Skip to content

Early Cycloergometric Physiotherapy in Critically Ill Patients With Invasive Mechanical Ventilation

Functional and Motor Effects of an Early Cycloergometric Physiotherapy Program in Critically Ill Patients With Invasive Mechanical Ventilation. A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02478411
Enrollment
68
Registered
2015-06-23
Start date
2015-06-30
Completion date
2021-06-30
Last updated
2019-08-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Weakness

Keywords

muscle weakness, rehabilitation, intensive care, mechanical ventilation, cyclo ergometer, physiotherapy

Brief summary

Study designed to evaluate the functional and motor effects in critically ill subjects at ICU and hospital discharge with the incorporation of a mobilization program of cycloergometric physiotherapy sessions compared with conventional physiotherapy.

Detailed description

Cycloergometric treatment is described to improve the functional and motor status of critically ill subjects. However, there are few studies comparing cycloergometric physiotherapy and conventional physiotherapy in intensive care subjects under mechanical ventilation. The most relevant of these studies conducted by Burtin et al showed beneficial effects of cycloergometric treatment. However, the duration of the physiotherapy sessions in this study differed between groups as cycloergometric group received a double daily dose of treatment. It is known that the intensity of physiotherapy also affects the functional and motor status. For this reason, the investigators designed a randomized controlled study with early cycloergometric or conventional treatment, with the same intensity between groups to analyze objective functional and motor endpoints.

Interventions

PROCEDURECycle ergometer physiotherapy

15 minutes of cyclo ergometer physiotherapy with MOTOmed ® Letto 2 device with passive, motor-assisted and active-resisted exercise of the lower and upper extremity, and 15 minutes of conventional physiotherapy

PROCEDUREConventional physiotherapy

30 minutes of conventional physiotherapy

Sponsors

Hospital Son Llatzer
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Criteria of functional independence before hospital admission (Barthel scale \> 70 points). * Invasive mechanical ventilation \< 72 hours. * Signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Neuromuscular disease (peripheric or central neurologic disorder). * Presumed fatal evolution in 48 hours. * Conditions that impede pedaling movement (leg, pelvis or lumbar spinal surgery or traumatism). * Admission due to cardiac arrest. * Pregnancy. * Thrombopenia less than 50.000. * Severe agitation. * Hemodynamic instability with noradrenaline requirements greater than 1 mcg/kg/min. * Fraction of inspired Oxygen (FiO2) requirements greater that 0.55 and respiratory rate greater than 30 bpm.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Walking test distance at six minutesAt hospital discharge, with an expected average of 4 weeks after hospital admission
Basic activities of daily living score (BADL)At 28 days after hospital discharge, that is an expected average of 8 weeks
Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36), physical functioning sectionAt 28 days after hospital discharge, that is an expected average of 8 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ICU mobilization scaleDuring hospital stay, as expected average of 4 weeks, and at 28 days and at 6 months after discharge
Isometric quadriceps force (N/kg)During ICU admission, with an expected average of 2 weeksQuadriceps strength will be measured with a handheld dynamometer with patients in supine position and 30º of knee flexion.
Lung Functional TestingAt the end of hospital stay, with an expected average of 5 weeks
Presence of intensive care acquired paresis (Medical Research Council score < 48 points)During ICU admission and ICU discharge, with an expected average of 2 weeks
Walking test distance at six minutesAt 28 days and at 6 months after hospital discharge, that is up to 1 year
Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36), physical functioning sectionAt 7 days and at 6 months after hospital discharge, that is up to 1 year
Basic activities of daily living score (BADL)At 7 days and at 6 months after hospital discharge, that is up to 1 year

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in respiratory rate between end and initial values after physiotherapy sessionsICU admission, with an expected average of 2 weeksRespiratory rate
Changes in Pulse Oximeter Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) between end and initial values after physiotherapy sessionsICU admission, with an expected average of 2 weeks
Change in mean blood pressure between end and initial values after physiotherapy sessionsICU admission, with an expected average of 2 weeks
Change in heart rate between end and initial values after physiotherapy sessionsICU admission, with an expected average of 2 weeks

Countries

Spain

Contacts

Primary ContactGemma Rialp, M.D.
grialp@gmail.com00 34 871202133
Backup ContactCatalina Morey, Phyt
cati.cmf@gmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026