Skip to content

Two-week Course Versus Conventionally Fractionated Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer

Two-Week COurse Versus Conventionally Fractionated Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy In Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer (TwoArc Trial): A Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02484040
Enrollment
370
Registered
2015-06-29
Start date
2015-12-31
Completion date
2021-07-31
Last updated
2017-06-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Recurrence, Response to Toxin, Toxicity

Keywords

tumor response, toxicity, recurrence, chemoradiotherpy, rectum

Brief summary

The investigators compare two-week course of chemoradiation (33 Gy in 10 fractions with oral capecitabine) and conventional chemoradiation (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions with 5-FU and leucovorin) in this randomized trial.

Detailed description

1.1 experimental arm Two-week course concurrent chemoradiotherapy * Radiotherapy, 33 Gy/10 fractions for 2 weeks ↓↓↓↓↓ ↓↓↓↓↓ Radical surgery 6 weeks after completion of chemoradiotherapy D1----------------------D12 * Capecitabine 825 mg/m2, twice daily 1.2 control arm Standard concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) * Radiotherapy, 50.4 Gy/28 fractions for 6 weeks ↓↓↓↓↓ ↓↓↓↓↓ ↓↓↓↓↓ ↓↓↓↓↓ ↓↓↓↓↓ ↓↓↓ Radical surgery D1--------------------------------------------------------------------------D38 * Bolus 5-FU, 400 mg/ m2 and leucovorin, 20 mg/ m2 during week 1 and 5 * Capecitabine, 825 mg/ m2, bid

Interventions

RADIATIONTwo-week course of radiation

33 Gy in 10 fractions for 2 weeks

Sponsors

Jong Hoon Lee
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma; 2. distal margin of the tumor located \< 10 cm from the anal verge; 3. cT3-4N0-2 classification as determined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or endorectal ultrasonography (EUS); 4. no evidence of distant metastasis; 5. Karnofsky performance score over 70; 6. adequate bone marrow, liver, and renal function (leucocytes \>4000/mm3, hemoglobin \>10 g/dL, platelets \>100,000/mm3; serum bilirubin \<1.5 mg/dL, serum transaminase \<2.5 times the upper normal limit; serum creatinine \<1.5 mg/dL).

Exclusion criteria

1. Metastatic disease 2. No complete resection of tumor (R2)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tumor response from stage II-III to stage 0-Ifrom clinical staging time to radical surgery date (about 3 months)Downstaging rate was evaluated by comparing pre-clinical and post-CRT pathological stages, and downstaging was defined as ypStage 0-I (ypT0-2N0M0)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Toxicity (acute and chronic)from radiation start to 3 years after radical surgeryDuring the course of radiotherapy, patients were evaluated weekly to assess acute toxicity. Patients were also followed 2 and 4 weeks after completion of radiotherapy and until 3 years after curative surgery to assess toxicity. Toxicity are assessed using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0).
Recurrence and survival3-year recurrence-free survival and 3-year overall survival

Countries

South Korea

Contacts

Primary ContactJong Hoon Lee, MD
koppul@catholic.ac.kr+82-031-249-8440

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026