimize internal consistency. Scoring scale range from 1 - never, 2 - rarely, 3 - sometimes, 4 - often and 5 - always. A mean of the participants scores was taken. |
| Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed by the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-Expanded Form (Daily) | At 0-2 weeks and 8-10 weeks after start of intervention | Regulation of psychological stress will be assessed daily with the 3-item serenity subscale (calm, relaxed, at ease) from the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-Expanded Form. Each item is rated on a five-point Likert Scale, ranging from 1 = Very Slightly or Not at all to 5 = Extremely. Positive Affect Score: Scores can range from 10 - 50, with higher scores representing higher levels of positive affect and lower scores representing lower levels of negative affect. |
| Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory | At baseline, 8 weeks, 10 weeks and 14 weeks after start of intervention | Regulation of psychological stress will be determined by ratings on four of the seven factors of the Cancer Behavior Inventory, which assess self-efficacy for stress management, coping with treatment-related side-effects, accepting cancer/maintaining positive attitude, and affective regulation. Scale ranged from 1-9 (1 - 3 not at all confident; 4-6 moderately confident and 7-9 totally confident). 4 of the 7 items from the Cancer Behavior Inventory (V2.0) were used with each item's score ranges from 0-50 with higher scores indicating more confidence in the item. |
| Minutes of Home Practice Completed | Up 10 weeks after start of intervention | Participants will keep daily paper logs of their home practice. In addition, one item will ask via the daily automated survey how many minutes participants practiced the intervention that day for two weeks after completion of the intervention. |
| Percent of Planned In Person Intervention Sessions Attended | At baseline, 2 weeks, 8 weeks, 10 weeks and 14 weeks after start of intervention | Percent of all assessments completed and timeliness of completion will be tracked. |
| Number of Participants With Successful Qualitative Data Collection | At 14 weeks after start of intervention | Qualitative feedback will be assessed with a semi-structured interview conducted after completion of all assessments. Qualitative information gained will enrich quantitative results and inform the protocol of a larger trial. |
| Psychological Stress Assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) | At baseline, 8 weeks, 10 weeks and 14 weeks after start of intervention | Psychological stress will be assessed by the 10-item PSS. The PSS has 2 factors (stress and counter stress). Scoring scale range from 0 - never, 1 - almost never, 2 - sometimes, 3 - fairly often and 4 - very often. Score range is 0-40. A higher score represents more of the concept being measured. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) Patients participate in YST consisting of four 30 minute in-person yoga sessions at weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8 that instructs skills to enhance mindfulness and promote relaxation, through instruction of awareness, movement, breathing practices, and meditation.
Laboratory Biomarker Analysis: Correlative studies
Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies
Daily Survey Administration: Ancillary studies
Yoga Skills Training: The YST intervention consists of four 30 minute in-person sessions that instructs skills to enhance mindfulness and promote relaxation. Participants will also be encouraged to practice daily at home.
Actigraphy Assessment: Ancillary studies | 23 |
| Group II (Attention Control) Patients participate in four 30 minute in-person sessions of supportive conversation at weeks 2, 4, 6, 8.
Laboratory Biomarker Analysis: Correlative studies
Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies
Daily Survey Administration: Ancillary studies
Attention Control: The AC intervention consists of four 30 minute in-person sessions of supportive conversation. In addition, the interventionist will recommend that the patients write brief diary entries daily at home.
Actigraphy Assessment: Ancillary studies | 21 |
| Total | 44 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Total | Group II (Attention Control) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 60.8 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3 | 58.5 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7 | 56.0 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 23 Participants | 43 Participants | 20 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 3 Participants | 6 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 20 Participants | 38 Participants | 18 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 23 participants | 44 participants | 21 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 13 Participants | 23 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 10 Participants | 21 Participants | 11 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 2 / 23 | 2 / 21 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 1 / 23 | 2 / 21 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 4 / 23 | 3 / 21 |
Outcome results
Fatigue Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)
Fatigue will be assessed with the 7-item measure of Fatigue from the PROMIS-cancer specifically designed for use in cancer patients. These tests will be evaluated using mixed-effects (or multilevel) generalized linear modeling procedures. Score range 1 - never, 2 - rarely, 3 - sometimes, 4 - often and 5 - always. Total scores can range from 24 to 86, with higher scores indicating greater fatigue.
Time frame: At baseline, 8 weeks, 10 weeks and 14 weeks after start of intervention
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Fatigue Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) | Baseline | 53.1 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.8 |
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Fatigue Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) | 8 weeks | 53.0 score on a scale | Standard Error 2.1 |
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Fatigue Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) | 10 weeks | 51.1 score on a scale | Standard Error 2.2 |
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Fatigue Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) | 14 weeks | 55.4 score on a scale | Standard Error 2.2 |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Fatigue Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) | 14 weeks | 60.6 score on a scale | Standard Error 2.3 |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Fatigue Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) | Baseline | 56.8 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.9 |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Fatigue Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) | 10 weeks | 57.2 score on a scale | Standard Error 2.4 |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Fatigue Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) | 8 weeks | 57.2 score on a scale | Standard Error 2.2 |
Circadian Disruption (Daily)
Circadian disruption will be assessed with actigraphy. Circadian disruption is defined as a ratio of nighttime activity to daytime activity with higher scores indicating greater circadian disruptions. Summaries of the proportion and frequency of missing daily assessments will inform the feasibility of collecting this type of data.
Time frame: At 0-2 weeks after start of intervention
Population: Participants analyzed represents the number of participants that completed the analysis and had data for this outcome measure out of the total number of participants for the trial.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Circadian Disruption (Daily) | 11.5 days | Standard Error 2.8 |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Circadian Disruption (Daily) | 9.9 days | Standard Error 3.4 |
Circadian Disruption (Daily)
Circadian disruption will be assessed with actigraphy. Circadian disruption is defined as a ratio of nighttime activity to daytime activity with higher scores indicating greater circadian disruptions. Summaries of the proportion and frequency of missing daily assessments will inform the feasibility of collecting this type of data.
Time frame: At 8-10 weeks after start of intervention
Population: The number of participants is the actual number that completed this portion of the outcome measure during this timeframe that had measurable data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Circadian Disruption (Daily) | 11.8 days | Standard Deviation 2.3 |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Circadian Disruption (Daily) | 11.9 days | Standard Deviation 2.3 |
Circadian Disruption (Recalled)
Circadian disruption will be assessed with measures of activity and rest. Activity will be measured using the 3-item Godin's leisure score index (LSI), previously used with colorectal cancer patients during chemotherapy. Rest will be assessed with the 8-item PROMIS sleep disturbance short-form. Each item on the measure is rated on a 5-point scale (1=never; 2=rarely; 3=sometimes; 4=often; and 5=always) with a range in score from 8 to 40 with higher scores indicating greater severity of sleep disturbance.
Time frame: At baseline, 8 weeks, 10 weeks and 14 weeks after start of intervention
Population: Numbers may vary based on number of participants that actually completed intervention materials
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Circadian Disruption (Recalled) | Baseline leisure score index (LSI) | 19.6 score on a scale | Standard Error 5.4 |
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Circadian Disruption (Recalled) | 10 weeks leisure score index (LSI) | 19.8 score on a scale | Standard Error 4.4 |
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Circadian Disruption (Recalled) | 14 weeks leisure score index | 24.1 score on a scale | Standard Error 5.5 |
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Circadian Disruption (Recalled) | 8 weeks leisure score index (LSI) | 24.1 score on a scale | Standard Error 7.1 |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Circadian Disruption (Recalled) | 14 weeks leisure score index | 38.1 score on a scale | Standard Error 12.8 |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Circadian Disruption (Recalled) | Baseline leisure score index (LSI) | 19.9 score on a scale | Standard Error 3.6 |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Circadian Disruption (Recalled) | 8 weeks leisure score index (LSI) | 23.9 score on a scale | Standard Error 6.2 |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Circadian Disruption (Recalled) | 10 weeks leisure score index (LSI) | 29.7 score on a scale | Standard Error 12 |
Depressive Symptoms Assessed by PROMIS
Will be assessed with the standardized 10-item PROMIS-cancer depressive symptoms short-form. These tests will be evaluated using mixed-effects (or multilevel) generalized linear modeling procedures. Scoring scale range from 1 - never, 2 - rarely, 3 - sometimes, 4 - often and 5 - always. The higher the score the more depressive the symptoms. Scores on the short form range from 10 to 81.3; 10-55 is normal, 55.1-59.9 mild, 60-64.25 moderate, and over 64.26 severe depression.
Time frame: At baseline, 8 weeks, 10 weeks and 14 weeks after start of intervention
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Depressive Symptoms Assessed by PROMIS | Baseline | 49.9 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.9 |
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Depressive Symptoms Assessed by PROMIS | 8 weeks | 47.4 score on a scale | Standard Error 2 |
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Depressive Symptoms Assessed by PROMIS | 10 weeks | 46.6 score on a scale | Standard Error 2.3 |
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Depressive Symptoms Assessed by PROMIS | 14 weeks | 49.1 score on a scale | Standard Error 2 |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Depressive Symptoms Assessed by PROMIS | 14 weeks | 50.2 score on a scale | Standard Error 2.1 |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Depressive Symptoms Assessed by PROMIS | Baseline | 51.4 score on a scale | Standard Error 2 |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Depressive Symptoms Assessed by PROMIS | 10 weeks | 50.5 score on a scale | Standard Error 2.5 |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Depressive Symptoms Assessed by PROMIS | 8 weeks | 51.2 score on a scale | Standard Error 2.1 |
Depressive Symptoms (Daily)
Depressive symptoms will be assessed with 3 items selected from the PROMIS measure of depression validated for use in daily diaries. Scoring scale range from 1 - never, 2 - rarely, 3 - sometimes, 4 - often and 5 - always. The higher the score the more depressive symptoms the participants exhibited. scores on the short form range from 0 to 81.3; 0-55 is normal, 55.1-59.9 mild, 60-64.25 moderate, and over 64.26 severe depression.
Time frame: At 0-2 weeks and 8-10 weeks after start of intervention
Population: Numbers may vary based on number of participants that actually completed intervention materials
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Depressive Symptoms (Daily) | 0-2 weeks | 43.96 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.52 |
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Depressive Symptoms (Daily) | 8-10 weeks | 44.38 score on a scale | Standard Error 2.36 |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Depressive Symptoms (Daily) | 0-2 weeks | 45.49 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.82 |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Depressive Symptoms (Daily) | 8-10 weeks | 44.58 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.89 |
Fatigue (Daily)
Fatigue will be assessed with 3 items selected from the PROMIS measure of fatigue validated for use in daily diaries. Scoring scale range from 1 - never, 2 - rarely, 3 - sometimes, 4 - often and 5 - always. The higher the score the more fatigued the participants. Scores on the short form range from 0 to 81.3; 0-55 is normal, 55.1-59.9 mild, 60-64.25 moderate, and over 64.26 severe fatigue.
Time frame: At 0-2 weeks and 8-10 weeks after start of intervention
Population: Numbers may vary based on number of participants that actually completed intervention materials
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Fatigue (Daily) | 0-2 weeks | 49.18 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.73 |
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Fatigue (Daily) | 8-10 weeks | 51.00 score on a scale | Standard Error 2.06 |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Fatigue (Daily) | 0-2 weeks | 53.27 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.92 |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Fatigue (Daily) | 8-10 weeks | 53.29 score on a scale | Standard Error 2.38 |
Interleukin 6 [IL-6] Measured Using High-sensitivity Quantikine Immunoassay Kits
Inflammatory cytokines (i.e., interleukin 6 \[IL-6\], soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 \[sTNF-R1\], and tumor necrosis factor alpha \[TNF-alpha\]) that have been associated with fatigue during treatment for gastrointestinal cancer and influenced by yoga practice will be measured using high-sensitivity Quantikine immunoassay kits.
Time frame: At 2 weeks after start of intervention
Population: The number of participants represents the number that completed data to be analyzed for this particular outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Interleukin 6 [IL-6] Measured Using High-sensitivity Quantikine Immunoassay Kits | 5.6 pg/ml |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Interleukin 6 [IL-6] Measured Using High-sensitivity Quantikine Immunoassay Kits | 4.6 pg/ml |
Interleukin 6 [IL-6] Measured Using High-sensitivity Quantikine Immunoassay Kits
Inflammatory cytokines (i.e., interleukin 6 \[IL-6\], soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 \[sTNF-R1\], and tumor necrosis factor alpha \[TNF-alpha\]) that have been associated with fatigue during treatment for gastrointestinal cancer and influenced by yoga practice will be measured using high-sensitivity Quantikine immunoassay kits. ). All samples will be assayed in duplicate and the average of the two measures will be used for data analyses.
Time frame: At 10 weeks after start of intervention
Population: The number of participants represents the number that completed data to be analyzed for this particular outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Interleukin 6 [IL-6] Measured Using High-sensitivity Quantikine Immunoassay Kits | 0.58 pg/ml |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Interleukin 6 [IL-6] Measured Using High-sensitivity Quantikine Immunoassay Kits | 0.58 pg/ml |
Minutes of Home Practice Completed
Participants will keep daily paper logs of their home practice. In addition, one item will ask via the daily automated survey how many minutes participants practiced the intervention that day for two weeks after completion of the intervention.
Time frame: Up 10 weeks after start of intervention
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Minutes of Home Practice Completed | 11.2 minutes | Standard Error 1.9 |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Minutes of Home Practice Completed | 12.1 minutes | Standard Error 6.3 |
Number of Participants With Successful Qualitative Data Collection
Qualitative feedback will be assessed with a semi-structured interview conducted after completion of all assessments. Qualitative information gained will enrich quantitative results and inform the protocol of a larger trial.
Time frame: At 14 weeks after start of intervention
Population: As per the protocol, this outcome was intended to be combined after all other data collection is complete to solicit feedback as a group on the acceptability of data collection methods, the participants' experience with both the interventions (e.g., expected efficacy, what was useful), and barriers and facilitators to home practice. It was not intended to be separated but as overall feedback.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Number of Participants With Successful Qualitative Data Collection | 30 Participants |
Percent of Planned In Person Intervention Sessions Attended
Percent of all assessments completed and timeliness of completion will be tracked.
Time frame: At baseline, 2 weeks, 8 weeks, 10 weeks and 14 weeks after start of intervention
Population: Four in-person interventions were performed per participant at weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8. A total of 92 interventions were available for completion for Group I. A total of 84 interventions were available for completion for Group II.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Percent of Planned In Person Intervention Sessions Attended | 68 total interventions actually completed |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Percent of Planned In Person Intervention Sessions Attended | 72 total interventions actually completed |
Psychological Stress Assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)
Psychological stress will be assessed by the 10-item PSS. The PSS has 2 factors (stress and counter stress). Scoring scale range from 0 - never, 1 - almost never, 2 - sometimes, 3 - fairly often and 4 - very often. Score range is 0-40. A higher score represents more of the concept being measured.
Time frame: At baseline, 8 weeks, 10 weeks and 14 weeks after start of intervention
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Psychological Stress Assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) | Baseline, mean | 14.7 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.5 |
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Psychological Stress Assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) | 10 weeks | 12.1 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.8 |
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Psychological Stress Assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) | 8 weeks | 11.4 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.8 |
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Psychological Stress Assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) | 14 weeks | 12.5 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.8 |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Psychological Stress Assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) | 14 weeks | 13.6 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.9 |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Psychological Stress Assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) | Baseline, mean | 16.5 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.6 |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Psychological Stress Assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) | 8 weeks | 13.7 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.9 |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Psychological Stress Assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) | 10 weeks | 12.3 score on a scale | Standard Error 2.1 |
Psychological Stress Assessed by the PSS (Daily)
Psychological stress will be assessed daily with two items from the 4-item PSS that would be on the same factor to optimize internal consistency. Scoring scale range from 1 - never, 2 - rarely, 3 - sometimes, 4 - often and 5 - always. A mean of the participants scores was taken.
Time frame: At 0-2 weeks and 8-10 weeks after start of intervention
Population: Numbers may vary based on number of participants that actually completed intervention materials
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Psychological Stress Assessed by the PSS (Daily) | 0-2 weeks, mean | 1.34 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.36 |
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Psychological Stress Assessed by the PSS (Daily) | 8-10 weeks, mean | 1.69 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.55 |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Psychological Stress Assessed by the PSS (Daily) | 0-2 weeks, mean | 1.58 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.42 |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Psychological Stress Assessed by the PSS (Daily) | 8-10 weeks, mean | 1.78 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.45 |
Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed by the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-Expanded Form (Daily)
Regulation of psychological stress will be assessed daily with the 3-item serenity subscale (calm, relaxed, at ease) from the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-Expanded Form. Each item is rated on a five-point Likert Scale, ranging from 1 = Very Slightly or Not at all to 5 = Extremely. Positive Affect Score: Scores can range from 10 - 50, with higher scores representing higher levels of positive affect and lower scores representing lower levels of negative affect.
Time frame: At 0-2 weeks and 8-10 weeks after start of intervention
Population: Numbers may vary based on number of participants that actually completed intervention materials
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed by the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-Expanded Form (Daily) | 0-2 weeks, mean | 10.51 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.55 |
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed by the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-Expanded Form (Daily) | 8-10 weeks, mean | 10.53 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.74 |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed by the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-Expanded Form (Daily) | 0-2 weeks, mean | 9.59 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.66 |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed by the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-Expanded Form (Daily) | 8-10 weeks, mean | 10.36 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.84 |
Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory
Regulation of psychological stress will be determined by ratings on four of the seven factors of the Cancer Behavior Inventory, which assess self-efficacy for stress management, coping with treatment-related side-effects, accepting cancer/maintaining positive attitude, and affective regulation. Scale ranged from 1-9 (1 - 3 not at all confident; 4-6 moderately confident and 7-9 totally confident). 4 of the 7 items from the Cancer Behavior Inventory (V2.0) were used with each item's score ranges from 0-50 with higher scores indicating more confidence in the item.
Time frame: At baseline, 8 weeks, 10 weeks and 14 weeks after start of intervention
Population: Numbers may vary based on number of participants that actually completed intervention materials
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory | Baseline - Stress management | 34.8 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.4 |
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory | Baseline - Coping with treatment-related side effects | 33.1 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.8 |
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory | Baseline - Accepting cancer/maintaining positive attitude | 37.8 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.3 |
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory | Baseline - Affective regulation | 28.2 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.6 |
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory | 8 weeks - Stress management | 38.1 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.3 |
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory | 8 weeks - Coping with treatment-related side effects | 37.1 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.7 |
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory | 8 weeks - Accepting cancer/maintaining positive attitude | 40.4 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.2 |
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory | 8 weeks - Affective regulation | 29.8 score on a scale | Standard Error 2.1 |
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory | 10 weeks - Stress management | 38.2 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.1 |
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory | 10 weeks - Coping with treatment-related side effects | 36.8 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.6 |
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory | 10 weeks - Accepting cancer/maintaining positive attitude | 40.6 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.9 |
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory | 10 weeks - Affective regulation | 30.1 score on a scale | Standard Error 2.2 |
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory | 14 weeks - Stress management | 39.2 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.4 |
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory | 14 weeks - Coping with treatment-related side effects | 37.0 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.7 |
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory | 14 weeks - Accepting cancer/maintaining positive attitude | 40.0 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.2 |
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory | 14 weeks - Affective regulation | 32.3 score on a scale | Standard Error 2.1 |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory | 14 weeks - Affective regulation | 34.0 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.9 |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory | Baseline - Stress management | 34.2 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.5 |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory | 10 weeks - Stress management | 38.5 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.6 |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory | Baseline - Coping with treatment-related side effects | 30.6 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.8 |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory | 14 weeks - Stress management | 40.1 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.1 |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory | Baseline - Accepting cancer/maintaining positive attitude | 39.3 score on a scale | Standard Error 0.9 |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory | 10 weeks - Coping with treatment-related side effects | 37.5 score on a scale | Standard Error 2.3 |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory | Baseline - Affective regulation | 29.9 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.6 |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory | 14 weeks - Accepting cancer/maintaining positive attitude | 41.1 score on a scale | Standard Error 1 |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory | 8 weeks - Stress management | 38.6 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.9 |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory | 10 weeks - Accepting cancer/maintaining positive attitude | 40.6 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.6 |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory | 8 weeks - Coping with treatment-related side effects | 35.4 score on a scale | Standard Error 2.1 |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory | 14 weeks - Coping with treatment-related side effects | 38.4 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.5 |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory | 8 weeks - Accepting cancer/maintaining positive attitude | 38.9 score on a scale | Standard Error 1.6 |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory | 10 weeks - Affective regulation | 33.1 score on a scale | Standard Error 2.3 |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Regulation of Psychological Stress Assessed Using the Cancer Behavior Inventory | 8 weeks - Affective regulation | 31.8 score on a scale | Standard Error 2.1 |
Soluble Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor 1 [sTNF-R1] Measured Using High-sensitivity Quantikine Immunoassay Kits
Inflammatory cytokines (i.e., interleukin 6 \[IL-6\], soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 \[sTNF-R1\], and tumor necrosis factor alpha \[TNF-alpha\]) that have been associated with fatigue during treatment for gastrointestinal cancer and influenced by yoga practice will be measured using high-sensitivity Quantikine immunoassay kits.
Time frame: At 2 weeks after start of intervention
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Soluble Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor 1 [sTNF-R1] Measured Using High-sensitivity Quantikine Immunoassay Kits | 1633.8 pg/ml |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Soluble Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor 1 [sTNF-R1] Measured Using High-sensitivity Quantikine Immunoassay Kits | 1727.5 pg/ml |
Soluble Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor 1 [sTNF-R1] Measured Using High-sensitivity Quantikine Immunoassay Kits
Inflammatory cytokines (i.e., interleukin 6 \[IL-6\], soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 \[sTNF-R1\], and tumor necrosis factor alpha \[TNF-alpha\]) that have been associated with fatigue during treatment for gastrointestinal cancer and influenced by yoga practice will be measured using high-sensitivity Quantikine immunoassay kits. All samples will be assayed in duplicate and the average of the two measures will be used for data analyses.
Time frame: At 10 weeks after start of intervention
Population: The number of participants represents the number that completed data to be analyzed for this particular outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Soluble Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor 1 [sTNF-R1] Measured Using High-sensitivity Quantikine Immunoassay Kits | 0.87 pg/ml |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Soluble Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor 1 [sTNF-R1] Measured Using High-sensitivity Quantikine Immunoassay Kits | 0.87 pg/ml |
Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha [TNF-alpha] Measured Using High-sensitivity Quantikine Immunoassay Kits
Inflammatory cytokines (i.e., interleukin 6 \[IL-6\], soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 \[sTNF-R1\], and tumor necrosis factor alpha \[TNF-alpha\]) that have been associated with fatigue during treatment for gastrointestinal cancer and influenced by yoga practice will be measured using high-sensitivity Quantikine immunoassay kits. All samples will be assayed in duplicate and the average of the two measures will be used for data analyses.
Time frame: At 10 weeks after start of intervention
Population: Numbers may vary based on number of participants that actually completed intervention materials
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha [TNF-alpha] Measured Using High-sensitivity Quantikine Immunoassay Kits | 1.01 pg/ml |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha [TNF-alpha] Measured Using High-sensitivity Quantikine Immunoassay Kits | 1.01 pg/ml |
Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha [TNF-alpha] Measured Using High-sensitivity Quantikine Immunoassay Kits
Inflammatory cytokines (i.e., interleukin 6 \[IL-6\], soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 \[sTNF-R1\], and tumor necrosis factor alpha \[TNF-alpha\]) that have been associated with fatigue during treatment for gastrointestinal cancer and influenced by yoga practice will be measured using high-sensitivity Quantikine immunoassay kits.
Time frame: At 2 weeks after start of intervention
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Group I (Yoga Skills Training) | Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha [TNF-alpha] Measured Using High-sensitivity Quantikine Immunoassay Kits | 1.6 pg/ml |
| Group II (Attention Control) | Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha [TNF-alpha] Measured Using High-sensitivity Quantikine Immunoassay Kits | 1.7 pg/ml |