Applicability Clinic of Cement Portland Structural White in Endodontic Surgery

Status

Completed

Phases

Phase 1Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT02474615

Enrollment

Registered

2015-06-18

Start date

2013-02-28

Completion date

2015-01-31

Last updated

2015-06-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mandibular Hypoplasia

Keywords

Apicoectomy, Oral surgery, Biocompatible materials, Dental Cements, Translational Medical Research

Brief summary

Thirty teeth twelve patients, two female and a male, who had persistent periradicular lesions were selected to participate in this study. The lesions were diagnosed with cone-beam computed tomography (cone-beam CT; Model i-Cat 17-19, Imaging Sciences International LLC).In patients with two teeth to be treated, a tooth was retroobturado with PBEA cement, (experiment) and another tooth was retroobturado with MTA cement (control). There was significance for the two cements on the repair of wounds. Key words: Apicoectomy; Oral Surgery; Biocompatible Materials; Dental Cements; Translational Medical Research

Detailed description

Objective: to evaluate the clinical applicability of structural Portland white cement additive in retrofilling surgeries. Method: persistent apical periodontitis 30 teeth of 12 patients were diagnosed by computed tomography CT, cone beam. Each of them had from two to four compromised teeth. The endodontic surgery were performed and the teeth were retrofilling Each patient had a retrofilling tooth with cement mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) control and other tooth with white Portland cement structural additive (PBEA) experiment. When the patient presented four teeth with injury, two were retrofilling with MTA and two Portland cement with structural white cement additive. Six months after surgery, there were new scans to evaluate the repair or not the wounds.

Interventions

PROCEDUREENDODONTIC SURGERY

ENDODONTIC SURGERY

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

18 Years to 60 Years

Healthy volunteers

Yes

Inclusion criteria

* patients were diagnosed by computed tomography CT, cone beam * each of them had from two to four compromised teeth

Exclusion criteria

* patients who did not return for review after six months

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Regeneration measured by tomographers endodontic surgery	Six months after surgery	Six months after surgery, there were new scans to evaluate the repair or not the wounds.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026