Skip to content

The Use of Platelet Rich Fibrin in Pulpal and Periodontal Regeneration in Mature Teeth

The Use of Platelet Rich Fibrin in Pulpal and Periodontal Regeneration in Mature Teeth

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02477358
Enrollment
18
Registered
2015-06-22
Start date
2014-09-29
Completion date
2016-06-01
Last updated
2023-10-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pulpal Necrosis

Brief summary

In cases of permanent tooth avulsion, it is widely accepted that some necrosis always occurs after avulsion injury. If the pulp tissue does not revascularize or if endodontic therapy is not performed, the pulp space can become infected. Platelet rich fibrin (PRF) is a second generation platelet concentrate that allows the clinician to obtain fibrin membranes enriched with platelets and growth factors from an anticoagulant-free blood harvest. Clinical relevance of PRF and revascularization has been demonstrated in several case studies of avulsion. To date no human clinical trials have been performed evaluating the effectiveness of PRF on pulpal revascularization after reimplantation and its benefits in limiting inflammation. The following study consists of two phases: Phase 1: An in vitro model evaluating the effects of PRF in limiting inflammatory response of pdl cell cultures in the presence of an inflammatory mediators. Phase 2: An in vivo model utilizing mature teeth previously treatment planned for extraction, treating with PRF, reimplanting teeth and following for three to four months before extracting and performing histological analysis. If PRF is capable of promoting revascularization in mature teeth the potential benefits extend to limiting the need for endodontic therapy following mature tooth avulsion, potential for mature tooth transplantation in situations of congenitally missing teeth, and utilization of PRF in endodontic revascularization therapy.

Detailed description

When a tooth is avulsed, it is separated from its socket causing damage to the attachment apparatus. The periodontal ligament (pdl) is a group of specialized connective tissue fibers that attaches the cementum of the root (outer layer) to the alveolar bone. Avulsion can cause damage to the pdl and possible cemental tears. If the periodontal ligament is left attached to the root and minimal time lapse occurs damage to the tissues is usually limited. In these cases, reimplantation is a widely accepted treatment; however the long term success of an avulsed tooth is dependent on various factors. When excessive drying occurs prior to re-implantation, a severe inflammatory response is elicited directly on the root surface which may result in osseous replacement or replacement resorption. Some necrosis always occurs after avulsion injury, and while the necrotic pulp is of little consequence, this necrotic tissue is at high risk for bacterial contamination. If the pulp tissue does not revascularize or if endodontic therapy is not performed, the pulp space can become infected. It has been suggested that treatment strategies should attempt to limit peri-radicular inflammation therefore promoting favorable cemental healing and limiting unfavorable osseous replacement. Platelet rich fibrin (PRF) is a second generation platelet concentrate that allows the clinician to obtain fibrin membranes enriched with platelets and growth factors from an anticoagulant-free blood harvest and without the addition of artificial biochemical modification. PRF has demonstrated clinical relevance through its ability to stimulate cell proliferation of osteoblasts, gingival fibroblasts, and periodontal ligament (PDL) cells. In addition, PRF has been shown to limit epithelial cell growth therefore promoting connective tissue and alveolar bone regeneration and inhibiting epithelial proliferation. These properties make it a favorable product for surgical procedures requiring micro vascularization. In vitro studies with PRF and canine dental pulp cells demonstrate PRF's ability to promote chemotaxis and proliferation of the pulp cells and contributed to pulp repair. When PRF was combined with human dental pulp cells derived from extracted third molars it did not interfere with vitality and stimulated proliferation and differentiation. Additionally it upregulated the expression of osteoprotegerin and alkaline phosphatase. Animal models evaluated PRF granules combined with human pdl stem cells and placed them on the root surface of freshly extracted canine teeth. The teeth were then reimplanted and evaluated histologically after a healing phase. A regeneration of the PDL-like tissue and reduction in ankylosis and inflammation were noted in animals with the PRF granules. Clinical relevance of PRF and revascularization has been demonstrated in several case studies of avulsion. These case studies utilized a general protocol of minimally instrumenting the avulsed tooth. One study performed a 3 mm resection of the root apex followed by minimal instrumentation of the canal. Blood is then drawn from the patient and PRF is prepared via Choukroun's method. The PRF is then placed on the root surface and condensed into the canal. The tooth was then reimplanted, splinted, and the patient followed for up to 24 months. The tooth tested vital to thermal and percussion testing and radiographically did not show signs of replacement resorption or inflammation. To date no human studies have been performed evaluating the effectiveness of PRF on pulpal revascularization after reimplantation and its benefits in limiting inflammation. Additionally, only histological evidence of the benefits of PRF has been demonstrated in animal models. If PRF is capable of promoting revascularization in mature teeth the potential benefits extend to limiting the need for endodontic therapy following mature tooth avulsion, potential for mature tooth transplantation in situations of congenitally missing teeth, and utilization of PRF in endodontic revascularization therapy. The following research would consist of two phases: Phase 1. An in vitro model evaluating the effects of PRF in limiting inflammatory response of pulp and pdl cell cultures in the presence of an inflammatory mediators. Phase 2. An in vivo model utilizing mature teeth previously treatment planned for extraction, treating in accordance to the procedure documented by one group, reimplanting teeth and following for three to four months before extracting and performing histological analysis.

Interventions

PROCEDURELeft Tooth Platelet Rich Fibrin; Right Tooth Implant Alone

All study participants will have two teeth extracted and 2 mm of root removed. Half of the subjects will have platelet rich fibrin endodontic revascularization therapy will be applied to the left tooth socket only. The right tooth is implanted alone. Each tooth is replaced and splinted to the adjacent teeth. Teeth are followed for 3 months and then tested for vitality before extracting and examining histologically.

PROCEDURERight Tooth Platelet Rich Fibrin; Left Tooth Implant Alone

All study participants will have two teeth extracted and 2 mm of root removed. Half of the subjects will have platelet rich fibrin endodontic revascularization therapy to the right tooth socket only. The left tooth is implanted alone. Each tooth is replaced and splinted to the adjacent teeth. Teeth are followed for 3 months and then tested for vitality before extracting and examining histologically.

Sponsors

University of Nebraska
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Masking description

Participant and Operating Surgeon were masked to tooth designation. Principal investigator/outcomes assessor aware of designation.

Intervention model description

Multiple teeth (2-6 teeth per participant) will be removed with the root attached and then half of the total teeth(per participant) will be placed back in the socket with Platelet Rich Fibrin (PRF) and the other half will be placed in the socket without PRF.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* any adult with single rooted vital teeth previously treatment planned for extraction to meet their prosthetic or orthodontic needs.

Exclusion criteria

*

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Vitality of Teeth (Units) Using Thermal and Percussion Sensitivity Trend Observed During Study Duration (3-11 Months)3-11 months. Each participant was measured for as long as it took to complete their prosthesis. The minimum study duration was 3 months and the maximum duration was 11 months in one subject.Teeth (units) measuring vital via the following tests: thermal, percussion. Thermal was utilized with endo cold spray and percussion from tapping on teeth with mouth mirror.
Vitality of Teeth Using Electronic Pulp Test (EPT Units) Trend Observed During Study Duration (3-11 Months)3-11 months. Each participant was measured for as long as it took to complete their prosthesis. The minimum study duration was 3 months and the maximum duration was 11 months in one subject.Teeth (units) measuring vital via the following tests: EPT utilizing EPT units (0-80). There is no specific number that suggests vital vs un-vital but rather it is a trend towards un-vital which is determined as 80.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patient's were recruited from the UNMC Dental School

Pre-assignment details

No pre-assignment details were completed prior to assignment to an arm/group

Participants by arm

ArmCount
PRF Treatment
All study participants are scheduled for teeth extraction (between 2 to 6 teeth per participant). Subjects will be randomized to either receive either left tooth PRF; right tooth re-implantation, OR right tooth PRF; left tooth re implantation. Following treatment each tooth is replaced and splinted to the adjacent teeth. Teeth are followed for at least 3 months (up to 11 months) and then tested for vitality before extracting and examining histologically. All study participants will have two teeth extracted and 2 mm of root removed. Half of the subjects teeth will have PRF endodontic revascularization therapy. Each tooth is replaced and splinted to the adjacent teeth. Teeth are followed for 3 months and then tested for vitality before extracting and examining histologically.
18
PRF Treatment
All study participants are scheduled for teeth extraction (between 2 to 6 teeth per participant). Subjects will be randomized to either receive either left tooth PRF; right tooth re-implantation, OR right tooth PRF; left tooth re implantation. Following treatment each tooth is replaced and splinted to the adjacent teeth. Teeth are followed for at least 3 months (up to 11 months) and then tested for vitality before extracting and examining histologically. All study participants will have two teeth extracted and 2 mm of root removed. Half of the subjects teeth will have PRF endodontic revascularization therapy. Each tooth is replaced and splinted to the adjacent teeth. Teeth are followed for 3 months and then tested for vitality before extracting and examining histologically.
35
No Treatment
All study participants are scheduled for teeth extraction (between 2 to 6 teeth per participant). Subjects will be randomized to either receive either left tooth PRF; right tooth re-implantation, OR right tooth PRF; left tooth re-implantation. Following treatment each tooth is replaced and splinted to the adjacent teeth. Teeth are followed for 3 months (up to 11 months) and then tested for vitality before extracting and examining histologically. All study participants will have two teeth extracted and 2 mm of root removed. Half of the subjects teeth will be re implanted alone. Each tooth is replaced and splinted to the adjacent teeth. Teeth are followed for 3 months and then tested for vitality before extracting and examining histologically.
18
No Treatment
All study participants are scheduled for teeth extraction (between 2 to 6 teeth per participant). Subjects will be randomized to either receive either left tooth PRF; right tooth re-implantation, OR right tooth PRF; left tooth re-implantation. Following treatment each tooth is replaced and splinted to the adjacent teeth. Teeth are followed for 3 months (up to 11 months) and then tested for vitality before extracting and examining histologically. All study participants will have two teeth extracted and 2 mm of root removed. Half of the subjects teeth will be re implanted alone. Each tooth is replaced and splinted to the adjacent teeth. Teeth are followed for 3 months and then tested for vitality before extracting and examining histologically.
35
Total106

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPRF TreatmentNo TreatmentTotal
Age, Continuous58.5 years58.5 years58.5 years
Pre-treatment Tooth Vitality to Electric Pulp Test (EPT)34.0 EPT Units (0-80)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3
33.1 EPT Units (0-80)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3
33.5 EPT Units (0-80)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3
Pre-treatment Tooth Vitality to Thermal and Percussion Sensitivity
Pre Percussion
.121 Teeth
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.066
.092 Teeth
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.056
.1065 Teeth
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.061
Pre-treatment Tooth Vitality to Thermal and Percussion Sensitivity
Pre Thermal
.852 Teeth
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.089
.939 Teeth
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.048
.8955 Teeth
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.0685
Sex: Female, Male
Female
17 Teeth17 Teeth34 Teeth
Sex: Female, Male
Male
18 Teeth18 Teeth36 Teeth

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 180 / 18
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 180 / 18
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 180 / 18

Outcome results

Primary

Vitality of Teeth (Units) Using Thermal and Percussion Sensitivity Trend Observed During Study Duration (3-11 Months)

Teeth (units) measuring vital via the following tests: thermal, percussion. Thermal was utilized with endo cold spray and percussion from tapping on teeth with mouth mirror.

Time frame: 3-11 months. Each participant was measured for as long as it took to complete their prosthesis. The minimum study duration was 3 months and the maximum duration was 11 months in one subject.

Population: Half of the subjects teeth will have PRF endodontic revascularization therapy and the other teeth will be reimplanted only without PRF endodontic reveascularization therapy.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: PRF TreatedVitality of Teeth (Units) Using Thermal and Percussion Sensitivity Trend Observed During Study Duration (3-11 Months)Teeth with Thermal Sensitivity Results.559 TeethStandard Deviation 0.12
Experimental: PRF TreatedVitality of Teeth (Units) Using Thermal and Percussion Sensitivity Trend Observed During Study Duration (3-11 Months)Teeth with Percussion Sensitivity Results.065 TeethStandard Deviation 0.046
No Intervention: ControlVitality of Teeth (Units) Using Thermal and Percussion Sensitivity Trend Observed During Study Duration (3-11 Months)Teeth with Thermal Sensitivity Results.592 TeethStandard Deviation 0.118
No Intervention: ControlVitality of Teeth (Units) Using Thermal and Percussion Sensitivity Trend Observed During Study Duration (3-11 Months)Teeth with Percussion Sensitivity Results.040 TeethStandard Deviation 0.034
Primary

Vitality of Teeth Using Electronic Pulp Test (EPT Units) Trend Observed During Study Duration (3-11 Months)

Teeth (units) measuring vital via the following tests: EPT utilizing EPT units (0-80). There is no specific number that suggests vital vs un-vital but rather it is a trend towards un-vital which is determined as 80.

Time frame: 3-11 months. Each participant was measured for as long as it took to complete their prosthesis. The minimum study duration was 3 months and the maximum duration was 11 months in one subject.

Population: Half of the subjects teeth will have PRF endodontic revascularization therapy and the other teeth will be reimplanted only without PRF endodontic reveascularization therapy.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental: PRF TreatedVitality of Teeth Using Electronic Pulp Test (EPT Units) Trend Observed During Study Duration (3-11 Months)57 EPT Units (0-80)Standard Deviation 3.79
No Intervention: ControlVitality of Teeth Using Electronic Pulp Test (EPT Units) Trend Observed During Study Duration (3-11 Months)55.45 EPT Units (0-80)Standard Deviation 3.81

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026