Skip to content

Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin+Cytarabine vs Idarubicin+Cytarabine in Elderly Patients With AML.Mylofrance 4

Etude Exploratoire randomisée Comparant le Traitement Par Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin /Cytarabine au Traitement Standard Par Idarubicine/Cytarabinechez Les Sujets âgés de 60 à 80 Ans et présentant Une LAM et un Caryotype Non défavorable

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02473146
Acronym
ALFA1401
Enrollment
225
Registered
2015-06-16
Start date
2015-11-18
Completion date
2023-09-07
Last updated
2024-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Keywords

AML, untreated, 60-80 years old, favorable and intermediate karyotype

Brief summary

Purpose : The main objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and tolerance of the addition of repeated doses of low doses (3mg/m2) of Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin (GO) in addition with standard doses of Ara-C in previously untreated patients aged 60 to 80 years with de novo acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML) and non adverse cytogenetics. The main end point for efficacy is 2 years-event free survival. The secondary efficacy endpoints are CR/Cri rates, cumulative incidence of relapse and overall survival. The secondary endpoints for safety are early death rate (before day 30 and 60), grade 3 to 5 adverse events and severe adverse events, cardiac toxicity and quality of life. Additional secondary endpoints are treatment by covariate interactions with respect to biological characteristics present at diagnosis (CD33 positivity, cytogenetic, molecular abnormalities) or after treatment (Minimal residual disease levels). This study is an exploratory study. Patients will be allocated at inclusion with a 2/1 ratio either to receive treatment with GO and cytarabine or Idarubicin and cytarabine in a 3+7 regimen similar to the backbone ALFA 1200 scheme used concurrently by the ALFA group as treatment of AML patients aged \>60 years. Primary objective. The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of two doses of Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) during induction and one dose of GO during first consolidation in combination with Cytarabine in elderly patients with AML in the non adverse cytogenetics-risk group.

Interventions

Sponsors

Versailles Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with a morphologically proven diagnosis AML and both the following criteria: * Age ≥ 60 years and \< 80 years. * Not previously treated for their disease. * With favourable or intermediate-risk cytogenetics. (Patients with urgent clinical need to begin treatment might be included before cytogenetic results, when necessary if they do not respond to Hydroxyurea. Patients might be included if the cytogenetic results are not expected in a time limit \< 5 days after AML diagnosis). * Fit to receive intensive chemotherapy * Cardiac function determined by radionucleide or echography within normal limits. * Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* M3-AML * Presence of adverse cytogenetics (according to European LeukemiaNet recommendation.) (17) defined as one of the following abnormalities: -5/5q-, -7, t(6;9), t(v;11q23) excluding t(9;11), inv(3)(q21;q26.2) or t(3;3)(q21;q26.2), complex karyotype (3+ abnormalities) * Secondary AML following treatment with radiotherapy or chemotherapy. * AML following previously known myeloproliferative or myelodysplastic syndrome. * ECOG performance status (PS) 0 to 3 * Serum creatinin level \> or = 2.5N; AST and ALT level \> or = 2.5N; total bilirubin level \> or = 2N

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
EFS (defined as the time from randomization to the date of assessment of response if CR or Cri had not been achieved, relapse or death)5 yearsEndoint for the primary objective of efficacy is EFS defined as the time from randomization to the date of assessment of response if CR or Cri had not been achieved, relapse or death.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Composite measure for Efficacy assessed by CR/Cri rates, cumulative incidence of relapse, overall survival.5 years
Composite measure for safety5 years* incidence of early deaths \< day 30 and day 60, * grade 3 to 5 adverse events and all serious adverse events during induction and consolidation treatment * cardiac toxicity evaluated on cardiac ejection function evaluation by echocardiography or isotopic measure. * Quality of life measured by questionaries' EORTC QLQ-C30 repeated at diagnosis, after induction treatment, after the two consolidations and 3 months after the end of treatment. End points for treatment-by-covariate interactions are * at diagnosis: percentage of CD33 positivity on blast cells, measured with a standardized method, cytogenetics and most relevant molecular markers (FLT3, MLL, CEBPa, NPM1, DNMT3a., * after induction and end of treatment: minimal residual disease determined by WT1 and/or NPM1 transcripts levels.

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026