Skip to content

Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography Randomization for Graft Optimization Trial

Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography Randomization for Graft Optimization Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02477371
Acronym
FARGO
Enrollment
100
Registered
2015-06-22
Start date
2014-06-30
Completion date
2016-12-31
Last updated
2018-10-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arteriosclerosis, Cardiovascular Diseases, Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Disease, Myocardial Ischemia

Brief summary

The FARGO trial is a prospective, randomized (1:1), multicenter study. The aim of the study is to assess the importance of fractional flow reserve (FFR) assessment prior to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with respect to planning and guiding the revascularization strategy. The study compares an FFR-guided strategy to an angiography-guided strategy in patients planned for surgical revascularization.

Detailed description

FFR measurements are made on all patients that enters the study. FFR measurements on coronary arteries with intermediate stenoses, that are planned for grafting, are done before CABG is performed. Patients are randomized to either an FFR-guided CABG or an Angiography guided CABG.

Interventions

PROCEDUREFractional flow reserve-guided CABG

Coronary arteries with angiographical significant stenoses, that are planned for grafting at the heart team meeting and where FFR-measurements are made, only receive grafting if FFR-value is ≤ 0,8. Arteries with FFR-values \> 0,8 are deferred.

PROCEDUREAngiography-guided CABG

Coronary arteries with angiographical significant stenoses, that are planned for grafting at the heart team meeting all receive grafting. FFR-measurements are still made, but not used for guidance of grafting.

Sponsors

Odense University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Stable angina or unstable angina / NSTEMI (Non ST segment elevation myocardial infarction) candidate to CABG * At least one study lesion, which is an intermediate lesion planned for grafting at the Heart Team Meeting.(Definition of Study lesions: ≥ 50% stenosis of a major epicardiel artery (where the proximal reference segment has a diameter\> 2.5 mm), which can be passed with a FFR-wire without significant risk. Study Lesions can be drawn from all coronary arteries.) * Signed informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

* Significant valvular disease with indication to surgical treatment * Previous open-heart-surgery * Left main lesion without other intermediate lesions * Treatment with Persantin Retard * One vessel disease * Renal impairment (creatinine ≥ 150 umol / l)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage open grafts of all grafts6 monthsOpen graft definition: graft with TIMI III flow with no anastomosis stenosis (TIMI flow grades based on results of the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction trial)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Procedure timeDuring surgery (minutes)
Graft stenosis (shaft and anastomoses)6 months
Procedural maximum Troponin I (cTnI), Troponin T (TnT) or creatinine kinase MB (CKMB) values depending on local conditions.The first 24 hours after the operation
Change in Quality of life (EQ-5D) from index to FU6 months
MACCE (Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular event: death, myocardial infarction, stroke, new revascularization by CABG or PCI (Percutaneous coronary intervention)6 months
Change in CCS class from index to follow-up (FU)6 monthsCCS class (Canadian Cardiovascular Society grading of angina)

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 4, 2026