Skip to content

Optimization of the Bowel Preparation Regimen for the PillCam® COLON 2 Capsule Endoscopy Procedure

COVGIC20482: A Multicenter, Consecutive, Randomized Study to Optimize the Bowel Preparation Regimen for the PillCam COLON 2 Capsule Endoscopy Procedure

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02481219
Enrollment
122
Registered
2015-06-25
Start date
2015-05-31
Completion date
2016-02-29
Last updated
2017-03-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Cancer Screening

Keywords

Polyps, Capsule endoscopy, Bowel preparation regimen, Average risk patients for colorectal cancer screening

Brief summary

This study is designed to determine the optimal bowel preparation regimen for PillCam® COLON 2 Capsule Endoscopy System (CCE) procedures in average risk patients. Patients will be randomized to receive one of two bowel preparation regimens prior to PillCam CCE.

Detailed description

This is a multicenter, prospective, consecutive, randomized study. Average-risk subjects undergoing CCE without optical colonoscopy will be consecutively enrolled and randomized 1:1 to receive one of two bowel preparation regimens prior to PillCam CCE. Subjects will be enrolled at 5-10 clinical sites in the United States. Subjects who meet the eligibility criteria will be screened for study participation at a baseline visit and will be evaluated on the procedure day or until capsule excretion. A telephone follow-up will be conducted 5 to 9 days post-capsule ingestion to verify capsule excretion, assess patient well-being, and capture any adverse events.

Interventions

DEVICEPillCam® COLON 2 procedure-CONTROL
DRUGSenna tablets
DRUGPEG
DRUGMetoclopramide
DRUGErythromycin
DRUGSUPREP oral sulfate solution
DRUGBisacodyl
DRUGSUPREP oral sulfate solution with Gastrografin

Sponsors

Medtronic - MITG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Subject is between 50 and 75 years of age. 2. Subject is classified as average risk per the American Gastroenterological Association Guidelines on Colorectal Cancer Screening: Individuals without a personal or family history of colorectal cancer (CRC) or adenomas, inflammatory bowel disease, or high-risk genetic syndromes. 3. Subject is willing and able to participate in the study procedures and to understand and sign the informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Subject with history of polyps (including those identified by computed tomography \[CT\], optical colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, etc.). 2. Subject with history of negative colon assessment (including CT, optical colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy etc.) within 5 years as these subjects would be defined not requiring screening in this time frame. 3. Subject with suspected or diagnosed with hematochezia, melena, iron deficiency with or without anemia, or any other rectal bleeding, including positive fecal occult blood test of any variety. 4. Subject with any condition believed to have an increased risk of capsule retention such as suspected or known bowel obstruction, stricture, or fistula. 5. Subject with dysphagia or any swallowing disorder. 6. Subject with serious medical conditions that would increase the risk associated with capsule or colonoscopy that are so severe that screening would have no benefit. 7. Subject with a cardiac pacemaker or other implanted electromedical device. 8. Subject expected to undergo MRI examination within 7 days after ingestion of the capsule. 9. Subject with clinical evidence of renal disease, including clinically significant laboratory abnormalities of renal function within the past 6 months, or at any time in the past if not tested within the last 6 months, defined as creatinine, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and/or glomerular filtration rate (GFR) outside of the local laboratory reference range. 10. Subject with known gastrointestinal motility disorders. 11. Subject with allergies or known contraindication to the medications or preparation agents used in the procedure as described in the relevant instructions for use. 12. Subject with comorbidities which, in the opinion of the investigator, will not be appropriate for the study or the subject has an estimated life expectancy of less than 6 months. 13. Subject is considered to be part of a vulnerable population (e.g. prisoners or those without sufficient mental capacity). 14. Subject is pregnant, suspected pregnant, or is actively breast-feeding. Females of child-bearing potential will be required to provide either a urine pregnancy test or serum pregnancy test as part of the participant's standard of care regardless of their participation in the study (except for subjects who are surgically sterile or are post-menopausal for at least two years). 15. Subject has participated in an investigational drug or device research study within 30 days of enrollment that may interfere with the subject's safety or ability to participate in this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Within two weeks of study procedureThe primary endpoint is the bowel cleansing level, as determined by a standardized 4-point grading scale, assessed in total and by segment (cecum, ascending, transverse, descending/sigmoid, and rectum).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparing Polyp Detection Rate of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCEan expected average of 3 weeks from study procedureWill be assessed from RAPID video in total and by segment
Colonic Transit Time of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCEan expected average of 3 weeks from study procedureColonic transit time of two different bowel preparation was assessed from RAPID video in total and by segment
Comparing of Completion Rate of Capsule of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCEan expected average of 3 weeks from study procedureWill be assessed from RAPID video in total and by segment
Excretion Rate of Capsule Within 12 Hours of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCEan expected average of 3 weeks from study procedureWill be assesses by applicable case report form (CRF)
Adverse Events Rate Between Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCEAdverse Events (AE) were collected starting from the screening visit and until 5-9 days following the PillCam procedure day.Will be assesses by applicable CRF

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Bowel Preparation Regimen -Control
Regimen includes administration of: Drug: 4 Senna tablets 2 days before the procedure, Drug: 2-liters of PEG on the evening before the procedure Drug: 2-liters of PEG on the morning of the procedure, Drug:10mg Metoclopramide or 250 mg Erythromycin Drug: 2 SUPREP oral sulfate solution Drug: 10mg Bisacodyl suppository. PillCam® COLON 2 procedure-CONTROL Senna tablets PEG Metoclopramide Erythromycin SUPREP oral sulfate solution Bisacodyl
60
Bowel Preparation Regimen-Test
Regimen includes administration of: Drug: 4 Senna tablets 2 days before the procedure, Drug: 2-liters of PEG on the evening before the procedure Drug: 2-liters of PEG on the morning of the procedure, Drug:10mg Metoclopramide or 250 mg Erythromycin Drug: 2 SUPREP oral sulfate solution with Gastrografin Drug: 10mg Bisacodyl suppository. PillCam® COLON 2 procedure-Test Senna tablets PEG Metoclopramide Erythromycin Bisacodyl SUPREP oral sulfate solution with Gastrografin
62
Total122

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBowel Preparation Regimen-TestBowel Preparation Regimen -ControlTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
6 Participants2 Participants8 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
56 Participants58 Participants114 Participants
Age, Continuous53 years53 years53 years
Region of Enrollment
United States
62 participants60 participants122 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
34 Participants31 Participants65 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
28 Participants29 Participants57 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 5912 / 62
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 591 / 62

Outcome results

Primary

Bowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)

The primary endpoint is the bowel cleansing level, as determined by a standardized 4-point grading scale, assessed in total and by segment (cecum, ascending, transverse, descending/sigmoid, and rectum).

Time frame: Within two weeks of study procedure

Population: this was calculated on the per protocol analysis (PPAS) set excluding patients with one (or more) unseen segment in Cecum, Ascending and Transverse colon.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Overall Good cleansing70.5 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Cecum Excellent cleansing14.0 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Ascending Excellent cleansing12.2 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Transverse Excellent cleansing10.6 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Descending Excellent cleansing9.5 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Rectum Excellent cleansing0 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Overall Excellent cleansing6.8 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Cecum Good cleansing54.0 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Ascending Good cleansing63.3 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Transverse Good cleansing61.7 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Descending Good cleansing73.8 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Rectum Good cleansing56.1 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Overall Fair cleansing22.7 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Cecum Fair cleansing30.0 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Ascending Fair cleansing22.5 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Transverse Fair cleansing27.7 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Descending Fair cleansing16.7 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Rectum Fair cleansing46.5 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Overall Poor cleansing0 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Cecum Poor cleansing2.0 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Ascending Poor cleansing2.0 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Transverse Poor cleansing0 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Descending Poor cleansing0 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Rectum Poor cleansing2.4 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Descending Poor cleansing0 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Overall Excellent cleansing16.7 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Overall Fair cleansing24.1 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Cecum Excellent cleansing14.6 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Overall Poor cleansing0 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Ascending Excellent cleansing18.2 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Cecum Fair cleansing30.9 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Transverse Excellent cleansing14.6 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Transverse Poor cleansing0 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Descending Excellent cleansing18.5 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Ascending Fair cleansing21.8 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Rectum Excellent cleansing10.0 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Cecum Poor cleansing1.8 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Overall Good cleansing59.3 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Transverse Fair cleansing25.5 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Cecum Good cleansing52.7 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Rectum Poor cleansing2.0 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Ascending Good cleansing60.0 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Descending Fair cleansing18.5 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Transverse Good cleansing60.0 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Ascending Poor cleansing0 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Descending Good cleansing63.0 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Rectum Fair cleansing36.0 percentage of particpants
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestBowel Cleansing Level of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam® Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE)Rectum Good cleansing52.0 percentage of particpants
Secondary

Adverse Events Rate Between Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCE

Will be assesses by applicable CRF

Time frame: Adverse Events (AE) were collected starting from the screening visit and until 5-9 days following the PillCam procedure day.

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlAdverse Events Rate Between Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCE3.4 percentage of participants with >1 AE
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestAdverse Events Rate Between Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCE19.4 percentage of participants with >1 AE
Secondary

Colonic Transit Time of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCE

Colonic transit time of two different bowel preparation was assessed from RAPID video in total and by segment

Time frame: an expected average of 3 weeks from study procedure

Population: The following patients were excluded from the analysis:2 withdrawn patients, 1 LTF (Lost to follow-up) patient, 2 pattients with failed prcedure, 16 patients with incomplete COLON exam.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlColonic Transit Time of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCE2.8 hours
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestColonic Transit Time of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCE2.4 hours
Secondary

Comparing of Completion Rate of Capsule of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCE

Will be assessed from RAPID video in total and by segment

Time frame: an expected average of 3 weeks from study procedure

Population: Per protocol analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlComparing of Completion Rate of Capsule of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCE76.9 percentage of participants
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestComparing of Completion Rate of Capsule of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCE90.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Comparing Polyp Detection Rate of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCE

Will be assessed from RAPID video in total and by segment

Time frame: an expected average of 3 weeks from study procedure

Population: This analysis is a subset of the PPAs excluding patients with one or more missing video data for Cecum, Ascending and transverse colon. Patients with at least one polyp detected on overall segments.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlComparing Polyp Detection Rate of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCEOverall (any size)46.8 percentage of participants
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlComparing Polyp Detection Rate of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCECecum (any size)6.0 percentage of participants
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlComparing Polyp Detection Rate of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCEAscending (any size)14.0 percentage of participants
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlComparing Polyp Detection Rate of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCETransverse (any size)4.3 percentage of participants
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlComparing Polyp Detection Rate of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCEDescending (any size)31.9 percentage of participants
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlComparing Polyp Detection Rate of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCErectum (any size)24.4 percentage of participants
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlComparing Polyp Detection Rate of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCEOverall (polyps ≥6mm)21.3 percentage of participants
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlComparing Polyp Detection Rate of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCECecum (polyps ≥6mm)2.0 percentage of participants
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlComparing Polyp Detection Rate of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCEAscending (polyps ≥6mm)2.0 percentage of participants
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlComparing Polyp Detection Rate of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCETransverse (polyps ≥6mm)4.3 percentage of participants
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlComparing Polyp Detection Rate of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCEDescending (polyps ≥6mm)12.8 percentage of participants
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlComparing Polyp Detection Rate of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCERectum (polyps ≥6mm)7.3 percentage of participants
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlComparing Polyp Detection Rate of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCEOverall (polyps ≥10mm)8.5 percentage of participants
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlComparing Polyp Detection Rate of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCECecum Overall (polyps ≥10mm)0 percentage of participants
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlComparing Polyp Detection Rate of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCEAscending Overall (polyps ≥10mm)2.0 percentage of participants
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlComparing Polyp Detection Rate of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCETransverse (polyps ≥10mm)0 percentage of participants
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlComparing Polyp Detection Rate of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCEDescending (polyps ≥10mm)4.3 percentage of participants
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlComparing Polyp Detection Rate of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCERectum (polyps ≥10mm)4.9 percentage of participants
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestComparing Polyp Detection Rate of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCECecum Overall (polyps ≥10mm)7.3 percentage of participants
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestComparing Polyp Detection Rate of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCEOverall (any size)58.2 percentage of participants
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestComparing Polyp Detection Rate of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCETransverse (polyps ≥6mm)7.3 percentage of participants
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestComparing Polyp Detection Rate of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCECecum (any size)14.6 percentage of participants
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestComparing Polyp Detection Rate of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCERectum (polyps ≥10mm)2.0 percentage of participants
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestComparing Polyp Detection Rate of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCEAscending (any size)9.1 percentage of participants
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestComparing Polyp Detection Rate of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCEDescending (polyps ≥6mm)16.4 percentage of participants
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestComparing Polyp Detection Rate of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCETransverse (any size)7.3 percentage of participants
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestComparing Polyp Detection Rate of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCEAscending Overall (polyps ≥10mm)3.6 percentage of participants
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestComparing Polyp Detection Rate of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCEDescending (any size)29.1 percentage of participants
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestComparing Polyp Detection Rate of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCERectum (polyps ≥6mm)6.0 percentage of participants
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestComparing Polyp Detection Rate of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCErectum (any size)32.0 percentage of participants
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestComparing Polyp Detection Rate of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCEDescending (polyps ≥10mm)3.6 percentage of participants
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestComparing Polyp Detection Rate of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCEOverall (polyps ≥6mm)36.4 percentage of participants
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestComparing Polyp Detection Rate of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCEOverall (polyps ≥10mm)14.6 percentage of participants
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestComparing Polyp Detection Rate of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCECecum (polyps ≥6mm)12.7 percentage of participants
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestComparing Polyp Detection Rate of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCETransverse (polyps ≥10mm)1.8 percentage of participants
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestComparing Polyp Detection Rate of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCEAscending (polyps ≥6mm)3.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Excretion Rate of Capsule Within 12 Hours of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCE

Will be assesses by applicable case report form (CRF)

Time frame: an expected average of 3 weeks from study procedure

Population: PPAS: Subjects withdrawn prior to the PillCam procedure (3) and subjects with one or more of the following protocol deviations (13) have been excluded: Evening PEG intake \<1h and \> 2.15h, Morning PEG intake \<1h and \>2:15 h, Capsule ingestion l\<45 min or \>75 min after PEG intake , Overall PEG intake volume is less than 3 liters

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Bowel Preparation Regimen -ControlExcretion Rate of Capsule Within 12 Hours of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCE80.4 percentage of participants
Bowel Preparation Regimen-TestExcretion Rate of Capsule Within 12 Hours of Two Different Bowel Preparation Methods for PillCam CCE90.9 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026