Skip to content

Gait Analyses After Resurfacing Hip Arthroplasty Versus Metal on Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty, an Exploratory Study

Gait Analyses After Resurfacing Hip Arthroplasty Versus Metal on Metal Total Hip

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02484781
Enrollment
34
Registered
2015-06-30
Start date
2015-12-31
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2016-07-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Difficulty Walking, Gait, Stumbling

Keywords

Gait disorder, Resurfacing Hip Arthroplasty, Total Hip Arthroplasty

Brief summary

Total hip replacement surgery is a very successful operation with good long-term results. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty is offered as a treatment option for young and active patients with osteoarthritis of the hip. It has been proposed as a treatment option for younger patients because of claims that it preserves femoral bone stock and has better functional outcomes. The assessment of gait after hip replacement surgery may be able to determine functional differences between patients who have undergone total hip replacement / arthroplasty (THA) versus hip resurfacing.

Detailed description

A group of 58 patients, part of a ungoing randomized trial comparing resurfacing hip arthroplasty to metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty, will be invited to a single gait analysis on a trendmill. All patients have reached a follow up of five years. Patient 's gait will be assessed during two walking sessions, in both sessions spatio-temporal, kinetic and kinematic parameters will be recorded. * At first when flat walking with increasing speeds to their top walking speed. * Secondly: when walking at a fixed speed with an increasing incline to their top walking incline.

Interventions

OTHERGait analysis on a trendmill

Gait analysis on a trendmill GRAIL to analyse spatio-temporal kinetics and kinematics when flat walking and inclining

Sponsors

RMC Groot Klimmendaal
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Rijnstate Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patient part of randomised controlled trial (RCT) of hip resurfacing versus MoM total hip arthroplasty for symptomatic osteoarthritis of the hip * Patient must be able to consent to the study (written informed consent) * Patients who are functioning well post-operatively and not under routine follow up * Patients who are able to walk without any safety rail assistance on the treadmill

Exclusion criteria

* Patient not originally randomised during an RCT of hip resurfacing versus MoM total hip arthroplasty * Patients who suffer from any neurological or musculoskeletal conditions that might make a gait test dangerous. * Patients whose cognitive function prevents them from understanding the study * Patients who have had or are awaiting revision surgery for their hip

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hip maximum internal/external rotation per cycle5 years postoperativeMean hip kinematics in degrees assessed on a trendmill
Maximum weight acceptance (N/kg) per cycle5 years postoperativeMean ground reaction forces assessed on a trendmill
Mid-stance force (N/kg) per cycle5 years postoperativeMean ground reaction forces assessed on a trendmill
Hip maximum flexion/extension per cycle5 years postoperativeMean hip kinematics in degrees assessed on a trendmill
Top walking speed5 years postoperativeMean top walking speed in kilometers / hour assessed on a trendmill
Walking cadence5 years postoperativeMean steps / minute at top walking speed assessed on a trendmill
Step length5 years postoperativeMean step distance in meters at top walking speed assessed on a trendmill
Maximum Push off force (N/kg) per cycle5 years postoperativeMean ground reaction forces in Newton / kilogram on a trendmill

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
General Health according EurQol-5D5 years postoperativeHealth outcome on the EQ-5D questionairre
Physical activity level according the UCLA-activity score5 years postoperativeThe University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score
Postoperative hip functionality after hip arthroplasty.5 years postoperativePostoperative hip function according the Harris Hip Score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026