Skip to content

Prospective Cohort Study of Outcome After Minimally Invasive Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery

Prospective Cohort Study of Outcome After Minimally Invasive Posterior Surgery (Posterior Percutaneous Endoscopic Foraminotomy or Tubular Retractor Assisted Micro-foraminotomy) for Single Level Cervical Foraminal Stenosis

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02486107
Acronym
PECD
Enrollment
156
Registered
2015-07-01
Start date
2015-05-31
Completion date
2020-12-31
Last updated
2024-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spinal Curvature

Keywords

cervical vertebra, surgery, tubular retractor, endoscope

Brief summary

In case of cervical foraminal stenosis without central stenosis, there are several options; anterior discectomy and fusion (ACDF), tubular retractor assisted micro-foraminotomy (MTPF) and posterior percutaneous cervical foraminotomy and discectomy (P-PECD). P-PECD is a modern technique and there was no RCT with MTPF, although P-PECD showed not inferior result to ACDF. Nowadays MTPF and P-PECD are minimally invasive surgical techniques, but there was no comparative study. The primary object of the study is to compare radiological outcome (segment angle) after MTPF or P-PECD.

Detailed description

P-PECDs are performed in Seoul National University Hospital MTPFs are performed in Kyoung-Pook National University Hospital and ACDF are performed in Seoul National University Bundang Hospital.

Interventions

PROCEDUREsurgical procedure

Sponsors

Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Kyungpook National University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Seoul National University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* cervical radicular pain * no cervical myelopathy

Exclusion criteria

* motor weakness less than MMT Gr III * cervical myelopathy * OPLL and myelopathy * previous cervical spine surgery * combined fracture or spinal tumor

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
change of segmental anglepostoperative 1 year

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
operation timepostoperative 1 year
neck/arm painpostop 1 year
neck disability, indexpostop 1 year
cervical curvaturepostop 1 year

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026