Skip to content

Study of the Consumer Use of a New Home Test to Measure Sperm Concentration

A Clinical Study Evaluating Consumer Use of a New Device (TRAK) to Measure Sperm Concentration From Human Semen Samples, and Comparing TRAK Test Results With Laboratory Reference Method Testing

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02475395
Enrollment
272
Registered
2015-06-18
Start date
2015-09-02
Completion date
2015-11-30
Last updated
2017-10-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fertility, Male, Sub-Fertility, Male

Keywords

Male Fertility, Male Infertility, Fertility, Sperm, Sperm Concentration

Brief summary

The objective of the study is to evaluate the agreement in measurement of sperm concentration in human semen between lay users with TRAK and a recognized reference method. The study will also include the measurement of matched samples by TRAK when tested by healthcare professionals trained in use of the TRAK device.

Interventions

DEVICETRAK device

Use of TRAK to attain sperm concentration measurement

Sponsors

Sandstone Diagnostics
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Subjects (Donor/Tester) * Generally healthy (apart from fertility or reproductive care), ambulatory, and have absence of chronic conditions or treatments, except those related to fertility and reproductive care * 20 - 50 years of age inclusive * Male sex (subjects providing and/or testing human semen specimens) * For males providing human semen specimens, either healthy subjects or men receiving health care for any one or more of the following reasons: * Partner in a couple having difficulty conceiving * Diagnosed with male factor infertility * Post-vasectomy patients * Post-vasectomy reversal patients Testers Only * Be able to provide signed Informed Consent * 20 - 50 years of age inclusive

Exclusion criteria

* Any medical or personal issue that would impair the ability of the subject to adhere to the protocol (e.g. substance abuse, neurological disorders) * Patients currently taking investigational drugs or who are active participants in a treatment trial for any condition * Unable to speak, understand, or write English * Mental illness that would interfere with understanding during the discussion of Informed Consent or that would compromise ability to follow the study protocol including, but not limited to, review of the TRAK™ Instructional Booklet, semen specimen collection, and semen specimen testing.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Untrained Lay Users That Obtained Accurate and Inaccurate Subfertility Results From the TRAK Device When Compared to Results Obtained From the Gold StandardParticipants will be followed for one visit for up to 2 hoursLay users obtained categorical sperm concentration result. Positive (for subfertility) results are less than or equal to 15 M/mL threshold. Gold standard reference (analysis by Computer-aided Semen Analysis \[CASA\]) result was measured and compared to Trak. True positive and true negative matched Reference category result and false negative, false positive did not match gold standard reference category result.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Accurate and Inaccurate Subfertility Results as Obtained by Healthcare Professionals Observing Assays Result Performed by Untrained Lay Users.Participants will be followed for one visit for up to 2 hoursHealthcare professions obtained a categorical sperm concentration result by observing completed assay outputs as performed by Lay Users. Positive (for subfertility) results are less than or equal to 15 M/mL threshold. Reference result using gold standard (CASA) was measured and compared to Trak. True positive and true negative matched Reference category result and false negative, false positive did not match reference category result.
Number of Accurate and Inaccurate Results Obtained by Healthcare Professionals Performing Trak Assays on Subjects' Samples.Participants will be followed for one visit for up to 2 hoursHealthcare professions obtained a categorical sperm concentration result by performing assay on aliquot obtained from Lay User's sample. Positive (for subfertility) results are less than or equal to 15 M/mL threshold. Reference result using gold standard (CASA) was measured and compared to Trak. True positive and true negative matched Reference category result and false negative, false positive did not match reference category result.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Men were recruited at three medical clinic sites from 2 September 2015 to 4 December 2015.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Donor/Tester Subjects
Male subjects use the TRAK device to attain a measurement of sperm concentration from a semen specimen TRAK device: Use of TRAK to attain sperm concentration measurement
258
Tester Only Subjects
Male or female subjects use the TRAK device to attain a measurement of sperm concentration from a semen specimen TRAK device: Use of TRAK to attain sperm concentration measurement
14
Total272

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyProtocol Violation303

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTester Only SubjectsDonor/Tester SubjectsTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
14 Participants258 Participants272 Participants
Age, Continuous33 years34 years34 years
Region of Enrollment
United States
14 participants258 participants272 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants0 Participants14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants258 Participants258 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 2580 / 14
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 2580 / 14

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Untrained Lay Users That Obtained Accurate and Inaccurate Subfertility Results From the TRAK Device When Compared to Results Obtained From the Gold Standard

Lay users obtained categorical sperm concentration result. Positive (for subfertility) results are less than or equal to 15 M/mL threshold. Gold standard reference (analysis by Computer-aided Semen Analysis \[CASA\]) result was measured and compared to Trak. True positive and true negative matched Reference category result and false negative, false positive did not match gold standard reference category result.

Time frame: Participants will be followed for one visit for up to 2 hours

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Donor/Tester SubjectsNumber of Untrained Lay Users That Obtained Accurate and Inaccurate Subfertility Results From the TRAK Device When Compared to Results Obtained From the Gold StandardTrue Positive Trak Results52 Participants
Donor/Tester SubjectsNumber of Untrained Lay Users That Obtained Accurate and Inaccurate Subfertility Results From the TRAK Device When Compared to Results Obtained From the Gold StandardTrue Negative Trak Results160 Participants
Donor/Tester SubjectsNumber of Untrained Lay Users That Obtained Accurate and Inaccurate Subfertility Results From the TRAK Device When Compared to Results Obtained From the Gold StandardFalse Positive Trak Results10 Participants
Donor/Tester SubjectsNumber of Untrained Lay Users That Obtained Accurate and Inaccurate Subfertility Results From the TRAK Device When Compared to Results Obtained From the Gold StandardFalse Negative Trak Results6 Participants
Tester Only SubjectsNumber of Untrained Lay Users That Obtained Accurate and Inaccurate Subfertility Results From the TRAK Device When Compared to Results Obtained From the Gold StandardFalse Negative Trak Results0 Participants
Tester Only SubjectsNumber of Untrained Lay Users That Obtained Accurate and Inaccurate Subfertility Results From the TRAK Device When Compared to Results Obtained From the Gold StandardTrue Positive Trak Results2 Participants
Tester Only SubjectsNumber of Untrained Lay Users That Obtained Accurate and Inaccurate Subfertility Results From the TRAK Device When Compared to Results Obtained From the Gold StandardFalse Positive Trak Results2 Participants
Tester Only SubjectsNumber of Untrained Lay Users That Obtained Accurate and Inaccurate Subfertility Results From the TRAK Device When Compared to Results Obtained From the Gold StandardTrue Negative Trak Results7 Participants
95% CI: [79.9, 95.3]
95% CI: [88.7, 96.1]
Secondary

Number of Accurate and Inaccurate Results Obtained by Healthcare Professionals Performing Trak Assays on Subjects' Samples.

Healthcare professions obtained a categorical sperm concentration result by performing assay on aliquot obtained from Lay User's sample. Positive (for subfertility) results are less than or equal to 15 M/mL threshold. Reference result using gold standard (CASA) was measured and compared to Trak. True positive and true negative matched Reference category result and false negative, false positive did not match reference category result.

Time frame: Participants will be followed for one visit for up to 2 hours

Population: One fewer was analyzed in this population because a sample did not have enough sample to allow the HCP to run the test.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Donor/Tester SubjectsNumber of Accurate and Inaccurate Results Obtained by Healthcare Professionals Performing Trak Assays on Subjects' Samples.True Positive Trak Results57 Participants
Donor/Tester SubjectsNumber of Accurate and Inaccurate Results Obtained by Healthcare Professionals Performing Trak Assays on Subjects' Samples.True Negative Trak Results160 Participants
Donor/Tester SubjectsNumber of Accurate and Inaccurate Results Obtained by Healthcare Professionals Performing Trak Assays on Subjects' Samples.False Positive Trak Results9 Participants
Donor/Tester SubjectsNumber of Accurate and Inaccurate Results Obtained by Healthcare Professionals Performing Trak Assays on Subjects' Samples.False Negative Trak Results1 Participants
Tester Only SubjectsNumber of Accurate and Inaccurate Results Obtained by Healthcare Professionals Performing Trak Assays on Subjects' Samples.False Negative Trak Results1 Participants
Tester Only SubjectsNumber of Accurate and Inaccurate Results Obtained by Healthcare Professionals Performing Trak Assays on Subjects' Samples.True Positive Trak Results1 Participants
Tester Only SubjectsNumber of Accurate and Inaccurate Results Obtained by Healthcare Professionals Performing Trak Assays on Subjects' Samples.False Positive Trak Results2 Participants
Tester Only SubjectsNumber of Accurate and Inaccurate Results Obtained by Healthcare Professionals Performing Trak Assays on Subjects' Samples.True Negative Trak Results7 Participants
95% CI: [88.7, 99.1]
95% CI: [89.2, 96.5]
Secondary

Number of Accurate and Inaccurate Subfertility Results as Obtained by Healthcare Professionals Observing Assays Result Performed by Untrained Lay Users.

Healthcare professions obtained a categorical sperm concentration result by observing completed assay outputs as performed by Lay Users. Positive (for subfertility) results are less than or equal to 15 M/mL threshold. Reference result using gold standard (CASA) was measured and compared to Trak. True positive and true negative matched Reference category result and false negative, false positive did not match reference category result.

Time frame: Participants will be followed for one visit for up to 2 hours

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Donor/Tester SubjectsNumber of Accurate and Inaccurate Subfertility Results as Obtained by Healthcare Professionals Observing Assays Result Performed by Untrained Lay Users.True Positive Trak Results56 Participants
Donor/Tester SubjectsNumber of Accurate and Inaccurate Subfertility Results as Obtained by Healthcare Professionals Observing Assays Result Performed by Untrained Lay Users.True Negative Trak Results161 Participants
Donor/Tester SubjectsNumber of Accurate and Inaccurate Subfertility Results as Obtained by Healthcare Professionals Observing Assays Result Performed by Untrained Lay Users.False Positive Trak Results9 Participants
Donor/Tester SubjectsNumber of Accurate and Inaccurate Subfertility Results as Obtained by Healthcare Professionals Observing Assays Result Performed by Untrained Lay Users.False Negative Trak Results2 Participants
Tester Only SubjectsNumber of Accurate and Inaccurate Subfertility Results as Obtained by Healthcare Professionals Observing Assays Result Performed by Untrained Lay Users.False Negative Trak Results1 Participants
Tester Only SubjectsNumber of Accurate and Inaccurate Subfertility Results as Obtained by Healthcare Professionals Observing Assays Result Performed by Untrained Lay Users.True Positive Trak Results1 Participants
Tester Only SubjectsNumber of Accurate and Inaccurate Subfertility Results as Obtained by Healthcare Professionals Observing Assays Result Performed by Untrained Lay Users.False Positive Trak Results2 Participants
Tester Only SubjectsNumber of Accurate and Inaccurate Subfertility Results as Obtained by Healthcare Professionals Observing Assays Result Performed by Untrained Lay Users.True Negative Trak Results7 Participants
95% CI: [86.3, 98.3]
95% CI: [90.6, 97.3]

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 11, 2026