Biofeedback, Exercise, Pelvic Floor, Prostatectomy, Prostate Neoplasm, Surgical Procedures, Robotic, Urinary Incontinence
Conditions
Keywords
Prostate cancer, Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery, Radical prostatectomy, Post-prostatectomy incontinence, Pelvic floor muscle exercise, Extracorporeal biofeedback device
Brief summary
To evaluate the efficacy of postoperative pelvic floor muscle training using personalized extracorporeal biofeedback device among patients with post-prostatectomy incontinence
Detailed description
* Post prostatectomy urinary incontinence (PPI) was common complication after radical prostatectomy among prostate cancer patients. * The prevalence of post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence was reported at 87%. * The pelvic floor muscle therapy (PFMT) using Kegel exercise was first methods to prevent PPI after prostatectomy. * However, there was no standardized protocol of the PFMT and it was necessary of biofeedback to PFMT. * Therefore, we hypothesis the efficacy of personalized device of PFMT with biofeedback among patients who underwent radical prostatectomy * In this study, we evaluate the efficacy of postoperative pelvic floor muscle training using personalized extracorporeal biofeedback device among patients with post-prostatectomy incontinence.
Interventions
Prostate cancer patients of intervention group will received extracorporeal biofeedback device (Any Kegel) for pelvic floor muscle exercise (PFME) to improve the post-prostatectomy incontinence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Enrolled patients in intervention group should be performed PFME regularly, based on following protocols: total exercise time (10 minutes/day), intensity (1.2 kgf), tension duration (10 sec/ 1 contraction), total exercise number (4 times/day)
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Prostate cancer patients who underwent robotic radical prostatectomy * Neurovascular saving at least one side * Bladder neck reconstruction at prostatectomy * Posterior reconstruction at prostatectomy * Patients who have post-prostatectomy incontinence after Foley catheter removal
Exclusion criteria
* Patients who have not post-prostatectomy incontinence after Foley catheter removal * Neurological deficits * Anatomic deformities of pelvic bone * Pelvic irradiation history * History of other major urological procedures * Complications influencing urinary incontinence
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Recovery of urinary continence | postoperative 1 month | weight of pad (g) by 24 hours pad test |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Recovery of urinary continence | postoperative 3 month | weight of pad (g) by 24 hours pad test |
Countries
South Korea