Skip to content

Evaluation of an Algorithm for Length Based Weight Estimation

Evaluation of an Algorithm for Length Based Weight Estimation in Comparison to Already Known Devices Like the Pediatric Emergency Tape (Pädiatrisches Notfalllineal - PNL)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02480413
Enrollment
492
Registered
2015-06-24
Start date
2015-07-31
Completion date
2016-03-31
Last updated
2016-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Length Based Weight Estimation

Keywords

Broselow Tape, Weight estimation, Patient safety

Brief summary

The purpose of this prospective single center study is to investigate if a developed algorithm is more accurate than the pediatric emergency tape (Alpha 1 Werbedesign e.K., Falkenberg, Germany). For this study 500 patients are required to collect anonymized data (length, weight, age, anaesthesia material used during anaesthesia) for achieving a power of 80% during statistical analysis. The main hypothesis ist that the algorithm has a better accuracy than the pediatric emergency tape (53% are in a +/- 10% interval).

Detailed description

This prospective single center study is performed at the university children's hospital zurich. Patients planned for surgery in general anaesthesia with intubation, aged 0 to 16 years and with a body length suitable for the emergency tapes can be included in this study. Patient and parental information is performed during the pre-anaesthetic visit. After written consent the patient will be included. Patient´s length and weight will be measures earliest one day before data collection. Data collection during anaesthesia has no influence on the daily anaesthesia routine and has no impact on patient safety and anaesthesia. Patient's data is made anonymous for further inspection. Data is documented in Microsoft Excel and statistical analysis calculated with SPSS. 500 patients are needed for a power of 80%. Primary outcome parameter is length-based weight estimation, secondary outcome parameters are length-based age estimation and the correctness of recommended anaesthesia material (endotracheal tube, laryngeal mask, oropharyngeal mask and face mask). Both tools (algorithm and pediatric emergency tape) will be compared with eachother regarding primary and secondary outcome parameters.

Interventions

OTHERAccuracy of an algorithm and the pediatric emergency tape.

No intervention

Sponsors

University Children's Hospital, Zurich
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Days to 16 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* body length suitable with the investigated emergency tapes * all patients aged 0 -16 years * receiving general anaesthesia with intubation

Exclusion criteria

* Already included in this study once * missing patient or parental consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
length based weight estimation by algorithmduring anaesthesia

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
length based age estimationduring anaesthesia
size of endotracheal tubeduring anaesthesia
size of laryngeal maskduring anaesthesia
size of facemaskduring anaesthesia
size of oropharyngeal tubeduring anaesthesia

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026