Difficulty Walking, Gait, Stumbling
Conditions
Keywords
Gait disorder, Resurfacing Hip Arthroplasty, Total Hip Arthroplasty
Brief summary
Total hip replacement surgery is a very successful operation with good long-term results. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty is offered as a treatment option for young and active patients with osteoarthritis of the hip. It has been proposed as a treatment option for younger patients because of claims that it preserves femoral bone stock and has better functional outcomes. The assessment of gait after hip replacement surgery may be able to determine functional differences between patients who have undergone total hip replacement / arthroplasty (THA) versus hip resurfacing.
Detailed description
A group of 58 patients, part of a ungoing randomized trial comparing resurfacing hip arthroplasty to metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty, will be invited to a single gait analysis on a trendmill. All patients have reached a follow up of five years. Patient 's gait will be assessed during two walking sessions, in both sessions spatio-temporal, kinetic and kinematic parameters will be recorded. * At first when flat walking with increasing speeds to their top walking speed. * Secondly: when walking at a fixed speed with an increasing incline to their top walking incline.
Interventions
Gait analysis on a trendmill GRAIL to analyse spatio-temporal kinetics and kinematics when flat walking and inclining
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Patient part of randomised controlled trial (RCT) of hip resurfacing versus MoM total hip arthroplasty for symptomatic osteoarthritis of the hip * Patient must be able to consent to the study (written informed consent) * Patients who are functioning well post-operatively and not under routine follow up * Patients who are able to walk without any safety rail assistance on the treadmill
Exclusion criteria
* Patient not originally randomised during an RCT of hip resurfacing versus MoM total hip arthroplasty * Patients who suffer from any neurological or musculoskeletal conditions that might make a gait test dangerous. * Patients whose cognitive function prevents them from understanding the study * Patients who have had or are awaiting revision surgery for their hip
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Hip maximum internal/external rotation per cycle | 5 years postoperative | Mean hip kinematics in degrees assessed on a trendmill |
| Maximum weight acceptance (N/kg) per cycle | 5 years postoperative | Mean ground reaction forces assessed on a trendmill |
| Mid-stance force (N/kg) per cycle | 5 years postoperative | Mean ground reaction forces assessed on a trendmill |
| Hip maximum flexion/extension per cycle | 5 years postoperative | Mean hip kinematics in degrees assessed on a trendmill |
| Top walking speed | 5 years postoperative | Mean top walking speed in kilometers / hour assessed on a trendmill |
| Walking cadence | 5 years postoperative | Mean steps / minute at top walking speed assessed on a trendmill |
| Step length | 5 years postoperative | Mean step distance in meters at top walking speed assessed on a trendmill |
| Maximum Push off force (N/kg) per cycle | 5 years postoperative | Mean ground reaction forces in Newton / kilogram on a trendmill |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| General Health according EurQol-5D | 5 years postoperative | Health outcome on the EQ-5D questionairre |
| Physical activity level according the UCLA-activity score | 5 years postoperative | The University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score |
| Postoperative hip functionality after hip arthroplasty. | 5 years postoperative | Postoperative hip function according the Harris Hip Score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index |
Countries
Netherlands