Skip to content

A Study for Lymphocele and Lymphorrhea Control Following Inguinal and Axillary Radical Lymph Node Dissection

A Randomized Control Trial for Lymphocele and Lymphorrhea Control Following Inguinal and Axillary Radical Lymph Node Dissection

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02476357
Enrollment
80
Registered
2015-06-19
Start date
2009-01-31
Completion date
2017-12-31
Last updated
2020-08-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lymph Node Dissection, Lymphoedema, Lymphocoele

Brief summary

Patients undergoing groin or axillary Radical lymph node dissection (RLND) or completion lymph node dissection (CLND, after positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for melanoma or breast cancer were randomized in a controlled trial for surgical dissection technique. Harmonic scalpel dissection were compared with classic dissection in term of lymphocoele and oedema.

Detailed description

The aim of the present study was to assess the value of USS in RLND in groin and axilla in a homogenous group of patients. In a tertiary academic centre, patients undergoing groin or axillary RLND or CLND after positive SLNB for melanoma, skin cancer, sarcoma or breast cancer were enrolled in a randomized controlled trial for surgical dissection technique. The study was reviewed and accepted by the local ethical committee. Patients were older than 18 years and gave an informed consent. All patients with a past medical history of contralateral lymph node dissection or other cause of lymphedema (previous trauma, deep venous thrombosis, radiotherapy, etc.) were excluded. Patients undergoing both iliac and inguinal lymph node dissections were excluded as well. No patients had distant or in transit metastasis. Patients were randomly assigned using sealed numbered envelopes to one of two arms of the study in a 1: 1 ratio. In the first group the dissection was conducted with USS (Harmonic Focus ®, Ethicon Endo-Surgery (Europe) GmbH) exclusively. In the control group the lymphadenectomy was performed using ligation and monopolar electrocautery. All patients were operated by a dedicated team headed by a single surgeon.

Interventions

Sponsors

University of Lausanne Hospitals
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

unblinded

Intervention model description

Monocentric, open, interventional, randomized with two arms 1:1

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All adult patients undergoing groin or axillary Radical lymph node dissection (RLND) or completion lymph node dissection (CLND), after positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for melanoma or breast cancer were included.

Exclusion criteria

* Patient with a past medical history of contralateral lymph node dissection or other cause for lymphedema (trauma, deep venous thrombosis, radiotherapy, etc.) were excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative Draining TimeLymph quantity measured every day. Drained removed when < 50 ml. per day for 2 consecutive daysDuration (days) between surgery and removal of postoperative suction drain

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Daily Amount of Drained LymphLymph quantity measured every day, up to 50 days.Patients had to record on a list the amount in ml. of lymph in the suction drain bottles

Countries

Switzerland

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Harmonic
Harmonic Scalpel (HS; Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati, OH)
40
Control
Monopolar scalpel and ligature
40
Total80

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControlTotalHarmonic
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
25 Participants49 Participants24 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
15 Participants31 Participants16 Participants
Age, Continuous61.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
60.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.1
59.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.1
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Switzerland
40 Participants80 Participants40 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
24 Participants48 Participants24 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
16 Participants32 Participants16 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 400 / 40
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 400 / 40

Outcome results

Primary

Postoperative Draining Time

Duration (days) between surgery and removal of postoperative suction drain

Time frame: Lymph quantity measured every day. Drained removed when < 50 ml. per day for 2 consecutive days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HarmonicPostoperative Draining Time31 daysStandard Deviation 20
ControlPostoperative Draining Time32 daysStandard Deviation 18
Secondary

Daily Amount of Drained Lymph

Patients had to record on a list the amount in ml. of lymph in the suction drain bottles

Time frame: Lymph quantity measured every day, up to 50 days.

Population: One patient in the Harmonic group was excluded due to insufficient data collection of lymph at home

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HarmonicDaily Amount of Drained Lymph2908 ml.Standard Deviation 2453
ControlDaily Amount of Drained Lymph3898 ml.Standard Deviation 5791

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026