Skip to content

Straight Versus Coiled Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter for Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

Randomized Controlled Trial of Straight Versus Coiled Peritoneal Dialysis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02479295
Enrollment
306
Registered
2015-06-24
Start date
2015-06-01
Completion date
2019-09-01
Last updated
2021-01-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

End-stage Renal Disease, Renal Failure

Brief summary

This study compares the result of straight versus coiled Tenckhoff catheters for peritoneal dialysis patients. Recent meta-analysis of the peritoneal dialysis catheter type was in favor of straight catheters. The effects of straight versus coiled peritoneal dialysis catheters, however, are unclear. The investigators design an adequately powered randomized controlled study to evaluate the two types of double-cuffed peritoneal dialysis catheters. The primary objective is to assess whether straight peritoneal dialysis catheters can reduce the risk of catheter dysfunction that requires intervention. The investigators estimate that they would need to enroll 132 incident peritoneal dialysis patients in each group for the study to have 80% power to detect a difference between 7% and 15% in the primary endpoint of catheter dysfunction requiring intervention.

Detailed description

The objective of the present study is to evaluate the a priori hypothesis that straight peritoneal dialysis catheters would improve the treatment outcomes of peritoneal dialysis. The early and late catheter complications, as well as catheter survival, will be compared between peritoneal dialysis patients who are randomized to straight and coiled Tenckhoff catheters.

Interventions

DEVICETenckhoff catheter

Peritoneal dialysis catheters for long term use

Sponsors

Chinese University of Hong Kong
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

straight versus coiled Tenckhoff catheters

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* requires dialysis catheter insertion for maintenance peritoneal dialysis * aged 18 or older * willingness to give written consent and comply with the study protocol

Exclusion criteria

* known contraindication to peritoneal dialysis * participation in another interventional study within last 30 days of randomization * history of a psychological illness or condition that would interfere with the patient's ability to understand the requirement of the study and/or comply with the dialysis procedures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of catheter dysfunction that requires interventionOne yearCatheter dysfunction refers to drainage failure, as defined by the inability to drain peritoneal dialysate effluent reliably within 45 minutes. Intervention includes catheter repositioning or reinsertion, either by open surgical method or laparoscopically

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Dialysis catheter migration with dysfunctionOne yearDialysis catheter tip located above the pelvic brim on the abdominal radiograph
Infusion painOne monthPatient will be questioned on infusion pain around one month after starting peritoneal dialysis
Time to catheter dysfunction requiring interventionOne yearsee above
Technique failureOne year
Peritoneal dialysis catheter survivalOne year
Risk of peritonitisOne year

Countries

Hong Kong

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026