Skip to content

Comparative Effectiveness of Hot Versus Cold Snare Polypectomy of Small Colorectal Polyps

Comparative Effectiveness of Hot Versus Cold Snare Polypectomy of Small Colorectal Polyps. A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02484079
Acronym
HOT/COLD
Enrollment
429
Registered
2015-06-29
Start date
2015-05-18
Completion date
2022-12-31
Last updated
2023-02-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adenoma, Colonic Polyps, Colorectal Neoplasms

Brief summary

This study aims to investigate the comparative effectiveness between polyp removal with or without electrical current. The investigators want to include 600 polyps in the trial. It is known that polyps have the potential to develop to cancer if left in situ, but the investigators do not know the best way to remove them completely.

Detailed description

In this study the investigators want to compare to widely used methods for polyp removal; hot and cold snare polypectomy. There has not been performed any big studies on this subject earlier, but current knowledge indicates that hot polypectomy (i.e. with use of electrical current) is somewhat better with regard to complete resection of polyps compared to cold polypectomy (without electrical current). In this project the patients will be randomized to either hot or cold polypectomy. The investigators will distribute videos of how the polypectomies should be performed, and a gastroenterologist in the project group will instruct the doctors examining the patients to make sure that everyone performs polypectomy according to current guidelines. The study is designed as a non-inferiority trial.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPolypectomy

Sponsors

Sorlandet Hospital HF
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Outpatient colonoscopy * Signed, written informed consent * At least one flat/sessile polyp sized 4-9 mm identified during colonoscopy

Exclusion criteria

* Implanted cardiac electro converter * Severe comorbidity (NYHA 3-4) * Known coagulopathy (INR \> 1,8) or resent use of any of the new oral anti-coagulant medications * Platelet count \< 100 * Resent use of clopidogrel or other non-acetylsalicylic acid platelet inhibitor (Last dose \< 5 days before the procedure) * Previous biopsy or attempt of polypectomy of the polyp considered for inclusion in the trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complete resection rateHopefully within 4 weeks, when the histopathologist has examined the biopsiesWe want to measure the rate of polyps that are resected completely, both with biopsies from the margin and the histopathologists evaluation of the resection margins of the polyp itself.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complications4 weeksWe want to register early (during the procedure) and late (within 4 weeks after the procedure) complications. Complications we will record is bleeding/blood in the stool, perforation and patient contact with health care provider
Factors explaining the primary outcomeDuring the hospital stay and up to 4 weeks.Patient characteristics

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026