Skip to content

Management of Persistent Epistaxis Using Floseal Hemostatic Matrix

Management of Persistent Anterior Epistaxis Using Floseal Hemostatic Matrix vs. Traditional Nasal Packing: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02488135
Enrollment
26
Registered
2015-07-02
Start date
2015-07-01
Completion date
2017-03-01
Last updated
2023-01-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Epistaxis

Keywords

Floseal® (Baxter, USA), epistaxis, nasal packing, persistent

Brief summary

Nosebleeds that persist even after adequate traditional nasal packing may require aggressive treatment strategies to stop bleeding. Currently these strategies include a surgical approach to cut off blood supply to the vessel that is bleeding. FloSeal Hemostatic matrix is a gel like medical therapy that is inserted into the nose and is engineered to stop bleeding in severe cases, possibly avoiding the need for surgery. In this study the investigators will randomize patients to either receive FloSeal Hemostatix matrix or traditional nasal packing as a treatment for severe nosebleeds. The main outcome will be whether the investigators are able to stop bleeding with FloSeal or traditional packing alone and whether additional measures are necessary to stop the bleeding. The investigators will also perform a patient comfort survey and cost analysis. Even if FloSeal has equal effectiveness in treating nosebleeds as traditional packing, if it is much more comfortable for patients then it may be the favourable treatment.

Detailed description

Background: Epistaxis is the most common emergent consultation to otolaryngology-head & neck surgery (OHNS) and with 60% of the population having experienced an episode and 1.6 in 10,000 requiring hospitalization in their lifetime. In preliminary studies Floseal® (Baxter, USA) Hemostatic Matrix has shown efficacy in up to 80% of persistent anterior epistaxis. We sought to evaluate the clinical efficacy¬ and cost-effectiveness of Floseal® (Baxter, USA) compared to traditional nasal packing for persistent epistaxis. Methods: A prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted on all adult patients consulted to the OHNS service at the tertiary referral centers of the University of Alberta Hospital and Royal Alexandra Hospital for persistent epistaxis. Patients were randomized to the Floseal® (Baxter, USA) or traditional packing study arms. Our main clinical outcome measures were: 1) Hemostasis directly following treatment and at 48 hours post-treatment, and 2) self-reported patient comfort at 48 hours post-treatment. Further, trial data was used for a formal cost-effectiveness analysis to determine incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Univariate sensitivity analysis and uncertainty analysis were performed.

Interventions

Floseal Hemostatic Matrix is a gel like fibrin glue used topically in the nasal cavity and applied with a syringe.

PROCEDURETraditional Nasal Packing

Using either vaseline gauze or nasal merocels. These will be placed in the anterior nasal cavity using nasal speculum and forceps.

Sponsors

University of Alberta
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients age 18+ presenting with epistaxis that requires an ENT consult that had a first attempt at treatment by an emergency physician.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients will be excluded based on the presence of a hypo-coagulable state. Including patients actively taking anti-coagulant medications or other patients with either acquired or hereditary bleeding disorders.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Initial Hemostasis4 hoursResidents administering the treatments will empirically observe primary hemostasis. Any active bleeding requiring further intervention within 4 hours of treatment will be defined as failure of initial hemostasis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Pain Level48 hoursPatients will be contacted 48 hours following treatment with either Floseal or traditional nasal packing and be asked to rate their pain on a 10-point Visual Analog Pain Scale. They will rate their pain for: 1) the placement of the treatment, 2) the duration of the treatment AND 3) the removal of the treatment. Minimum: 0 (less pain) Maximum: 10 (more pain) Higher scores indicate more pain and lower scores indicate less pain.

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Floseal Hemostatic Matrix
Floseal Hemostatic Matrix provided as treatment.
13
Traditional Nasal Packing
Traditional nasal packing provided as treatment.
13
Total26

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFloseal Hemostatic MatrixTraditional Nasal PackingTotal
Age, Continuous58.95 years55.08 years57.02 years
Aspirin Use2 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Charlson Comorbidity Index2.31 units on a scale2.31 units on a scale2.31 units on a scale
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
13 participants13 participants26 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants7 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants6 Participants14 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 130 / 13
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 130 / 13
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 130 / 13

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Initial Hemostasis

Residents administering the treatments will empirically observe primary hemostasis. Any active bleeding requiring further intervention within 4 hours of treatment will be defined as failure of initial hemostasis.

Time frame: 4 hours

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Floseal Hemostatic MatrixNumber of Participants With Initial Hemostasis10 Participants
Traditional Nasal PackingNumber of Participants With Initial Hemostasis11 Participants
p-value: 1Fisher Exact
Secondary

Patient Pain Level

Patients will be contacted 48 hours following treatment with either Floseal or traditional nasal packing and be asked to rate their pain on a 10-point Visual Analog Pain Scale. They will rate their pain for: 1) the placement of the treatment, 2) the duration of the treatment AND 3) the removal of the treatment. Minimum: 0 (less pain) Maximum: 10 (more pain) Higher scores indicate more pain and lower scores indicate less pain.

Time frame: 48 hours

Population: Patients that failed initial hemostasis were traditionally packed and therefore were not able to rate either treatment or removal of the product.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Floseal Hemostatic MatrixPatient Pain LevelPain Score During Placement2.42 units on a scale
Floseal Hemostatic MatrixPatient Pain LevelPain Score During Treatment0.50 units on a scale
Floseal Hemostatic MatrixPatient Pain LevelPain Score During Removal0 units on a scale
Traditional Nasal PackingPatient Pain LevelPain Score During Placement7.77 units on a scale
Traditional Nasal PackingPatient Pain LevelPain Score During Treatment4.46 units on a scale
Traditional Nasal PackingPatient Pain LevelPain Score During Removal3.85 units on a scale
Comparison: Comparison between groups for pain during placement.p-value: 0.0022Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Comparison between groups for pain during treatment.p-value: 0.0007Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Comparison between scores for pain during removal.p-value: 0.0021Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 25, 2026