Skip to content

Two Points Versus Three Points Turning in Prevention of Bed Sores in Critically Ill Patients

Two Pints Versus Three Points Turning in Prevention of Bed Sores in Critically Ill Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02479425
Enrollment
150
Registered
2015-06-24
Start date
2011-05-31
Completion date
2012-07-31
Last updated
2015-07-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pressure Ulcer

Keywords

pressure ulcer, Positioning

Brief summary

Several studies were searched the preventive measures of bed sores. Although repositioning is the mainstay in most preventive measures, there is no evidence to recommend specific turning regimen. The aim of this study is to comparative the impact of the two points repositioning in lateral lying position on the right and left versus the traditional three points repositioning on the right, back, and left in the occurrence of bed sores. This study was conducted on 150 patients admitted to the critical care department of Alexandria Main University Hospital after obtaining an informed consent from their relatives. The investigators excluded patients who: have active or healed bed sores. Patients were randomly divided into two groups by allocated randomization: * Group 1: traditional three points rotation. * Group 2: two points rotation.

Detailed description

Several studies were searched the preventive measures of bed sores. Although repositioning is the mainstay in most preventive measures, there is no evidence to recommend specific turning regimen. Aim of the study: The aim of this study was designed to evaluate the comparative impact of the two points repositioning in lateral lying position on the right and left versus the traditional three points repositioning on the right, back, and left in the occurrence of bed sores. Patients: This study was conducted on 150 patients admitted to the critical care department of Alexandria Main University Hospital after obtaining an informed consent from their relatives. The investigators excluded patients who: have active or healed bed sores. Patients were randomly divided into two groups by allocated randomization: * Group 1: traditional three points rotation. * Group 2: two points rotation. Methods: The studied patients were subjected to: Complete history taking, physical examination, primary ICU diagnosis, routine laboratory investigation and recording Glasgaw coma scale (GCS), use of sedation, vasopressors and mechanical ventilation Patients in group 1 nursed by traditional protocol \[ two hours on the right side in 30 degree lateral position, two hours on the back and two hours on the left side in 30 degree lateral position\] Patients in group 2 nursed in lateral position with 30 degree two hours on the right and two hours on the left with elevation of the head of bed by 30 degree in the two groups. both groups were monitored for bed sores incidence, timing and sites of occurence

Interventions

positioning patients, every 2 hours, either to standard (right, back, left sides) or only to right and left sides

Sponsors

University of Alexandria
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients admitted to critical care medicine department and expected to have long stay

Exclusion criteria

* active or healed bed sores

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
pressure ulcer occurence21 daysincidence

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026