Skip to content

Optimal Inspiratory Pressure for Facemask Pressure-controlled Ventilation in Children

Optimal Inspiratory Pressure for Facemask Pressure-controlled Ventilation in Children: Study Using Detection of Gastric Insufflation Using Ultrasonography of the Antrum and Epigastric Auscultation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02471521
Enrollment
120
Registered
2015-06-15
Start date
2015-02-28
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2019-01-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Child, Anesthesia

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to find an optimal inspiratory pressure to provide adequate tidal volume and prevent gastric insufflation in pediatric patients. The children under 5 years old are randomly assigned to muscle relaxation group and non-relaxation group. For muscle relaxation group, routine anesthesia induction is performed with muscle relaxant and mask ventilation is started by pressure-controlled mechanical ventilation. Gastric auscultation and abdominal ultrasonography are performed simultaneously during mask ventilation to detect inflow of air. Initial inspiratory airway pressure is 10 cmH2O and increased gradually by 2 cmH2O until gastric insufflation is detected by either of two methods. Tracheal intubation is done after detection of gas. For non-relaxation group, mask ventilation is performed in a same manner, without muscle relaxant. After detection of gas by any of the two methods, rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg is administered and tracheal intubation is performed.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to find an optimal inspiratory pressure to provide adequate tidal volume and prevent gastric insufflation in pediatric patients. The children under 5 years old are randomly assigned to muscle relaxation group and non-relaxation group. Stratum was constructed based on age and randomization scheme was performed separately within each stratum. Block randomization was done to ensure balance of the age groups. For muscle relaxation group, routine anesthesia induction is performed with muscle relaxant and mask ventilation is started by pressure-controlled mechanical ventilation. Gastric auscultation and abdominal ultrasonography are performed simultaneously during mask ventilation to detect inflow of air. Initial inspiratory airway pressure is 10 cmH2O and increased gradually by 2 cmH2O until gastric insufflation is detected by either of two methods. Tracheal intubation is done after detection of gas. For non-relaxation group, mask ventilation is performed in a same manner, without muscle relaxant. After detection of gas by any of the two methods, rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg is administered and tracheal intubation is performed. Tidal volume and oxygen saturation are recorded during study period.

Interventions

Mask ventilation is performed after administration of rocuronium or not. Initial inspiratory pressure is set as 10 cmH2O and increased gradually by 2 cmH2O until gastric insufflation is detected by either of two methods. Tracheal intubation is done after detection of gas.

DRUGRocuronium

Rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg is injected before mask ventilation in muscle relaxant group or after finish of study in non-relaxant group.

Sponsors

Seoul National University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Months to 5 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Pediatric patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia * BMI \< 30 * ASA class 1 or 2

Exclusion criteria

* with difficult airway * preexisting pulmonary disease * upper respiratory tract infection * intestinal obstruction * with risk of pulmonary aspiration * history of stoke or moyamoya disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Inspiratory Pressure That Cause Gastric InsufflationInterval between start of mask ventilation and detection of gastric insufflation, an expected average of 100 secDifference in the inspiratory pressure that minimized the incidence of gastric insufflation, yet guaranteed a tidal volume of at least 6 ml/kg between the neuromuscular blocker and non-neuromuscular blocker groups. Gastric insufflation was measured using both gastric ultrasonography and epigastric auscultation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Diagnostic Method That Detects Gastric Insufflation FirstInterval between start of mask ventilation and detection of gastric insufflation, an expected average of 100 sec

Countries

South Korea

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This single-center study was performed in a tertiary children's hospital in Republic of Korea.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Neuromuscular Blocker Group
Facemask ventilation was performed after rocuronium (0.6mg/kg) was administered.
60
Non-neuromuscular Blocker Group
Facemask ventilation was performed without rocuronium administration.
52
Total112

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalNeuromuscular Blocker GroupNon-neuromuscular Blocker Group
Age, Continuous1.3 years1.2 years1.4 years
Height77.2 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.5
76.0 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3
78.8 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.2
Sex: Female, Male
Female
42 Participants21 Participants21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
70 Participants39 Participants31 Participants
Weight10.3 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.7
10.0 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8
10.4 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 600 / 52
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 600 / 52
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 600 / 52

Outcome results

Primary

Inspiratory Pressure That Cause Gastric Insufflation

Difference in the inspiratory pressure that minimized the incidence of gastric insufflation, yet guaranteed a tidal volume of at least 6 ml/kg between the neuromuscular blocker and non-neuromuscular blocker groups. Gastric insufflation was measured using both gastric ultrasonography and epigastric auscultation.

Time frame: Interval between start of mask ventilation and detection of gastric insufflation, an expected average of 100 sec

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Neuromuscular Blocker GroupInspiratory Pressure That Cause Gastric Insufflation13 cmH2O
Non-neuromuscular Blocker GroupInspiratory Pressure That Cause Gastric Insufflation13 cmH2O
Secondary

Diagnostic Method That Detects Gastric Insufflation First

Time frame: Interval between start of mask ventilation and detection of gastric insufflation, an expected average of 100 sec

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Neuromuscular Blocker GroupDiagnostic Method That Detects Gastric Insufflation FirstAuscultation4 Participants
Neuromuscular Blocker GroupDiagnostic Method That Detects Gastric Insufflation FirstSimultaneous detection by both methods12 Participants
Neuromuscular Blocker GroupDiagnostic Method That Detects Gastric Insufflation FirstUltrasound44 Participants
Non-neuromuscular Blocker GroupDiagnostic Method That Detects Gastric Insufflation FirstAuscultation10 Participants
Non-neuromuscular Blocker GroupDiagnostic Method That Detects Gastric Insufflation FirstSimultaneous detection by both methods19 Participants
Non-neuromuscular Blocker GroupDiagnostic Method That Detects Gastric Insufflation FirstUltrasound23 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 6, 2026