Skip to content

ABSORB Bioresorbable Scaffold vs. Xience Metallic Stent for Prevention of Restenosis in Patients at High Risk of Restenosis

ABSORB Bioresorbable Scaffold vs. Xience Metallic Stent for Prevention of Restenosis Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients at High Risk of Restenosis

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02486068
Acronym
Compare Absorb
Enrollment
1670
Registered
2015-07-01
Start date
2015-09-28
Completion date
2024-09-30
Last updated
2018-08-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Lesion

Brief summary

The primary objectives of this trial are: In patients at high-risk for restenosis, * To assess non-inferiority of the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) to the everolimus eluting cobalt chromium metallic stent (EES) in target lesion failure (TLF) at 1 year * To assess superiority of the BRS to the EES in TLF between 3 and 7 years

Interventions

Sponsors

European Cardiovascular Research Center
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients (18-75 years old) with at least one of the followings: * High-risk characteristics for restenosis * Medically treated Diabetes (oral medication or insulin) * Multivessel disease of which more than one de-novo target lesion to be treated with the study scaffold/stent * Complex target lesion * Single de-novo target lesion satisfying at least one of the following: * Lesion length \>28 mm * Small vessels: Target lesion reference vessel diameter between ≥2.5 mm and ≤2.75mm * Lesion with pre-existing total occlusion (pre-procedural TIMI = 0) * Bifurcation with single stent strategy

Exclusion criteria

* Patients are excluded from this study if they have: * Age \<18 years or \>75 years * Known comorbidities which make patients unable to complete 7-years follow-up * Female of childbearing potential (and last menstruation within the last 12 months), who did not undergo tubal ligation, ovariectomy or hysterectomy * Pregnant woman * Breastfeeding woman * Known intolerance to aspirin, heparin, PLLA, everolimus, contrast material * Cardiogenic Shock (Killip \>2) * PCI with implantation of stents/scaffolds within previous 30 days. * Active bleeding or coagulopathy or patients at chronic anticoagulation therapy * Subject is currently participating in another clinical trial that has not yet completed its primary endpoint * Renal insufficiency (GFR \<45 ml/min) * Life expectancy \< 7 years * Known non-adherence to DAPT * Patients on oral anticoagulation therapy (including novel oral anticoagulant such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban) * LVEF \<30% * Patients at high bleeding risk who are not suitable for long-term DAPT * Following lesion characteristics: * Target lesion reference vessel diameter (RVD) \< 2.5 and \> 4 mm * STEMI with RVD of \>3.5mm of the culprit target lesion * Target lesion with in-stent/scaffold thrombosis * Graft lesions as target lesions * Aorto-ostial lesion(s) * Left main lesion * Severe tortuosity of target vessel * In-scaffold restenosis * Bifurcation target lesion with intended 2 stent/scaffold strategy * Non-target lesion and target lesion in the same epicardial coronary artery (right coronary artery, left circumflex artery or left anterior descending artery)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
non-inferiority of the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold (Absorb) to the everolimus eluting cobalt chromium metallic stent (Xience) in target lesion failure (TLF)1 yearComposite of: * Cardiac death * Myocardial infarction (MI) in target vessel territory (SCAI consensus for periprocedural MI, 3rd universal definition for spontaneous or other MI) * Clinically Indicated Target lesion revascularization

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
superiority of the Absorb to the Xience in TLF between 3 and 7 years5 years
Superiority of the Absorb to the Xience in TLF at 7 years7 years
Superiority of the Absorb to the XIence in cumulative angina rate at 1 year1 year

Countries

Belgium, Czechia, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Spain, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 3, 2026