Effect of Natural Cesarean Section on Breastfeeding

Effect of Natural Cesarean Section in Comparison to Traditional Cesarean Section on Maternal and Fetal Recovery

Status

UNKNOWN

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT02479282

Enrollment

100

Registered

2015-06-24

Start date

2015-06-30

Completion date

2016-02-29

Last updated

2015-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Natural Cesarean Section

Brief summary

Effect of natural cesarean section in comparison to traditional cesarean section on maternal and fetal recovery.

Interventions

PROCEDUREnatural cesarean section

PROCEDUREtraditional cesarean section

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

SCREENING

Masking

SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

FEMALE

Age

20 Years to 40 Years

Healthy volunteers

Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. primigravida or para one section 2. full term 3. cephalic 4. single baby 5. average weight 6. spinal anathesia

Exclusion criteria

1. High risk pregnancy. 2. Women with known or suspected fetal malformation. 3. Women with uterine malformations. 4. Breech or transverse lie. 5. Emergency caesarean section. 6. Previous two or more caesarean section

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
time to start breastfeeding	3 hrs

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026