Skip to content

Single-Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System vs. Traditional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System (tNPWT)

A Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Effectiveness Study of a Single-Use, Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System (PICO) Versus a Traditional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System (tNPWT) in the Treatment of Lower Extremity Ulcers

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02470806
Acronym
NPWT
Enrollment
164
Registered
2015-06-12
Start date
2015-07-02
Completion date
2017-11-14
Last updated
2020-04-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Foot Ulcers, Venous Leg Ulcers

Keywords

Venous leg ulcer, ulcer, venous stasis, compression, diabetic foot ulcers, dfu, vlu

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy of two types of NPWT systems; the traditional negative pressure wound therapy (tNPWT) system and the single-use negative pressure wound therapy (PICO) system.

Detailed description

The two types of NPWT systems include the tNPWT system that has successfully completed a coding verification request with CMS and has the following capabilities (e.g., range of negative pressure, connective tubing, canister, foam or gauze filler, and approved for home use), and a portable, canister-less, battery operated, disposable PICO system to see if there are any observed differences with regard to the clinical efficacy of the two devices.

Interventions

DEVICEPICO System

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) at 80mmHg (nominal) +/- 20 mmHg to the wound surface

DEVICEtNPWT System

NPWT from -25 mmHg and up to -200 mmHg; intensity settings of either low, medium and high; delivery modes of continuous or intermittent. The pressure, intensity and delivery settings will be left to the Investigator's discretion at each study treatment visit.

Sponsors

Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Provide informed consent * Age ≥ 18 years and of either sex * Willing to comply with protocol instructions, including allowing all study assessments * Have a Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) between the knee and ankle (at or above the malleolus), with a surface area ≥ 2.0 cm2 and ≤ 36.0 cm2 * Target ulcer duration ≥ 4 weeks but ≤ 104 weeks (24 months) * Have a Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU) present on any part of the plantar or dorsum surface of the foot, with a surface area ≥ 0.5 cm2 and ≤ 10.0 cm2 * Target ulcer involves a full thickness skin loss, but WITHOUT exposure of tendon, muscle, or bone * Target ulcer duration ≥ 4 weeks but ≤ 52 weeks (12 months) * Acceptable state of health and nutrition

Exclusion criteria

* Therapy with another investigational agent within thirty (30) days of Screening, or during the study Ulcers which are deemed as highly exuding, per the Investigator's discretion. * Current diagnosis of osteomyelitis at the target wound location that is not currently receiving treatment \[Documented history of resolved osteomyelitis is allowed\]. * Subjects with a VLU: Refusal of or inability to tolerate compression therapy. * Clinical evidence of target ulcer infection * Current systemic therapy with cytotoxic drugs. * Current therapy with chronic (\> 10 days) oral corticosteroids. * Previous treatment with NPWT device or hyperbaric oxygen within 7 days of screening. * Malignancy in the target ulcer, or history of cancer in the preceding 5 years (other than carcinoma in situ of the cervix or adequately treated non-melanoma skin cancers)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Ulcer Area From Baseline to the End of the Treatment PeriodBaseline through 12 weeksUlcer area was photographed in order to determine the measurements of the post-debridement ulcer area (cm\^2 and total percentage \[%\]) using the ARANZ Silhouette wound imaging and measurement device.
Percentage Change in Ulcer Area From Baseline to the End of the Treatment PeriodBaseline through 12 weeksUlcer area was photographed in order to determine the measurements of the postdebridement ulcer area (cm\^2 and total percentage \[%\]) using the ARANZ Silhouette wound imaging and measurement device.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Target Ulcer Depth Following Treatment With Either PICO or tNPWT From Baseline Over the 12-week Treatment PeriodBaseline through 12 weeksUlcer area was analyzed for depth measurement in millimeters (mm), volume measurement in cubic centimeters (cm\^3), and percentage change (%) including terms for treatment, baseline depth, baseline volume, wound type, pooled sites, and wound duration using the ARANZ Silhouette wound imaging and measurement device.
Change in Target Ulcer Volume Following Treatment With Either PICO or tNPWT From Baseline Over the 12-week Treatment PeriodBaseline through 12 weeksUlcer area was analyzed for depth measurement in millimeters (mm), volume measurement in cubic centimeters (cm\^3), and percentage change (%) including terms for treatment, baseline depth, baseline volume, wound type, pooled sites, and wound duration using the ARANZ Silhouette wound imaging and measurement device.
Percentage Change in Target Ulcer Depth and Volume Following Treatment With Either PICO or tNPWT From Baseline Over the 12-week Treatment PeriodBaseline through 12 weeksUlcer area was analyzed for depth measurement in millimeters (mm), volume measurement in cubic centimeters (cm\^3), and percentage change (%) including terms for treatment, baseline depth, baseline volume, wound type, pooled sites, and wound duration using the ARANZ Silhouette wound imaging and measurement device.

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
PICO System
Subjects randomized to receive the PICO system applied to the target ulcer area over the 12-week treatment period from Baseline.
80
tNPWT System
Subjects randomized to receive the tNPWT system applied to the target ulcer area over the 12-week treatment period from Baseline.
81
Total161

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event52
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy515
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up11
Overall StudyPhysician Decision03
Overall StudyProtocol Violation411
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject310

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPICO SystemtNPWT SystemTotal
Age, Continuous62.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.7
60.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9
61.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
BMI (kg/m^2)33.7 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8
33.9 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
33.8 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
77 Participants79 Participants156 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
8 Participants12 Participants20 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
67 Participants67 Participants134 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
2 participants5 participants7 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
78 participants76 participants154 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
32 Participants27 Participants59 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
48 Participants54 Participants102 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 800 / 84
other
Total, other adverse events
65 / 8057 / 84
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 808 / 84

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Ulcer Area From Baseline to the End of the Treatment Period

Ulcer area was photographed in order to determine the measurements of the post-debridement ulcer area (cm\^2 and total percentage \[%\]) using the ARANZ Silhouette wound imaging and measurement device.

Time frame: Baseline through 12 weeks

Population: The Per-Protocol (PP) population was used to analyze outcome measure data and included all subjects who were randomized, met inclusion/exclusion criteria, had not discontinued treatment within the first 9 weeks (-1 day), and had no significant protocol deviations.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PICO SystemChange in Ulcer Area From Baseline to the End of the Treatment PeriodBaseline wound area6.2 cm^2Standard Deviation 5.9
PICO SystemChange in Ulcer Area From Baseline to the End of the Treatment PeriodFinal wound area0.7 cm^2Standard Deviation 1.8
PICO SystemChange in Ulcer Area From Baseline to the End of the Treatment PeriodChange in wound area-5.5 cm^2Standard Deviation 5.4
tNPWT SystemChange in Ulcer Area From Baseline to the End of the Treatment PeriodBaseline wound area7.8 cm^2Standard Deviation 6.3
tNPWT SystemChange in Ulcer Area From Baseline to the End of the Treatment PeriodFinal wound area3.8 cm^2Standard Deviation 6.7
tNPWT SystemChange in Ulcer Area From Baseline to the End of the Treatment PeriodChange in wound area-4.0 cm^2Standard Deviation 6.2
Comparison: Percentage change in wound area from Baseline to end of 12-week treatment period (PP population - all wounds)p-value: 0.001Stepwise regression
Primary

Percentage Change in Ulcer Area From Baseline to the End of the Treatment Period

Ulcer area was photographed in order to determine the measurements of the postdebridement ulcer area (cm\^2 and total percentage \[%\]) using the ARANZ Silhouette wound imaging and measurement device.

Time frame: Baseline through 12 weeks

Population: The Per-Protocol (PP) population was used to analyze outcome measure data and included all subjects who were randomized, met inclusion/exclusion criteria, had not discontinued treatment within the first 9 weeks (-1 day), and had no significant protocol deviations.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PICO SystemPercentage Change in Ulcer Area From Baseline to the End of the Treatment Period-88.7 Percentage of change in wound areaStandard Deviation 24.1
tNPWT SystemPercentage Change in Ulcer Area From Baseline to the End of the Treatment Period-58.6 Percentage of change in wound areaStandard Deviation 63.5
Secondary

Change in Target Ulcer Depth Following Treatment With Either PICO or tNPWT From Baseline Over the 12-week Treatment Period

Ulcer area was analyzed for depth measurement in millimeters (mm), volume measurement in cubic centimeters (cm\^3), and percentage change (%) including terms for treatment, baseline depth, baseline volume, wound type, pooled sites, and wound duration using the ARANZ Silhouette wound imaging and measurement device.

Time frame: Baseline through 12 weeks

Population: Change in wound depth over 12-week treatment period by treatment group (PP population - all wounds)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PICO SystemChange in Target Ulcer Depth Following Treatment With Either PICO or tNPWT From Baseline Over the 12-week Treatment PeriodBaseline wound depth4.0 mmStandard Deviation 6.8
PICO SystemChange in Target Ulcer Depth Following Treatment With Either PICO or tNPWT From Baseline Over the 12-week Treatment PeriodFinal wound depth0.6 mmStandard Deviation 1.1
PICO SystemChange in Target Ulcer Depth Following Treatment With Either PICO or tNPWT From Baseline Over the 12-week Treatment PeriodChange in wound depth-3.4 mmStandard Deviation 7.1
tNPWT SystemChange in Target Ulcer Depth Following Treatment With Either PICO or tNPWT From Baseline Over the 12-week Treatment PeriodBaseline wound depth2.4 mmStandard Deviation 1.3
tNPWT SystemChange in Target Ulcer Depth Following Treatment With Either PICO or tNPWT From Baseline Over the 12-week Treatment PeriodFinal wound depth1.5 mmStandard Deviation 2.1
tNPWT SystemChange in Target Ulcer Depth Following Treatment With Either PICO or tNPWT From Baseline Over the 12-week Treatment PeriodChange in wound depth-0.9 mmStandard Deviation 1.9
Secondary

Change in Target Ulcer Volume Following Treatment With Either PICO or tNPWT From Baseline Over the 12-week Treatment Period

Ulcer area was analyzed for depth measurement in millimeters (mm), volume measurement in cubic centimeters (cm\^3), and percentage change (%) including terms for treatment, baseline depth, baseline volume, wound type, pooled sites, and wound duration using the ARANZ Silhouette wound imaging and measurement device.

Time frame: Baseline through 12 weeks

Population: Change in wound volume over 12-week treatment period by treatment group (PP population - all wounds)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PICO SystemChange in Target Ulcer Volume Following Treatment With Either PICO or tNPWT From Baseline Over the 12-week Treatment PeriodBaseline wound volume0.3 cm^3Standard Deviation 0.3
PICO SystemChange in Target Ulcer Volume Following Treatment With Either PICO or tNPWT From Baseline Over the 12-week Treatment PeriodFinal wound volume0.2 cm^3Standard Deviation 0.5
PICO SystemChange in Target Ulcer Volume Following Treatment With Either PICO or tNPWT From Baseline Over the 12-week Treatment PeriodChange in wound volume-0.3 cm^3Standard Deviation 0.3
tNPWT SystemChange in Target Ulcer Volume Following Treatment With Either PICO or tNPWT From Baseline Over the 12-week Treatment PeriodBaseline wound volume0.3 cm^3Standard Deviation 0.3
tNPWT SystemChange in Target Ulcer Volume Following Treatment With Either PICO or tNPWT From Baseline Over the 12-week Treatment PeriodFinal wound volume0.1 cm^3Standard Deviation 0.3
tNPWT SystemChange in Target Ulcer Volume Following Treatment With Either PICO or tNPWT From Baseline Over the 12-week Treatment PeriodChange in wound volume0 cm^3Standard Deviation 0.4
Secondary

Percentage Change in Target Ulcer Depth and Volume Following Treatment With Either PICO or tNPWT From Baseline Over the 12-week Treatment Period

Ulcer area was analyzed for depth measurement in millimeters (mm), volume measurement in cubic centimeters (cm\^3), and percentage change (%) including terms for treatment, baseline depth, baseline volume, wound type, pooled sites, and wound duration using the ARANZ Silhouette wound imaging and measurement device.

Time frame: Baseline through 12 weeks

Population: Percentage change in wound depth and volume over 12-week treatment period by treatment group (PP population - all wounds)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PICO SystemPercentage Change in Target Ulcer Depth and Volume Following Treatment With Either PICO or tNPWT From Baseline Over the 12-week Treatment PeriodPercentage change from baseline in wound depth-68.8 percent changeStandard Deviation 59.4
PICO SystemPercentage Change in Target Ulcer Depth and Volume Following Treatment With Either PICO or tNPWT From Baseline Over the 12-week Treatment PeriodPercentage change from baseline in wound volume-98.0 percent changeStandard Deviation 8.1
tNPWT SystemPercentage Change in Target Ulcer Depth and Volume Following Treatment With Either PICO or tNPWT From Baseline Over the 12-week Treatment PeriodPercentage change from baseline in wound depth-38.8 percent changeStandard Deviation 71.3
tNPWT SystemPercentage Change in Target Ulcer Depth and Volume Following Treatment With Either PICO or tNPWT From Baseline Over the 12-week Treatment PeriodPercentage change from baseline in wound volume-10.1 percent changeStandard Deviation 207.8

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026