Skip to content

A Comparison Between Conventional and Waveform-Confirmed Loss-of-Resistance for Thoracic Epidural Blocks

A Randomized Comparison Between Conventional and Waveform-Confirmed Loss-of-Resistance for Thoracic Epidural Blocks

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02479763
Enrollment
106
Registered
2015-06-24
Start date
2015-06-30
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2016-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia

Keywords

Epidural waveform analysis, Loss of resistance

Brief summary

In the investigators' institution, the failure rate for thoracic epidural blocks is 23.1%. This stems from the prevalence of trainee operators coupled with the non-specific nature of loss-of-resistance. In the current randomized trial, we will set out to compare conventional and epidural waveform analysis-confirmed loss-of-resistance. The investigators' research hypothesis is that loss-of-resistance combined with epidural waveform analysis will decrease the failure rate of thoracic epidural blocks.

Interventions

PROCEDUREWaveform-confirmed loss-of-resistance

Using waveform analysis to confirm thoracic epidural space

Sponsors

Montreal General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* the patients undergoing thoracic epidural catheter insertion for thoracic and abdominal surgery or rib fractures with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification 1-3 and body mass index between 18 and 35

Exclusion criteria

* adults who are unable to give their own consent * coagulopathy (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work up ie platelets ≤ 100, or International Normalized Ratio ≥ 1.4) * renal failure (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work up ie creatinine ≥ 100) * hepatic failure (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work up ie transaminases ≥ 100) * allergy to local anesthetic (LA) * pregnancy * prior surgery in the thoracic spine

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Patients With Successful Epidural Blocksup to 15 minutes after the procedureFifteen minutes after the LA injection, a blinded observer will apply ice to the T1-L4 dermatomes and assess the epidural block. The criterion standard for success will be the presence of an epidural block (defined as a block to ice in at least 2 dermatomes bilaterally). If the operators cannot thread the catheter after 2 attempts, epidural blocks will considered failures.

Countries

Canada, Thailand

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Conventional Loss-of-resistance
Conventional loss-of-resistance: Using tactile feeling to identify thoracic epidural space
50
Waveform-confirmed Loss-of-resistance
Waveform-confirmed loss-of-resistance: Using waveform analysis to confirm thoracic epidural space
50
Total100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicConventional Loss-of-resistanceWaveform-confirmed Loss-of-resistanceTotal
Age, Continuous61.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
61.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8
61.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4
American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status, Categorical
Class I; A normal healthy patient
3 participants9 participants12 participants
American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status, Categorical
Class II; A patient with mild systemic disease
21 participants23 participants44 participants
American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status, Categorical
Class III; A patient with severe systemic disease
26 participants18 participants44 participants
BMI (kg/m^2), Continuous25.5 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4
24.6 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.7
25.1 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.1
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants20 Participants36 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
34 Participants30 Participants64 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 502 / 50
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 500 / 50

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Patients With Successful Epidural Blocks

Fifteen minutes after the LA injection, a blinded observer will apply ice to the T1-L4 dermatomes and assess the epidural block. The criterion standard for success will be the presence of an epidural block (defined as a block to ice in at least 2 dermatomes bilaterally). If the operators cannot thread the catheter after 2 attempts, epidural blocks will considered failures.

Time frame: up to 15 minutes after the procedure

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Conventional Loss-of-resistancePercentage of Patients With Successful Epidural Blocks76 percentage of patients
Waveform-confirmed Loss-of-resistancePercentage of Patients With Successful Epidural Blocks98 percentage of patients

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026